Quantcast
Tor Forge

Science fiction. Fantasy. The universe. And related subjects.

Latest Posts

› archive

Latest Comments

› show all

Hot Bookmarks


Blog Archive


posted Wednesday March 04, 2009 05:35pm EST

Review: Watchmen

Bridget McGovern

Last night I had the immense good fortune to attend an invitation-only sneak preview of Watchmen here in New York. The best word to describe the experience is, simply, “epic.”

It was epic. Review and possible spoilers (particularly for those who haven’t read the graphic novel) follow below the fold.

I should probably admit that I was halfway in love with this movie even before the opening credits rolled to a close. I can’t imagine a better introduction to this film than the first scene, which opens with the assault and murder of Eddie Blake, the masked vigilante and sometime-assassin better known as The Comedian. The portrayal of violence (in this scene and throughout the film) is unrelentingly ruthless and brutal—cringe-inducing without being cartoonish. Every blow seems bone-shattering; it almost hurts to watch, on a profoundly visceral level, and yet the fight scenes are so brilliantly choreographed that it’s impossible to look away. Also, in an interesting move, director Zach Snyder occasionally breaks up the action with split-second freeze frames, so that the moment visually mimics the act of looking at a single comic book panel...he’s pointing to his source material as if to show that he’s not so much adapting but faithfully translating—not re-envisioning the comic for the audience but re-reading along with them, an attitude which generally holds true for the film as a whole.

The murder then segues into an amazing montage delineating the history of the several decades worth of masked crusaders, parading a mix of iconic real-life images and figures across the screen, interwoven with the mythos of the alternate America first imagined by Alan Moore in the early 1980s, in which Richard Nixon has served five consecutive terms as president and nuclear war with Russia appears increasingly immanent. An earlier generation of masked heroes known as the Minutemen, composed of Captain Metropolis, Silk Spectre, Hooded Justice, Nite Owl, Silhouette, Dollar Bill, Mothman and The Comedian, gives way to the Watchmen as the world grows darker and more chaotic. One moment, JFK is warmly greeting Dr. Manhattan on the White House lawn, the next The Comedian is slinking away from a grassy knoll in Dallas, smoking rifle in hand. The image of a burning Buddhist monk shifts to scenes from the Vietnam War, which in turn give way to Andy Warhol’s Factory and Ozymandias partying at Studio 54 with David Bowie and the Village People, while crime and poverty escalate and riots rage in the streets. By the end of the credits, we are left with an overwhelming sense of decline and decadence, a society spiraling rapidly out of control.

From there, the plot closely follows the main narrative arc of the original comics. The death of The Comedian sets off a chain of events among his former crime-fighting compatriots, all of whom have been forced into early retirement by the anti-vigilante legislation known as the Keene Act. All, that is, except for Rorschach, whose fanatical, uncompromising dedication to justice has driven him to become a renegade, operating outside of the law. His obsessive investigation into Blake’s murder brings him back into contact with his former partner, Dan Dreiberg (the second generation Nite Owl), just as Dreiberg reconnects with with Laurie Juspeczyk (the former Silk Spectre II). Laurie’s troubled relationship with godlike superhero Dr. Manhattan has reached a breaking point, but as the threat of nuclear Armageddon trembles on the horizon and a proof of an anti-mask conspiracy growing clearer by the hour, all of the former Watchmen are inexorably drawn together for a climactic confrontation at the Karnak, the Antarctic fortress of Ozymandias, a.k.a. Adrian Veidt, “The Smartest Man In The World.”

Which isn’t to say that things haven’t been changed and lost along the way. As satisfying as the opening sequence is, it’s also the last we get to see of most of the older generation of masked heroes, except for a few brief flashbacks and the occasional offhand comment. Their history has been stripped down to bare bones, leaving only what is needed to comprehend the present state of affairs: the troubled attraction between Sally Jupiter and Eddie Blake, the latter-day reformation of the group under the leadership of Ozymandias, and its gradual disintegration, ending with the passage of the aforementioned Keene Act. As much as fans of the graphic novel will miss the omitted aspects of the backstory, however, the cuts are made cleanly, throwing the major themes of the story into sharper relief. Moore’s warped, nightmarish vision of the American Dream gone horribly awry remains intact, thanks to a script which stays remarkably faithful to the source material, a sublime visual aesthetic, and a solid cast, several of whom provide truly exceptional performances.

As rumored, Jeffrey Dean Morgan’s scene-stealing Comedian is pitch-perfect, bringing exactly the right blend of self-destructive charisma and pathos to one of the most complex and ambiguous roles in the film. Likewise, Jackie Earle Haley brings Rorschach to life in a subtle and surprisingly touching performance, conveying the sense of a painfully sensitive soul warped and traumatized by a brutal and pitiless world. As Ozymandias, British-born actor Matthew Goode sometimes seems to slip into an odd (but pretty decent) Marilyn Monroe impression, pouting out his lines like Little Lord Fauntleroy in a community theater production of Some Like It Hot. It’s off-putting at first, but strangely, his performance works: when the appearance of an effete, yuppie pretty-boy gives way in the madness and horror of the climactic scenes, the effect is all the more devastating.

Billy Crudup, on the other hand, turns the all-powerful Dr. Manhattan into the universe’s most detached, creepily-mellow kindergarten teacher. He looks great, certainly, but when delivering lines like, “In my opinion, the existence of life is a highly overrated phenomenon,” he seems to be channeling Jeff Bridges in Starman, with a twist of Lieutenant Commander Data. Similarly, Malin Akerman fits nicely into the tight, vinyl Silk Spectre costume and performs admirably in her extended fight scenes, but her little-girl voice is often grating and her performance lacks the depth of the rest of the cast, as she attempts to project a kind of wounded vulnerability and comes off more like a neurotic sorority girl. Her character grows less irritating through her interactions with Dreiberg (an always-solid Patrick Wilson, slightly schlub-ified for the occasion), but that might be because once they finally get together, there’s less talking and more sex, fire, and ass-kicking leather boots. And who doesn’t like that?

As I said, this is an epic movie. It doesn’t pretend otherwise. Even the soundtrack is decidedly epic; there are certain songs which are so iconic that they’ve come to border on the cliché, from overuse as well as through parody. Most films can get away with using one or two of these songs to highlight a particularly climactic or emotionally-wrought scene. Watchmen, though, uses nothing but iconic, instantly-recognizable songs from artists ranging from Nat King Cole, Bob Dylan, and Leonard Cohen, to Philip Glass and Richard Wagner. The choice makes complete sense because these songs actually fit the scale of the movie and its themes rather perfectly. There was a moment when Dreiberg and Rorschach approach Ozymandias’ fortress as the Hendrix version of “All Along The Watchtower” blasted through the theater, and I thought, “Huh. Really? Couldn’t come up with anything less obvious?” But in a matter of seconds, I was won over by the sheer scope of the scene, the forbidding, awe-inspiring setting, the anticipation of a final battle...the scene not only lives up to the song—it owns it.

Furthermore, there are plenty of intriguing, fan-pleasing details worked into the film, and many fine, subtle moments which touch upon elements from Moore’s original narrative in a brief but satisfying way. At the end of a disturbing and difficult flashback in which Hooded Justice intervenes in Eddie Blake’s brutal attempt to rape Sally Jupiter, there is a split-second silence and exchange of glances following an embittered quip from the beaten and bloodied Comedian which seems to cut to the heart of the sado-masochistic undertones of the crime-fighting lifestyle: the violence, the costumes, the repression and strangeness of their daily lives are thrown into a new light, all in one brief scene, with hardly any dialogue. The subtext, greatly reduced but not forgotten, lingers just long enough to infuse additional meaning and complexity into the plot without derailing or muddling the narrative.

For the most part, though, Watchman is a film about ideas and action on a grand scale. It questions to what degree an individual can take responsibility for the rest of humanity without separating oneself from the ebb and flow of human experience, without compromising a sense of one’s own humanity entirely. It takes the troubling, familiar axiom involving great power and great responsibility and masterfully spins it out into a bleak, complex philosophical endgame to which there are no easy answers, only insoluble moral ambiguities. It’s a tale of heroes and villains, gods and monsters, set in strange but uncannily familiar past, and it is as enthralling, unsettling, stirring and impressive as any epic needs to be. I’m sure that there will be plenty of diverse and dissenting opinions tossed about over the coming weeks, and I look forward to the discussion...but mainly I’m looking forward to seeing the movie again as soon as possible. And for those of you rushing out to theaters this weekend, please check back in and let us know what you think. Trust me, there will be plenty to talk about, once we’re all watching the Watchmen.

ReddIt Stumble Upon del.icio.us Digg It Send via Mail
BOOKMARK
PRINT

categories: Comics, Movies
tags: The Watchmen movie, Alan Moore, Zach Snyder, review, soundtrack, who watches the watchmen?

15 comments
eric orchard
1.  orchard
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 04, 2009 05:59pm EST
Wow! Your's is the first review that really makes me want to see the film. I didn't love 300, I think because it didn't have a lot of depth and a movie with that much violence should have some context.Maybe Mr. Snyder is growing as a director.

"It questions to what degree an individual can take responsibility for the rest of humanity without separating oneself from the ebb and flow of human experience" is the very best critical summation I've ever read in regards to Watchmen.
Edward Gauvin
2.  CayceParkaboy
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 04, 2009 07:19pm EST
But "All Along the Watchtower" is quoted in the book... as is a famous Nat King Cole song.
Bridget McGovern
3.  BMcGovern
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 04, 2009 07:54pm EST
@ CayceParkaboy #2

Yes, but the book also quotes lesser-known songs by Elvis Costello and John Cale, neither of which appeared in the movie (at least not in any obvious way, as far as I could tell), and Dylan's "Desolation Row" surfaces only in the end credits, in a cover recorded specifically for the film by My Chemical Romance. So it's not as if the people making this movie absolutely had to use those particular songs, and use them in the way that they did.

Nat King Cole and Hendrix clearly have a special resonance given their context in the original work, but the decision to go with a hit-heavy, almost over-the-top soundtrack is not an accident; I have a feeling it's going to be a sticking point for a lot of critics, and wanted to point out the reasons I think it works. My point is that employing Hendrix's "All Along the Watchtower" at that particular moment in the film could seem obvious, and even lazy, but the movie consistently operates on such a grand scale that the soundtrack complements the action rather than overwhelming or detracting from it.

@ orchard #1

Thanks, Eric! I really hope you enjoy it, if you see it (for the record, I wasn't a fan of 300 either--good visuals, with not much else to recommend it. This is definitely an improvement!)
Melissa Frain
4.  frainmelissa
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 04, 2009 07:59pm EST
I will chime in just for a second to say that - despite having a severely halitosis-afflicted man sitting next to me and insistently breathing in my direction - WATCHMEN was incredibly enjoyable for me, as well, even though I am not familiar with the original work. (Though I do think that I probably missed a lot of subtle details that were included as nods to the fans/the comics.)

All that stuff Bridget said? That. This review sums up pretty spectacularly how I felt after seeing it.
Schizohedron
5.  Schizohedron
Wednesday March 04, 2009 10:30pm EST
>the next The Comedian is slinking away from a grassy knoll in Dallas, smoking rifle in hand.

Whoa! Can't consult my copy of the comic right now (my mother is actually borrowing it), but this sounds new for the movie. I know in the comic it's implied that he knocks off Woodward and Bernstein, but JFK?
Schizohedron
6.  Hwarg
Wednesday March 04, 2009 11:19pm EST
Well, now that both Wesley Crusher and Bridget have given their four collective thumbs up, I'm sold. Not that I wasn't going to go see it anyway, but it's good to know that some have traveled the way already and found it good.
Bridget McGovern
7.  BMcGovern
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 01:10am EST
@ Schizohedron #5

First off? Best reason ever for not having a copy of a comic book on hand--I salute you, and also your mother :) Secondly, there are definitely moments in the opening montage that were inspired by the book but not directly drawn from it. I'm glad you brought up the JFK thing; turns out that in Chapter IX, "The Darkness of Mere Being," Laurie remembers attending a party for Eddie Blake at which she drunkenly confronts him about the attempted rape of her mother. Just before she approaches The Comedian, he's pictured with a group of his government cronies talking about Woodward and Bernstein, after which he says, "Nah...I'm clean, guys. Just don't ask where I was when I heard about J.F.K." (It gets a lot of laughs, and somebody replies, "That's good! Dick'll love that.") So there is at least *some* precedent for that particular bit in the montage, however loose it is.

@ Hwarg #6

You just mentioned my name in the same sentence (as a fictional character portrayed by) Wil Wheaton. You win! ...And I definitely win. I think we *all* win, really. I thank you, and declare Flawless Victory.
Schizohedron
8.  Ross Smith
Thursday March 05, 2009 02:44am EST
Just saw it. I was expecting to have to wait a few weeks but was surprised to find that it was released here (New Zealand) on the same day as the US.

Verdict: Excellent! Definitely two thumbs up from me. Easily the best comic adaptation I've ever seen, although I'll admit that's not exactly the highest bar in the world. Yeah, I'll see it again, buy the DVD, etc.

I kept noticing little details they threw in that were easy to miss if you didn't pay close attention. The Apple 1984 commercial on one of Adrian's TV screens. The WTC surviving the ... er ... the redacted spoiler. And (my favourite) Neil Armstrong saying "Good Luck, Mr Gorsky" :)
David Lev
9.  davidlev
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 02:56am EST
I just saw it too ( an unexpected side benefit of deciding to study abroad here in New Zealand). I absolutely LOVED the opening credit sequence of 50 years of superhero history set to Bob Dylan singing "The Times They Are a Changin'" I spazzed so much, I was excited. It was amazing. In one of the clips of the Minutemen, just before it faded to black, I noticed Captain Metropolis leaning in towards Hooded Justice and I was like "HA! I know what that means!" I also noticed that The Comedian was staying in room 300...which I thought was cute. I also liked that the movie has more real-life people in it (Pat Buchanan, Ted Koppel, Henry Kissinger, and of course Nixon), which just made it seem cool. I was sad that some of the side elements (like the events surrounding the news stand) were trimmed down to cameo appearances in the main story.

I'm kinda unsure how I feel about the changed ending. It all leads to the same effect, but somehow it left a bit of a bitter taste in my mouth. I also wonder what people who haven't read the comic and go to this movie for a good time with some superhero action will feel. This movie is grim and gory, too. Seeing a man getting his arms cut off in "real life" is a different experience than getting his arms cut off in a drawing.

All in all, it was a good and awesome movie, especially for those who've read the comic
seth johnson
10.  seth
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 04:47am EST
For crap's sake! They reference the Neil Armstrong / Gorsky joke?!!?! Damn. I wrote a script for a gag short film and now this movie overexposed my central plot point...

Another example of not following through on an idea and missing the opportunity completely.

Seth
Schizohedron
11.  Schizohedron
Thursday March 05, 2009 11:28am EST
@ #7 BMcGovern:

I thank you for the salute, and I'll proxy-thank you for my mom. She'd been hearing about the movie, and had become curious about the original work. I figured the best way to bring her up to date was to slide the comic onto her book pile and let her dig on in. (Plus she introduced me to Harlan Ellison's work a zillion years ago, so I figured this would return the favor.)

Thanks also for quoting that frame (which I can see in my head now). It was a different twist on the Comedian, and I hope my post conveyed more surprise than discontent. I'm trying to view the inevitable differences, elaborations, and compromises that I'll note between the film and the comic the way I approached Heath Ledger's take on the Joker. I went into Dark Knight with the goal of not comparing Ledger's Joker with previous film/TV/comic incarnations, but to judge how successful he was in his own skin, in the way he breathed life into the character. That's my plan for the Comedian, and the film in general. (Contrast this with the 1990-era me, who would've gone crazy at any little difference from the master-text in a movie; I'm trying not to be such a ranty-pants in my old age.)
Bridget McGovern
12.  BMcGovern
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 05:55pm EST
@ Ross Smith #8 and davidlev #9

Glad you guys liked it, too, and *really* glad you mention those details. I was so tempted to try to include all of the little touches that warmed my geeky, fangirl heart, but then the review would have been twice as long. One of the main reasons I can't wait to see it again is to try to catch all the things I may have missed the first time around :)

@ Schizohedron #11

That sounds like a great approach to this film (although I definitely read your comment as surprise, not annoyance :) Thanks again for bringing it up, though--it made me go back and do a quick reread of the entire comic, because I knew there was another Kennedy reference somewhere.

In Chapter XI, "Look On My Works, Ye Mighty..." (page 18), Ozymandias tells Rorschach and Dreiberg that Blake "was in Dallas, minding Nixon, the day Kennedy died. Nobody's sure why Nixon was there." Then he quotes Kennedy's intended speech from that day. Again, the glimpse of the Comedian on the grassy knoll would still work without the additional context...but knowing where the reference is coming from makes it a little more interesting. At least it does for me, so thanks again!
Stefan Raets
13.  Stefan
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 08:42pm EST
Question for the reviewer (and anyone else who wishes to chime in): would you suggest taking someone to this movie who hasn't read the book? I've read the durn thing a dozen times or more, but my wife never has... and I don't think she'll get a chance to read it before I drag her to the theater. I don't want to color her perception of the classic book too much. I also don't want to wait. Argh. Suggestions?
Bridget McGovern
14.  BMcGovern
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 05, 2009 10:56pm EST
@ Stefan #13

Well, I watched the film with a friend (she chimed in on comment #4, actually) who hasn't read the comic, and she very much enjoyed it. As other people have pointed out, there is a fair amount of gore and violence in the movie, but as long as that's not a deal breaker, I think the movie is very accessible to people who haven't read Watchmen. Your wife won't pick up on all the minor details and allusions, obviously, but if she enjoys the superhero/action genre in general, go ahead and drag her to the theater! I don't think it will ruin the book for her--I can't imagine anything ruining Alan Moore, though. His work always speaks for itself...
Schizohedron
15.  Schizohedron
Friday March 06, 2009 11:49am EST
@ BMcGovern #12: Another good catch! The weird thing is, Nixon was in Dallas on 11/22/63. Details vary over whether his plane left before or after the assassination, but he was in town in his role as a lawyer with the firm representing PepsiCo. This being Nixon, you can hang just about any conspiracy on that peg. Especially a Nixon who also manages to warp the Constitution to let him serve five terms. . . . (I've spent the past couple of weeks rereading Hunter Thompson's works, so seeing his archenemy reincarnated will add an extra layer of bizarre to the film.) Blake's more explicit Dallas role in the movie version seems a shorthand way of expressing how tight he is with the government and what Tricky Dick is willing to do to gain and retain power in this world.

The expedition with which I'll see the film tomorrow includes a couple of Watchmen virgins, so they'll be even more well-suited to judge whether it succeeds on the terms it sets. Plus the rest of us can footnote a lot of allusions for them at the inevitable post-film diner run. Folks overhearing us there will get quite an earful, I'm sure.
POST A COMMENT Name: Email Address: Comment (bbCode allowed):