Quantcast
Tor Forge

Science fiction. Fantasy. The universe. And related subjects.

Latest Posts

› archive

Latest Comments

› show all

Hot Bookmarks


Blog Archive


posted Saturday March 28, 2009 02:03pm EDT

Review: Living With Ghosts

Megan Messinger

I’m not a compulsive book-finisher. If something is terrible, I’ll stop reading and move on, but there’s also a frustrating place between good enough to enjoy and bad enough to put down without guilt or curiosity. Kari Sperring’s Living With Ghosts, appropriately enough, falls into that gray area. It was tantalizingly almost good.

Sperring’s world has three cities: Tarnaroq, home of mages called undarii who deal with death; Lunedith, which follows its ancient clan ways; and Merafi, our setting. Merafi has no truck with ghosts or the clan magics, a position it can hold because of a big anti-ghost binding laid there by its founder. I thought of it as 18th-century Paris.

According to the back cover, main character Gracielis is a “failed assassin priest turned courtesan and spy,” which wins my personal Copy-Fail Award, with all runners-up being other parts of this back cover. (Three ellipses? Really?) Gracielis failed the final test to become undarios, but he still sees ghosts, which shouldn’t be happening in protected Merafi. Up in the palace, Yvelliane d’IIlandre is trying to hold the city’s government together while its queen is dying, an especially difficult task now that the troublemaking delegation from Lunedith has arrived, there’s plague in the lower city, and strange creatures have appeared in the mists. Yvelliane’s husband Thiercelin is fiercely bored with his wife working all the time, and, oh yeah, he saw a ghost the other day….

The character relationships are all interlaced: this one married to that one, whose brother loved that one, who ends up staying with…you get it. Everyone is a viewpoint character, so you see them from the inside and the outside at different times and in different contexts, and Sperring juggles them quite well. I liked the idea of a busy politician and her moping husband, and Thierry was well-drawn and sympathetic. I loved Gracielis’s patron Amalie and the Tarnaroqui envoy Iareth Yscoithi, enough that I was very angry at how Iareth ends up. Her taste in men is abominable; when we meet her true love Valdin, who has been built up as a rakish and tragic duelist, he’s actually just immature and whiny, the sort of guy that Ellen Kushner's Richard St. Vier would smack as soon as look at. The uneven characterization bothered me, but the ones I liked were enough to keep me reading.

The plot’s neat—almost pat—causality also gave the book momentum, although sometimes the payoff was too long in coming. At first, I thought that Living With Ghosts would be better if it were tighter, with less chance to lose the tension generated by the scenes with actual plot in them, but I got towards the end, I wished that I had more justification for events. Things that have to happen just happen, even if there’s no good reason other than that’s how the plot wraps up. It's a reminder of how hard this book-writing thing must be—and who am I to throw stones, when I don’t do it?—to have a book that works paragraph by paragraph, page by page, but doesn’t come together when you add them all up.

All of that said, you may very well like the book, dear reader, so I’m offering up my review copy to the first commenter who specifically asks for it; if you are that person, e-mail me your snail-mail address at megan dot messinger at macmillan dot com. It’s a regular mass market paperback with some “carried it in my messenger bag for two weeks” wear. Cave lector.

ReddIt Stumble Upon del.icio.us Digg It Send via Mail
BOOKMARK
PRINT

categories: Written Word
tags: living with ghosts, kari sperring, reading, reviews, ridiculous names

13 comments
Richard Fife
1.  R.Fife
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 02:15pm EDT · amended on Saturday March 28, 2009 02:30pm EDT
I'll take a bite of this. Send it my way and thank ya kindly.

I empathize with you on the "just good enough to keep reading." I had that with Tower of Shadows by Drew Bowling. Also had the kinda "What, that's the end? But why?" feeling you described.

Safety word is Kumquat, btw.
Tex Anne
2.  TexAnne
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 03:48pm EDT
Latin geek alert: "caveat lector." (Vel lectrix.) "Cave" means "beware of," as in "cave canem," "beware of the dog."

We now return you to your regular geekitude.
Richard Fife
3.  R.Fife
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 04:11pm EDT
Iunno, perhaps it is a "beward of the reader". Perhaps this book turns its readers into blood-thirsty ghosts, so we need to run screaming from anyone who has read it?
Megan Messinger
4.  thumbelinablues
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 10:14pm EDT
I was afraid to work from popular phrases, so I phoned a friend who did a bit of Latin - next time, I will definitely ask the audience! :-P
Angela Edwards
5.  AngelaE8654
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 10:48pm EDT
Tantalizingly "almost good" huh? I used to be an avid reader. Now, I don't seem to have the patience. I suspect that is part of the "internet lifestyle" which is too bad. My husband has the exact same problem.
Tex Anne
6.  TexAnne
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday March 28, 2009 10:52pm EDT
Nah, "beware of the reader" would be "cave lectorem," since "the reader" is the direct object.

Now that I think about it some more, "cave lector" fits the post perfectly--"Reader, watch out!" I forgot about the vocative for a second....
eric orchard
7.  orchard
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 29, 2009 09:28am EDT
I seem to come across a lot of almost good books. There will be some compelling element that pushes me forward slowly.I have been finishing less books lately because of this. If I hit that uncertainty at page 40 of 400 I know I probably won't finish the book.I think this book sounds pretty cool, actually.
Sheena Bandy
8.  Sheena Bandy
Sunday March 29, 2009 02:00pm EDT
Tantalizingly almost good. Wow.

I hope someone says that about my books someday.

*dies laughing*
Arachne Jericho
9.  arachnejericho
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 30, 2009 12:43am EDT
The "almost good" comes from, I think, having more experience in what you like or don't like, so that you can tell when you aren't likely to get it, even if the plot draws you forwards and you want to find out what happens.

I've run into that phenomenon as I read more and more (and not necessarily because of the Internet).
Mikah McCabe
10.  spriteheroine
VIEW ALL BY · Monday April 06, 2009 03:19pm EDT
Most of the books I read that fall into that grey area lure me with beautiful cover-men. It's a trap I can't seem to stop falling int--oh lord, look at that cloak, I want to read about it RIGHT NOW!
Sam Rateliff
11.  savings
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday September 15, 2009 09:14pm EDT
Even though I don't believe in ghosts, I am freaked out as anybody by a good ghost story.
Patricia Ryans
12.  patriciht8
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 14, 2009 08:47pm EDT
>>I'm not a compulsive book-finisher. If something is terrible, I'll stop reading and move on, but there's also a frustrating place between good enough to enjoy and bad enough to put down without guilt or curiosity

Haha! I can relate to that. Being a student of English literature for 8 long years, there have been countless instances when I have tucked away a voluminous novel after reading the first few chapters. My main problem is that I easily get bored and distracted. Novels that others would read again and again (think Harry Potter) would bore me too. I have been always like this, even though back then I had no internet access.

But give me a 100-page book any day - no more and no less - and I promise I would finish it in a heartbeat!
john stone
14.  fatbikez
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 13, 2009 11:08pm EST
Tantalizingly almost good. Wow.

I hope someone says that about my books someday.

*dies laughing*
POST A COMMENT Name: Email Address: Comment (bbCode allowed):