Before editors are editors, we are readers. And as readers, we can get caught up in a writer’s words, works, and worlds, to the point where we set aside whatever we should be reading to indulge our imaginations by grabbing a new work by a favorite writer.
I first became aware of Jane Lindskold’s work when her first Wolf book, Through Wolf’s Eyes, was published by Tor. The copy made the book sound intriguing and the cover had a cool-looking wolf on it, and the good reviews were the icing on the cake (since I write and read copy just about every day, it takes more than good cover copy to sell me). So when the book came out in paperback, I picked it up—I prefer mass market for anything I intend to read on the subway. Then, like everyone else, I had to wait impatiently for each successive volume to appear.
Luckily, we were publishing others of Jane’s books, so there was more for me to discover. And as wonderful and compelling as the Wolf series is, I love the changes of pace of Jane’s stand-alone novels. The kaleidoscope metaphors used in Child of a Rainless Year and that book’s wheels-within-wheels plot made me want to shove it into people’s hands and say, “You will love this.” Brother to Dragons, Companion to Owls made me cry.
And then there was The Buried Pyramid. I’ve been haunting The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Egyptian Wing since I was in preschool. When the first King Tut exhibit came to New York, my mother and I (then age 17) lined up for hours to be able to ogle the objects. I still have the issues of National Geographic that cover the relocation of Abu Simbel due to the rising waters from the Aswan Dam. I studied the shift from Amun to Aten and knew who Hatshepsut was. In other words, I was a bit of an Egypt nut.
So The Buried Pyramid was right up my alley. Set in the Victorian age, The Buried Pyramid is, at the start, an archaeological suspense novel. Jenny Benet, a recently orphaned American who was raised in the Wild West before being “finished” in Boston, goes to Egypt with her uncle, Neville Hawthorne, a prominent British archaeologist. They’re searching for the legendary Buried Pyramid, the tomb of the pharaoh Neferankhotep—who may also have been Moses the Lawgiver.
Discovering the tomb is not the end of their journey but only the beginning. In The Buried Pyramid, Jane Lindskold sends us on a marvelous ride through Ancient Egyptian myth, legend, and religion and leaves us enlightened and amazed. It remains my favorite of Jane’s non-series novels, and I hope you will enjoy it as much as I did. (You have to be a registered user of Tor.com, and logged in, in order to download this book.)
|
|
You can already tell that Jane is far from a one-trick pony. Even when she writes in series, she never does anything the same way twice. I’ve moved from just being a reader, to a fan, to Jane’s editor, and I’m really thrilled to announce that Tor has just published Thirteen Orphans, the first book in Jane’s new series, Breaking the Wall. It’s something else new and different from this talented writer, and I think you’ll love it.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 09:22am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 10:13am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 10:16am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 01:00pm EST
Tuesday November 25, 2008 01:12pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 02:15pm EST
Unfortunately, if we catered to every single file format out there, we'd never sleep. And by 'we', I mean 'I', of course.
The upside of this is that since we're adamant about backing open—and hopefully soon-to-be-standard—formats (hence our switch from .lrf to .epub for the Sony reader, and our inclusion of a plain HTML version), and doubly adamant about keeping our files drm-free, you can use the files we've provided to roll your own formats for personal use.
Also, a quick shout out to Arachne Jericho, in gratitude for lending me her expertise in crafting these files. I'm getting better, and it's partly her fault.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 02:23pm EST
How long will this book be available for free download?
Thanks.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 02:31pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 03:43pm EST
Tuesday November 25, 2008 03:44pm EST
I do hope that when you guys get around to actually selling ebooks you'll support it, though. I definitely won't purchase any ebooks I have to spend a bunch of time converting. Open formats are great, but only if they're actually supported on the device I use.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 04:02pm EST
Pablodefendini, thanks for the ebook. I've read this book before (it got lost in a move) so I know I'll enjoy it again.
Drak the Ebook Loving Dragon
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 04:11pm EST
Heh. If only these things were as simple as a "Save As". Maybe in a few years they will be.
The problem with being an early adopter (and anyone using e-books is still an early adopter, imho) is that these things happen—you run the risk of backing the wrong horse. I really hope you don't have a Betamax deck, an 8-Track player, a Laserdisk player, or and HD-DVD player lying around your house too ;)
That being said, even though it's almost too early to tell (but not really), I wouldn't be surprised if in some near future, Microsoft will also support the ePub format. All sorts of big players in the publishing biz are backing that particular horse, and that's why we've made the decisions we have in regards to supported formats here on Tor.com.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 04:24pm EST · amended on Tuesday November 25, 2008 04:26pm EST
The only tools I know of that can write Microsoft Reader format are (a) from Microsoft, (b) publicly known to have obtained a license from Microsoft, (c) don't dare distribute whatever tools they use to create the Microsoft format, which either means a private license or something else, and (d) illegal.
Surprisingly, there are no legal open source tools I know of to write in Microsoft Reader format (or frankly its predecessor, Microsoft Help Format). This usually indicates a licensing issue somewhere.
So. You know. It makes things hard.
Edit: And by the way, thanks for the shout-out, Pablo! :)
Tuesday November 25, 2008 05:06pm EST
As for open source tools, I suspect it's just the normal aversion to anything Microsoft that the rabid open source zealots have, combined with their unwillingness to relax their licenses to allow a binary distribution of a DLL from another source.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 05:49pm EST
For the open source stuff, not everybody in the OS world is rabid about avoiding all things Microsoft, and people find ways more often than not to rip apart formats and write them---hence OpenOffice, AbiWord, and various office programs out there that both read AND write in the Word office formats, not to mention the reworking of .Net via Mono. It's a cottage industry, so to speak.
Plus there are many programs, in all licensing stripes, out there that can read the files---just not write them. If there was a way to write *without* the DLL and the conflicting license, that would be fine---and would have been done some time since. And given what the major open source video players can do, supporting DLLs is something people are interested in and actually do successfully.
That this isn't done points me to other reasons, usually licensing.
Tuesday November 25, 2008 06:02pm EST
The problematic term in the license is probably this:
"Distribution Terms. You may reproduce and distribute an unlimited number of copies of the Sample Code and/or Redistributable Code (collectively “Redistributable Components”) as described above in object code form, provided that (a) you distribute the Redistributable Components only in conjunction with and as a part of your Application; (b) your Application adds significant and primary functionality to the Redistributable Components; (c) you distribute your Application containing the Redistributable Components pursuant to an End-User License Agreement (which may be “break-the-seal”, “click-wrap” or signed), with terms no less protective than those contained herein; (d) you do not permit further redistribution of the Redistributable Components by your end-user customers; (e) you do not use Microsoft's name, logo, or trademarks to market your Application except and unless as provided under a separate license program agreement between you and Microsoft; (f) you include a valid copyright notice on your Application; and (g) you agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys' fees, that arise or result from the use or distribution of your Application. Contact Microsoft for the applicable licensing terms for all other uses and/or distribution of the Redistributable Components.
(c) and (d) are probably the sticking parts, although as a small software developer (g) bugs me a lot more. If I were to throw together a tool to do the conversion, (g) would prevent me from releasing it as a freeware tool. A quick look at the spec for epub files indicates that the complexity would probably prevent me from even writing it, though.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 06:16pm EST
Wow. I didn't even realize (g) was something someone would have the gumption of putting into a license. I'm more used to open source software and in-house software.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 06:58pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 07:07pm EST
The last I heard, there was some legal snafu concerning webscriptions and Tor. The guys over there said it was Tor's lawyers that pulled the plug last time so I'm not sure that will be resolved anytime soon.
I'd love to see them back there, but I'm not holding my breath.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 08:48pm EST
Drak
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 25, 2008 09:19pm EST
When will you get the rights to reprint Changer and Legends Walking? They're fantastic.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 12:45am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 01:52am EST
As for the license above... (g) is actually fairly standard for what the license covers. They basically don't want to be on the hook if you create an app that does something illegal/litigatable. Say, create an app that breaks DRM on ebooks and writes it out in MS Reader format.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 02:19am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 03:09am EST
For anyone who is interested, and I think you'd have to be extremely geeky and without a life to be interested in my further thoughts on this, I yammered on at my blog.
But really, just download and read the book. You'll be much more satisfied.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 06:01am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 08:39am EST
I noticed one error though: the HTML has been pretty-printed and thus introduced some whitespaces where there should be none, e.g. at line 2603 (I replaced with ] otherwise it wouldn't display):
Which output looks like this:
It was easy enough for me to remove those whitespaces with some search and replace combined with regular expressions, but I just thought I'd point out this error.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 10:30am EST · amended on Wednesday November 26, 2008 10:31am EST
Drak
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 11:28am EST
@noelx99: I recently read Changer for the first time, and I agree, it's a great book. We've looked at the idea of returning it to print but it will be pretty expensive to do, given its length and today's market. So the answer, I'm afraid, is "not from Tor right now."
@angellemarcs: Much as we love those characters and that world, for now, Jane is indeed done with Firekeeper and on to other things.
@Drak: Firestarter is a Stephen King book . . . but we knew what you meant
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 01:17pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 07:54pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 26, 2008 08:10pm EST · amended on Wednesday November 26, 2008 08:28pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 27, 2008 09:39pm EST
Been reading the .pdf version on my iPhone (which normally has a canary about loading .pdfs) and am finding the book a lot of fun. Many thanks, Tor folks.
One question for Tor/Pablo. Is this the same pagination as the printed MM? I ask because I'm tearing through the book at what seems a fast pace for me, so I'm wondering if the pages are actually shorter than usual.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 27, 2008 11:42pm EST
A bit a of a quibble, but the EPUB version of the book is not entirely DRM-free. It uses Adobe-specific encryption to encrypt the font files. The rest of the book is perfectly accessible on any EPUB viewer, but only Adobe DE can utilize the embedded fonts.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 28, 2008 03:13am EST
My tbr pile just got bigger but I am not complaining.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday November 29, 2008 05:14pm EST · amended on Saturday November 29, 2008 05:29pm EST
Ah, guilty as charged. Font foundries are notoriously behind the times on their licensing schemes, and none (as far as I know) allow for full and free embedding onto websites, online documents, and such. It's an ongoing debate within the print, web, and now, eBook production industries.
Coming from a print production/typographic background, my first instinct when creating a publication is to define all typographic styles as specifically as possible, and to use the most versatile and platform-agnostic fonts I can use to create a beautiful publication (OpenType fonts, IMHO, fit this bill quite nicely, and Adobe is a fine foundry, making versatile, beautiful typefaces and font files).
I've recently come to understand that this approach is completely wrong-headed within the context of eBook production, since you want to give the reader as much control over how text is rendered on their individual device/platform.
Thanks for calling me out on this, and look for improvements on this end in subsequent eBooks from Tor.com.
@RichR #33
Actually, it's not. This PDF was created directly from the original manuscript, as opposed to the original page layout files from the printed book edition. As such, its typographic treatment is slightly different. For example, the leading (the space between lines of text) is a bit looser than on the printed version, which adds to the page count slightly, and ostensibly makes reading a bit easier.
One of the things that I didn't do, however, was to create a smaller page size for the ePDF as opposed to the pPDF, which is something I do for the short stories. This makes reading on devices like an iPhone a lot more pleasant, since it's easier to get the whole page (or a substantial part of it) onto a screen without having to do too much zooming in and out. In this case (for reasons which I won't get into here) I was more interested in recreating the original publication with the PDF than adapting it to different reading conditions. I'm glad that you're finding reading easier, even despite the lack of this size consideration.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday November 29, 2008 07:45pm EST
Interestingly, arachnejericho (on Twitter) also theorized that the smaller screen size would speed up reading slightly, which also makes sense, as the eyes don't have to cover so much space.
As this is the first ebook reading experience I've found really easy, comfortable and convenient, I think I'll be consuming more books this way. And if the initial suspicion of being able to read slightly faster on the iPhone is (even slightly) true I'll be in heaven, because I'm always wishing for more reading time...
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday November 29, 2008 08:05pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 11:06am EST
I read the Mobipocket books on my Palm, which has a screen 320 pixels wide. The Mobipocket Reader has an option to turn non-full-justified text into full-justified text, but if the book's formatted full-justified already, I can't turn it off--and full-justified on 320 pixels wide is not attractive as far as I'm concerned.
Can the Mobipocket versions revert to non-full-justified, since the reader gives you that option?
Thanks.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 12:25pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 12:44pm EST
My comments regarding typographic formatting @#36 apply to this issue as well. Thanks for bringing it up.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 01:00pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 01:01pm EST
I finally put Mobipocket on my Blackberry and installed 1984 from the Gutenburg project. It was nice to always have a book with me to read for a few minutes here & there.
Then I installed all the eBooks I've gotten from Tor so I'd have them with me. I read John Scalzi's The Old Man's War.
Last night I went to a bookstore and bought The Ghost Brigade and The Last Colony (?) - the two sequels. Your plan worked :-)
The other marketing brocures, I mean free eBooks are on my BB just waiting for a chance to sell me on another Tor author.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 01:09pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 03:55pm EST
This is a good opportunity to check out another Jane Lindskold book and see if I like it better.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 05:31pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 08:17pm EST
Any chance we'll ever see "Ender's Game" offered here? I keep buying the book and then giving it away to friends who have never read any of the series. I'm not likely to get rid of my N810.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 09:48pm EST
Tuesday December 02, 2008 10:00pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 02, 2008 11:10pm EST
I just wanted to mention the the only reason I now read Jane Lindskold is the Watch the Sky promotion. There is 0 chance that I would have bought "Through Wolf's Eyes" at the book store because it looks like a book written for young women and I am neither. I read the e-book and was hooked.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday December 03, 2008 02:02am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday December 03, 2008 04:26am EST
Could someone change the server setting so it is less likely to throw a tantrum when I am forced by my Third World Telecom NZ-mediated Internet connection, to dance the reconnection jig?
That would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 05, 2008 07:13pm EST
Actually, I take it back DRM-wise. According to Adobe's document on "Protecting Embedded Fonts in EPUB Documents," the encryption method used to "protect" the fonts is...
Wait for it...
XOR.
I have no idea what the point is supposed to be, especially given that not only is the "encryption method" XOR, but they are then publicly documenting how to "decrypt" the fonts. But it does mean than any EPUB reader is in fact free to access so-embedded fonts.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 06, 2008 01:26am EST
Well, yes. But I think your point probably still stands on an ideological level (even if it turns out to be a middling concern in the practical context of these things), as I understand it (and I could be wrong): the font file is still encrypted, and thus ostensibly inaccessible unless some sort of decryption is applied, thus it's locked down (even if it's relatively unobtrusive encryption and easily unlocked), QED some obtuse form of DRM, although maybe not the type of DRM that actually makes consumers' lives a pain in the ass.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 06, 2008 01:13pm EST
I’m kind of two minds about it. If you look at PDF font embedding, you have much the same issues, only the encryption/obfuscation is a natural part of how the format works. PDF renders need to extract the font information in order to render text in a particular font, which means the complete information for all rendered glyphs need to be present in the PDF. Adobe distributes from its own website PDFs containing every glyph in the font for every font they produce. Combine those with a little programming elbow grease and you’ve got your very own pirated copy of every one of Adobe’s fonts. Are they actually worried about that? Apparently not. This does the same thing for them – gives them some assurance that normal users won’t casually make out-of-license copies of their fonts from documents which embed the font.
The key “pro” points for me are that it’s (a) documented and (b) standards compliant. The OCF spec which describes how to bundle EPUB content into a ZIP archive specifies how encrypted content should be encrypted in a way which clearly indicates which files are encrypted with which method. Adobe’s scheme follows the spec and anyone is free to implement it, even to implement a font-extractor, just as they are with PDF.
On the other side are (a) the inelegance of an unnecessary obfuscation and (b) the possibility of using the DMCA. I’m not a lawyer, but I can see how Adobe might intend to use this to allow them to go after any potential font-pirates as violating not only their copyright, but also the DMCA. Eeeevil.
Monday December 08, 2008 01:25pm EST
Personally, I can't believe I worked so hard to download this damned thing. The Mobi version throws up a java error and will not open in Stanza and the ePub version, which converted to Kindle format, has the front matter mixed in with the novel text.
Tor has a long way to go with the ebook format, not to mention the way its Web site runs.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday December 14, 2008 12:12pm EST
I'm reading on either my Original Rocket, circa 1998 or my Sharp Mobilon running Windows CE 2.0, circa 1999 or my ebookwise 1150, circa 2000?.
Didn't know I was early adopter.
If I want to read these books, I have to do a sometimes rotten conversion to the ebookwise or just give up and read the Mobi file on the Sharp.
Not a problem, just an FYI.
Michael
VIEW ALL BY · Monday December 22, 2008 05:17pm EST
Currently I'm reading them on my Asus Eee PC 901, which I'm holding as if it was a paperback with only left pages. I'm simply using the presentation mode of my PDF viewer (after rotating the screen 90 degrees clockwise ofcourse) and use the mouse buttons at the touchpad to "flip pages". Works real well, except that the pages in the PDFs doesn't have width:height ration of exactly 10:16, so I get some minor black bars, usually at the top and bottom of the screen.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday January 06, 2009 10:45pm EST
I recently downloaded the epub file for this book, and while I can easily import the file into the Sony eBook Library software on my PC, I cannot transfer the file to my PRS-500 reader.
Thank you!
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday January 06, 2009 10:59pm EST
Ah, unfortunately, you're out of luck. As I understand it, Sony has added ePub support for their recent readers?starting with the PRS-505. Sadly, the 500 won't do.
@ jonno
I personally prefer PDF too, all else being equal (and I do exactly the same thing you do for reading, except I do it with a MacBook Air, which isn't as compact as an Asus eeePC).
But there is something to be said for the flexibility of re-flowable and re-sizeable text.
EPub, being an open format, and having been adopted as a standard by many outfits (including Adobe, who are pairing it with PDF as their "Digital Editions" initiative—essentially a best-of-both-worlds approach), is really shaping up to become a true standard.
As for the risk of 'losing' your book, well, here's a secret: ePub is nothing more than a series of html docs packaged into a Zip file with a funky extension. Take an un-DRMed ePub (like this one), change its file extension from .epub to .zip, and try to decompress it: you'll see the guts, which include an HTML file per chapter. It doesn't get much more accessible than good ol' HTML.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday January 06, 2009 11:23pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 22, 2009 09:37pm EDT