Alan Moore’s epic graphic novels about The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen have become steampunk classics, putting a new, Gothic twist on characters from Victorian literature and letting the technology enhance, rather than overwhelm, the complicated storyline.
The movie adaptation, unfortunately, mostly serves as proof positive that when Moore calls his work unfilmable, he has a good point. A box-office and critical flop, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (abbreviated LXG for marketing purposes) has served more as a cautionary tale than a movie in its own right. That said, for those who don’t mind a little schadenfreude, there’s comedy gold in them thar hills!

1. B-Movie Character Actor Theatre
Ignore Sean Connery and his shameless lens-hogging (if you can), and check out the ranks of veteran big-budget-B-movie actors filling out the cast: Tony Curran (Underworld), Jason Flemyng (Transporter 2), Stuart Townsend (Queen of the Damned), and Richard Roxburgh (Van Helsing).
Flemyng makes the rookie mistake of trying to do a good job in a bad movie, but the rest of them clearly took one look at the script and decided to have a field day by going as over-the-top as their meager screen time allowed. It’s worth the price of a rental just to watch Richard Roxburgh gnawing on scenery like it’s Victorian beef jerky.

2. The Dialogue
Why this movie hasn’t hit the midnight-show circuit is beyond me. The dialogue sounds suspiciously like lines pulled from early-90s cartoons and knocked together at random, and gets increasingly hilarious as you go along. Even the orphan snippets of Moore’s original writing sound bizarrely out of place in their own adaptation, and if Moore didn’t write it then it’s all downhill from there. If you don’t believe me, just wait until Sean Connery gets to smarm his way through, “My dear girl, I’ve buried two wives and many lovers...and I’m in no mood for more of either.”
...and knowing is half the battle.

3. The Gadgets
The spirit of Alan Moore’s novels is nowhere to be found in this film, but the gadgets were easier to bring to the screen, and even though the Victorian aesthetic is largely confined to libraries and the rest of the sets weirdly stark, the movie is still stuffed to the gills with the fancy trappings that have become a hallmark of steampunk style. Submarine shaped like a cigarette holder, anyone? How about a filigree sports coupe that can go 80 miles an hour while tipped on its side? (Don’t worry, everything will be fine; the American’s driving.)

4. What Not to Do
The movie is a veritable checklist of things to be wary of in steampunk (over-Matrixing the martial arts, excessive explosions, narrative incoherence, period shout-outs dropped like anvils at regular intervals). Much like seventh grade, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is a character-building experience that will prepare you for anything the world of steampunk has to throw at you. With any luck, in fact, the movie is just enough to get you interested in Moore’s graphic novels, which means you’re well on your way to getting your hands on some quality steampunk.
...and knowing that is half the battle.
Genevieve’s first steampunk novel, Mechanique: a Tale of the Circus Tresaulti, is forthcoming from Prime. (She promises not to turn any cars on their sides.) In the meantime, she indulges her taste for bad movies on her blog.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 02:12pm EDT
Unless he was ordered to ham it up, of course ...
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 02:50pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 02:52pm EDT
I thought he was the best part of an otherwise very wobbly movie. Seriously, had they just done a Nemo movie with him, that would have been great. Could have skipped the rest of the characters.
Whatever the problems with the film, he wasn't one of them.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 02:56pm EDT
DO NOT go rent this movie not worth the time it takes away from your life much less the money. For a long time I stayed away from comics and comic based movies because of this movie. It was only watchmen that gave me faith in them again.
I would say watchmen also proves that Alan Moores work can be fillmed well, and even though it is difficult it is worth doing.
I don't think I will ever by the comics this movie is based on, the movie is that bad.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 03:06pm EDT
What you said about the actors, though, reminds me of why I enjoy Bruce Willis's performance in The Fifth Element so much, because you could totally tell he was strolling through the production going "This is UTTERLY BONKERS" in his head, and just deciding to grin at it all and have fun being in his very bad movie.
(Mind you, I kind of adore The Fifth Element, because it is completely and inexplicably tremendous fun to watch. But it is, nevertheless, a very very bad movie.)
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 03:06pm EDT
Give the comics a try. They are a far, far cry from the train wreck that was LXG.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 03:50pm EDT
"Oh no, Mina can't be the leader. Girls can't be leaders, don't be silly"
Aaaaarrrrggggh!
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:16pm EDT
Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:17pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:26pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:27pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:29pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 04:30pm EDT
I love your writing dearly. Your M/W/F WoT posts usually make my day (although some make it very late in the day, ahem) but you are utterly wrong about Fifth Element. It's a really, really good movie. I think it doesn't get enough credit. It's enormously fun to watch and extremely inventive, as far as sci-fi is concerned. It's a future that looks plausible and, dare I say, even fun to live in. I'd give just about anything to have a guy come make noodles outside my apartment window.
To get back on topic, I haven't watched LXG all the way through. I catch 5 minutes here and there and then turn it off because it's just not worth my time.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 05:11pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 06:13pm EDT
Doesn't actually growl, SAYS IT. I nearly died for laughing.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 07:24pm EDT
And if we did openly condemn movie abortions like this, Hollywood would still not bother attempting to produce quality films.
For me, the most baffling thing about this movie is that the screenwriter thought it would be a wonderful idea to add Tom Sawyer to the team. Proving that he knows absolutely nothing whatsoever about history (Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn are set before the Civil War--by the time the movie is set, Tom would be an old man) or American literature (read Huckleberry Finn sometime--Tom is not one of the good guys).
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 07, 2009 11:05pm EDT
Thursday October 08, 2009 02:24am EDT
Have to say that Tom, in the books, is one of the good guys.
However if there actually were a Tom Sawyer, and we were looking back at his whole life from our vantage now we would probably see him as, at best, not a good guy.
The reason for that is of course that Tom would have grown up to fight for the South. No doubts about that. Huck on the other hand might have fought for the South, might have fought for the North, and might have lit out West.
Anyway, Tom Sawyer also had lots of other adventures, when he fought for the South he probably ended up in Florida for some reason and found Ponce De Leon's fountain of eternal youth, and some pirates...
Of course for narrative purposes it might have been useful to explain his strange youthfulness.
Thursday October 08, 2009 08:47am EDT
Have you read the last few chapters of Huckleberry Finn? The sheer callous brutality with which Tom allows both Huck and Jim to believe Jim is still a slave, when Jim had in fact been manumitted months previously, because Tom is enjoying the drama of trying (and failing) to "rescue" Jim from prison is an absolute eye-opener and it's very clear that Twain's using him as a means of showing Huck's mental and moral growth by contrast.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 08, 2009 09:37am EDT
Thursday October 08, 2009 11:18am EDT
yes.
"it's very clear that Twain's using him as a means of showing Huck's mental and moral growth by contrast. "
The conclusion that Huck has grown mentally and morally, which I agree with, does not automatically make Tom bad.
Originally it was said "(read Huckleberry Finn sometime--Tom is not one of the good guys)."
which would indicate that Tom is a villain. That is my experience with that phrase - if you are not 'one of the good guys' then you are 'one of the bad guys'.
On the other hand my conclusion from reading the last few chapters of Huck Finn was that Tom treats Jim still as an object, and Huck as a social inferior, for his games and that his character is so determined that he would end up fighting for the South and the social order it presented some few years after the events of that book. And that therefore he would become a bad guy. This viewpoint is probably indicated somewhat in my earlier comment.
Another argument could also be made, which would tie in with my conclusion that Tom was not bad but would become bad, is that in the story Tom is still a child and as such could not be expected to have a higher moral stature. In such a case Tom's failing is that of the boy who does not realize his romanticized pranks were anything but great fun.
I remember reading sometime the critical insight that Tom with these pranks and romanticism represented the immaturity of Southern culture whose men were often uncaring boys inconsiderate of the real consequences of their actions. A behavior that in a child might be problematic in an adult can be bad.
In short - while I agree that Huck is highly moral (and a repository of many ironies regarding rightness and wrongness) I believe your interpretation of what that moral stature means in relation to other characters is lacking in subtlety.
Thursday October 08, 2009 01:11pm EDT
- The League was terrible, and not in a good way. Moore's GN did not translate at all to the screen, although I will agree that Naseeruddin Shah was wonderful.
- The Fifth Element was fun, but not good. For an idea of what a good version of that movie might have been, read "The Incal" by Moebius and Jodorowsky.
KG
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 08, 2009 03:36pm EDT
I really don't know if I can try out the comics but if I can find a way not to buy them I may. His other works I have grown to love but GOD was this movie awful.
As for the fith element, eh. Not nearly as bad as this peice of trash but not good either. A movie can be fun and still be bad. The point of a movie shouldn't be only to be fun, art is supposed to tell us something about the world we didn't know or knew but didn't know we knew.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday October 09, 2009 02:35am EDT
Friday October 09, 2009 05:30am EDT
Friday October 09, 2009 12:25pm EDT
I also sort of think Stuart Townsend is sexy. But that's just me.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday October 09, 2009 03:42pm EDT
As for LXG, as anything more than a vehicle for macro-scaled FX work, it was really horrible. The producers should have saved the set expenses and made it as a cartoon. We're all more amenable to the improbable being commonplace when animated.
Saturday October 10, 2009 12:04pm EDT
I mostly liked the film, on its own terms, though they're the same sort of terms on which I like Hudson Hawk or Last Action Hero or indeed The Fifth Element, and modulo being peeved both at the downgrading of Mina's part and at the teeth-gritting nature of the Tom Sawyer/Allan Quartermain bonding; I can stull enjoy Townsend and Roxburgh immensely.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday October 10, 2009 02:07pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday October 11, 2009 10:48am EDT
I agree with Emmet @15 - I like LXG as a romp, similar to the way I like Hudson Hawk & Last Action Hero. And the way I expect I'll like 2012.
I couldn't keep my disbelief suspenders from snapping all over the place in LXG - I gave up trying to, and started enjoying the FX while driving tanks through the plot holes.
Sunday October 11, 2009 03:42pm EDT
the film however has peta wilson camping up mina harker/vamp. she alights from a night in a cave with her hair beautifully curled; she fights full-out with said coif, only to be stabbed and collapse with dead-straight hair, then moments later she rises up with her hair and makeup back in full force! no clue why that happens but it is one hilarious detail. "i believe you said you wanted to 'face your demon'" is one of my favorite, favorite quotes. right up there with "it was a bad call, ripley."
another nugget: jason flemyng as dr. jekyll. after seeing this i dearly wanted him cast as remus lupin in harry potter 3. he was the only one struggling with his freakishness. which leads to the next nugget: the teamwork of hyde and capt. nemo. it was hilarious that this monstrous guy calls out for help, but then little nemo turns comes running to his aide. that is kinda delicious.
then you have the ridiculous looking hyde-potion effects that just takes the lunacy to a higher level.
and with the interiors and costumes of nemo's ship and crew...this flick is cotton candy.
Thursday December 03, 2009 07:11am EST