Dorothy Sayers wrote early in the era of detective fiction and helped to establish the borders of the genre. Her Lord Peter Wimsey stories follow, and help shape a classic cosy formula, an amateur detective who provides the continuity from book to book, a small enclosed community with lots of fascinating detail, and into that community the horrible disruption of murder, turning everyone into suspects. Sayers’s genius was to write a pile of stories on this model, all very neat with elegant solutions, and then to make her cardboard hero real and write a couple of real novels in the series with heart and depth. These last two, Gaudy Night and Busman’s Honeymoon, deserve to be read after the others to be truly appreciated.
I came to Sayers very late, about ten years ago. I read Agatha Christie and Josephine Tey’s cosies as a teenager, but I found the British Sayers covers that were then current quite repellent, and also in a kind of reverse snobbery felt I didn’t much care to read about a lord solving mysteries. This idiocy deprived me of some excellent books for a long time. I eventually decided to read them after being thoroughly spoiled for Gaudy Night by Connie Willis’s To Say Nothing of the Dog. The spoiler—and I suppose I can forgive Willis for spoiling a sixty year old classic—was enticing. I asked for reading order, and Pamela Dean gave me the very wise advice that the books start with Whose Body, but the best one to start with if I wanted to know whether I liked them was the entirely stand alone Nine Tailors.
In Nine Tailors, Lord Peter gets stranded in a little fenland village and helps the village to ring an all night peal of bells on New Year’s Eve. Months later—the events of the book cover a year—a body is discovered in a grave, and not the body that’s supposed to be there. Lord Peter is called back to investigate. The book takes in snow, floods, the drainage of the fens, bell ringing, a missing necklace, bigamy, murder, a village idiot, church architecture, and in the end a very neat solution to the mystery.
Mysteries are, like science fiction, very dependent on the tech level at which they are set. The techniques available for autopsies, the possibilities of blood typing, of DNA evidence, the whole paraphernalia of detection depends utterly on the technology of the time. Reading an old book like this makes one very aware of the limitations of the techniques of the period. Unlike science fiction, you know that at the end of a cosy mystery nothing will really change, everything will get put away in the box again safely.
The thing that I love about cosy mysteries in general is the way there is a small enclosed society that is disrupted by the murder and then restored to order by the solution. I’m also fascinated by the way that they’re about the intrusion of violent death into lives, yet everything always seems so nice. There are cups of tea and bottles of beer and anything and everything may be a clue, but there will be muffins later, brought by a servant who is delighted to serve you, but who may be the butler who Did It. There’s a strange tension there. (This fascination is, naturally, why I deliberately played with all this in my Small Change books.) Nine Tailors is a perfect example of a classic British cosy, with the change ringing and emerald necklace and servants everywhere. Beyond that it’s beautifully written and it has tremendous forces of nature: the great flood, and most of all the huge named bells: Tailor Paul, Batty Thomas, John, Jericho, Gaude, Saboath, Jubilee, Dimity.
It’s a great pleasure to re-read a book like this on a cold day, knowing everyone’s motivations and revisiting the familiar scenes of an orderly universe with just a little uncanniness creeping in at the edges.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 11:03am EST
One of my favorite stand-alones--for sheer goofiness--is Murder Must Advertise, but as Lord Peter is playing a role for most of the book, I'm not sure it's a great intro.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 11:13am EST
Friday December 12, 2008 11:18am EST
My God. That's Nine Tailors in a nutshell. I've always loved that book--I'll pick it up in a library or bookstore, just to reread the last few pages--but I've never quite figured out what was it that made that one so different from the rest of Sayers' mysteries. It is that "edge" of uncanniness, isn't it.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 11:21am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 11:49am EST
It occurs to me that reading Nine Tailors first as a youngish teenager may account for how right the power of bells in Garth Nix's Abhorsen books seems.
Friday December 12, 2008 12:05pm EST
Well, I told you I loved Nine Tailors . . . this is partly why.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 12:43pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 01:55pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 02:14pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 05:29pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday December 12, 2008 09:45pm EST
No idea which I read first; that was 40 years ago probably.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 12:10am EST
But when I forget what falling in love feels like, I go back and read Gaudy Night. I fall in love with Lord Peter every single time.
Saturday December 13, 2008 10:51am EST
In my humble opinion, The Nine Tailors is the finest detective novel written. The mood shifts from the comic, and yes the comforting (warm buttery muffins) to the sad and sinister as the past catches up with many of the characters. The solution is splendidly satisfying and running through it all is the almost mystical presence of the bells themselves.
Nine Tailors Make a Man
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 11:28am EST
On the other hand, I heard about this novel 25 years ago...since Isaac Asimov mentioned it in one of his essays on Mathematics (the actual essay was about factorials, as I remember). He used the ringing of the bells as a springboard to explain how factorials can be counted.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 02:43pm EST
mcmatz: one thing about Allingham which I don't think your description captures is her fascination with the weird (not the same as the sinister, which as Clovis is to be found in Sayers). A lot of her books are set in places or communities with something definitely odd about them. This sometimes brings her to the borders of SF and F: her late work The Mind Readers is science fiction, and Look to the Lady may be fantasy.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 05:00pm EST
The butler stole the emeralds in Nine Tailors; married the girl in To Say Nothing of the Dog; and did the murder in at least one Agatha Christie which time has graciously obscured. Oh, and in Gosford Park it wasn't the butler but the housekeeper...
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 05:12pm EST
Time seems to have graciously obscured the Christie from my mind as well. But perhaps she saw it as an amazing defiance of convention, on the same lines as Roger Ackroyd and The Orient Express.
(And my previous comment should of course have read 'as Clovis says'.)
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday December 13, 2008 11:14pm EST
In what sense is Gosford Park metafictional? Its not really a murder mystery in the traditional sense (or at least the cozy sense) since the perpetrator isn't apprehended by the authorities. Tonally its all over the map, but i think its my favorite Robert Altman movie ...
Sunday December 14, 2008 01:18am EST
Sayers is more difficult than Christie, given the wealth of references to literature and history, but ultimately more satisfying. Strangely enough, I've yet to find a copy of Nine Tailors. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday December 14, 2008 08:46am EST
Sayers is now out of copyright in some parts of the world, so her books are slowly becoming available as free ebooks.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday December 14, 2008 12:02pm EST
(There is a butler who is also a murderer in And Then There Were None. But this again is known almost from the beginning.)
(And I am now getting very off-topic.)
VIEW ALL BY · Monday December 15, 2008 12:57am EST
Nine Tailors seems to be the only Sayers mystery that Harper doesn't have the rights to reprint, which might explain why it's the only one present in some stores and the only one absent in others. It took me ages to find a copy.
I adore the entire series. The bits in French and Latin in Gaudy Night and Busman's Honeymoon gave me fits until I finally Googled for translations and tucked printouts into my paperbacks. I could work around the literary allusions and cricket descriptions, but French...!
VIEW ALL BY · Monday December 15, 2008 10:46pm EST
I have a friend who loves Ngaio Marsh and didn't like Sayers; I felt the same in reverse, so we each lent the other a selected few books. She had more success than I did, as I discovered I do like Marsh whereas my friend merely found that Sayers wasn't as bad as she thought.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday December 15, 2008 11:12pm EST
I came to Sayers through the Carmichael adaptations, too, but I have to say that I came to love the later Beeb series with Edward Petherbridge and Harriet Walter even more. Partly, I think it was because they were adapting the Peter and Harriet books, which we've all gone on about already in this thread. But I think it was also because the actors played the subtext of the characters more, the desperation that should lie under all that British alternation of babble and understatement if it's going to be dramatically compelling.
I also had a wicked crush on Harriet Walter as Harriet Vane, but I don't think that was too much of it . . .
On spoilers, try to find a mint edition of the 80s volume Murder Ink. Along with a fun bunch of short pieces about various aspects of the history of the detective story, at the back it had a sealed section that revealed the endings of ten canonical detective stories that were legendarily famous for their endings. This is before we used the term "spoiler," children, but we still could have used the alert and all.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday December 16, 2008 07:28am EST
I'm certainly going to attempt the others now, but I shan't be upset if it turns out I accidentally started at the apex of the series.
Tuesday December 16, 2008 08:17am EST
Wednesday December 17, 2008 07:52am EST
I don't enjoy most mysteries and need to be reading for something else in order to pick up a second mystery by a particular author. Picking up a first mystery usually happens when I'm stuck somewhere and have nothing else or otherwise desperate. I can usually read a few chapters before I give up.
I suspect that the question of which Sayers book is the right one for a person to start with depends on what they like in their books. I think I read a lot of the series to find out where Peter and Harriet came from.
I tried the Ian Carmichael adaptations but couldn't manage to watch them because, although his mannerisms and voice were right, he looked (to me) utterly wrong.
Wednesday December 17, 2008 12:33pm EST
Thursday December 18, 2008 10:47am EST
I like the advertising sections of _Murder Must Advertise_, but I think the plot is pretty bad and the other sections drag quite a bit (I do like the cricket part, even though I don't actually understand it). Incidentally, I once read a really bad translation of MMA into German, in which almost the only clever bit was having Wimsey called Tod (Tod=Death in German). Most of the other clever bits got left out, sad to say. There is another translation that I am told is much better, but I've never run across it.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday December 18, 2008 10:25pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday January 10, 2009 06:21am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday January 10, 2009 08:17am EST