Not all science fiction involves aliens. When a story, TV show, or movie does, however, one of the most devastating criticisms is that its aliens are “humans in rubber suits.”
Exception: fictional aliens who are intentionally humans thinly disguised. In Pierre Boulle’s novel Planet of the Apes (the premise of the movies differed quite a bit), the aliens—intelligent apes and unintelligent humans—were clearly allegorical. (I won’t argue if you consider this book mainstream literature in a rubber suit. Its “science” was atrocious, even when it was published in 1963.) Throughout the Cold War, SFnal aliens were often stand-ins for one or both sides of that Earthly conflict. There are many other alien-for-human substitutions/parables.
But what about when the author wants true aliens?
What makes aliens alien? Here’s what works for me.
Don’t make them two-armed, two-legged bipeds. A look around Earth says there’s nothing special about that anatomical configuration (except the reduced FX budget for the video version). At least add a tail.
Give the aliens one or more senses humans don’t have, and maybe remove or diminish a sense we take for granted. Earth life offers such examples as echolocation (bats), infrared/heat sensing (pit vipers), electric-field reception (sharks), and magnetic-field reception (many migratory birds). Show how the aliens’ world view is affected by the additional (or missing) senses.
Get them off Earth, if only in flashbacks. These are aliens, evolved in an alien environment, so let’s see how that environment shaped them. We see great variety across Earth, of course—differences from Earth should lead to differences from terrestrial life. Parallel evolution and Panspermia can only be tortured so much.
And most important: give them behaviors—both culturally and psychologically—that relate to their environmental, physiological, and evolutionary context.
Here are some of my favorites SFnal aliens:
The “Tines” in Vernor Vinge’s A Fire Upon the Deep. They live on an Earthlike world, but in every other way they are alien. The individual biological unit is something like a dog—and unintelligent. Intelligence emerges from a small pack, its units communicating by ultrasound. Cooperating muzzles and jaws must substitute for hands. As units die, the nature of the collective intelligence changes—or may fade away. Tines can’t congregate too closely, lest the intra-mind communication of one pack be scrambled by the intra-mind communications within other packs.
Gaia, the world-sized intelligence of John Varley’s Titan series.
Puppeteers, the two-headed, herd/herbivore-descended, cowardly manipulators of Larry Niven’s Known Space. (Full disclosure: sometimes I write Known Space books with Larry, with Puppeteers taking a prominent part in the collaborations.)
My personal blog, SF and Nonsense has an ongoing series of (irregularly scheduled) posts on the alien-aliens topic, including mentions of some of my own contributions.
Alien aliens: a way to know we’re not in Kansas any more.
Edward M. Lerner worked in high tech for thirty years, as everything from engineer to senior vice president. He writes near-future techno-thrillers, most recently Fools’ Experiments and Small Miracles, and far-future space epics like the Fleet of Worlds series with colleague Larry Niven. Ed blogs regularly at SF and Nonsense.
Tuesday November 03, 2009 01:43pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 02:43pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 02:52pm EST
In particular, the traeki/Jophur are an interesting alien race. They are stack of semi-sentient rings that together gain sentience ... but they are slow to decide anything since their decision process is kind of like a democracy amongst all the rings. The difference between the traeki and the Jophur is the concept of I. Namely the Patrons of the traeki (the Poa) had a genetically engineered master ring add to make their pacifistic clients more useful ... unfortunately the Jophur, with the concept of I, turned on the Poa and destroyed them (and are now one of the most aggressive and feared races in the civilizations of the five galaxies).
There are a lot more, but that one sticks out in my mind.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 02:53pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 02:59pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 03:19pm EST
Tuesday November 03, 2009 03:26pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 05:02pm EST
Re SG-U: I agree it's too early to know (about the series, not just its aliens). But I enjoyed the earlier members of the franchise, so here's hoping.
Re the Uplift universe: Absolutely. Lots of good aliens. Don't know why I didn't think of it.
The other fictional suggestions: I'll have to check them out.
Jeff R: I understand your point about the metabolic efficiency of minimization, but I'm not convinced. Why can't things like octopi, squids, or starfish evolve into tool users? You said something about having to develop an asymmetric axis -- please explain. (Full disclosure: I'll admit to committing several many-limbed intelligent aliens.) And to play devil's advocate: if minimization for metabolic purposes were evolution's goal, I'd argue one, not two, is the logical end point. So maybe an elephant-like creature?
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 05:26pm EST
Hard to get much more alien...
Alastair Reynolds Pushing Ice is another one with very different aliens. From the Cancer Dogs to the Fountains and others. Then there are the ones in the Revelation Space series.
Ken Macleod's Engines of Light has sentient colonies of extermophiles, evolved dinosaurs and squid and neanderthals.
Tuesday November 03, 2009 05:42pm EST
When you take them out of the water, they need to get around. Which means that tentacles need to become specialized for walking, with stability and strength in mind. But if you want them to become tool users, you also need at least some of the tentacles to go the other direction, with sensitivity and fine manipulators. Which means you'll need to insert somewhere into the development process a way for telling the proto-legs and proto-arms apart, which strikes me as something evolution is highly unlikely to stumble into.
Also, minimization stops working at two, because a table with four legs balances whatever you do and a table (or animal) with two requires constant effort to stop from falling down. It's only when you get the benefit of using those extra limbs as wings or brachiators or manipulators that balance becomes a worthwhile proposition.
Staying quadraped and using something else as a manipulator could work, though. (Talking mostly noses, tongues, and maybe genitals here, I think. If you can put your tail in front of your eyes you're already more-or-less bipedal anyhow.)
Tuesday November 03, 2009 05:53pm EST
John Christopher's aliens from the Tripod series are pretty good, too.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 09:38pm EST
But rather than defend my intelligent, land-dwelling octopi, my larger point was simply that SF should consider alternate body plans. After all, Earth life offers biologists our only data. If you will allow me an analogy, planetary scientists had to change their view of solar-system formation and planetary possibilities once we had more examples from which to work.
In my novel Moonstruck, the Krulirim are trilaterally symmetric. It's the minimalist form of radial symmetry. (I had a dickens of a time eliminating all references to front, back, and sides from their speech. The terms seem endemic to English.)
Each Krul limb has three manipulators, each with three digits. A Krul can walk/stand on all three, or balance on just two limbs to free the third limb for manipulation. The forelimb offers, effectively, three three-fingered hands. Together they have better opposability than human fingers and thumb. Sensory clusters also come in threes, spread 120 degrees apart.
(The strangeness doesn't stop there. Without front, back, or sides, how do you orient yourself? How do you describe where anything or anyone is relative to yourself? Radial coordinates specify distance and angle. Distance from the Krul is straightforward, but angle with respect to what? They're radially symmetric! So I gave Krulirim a magnetic sense and they orient themselves relative to the nearest magnetic pole.)
Tuesday November 03, 2009 09:55pm EST
And if aliens are too different, how do we even recognize them as life?
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 10:26pm EST
Mistborn series has a few interesting aliens in them. They aren't "from another planet" alien, but they aren't originally of the planet either. The Kandra are your basic shape shifter. What's really interesting is when you learn that in their true from they use various other minerals to form their bones.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 10:37pm EST
"Nard ulcer await"
And yes, @Pilgrim, the aliens in "Blindsight" take alien-ness to a whole other level.
Brian Stableford's "Hooded Swan" series, particularly "Halcyon Drift" and "Promised Land", are a reminder that just because an alien looks and acts like us doesn't mean that it needs to think like us.
Larry Niven's Grogs are a sessile intelligent species, something that few authors have attempted.. And then you can have intelligences that exist on a whole different order of scale, such as the planetary intelligence of Lem's "Solaris".
Earth itself offers ample evidence of the bizarre diversity of possible life forms. Amidst all the strangeness we can expect convergent evolution to throw up at least some critters that look not too dissimilar to us, and who might even have concerns and cultures that we can at least comprehend. But then there are going to be the really odd ones ...
Tuesday November 03, 2009 10:54pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 03, 2009 11:37pm EST
I'd rather have generic humanoids if their thought process and behavior is truly alien.
Wednesday November 04, 2009 12:52pm EST
- actually the Atevi and the Chanur are bad examples, really - the Atevi are large, assive humanoids right down their fashion sense and culture(lace, braids, courtly formalities), but they have an inscrutable psychology - a propensity for mathematics, doing recreational calculus, seeing omens and felicities in random numbers, plus they are just not wired to have the same need for association/kinship/loyalty that humans do.
The Chanur, while clever, are actually just a riff of human sexual politics that is a stealth joke on Cherryh's part. They are just space faring lions who take their female dominiated prides into space.
However -
Cherryh does have some more interesting alien aliens. Although the kif are basically humanoid, they are, as far as I can tell, are like sentient rats/weasels/wolves, and they have this mental urge to submit to the alpha-male in larger and larger numbers until another rival knocks him down, and then they lose all sense of submission and scatter. The concept of 'sfik' is well developed and consistent. Plus they are color blind, so rather than color code things on their ships, they use a textured system of nodes and balls that is easily recognizable as being different.
Then again, Cheeryh has also given us the methane breathers - really, really wacky alien aliens: the knnn and.. I forget the name of the others. Some are like spiders with six-part minds who are unintelligible and unpredictable, and another is a species of space-faring cetaceans who have internal atmospheres...
Wednesday November 04, 2009 06:10pm EST
@18- I think the Atevi are great examples of how alien aliens that look like us can be. The Atevi are an amazing example of a truly alien mindset, they show that alienness extends beyond just outward appearance. There are several factors that go into alienness, there's no reason to focus on appearance to the exclusion of the other factors.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 05, 2009 09:41am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 05, 2009 04:59pm EST
@12 - Re: land squids. Reading about land squids reminded me of Animal Planet's "The Future is Wild". They predicted that squids could evolve into different land-dwelling species, millions of years from now.
---
Speaking of C. J. Cherryh, I really liked the alien-ess of the mri and regul species, from the "Faded Sun" trilogy.
Monday November 09, 2009 10:12pm EST
What makes you think evolution on other planets would follow a similar course to evolution on earth, even in rare cases? I see no good evidence of this.