Ask the average passerby how much a comic book costs now, and you’ll probably get a price ranging from $1.25 to $2.00 (along with the standard “I remember when they were only 12/35/50 cents” rejoinder, depending upon the person’s age and affability).
What you probably won’t hear is $3.99. And that, my friend, is the newsstand price of many Marvel comics right now.
I know, the price of everything else has skyrocketed, so why should comics be immune? Somehow though, this jump just seems flagrantly wrong. For one, it appears to be vastly exceeding the rate of inflation. Plus, we’re talking about comics, something historically perceived as inexpensive.
Something needs to be done—stat! Everyone has his or her own breaking point on pricing, and I think four bucks not only hurdles across that line, but turns around and spits in its face, too. And judging by the reaction of others, I’m not alone in feeling this way.
Are comics as we know them on a death march?
If you only visit comic stores for your monthly fix, or order them over the Internet, this price jump may be news to you, as the cover price there remains at $2.99 (at least for now). As I understand it, this is because newsstands can return unsold stock, while comic specialty stores can’t. The publishers run a higher risk shipping to newsstands, thus the higher pricing.
But everyone doesn’t have a local comic store, or buy enough titles to warrant a “pull list” at an Internet store.
Think about the casual fan, or the parent of a child who has just watched Iron Man and would like to read more about his new hero. Will these potential customers be completely shut out by this pricing? One would think so. I can’t see how this move will help the industry overall, especially when we’re deep in a recession. When it comes between choosing to eat or buying Weapon X, Wolverine has met his match.
Even before the recent increase, many readers have dropped monthly comics in lieu of trade paperbacks that collect multiple issues—often with better paper and no ads. In the comics world, trades are akin to DVD season box sets. You can either watch Lost week by week (like the floppies), or all at once without the ads (hello, Mr. Trade Paperback). More and more, people are opting for the latter. And who can blame them? Trade paperbacks are usually a better deal in terms of cost and format.
This poses the question: If sales of monthly titles bottom out, will they remain around for future trades/omnibus editions to collect? No more trades would effectively leave only the hardest of the hardcore comic aficionados as monthly customers—with very few new customers.
Goofy editorial decisions like the One More Day fiasco aside, I grant the businesspeople at Marvel with the intelligence and foresight to resolve the issue. As a possible panacea, they offer Marvel Digital Comics with an “all you can eat” subscription plan.
However, many back issues are not currently included. I had a difficult time locating any of the most recent and popular issues (e.g., Civil War # 1 and 2 are there, but not the rest of the series). Since recent titles would be the easiest to port over to the Web, one would think these would be the first to go up. Perhaps there’s a moratorium in place to prevent the sales cannibalization of the trades or monthly titles. If so, I’m not so sure this path is the way to go.
I think the audience for digital and those for print are two entirely different demographics. Digital books can be a hard sell to those who grew up with print; many—especially comic collectors—still want to hold the physical book in their hands and see it sitting on a shelf. The omission of recent issues in digital is only providing these potential customers with yet another reason to stay away from that format.
I haven’t bought a single issue of any comic for some time, and the high price is the prevailing factor. Perhaps comics, as we know them, will soon be a thing of the past. The real money appears to be made in licensing the characters to films, videogames, toys, etc., and Marvel is a business with all of the usual corporate needs to survive. But I can’t help but wonder if the public’s interest in the characters will remain strong if their intellectual properties aren’t properly nurtured.
No future titles may equal no future interest.
Even though I’m not a mainstay reader—Peter Bagge’s Hate and the Robotech titles were canceled a long time ago!—I don’t want to see comics die. But I, like many, am afraid that forking over $3.99 for what essentially amounts to 10 minutes of reading pleasure (at best) simply isn’t a sound decision. Especially when too many of The Big Two’s current storylines only appear to be money grabs or stunts.
What’s your take on this? Should monthly comics go all-digital with trade paperbacks collecting issues for those who prefer print? Or should they take the manga route, dumping the slick paper for cheap newsprint (and lower cover prices)? And, if $3.99 is okay with you, what about $4.99 or $5.99?
I’m sure Spidey would love to hear your replies.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 21, 2009 05:43pm EST
Your comment about the brevity of pleasure vs. price sure hits home. I can spend $1.00-$2.00 more on a good fantasy/scifi softcover and get at least a weeks worth of reading from it. Much better ROI. Or I can just go to the library and check them out for free. While I can also do that with comics, they are far behind and usually just trades.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 21, 2009 05:48pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 21, 2009 06:10pm EST
To be blunt, treeware comics are dead.
Wednesday January 21, 2009 06:38pm EST
But i still say Pop culture conventions all the way. Not only can you get cheap comics but i always find that the vendors like to give me Swag with their company name on it.
Wednesday January 21, 2009 07:37pm EST
But I'm not willing to pay those prices.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 21, 2009 08:29pm EST
King, many feel the same about videogames’ ROI. A $20 game that provides a month’s worth of entertainment can stretch someone’s dollars far more than five comics and one hour of reading.
David, that’s exactly how I feel, too. When both kids AND working adults are priced out of the comics market, who’s left? I just hope the industry isn’t so infatuated with Hollywood that it forgets who really butters its bread.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 21, 2009 10:08pm EST
However, it doesn't surprise me that none of this has penetrated with the execs. I think you give Marvel too much credit for having any business sense at all. Their two films with their own studio were wracked with problems because Marvel is being run by tight-fisted SOBs who bite the hand that feeds. They're dicking everyone on money (witness Jon Favreau's barely being hired back despite what he did for Iron Man; buh-bye Terrence Howard; go to hell, Ed Norton) at the same time that they are losing new-comic business, which means they will eventually have a finite and low amount of material from which to make movies. Now, with forty-odd years of comics to choose from, you can make a bunch of movies about the same characters over and over, but the profit will dry up as people get bored of the same-old, same-old. Which means the only way for them to stay afloat is to hawk the same shit over and over or find new characters (again, hello Iron Man) to bring to the theater for people. If they don't make new stuff, how the hell will they counter-act the boredom with the mainstays of their universes?
Moreover, what happens when the comic book hero phase of movies burns out, as it inevitably will? They're not planning for the future at all. This is how we got into a recession in the first place. Vicious cycle, like I said.
Wednesday January 21, 2009 11:40pm EST
I expect the days of floppies as the entry point for new readers is mostly over no matter what the price because most new readers are coming in from manga and webcomics. New readers for Superman and Batman are coming from cartoons and movies – and a probably buying the better deal for trades from Borders anyways. I expect the floppies will survive, but mostly for the collectors market for those who want to collect the format (instead of dinnerware with scenes from Star Trek painted on them because people will collect all sorts of absurd things).
My comic book shop has already made the transition. While it still carries a wide range of current floppies, its selection of trades dwarfs its collection of back issues even though it doesn’t even carry much manga.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 07:42am EST
Example: I remember a JLA story from a few years ago where the heroes (Superman, Batman, Aquaman, Etcman...) went to the past, battled some villain, lost, for some reason had to die an be locked in ghoul form (fully awake, mind you, no boring millennia-long hibernation) inside a cave for 3000 years, to emerge in the present, fight the villain again, win and be resurrected. Well, if this was a good story you'd think that after three THOUSAND years having nothing but reflecting and talking to each other, any human or human-like would come out either crazy, or with a completely changed outlook on the meaning of life, maybe both, or whatever. Evidently, they come out of it exactly as they've always been, no personal growth or development of any kind. And even before you start reading you knows that's how the (non-)story will unfold.
So, nowadays I still find myself at best browsing the latest issue of Ultimate Spider-Man, The Ultimates or Supreme Power, but even those are already moving towards the the average (lack of) quality they originally intended to surpass, so no sales to me.
Now, in the non-super-hero genres I've been pleased with Dark Horse's Conan and the Dark Tower-inspired series. Not to mention mangas. In fact, most of my comics purchases nowadays are of mangas. Sure, many, specially those targeted at male adolescents (shonen), are kind of repetitive rehashes of the same formulas, but there's still lots of creativity in the field, with actual character development and events that actually matter, and everything at a very good "pages per dollar" rate when compared to American comics.
Super-hero comics aren't doomed because of their price, although this surely helps to speed the process. They're doomed simply because they don't know how to change in a way that catches to the imagination of both new and old readers.
Thursday January 22, 2009 09:17am EST
Thursday January 22, 2009 10:25am EST
It seems like a field-test of a model that could potentially replace the floppies.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 10:34am EST · amended on Thursday January 22, 2009 11:15am EST
As literary tastes change over time, old media drop out and new media are created. It may be about time for comic books to go the way of pulp magazines and be replaced by digital versions.
Of course, it's hard to say whether "about time" is a matter of years or decades…
Thursday January 22, 2009 10:37am EST
Thursday January 22, 2009 10:48am EST
I was also motivated to quit because of the expense involved. Even at $2.00 per book, I was spending $30 to $50 per week! Something had to give and I had no choice but to walk away. I still miss it from time to time when watching the movies made from my favorite titles.
So, how could the comics industry save itself and re-energize the genre? Well, building on the ideas already posted here, here's my take:
1) Partner with Amazon (or Sony) and build a KindleComics reader. This would be a full color, electronic tablet that might incorporate a few minor animations and sound into the comics. Imagine a 'read-along' feature for sight-impaired collectors, or just helping kids to learn to read.
2) ALL new comics can be downloaded as PDFs to the KindleComics Reader for a nominal fee; perhaps $1 each. Your comics collection is now all digital and can be saved to your computer. A definite plus for those of us with dozens of long boxes taking up valuable space in our homes.
3) Utilize a Print On Demand service to allow collectors to buy issues that they want. Increase the price as the issue's value increases. After a certain period, stop offering that issue for print to maintain its rarity and value.
Let's face it, in any collection, there's really only a small percentage of those comics that are truly valuable. The rest usually sell for well below book value. Let collectors choose which issues they want to archive and which they just want to read for fun on their device.
Of course, this plan will essentially kill your local comic book shop, unless they are somehow incorporated into the downloading flow (e.g., you still go to the shop to download your comics), but I can't see that as an efficient strategy. Comics shops would probably have to close their brick and mortar stores and sell their back-issues online. It wouldn't be a total loss, but in all industries, new technologies and changing demands simply make others obsolete. Maybe it's inevitable that this was going to happen.
Given the popularity that comic book movies are enjoying right now, I would suggest that this is the perfect time to funnel those profits into the R&D of such a device and service.
Just my two cents. I'm eager to hear what everyone else thinks.
Thursday January 22, 2009 10:56am EST
Will Monthlies go away? I think so, in time. It'll take more of a shift towards bookstores, but as the direct market (comic specialty shops who live on monthlies) loses more and more market share, I think it'll happen. I, for one, won't miss them.
As for digital -- I'm not sure. I'm much more inclined to read text digitally on my Sony Reader than I am to look at comic scans on my laptop screen, but I think that's just a matter of the technology catching up to a point where a nice, not-backlit color screen (like e-ink) can be developed. What I think will never go away though, is print-on-demand availability for all the stuff that is going digital. I think readers will always like to have their favourites on a book shelf.
Cheers,
Cam
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 01:58pm EST
I'm hopeful that the future will be more trade driven, so they come out like mini-series or seasons. I imagine that will also give comics writers and artists a whole different level of creativity (although writing monthlies certainly provides its own share of creative challenges).
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 02:04pm EST
Spot-on. That's my feeling exactly. Scheduling creative runs around trades, like, say, Marvel has been doing with Astonishing X-Men (most notably with the excellent Whedon/Cassiday run) lends itslef to more cohesive storytelling.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 02:25pm EST
It sure seems inevitable. Look at Nobody Beats the Wiz, Sam Goody, or Circuit City, even, closing up shop. They were, save maybe Circuit City, heavily dependent on music sales to make their money. Along comes iTunes, and they're gone. (Circuit City failed in competition with Best Buy for the most part, but they also faulted in competition against online retailers for computers, one of their big sections.) This is a crisis facing publishing across the board, too, not just comic books. Borders might be next.
And yet? There are still a lot of holdouts. Streaming video has taken off, but purchased movies that exist SOLELY as digital copies have not. Things that are judged as "more expensive" (as opposed to $1 songs, etc.) make people nervous and they want backups. With literature and graphic novels, many people enjoy and even depend on the tactile connection with the page and the art. (In addition, some just can't read off screens for very long, no matter how gentle they are on the eye.) I think that's why the trade will trump the download, as DVD box sets still trump downloads. (Legal ones, I should say; given the amount of bandwidth dedicated to illegal downloads, it probably dwarfs legal DVD purchases. Then again, most bit torrented files don't tend to stick around--they're only for people who don't have TiVo or wanted to catch up on something. The majority of people I know who do illegal downloads end up deleting the file later.)
Thursday January 22, 2009 04:18pm EST
Thursday January 22, 2009 04:20pm EST
Unless it's a heavy-demand TPB, you're not gonna fetch a quarter of the price you paid for the thing. Resale value is largely nil.
And a used bookstore will give you pennies on the dollar for the thing.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 04:31pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 05:03pm EST
At the risk of providing TMI, I have to take umbrage with your statement. As a life-long bathroom reader, and someone who practically lives on the internet, I have plenty of quality experience with my laptop on the toilet (and no, I'm not talking about porn, thanks much. Get your minds out of the gutter!).
This aversion to reading off of a screen is an affectation of people older than, say, 20 (and I'm being generous here), and it's quickly becoming a quaint one, at best.
As some have mentioned above, once e-readers develop into a foldable, full-colour, high-resolution tabloid-size (or thereabouts), possibly touchscreen display capable of downloading new content every day, the floppies—along with daily printed newspapers and glossy print magazines—are dead, dead, dead. If this sounds too science-fictional, and if you'll excuse the self-pimpage, allow me to point you in the direction of a nifty proof of concept recently displayed at CES.
Thursday January 22, 2009 05:30pm EST
Watchman and other great selling Graphic Novels proves that the market is still strong. Several monthlies that have bad sales actually have really good TPB sales, so are kept around for that reason alone.
The real reason people think comics are dying is that technology and brainwashed masses that don't know how to use their frontal lobes don't know how (or are too lazy) to read and use their imaginations! But...there are still enough of us dreaming Nerds too hold up the industry for another 50 years at least!
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 06:20pm EST
You can find a whole bunch of Public Domain comics at www.goldenagecomics.co.uk and see what I mean.
As to the price, what's truly scary is looking at Marvel's April 2009 solicitations: 57% of their output for that month is $3.99 and above in the comic shops. (Currently most of their titles are $2.99 in comic shops and $3.99 on the newsstands.) I don't know what the newsstand prices are going to be. Meanwhile, DC has only 14% of their titles for that month priced at $3.99 and above. What makes this particularly pernicious is that a large number of Marvel's $3.99 comics are standard 32 page floppies with 22 pages of story. DC does have a few such, but much fewer than Marvel and all of their standard-sized $3.99 titles are licensed comics.
I started buying comics in 1974 - and at that time I could buy anywhere from four to six comics for the price of a paperback - now I'm lucky to get two for the price of a paperback.
They're definitely pricing themselves out of the market.
I'm now in the position where a $75.00 slipcased hardcover is easier to justify to the SO than a floppy - she sees the value in the hardcover.
It's not looking good for the industry, and Marvel is by far the worst when it comes to this.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 22, 2009 11:28pm EST
Since then, knowing that was a fad that's bound to have passed, I've made a few runs at getting back into comics: drop $9-12, get 3-4 different ones... And they're all a tiny amount of pretty bland story.
Also, when a comic is full of ridiculously shaped women, in ludicrous clothes, who do stupid things, I stop reading it even if it's free and provided to me instantly via the internet.
Friday January 23, 2009 12:57am EST
Oh no, we gonna do one of those tired feminism du comique rants now? Wake me up when your umbrage passes. ZZZzzzz
Friday January 23, 2009 12:59am EST
Take a look at Amazon used prices for standard tpbs. You're not getting a great return on your "investment".
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 01:18am EST
Considering that the comic book industry need all the readers it can get, the content of their books does have some bearing on their economic future. Just as you might be turned off by limp stories or cliched characters, many are turned off by hyper-exaggerated physiques. (I'm thinking of the runaway period where I think Jim Lee gave the Cap'n boobs.) If they need every reader, they can ill afford to continue hostilities in this fashion.
My point is that it's not a rant to question their business model from the art up. You can have the best business model in the world, but if the product is crappy or offensive, people won't purchase it.
@27: Still better than you'd get on the floppies. Also, books are hardly investments these days, trades or floppies both. The mistake of the 1990s boom was that people thought they could buy up the new stuff and make a profit off it.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 04:24am EST
Comics used to be the one thing you could buy as a kid that didn't cost all your allowance (and I *am* dating myself here). Not anymore, I guess.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 05:25am EST · amended on Friday January 23, 2009 05:41am EST
As Patrick Rennie notes, the 10 best-selling comics of the year are almost exclusively priced $3.99; despite the higher price, they sold 150,000+ copies each and outsold many cheaper books. (http://blog.comichron.com/2009/01/diamond-releases-2008-overall-top.html) Again, that doesn't *disprove* your points, but to speculate about sales bottoming out without discussing actual numbers basically forces us to extrapolate from our own feelings and those of random fans on the Internet. Which is maybe not the best way to go.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 09:50am EST
Anthony, thanks for commenting! I originally included more comparative data on the sales and Marvel’s bankruptcy filing in the mid 90s, but I felt the post was growing too long to sustain most readers’ interest. Having said that, 150,000 for a best selling title is quite low historically. Some titles used to sell in excess of one million per month.
Comics aren’t going away next month, or the month after that. But as Nat’s point illustrates (breaking my heart in the process), they’re priced out of the range of kids, so you have no new incoming fans (bad news). And when many hardcore adult fans—people who have been reading comics for over 30 years—collectively throw up their hands, I have to wonder who’s left (REALLY bad news).
As a fan of the medium in general, I’m concerned. Perhaps, as some suggest, the industry is now in Shyamalan mode—dead and it doesn’t know it. I’d like to believe otherwise, but this current trending doesn’t appear to bear that out.
The JLA and Avengers’ clarions are sounding loud and clear; I just hope someone answers the call.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 10:55am EST
As to the future of comic books, what really bothers me is the trend by the larger companies to play to their base. I understand that for financial reasons, they need to grab hold of the current audience. But increasingly it seems like that's all they're doing, often at the expense of making things accessible to new readers. The cost has already been mentioned. But lately we've had a lot of dredging up of older storylines. Heavy continuity-based series, crossovers, etc. All of these things are fine and appeal to people like me who have the background and have been reading comics for decades. But there seems little balance between things for the new reader.
I realize I'm making generalizations here, but I do think that the mainstream comics industry has worked its way into a corner and they need to try to find a way out if they want to grow. I don't know that they're in danger of dying - not with the movies doing as well as they're doing - but I think something needs to change.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 11:27am EST
Really? I left off with comics in the earlier part of this decade because I thought it was suffering from the exact opposite problem--i.e. that the comics were being overly invaded by story lines and art that were deliberate sops to non-comic followers. Costumes changed, Rogue had an alias "Anna" (as in Paquin?), and Marvel alone launched the Ultimates line to give new readers a new version of characters they wanted to know but didn't have the time/money/inclination to read about over the 40 years of their history. Don't get me wrong--I loved Ultimate Spider-Man for a good long run, but after a while the new and old titles catering to new people bored me to tears, and I walked.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 11:43am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 01:02pm EST
Exactly! When I grow up, maybe I can express myself this concisely.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 02:50pm EST
Actually it was Rob Liefield that gave Cap the boobs. Jim Lee's illustrations of boobs tended to be ridiculous, too, but he knew enough to keep boobs exclusively on women. Just sayin'.
Also, I feel like I should point out that unless there's an incredible writer I like (Grant Morrison, Bendis, Joss Whedon, or David Mack) I'm less inclined to pick up a superhero comic I grew up with, like the X-Men or Batman. (Daredevil seems to be the exception -- they had a consistently good run of writing for about 100 issues. Although to be fair, I didn't grow up reading him.) Mostly now I'm reading Vertigo books or series that seem to have an endpoint.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 03:09pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 03:10pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 03:25pm EST
On a worldwide scale, graphic storytelling is doing quite well. It's publishers who limit themselves both in format (floppies) and genre (superheroes and not much else) who are really hurting.
A look at how many girls -- a market segment entirely ignored by Marvel and DC -- have purchased mangas in the last decade shows just how much those companies have missed the boat. (And yes, I'm aware of he problems the manga glut is causing to that industry, but I daresay they have a better chance of surviving because of their broader audience.)
VIEW ALL BY · Friday January 23, 2009 04:07pm EST
@39: Guilty as charged of buying manga. However, I justify myself and my purchases in that I wasn't just fangirling over bishies or anything. Rather, I was guilty of the old "watch the movie, then read the book" behavior as the only manga I ever bought were ones from which anime series I loved were made. (And even then, I think I only ever bought two series, and not even completely and yes I'm defensive for no reason!)
Friday January 23, 2009 05:46pm EST
Saturday January 24, 2009 01:45pm EST
I also agree that the tactile nature of the comic book is part of its charm. However, something is driving up their cost, whether it's increased printing fees, delivery or whatever.
Digital downloads, though not a perfect solution, might help save the industry. Expensive printing costs, materials, labor and delivery would all be a thing of the past (at the unfortunate expense of alot of jobs).
It might seem a little cold and bleak, but the digital download, coupled with an effective/stylish e-reader might bring comics back from the dead.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday January 24, 2009 02:51pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday January 24, 2009 02:59pm EST
Saturday January 24, 2009 06:57pm EST
I feel an acute sense of loss at the notion that current creative failures at DC and Marvel in the superhero genre may lead to the closure of that market. I want people like Darwyn Cooke, J.M. DeMatteis, Kurt Busiek, Paul Dini, Ron Marz, Len Wein, Chuck Dixon, Gail Simone, John Rogers, Mark Evanier, Neil when he's in the mood, (and occasionally Grant Morrison, Mark Waid, Dan Jurgens, Fabien Nicenza, and Geoff Johns) to continue being able to find paying work in the superhero genre. I want to see them produce superhero comics in which they're free to live up to the top of their demonstrated potential. That goes for their associated artists, too: Darwyn Cooke again, Dan Jurgens again, Alex Ross, Sergio Aragones, Keith Giffen, Shawn McManus, Rick Veitch, Gene Ha, Jerry Ordway, John Totleben, Kevin Nowlan, and many others.
I'm longtime comic book reader who progressed from being a childhood omnivore, to a forty-year bypass of the entire superhero genre.
The appearance of Sandman in the early '90s reawakened my interest, and I quickly backtracked to absorb the easily-accessible portion of Alan Moore's output. Presto! I became a superhero comic fan again.
#24: I agree with the obvious superiority of the .CBR/.CBZ digital format for comics to PDF. (Basically, all this consists of is placing the sequential JPEG images of each page into a ZIP or WINRAR archive that is decoded by a reader application. The Comic reader application (CDisplay is the most commonly used one for Windows) provides a number of user-friendly options: single or double-page spreads, ability to set height and width to accommodate different screen resolutions, adjust color settings, etc.)
It's my belief that economic forces may be one significant factor that's causing the disappointing creative efforts we're currently seeing from DC and Marvel, the two major publishers in the superhero field. I contributed some thoughts on this in an early comment thread on one of Jim Henley's posts
(http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=blog&id=4828#4901).
The rules are changing for publishers and creators in the comic book industry. There's much discussion about how it's no longer practical for them to distribute single issues that contain complete stories. My personal, subjective feeling about DC is that their Executive Editor, Dan DiDio, is shooting himself in the foot with his attempts to impose overarching, top-down editorial control on the DC writers and artists according to his own personal theories about what it takes to increase sales figures. The most interesting comics appearing from DC, these days, are ones not tied into the global framework DiDio is attempting to build, such as the Evanier/Aragones issues of "The Spirit".
I'm wondering whether the solution to both the price point and story quality problems might be for savvy executives in the Big Two publishers to set up a user-friendly electronic distribution system for almost *everything* that they publish. Marvel has taken some steps in this direction, but their solution isn't attractive enough, now, to lure a lot of the potential electronic constituency into leaving the pirate sites and their illegal .CBR/.CBZ releases.
FWIW, some of the pirate scanners place urgent messages in what they distribute, urging readers to buy the paper copies of anything they read and enjoy. I think that any successful electronic distribution scheme from DC and Marvel would want to include an "issue preview" feature, where you can sample some pages before buying. I know that I'd be willing to try a subscription to such a scheme from DC.
Some commenters in this thread have said that the paper and electronic buyer markets for comic books are separate and distinct. Certainly, that's true now. But I'm not sure it has to stay that way. (Someone smarter than I am may want to add a comment in this thread on why the forces that have driven the music industry to adapt electronic distribution would work differently for a user-friendly scheme in the comic book industry.)
Saturday January 24, 2009 07:44pm EST
"Someone smarter than I am may want to add a comment in this thread on why the forces that have driven the music industry to adapt electronic distribution would work differently for a user-friendly scheme in the comic book industry."
OK. Obviously comic books are a visual experience, and there's no ancillary "portable comic viewer" industry akin to Sony and Apple's portable music players right now. Being a geek who does so many things through the computer, (listens to music, watches movies and tv shows, etc.) I tend to forget that everyone is not like me. Being able to read text on a Kindle is not exactly the same thing as looking at a comic book on one.
I wonder how much of the comic book buying market, we CDisplay users might become with good, legitimate electronic distribution systems for comics -- and whether a market for larger-screened portable comic book readers is something that might appear if good electronic distribution systems for comics became a reality. (This system might eventually be more cost-effective for comic book addicts with $50/mo. pull lists.
Thursday January 29, 2009 11:22am EST
On the bright side, he ignored me and spent his money on the comics that he wanted (a wide and intriguing variety, now that I come to look at his bookshelf for reference). At 14, his reading material tends more towards books but he still does buy and enjoy comics as well.
Thursday January 29, 2009 05:06pm EST
Thursday January 29, 2009 05:15pm EST
Friday January 30, 2009 02:52pm EST
If the comic books want to go the same way as over priced music, they are welcome to. But I think I already know the outcome.
Friday January 30, 2009 10:20pm EST
Denise Dorman
http://www.TheDevilsCandyStore.com
http://www.WriteBrainMedia.com
http://www.DaveDorman.com
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday February 01, 2009 03:34am EST
Also, does no one else read outside? I spend a lot of time reading outside, when at the lake, just sitting on the porch etc. as well as while waiting places or killing time over a lunch break. Most of the time I don't want to lug my laptop around with me just to read a book or comic. Or in the case of the lake who wants to take the risk of their electronics getting trashed.
Sunday February 01, 2009 11:16am EST
Monday February 09, 2009 10:37pm EST