Thu
Jan 27 2011 10:52am
SF Editors & Authors Discuss Future of Publishing

The future of books as envisioned by Star Trek V: The Final Frontier...

Here at Tor.com, we’re always interested in the future of publishing both in an irreverent sense (so by the time of Star Trek V, we take a huge step back?) as well as in a serious manner. Tor.com story readers themselves are never shy about wanting epub versions for their readers, and the very definition of science fiction involves a healthy dose of anticipating the future. Who better to talk about the future than those of us interested in SF&F, right? Recently SF Signal conducted interviews with numerous editors and experts from the field to share their thoughts on this ever-evolving topic.

Among those weighing in were Neil Clarke and Cheryl Morgan of Clarkesworld Magazine, Gordon Van Gelder of Fantasy & Science Fiction, author Nick Mamatas, author Lou Anders, and author Tim Pratt.

Cheryl Morgan thinks the changing forms of publishing may put fiction writers in danger of being able to make money purely from writing, a view largerly echoed by Tim Pratt.

Neil Clarke believes that despite massive changes like this, print books will still exist, while Nick Mamatas thinks the ratio will settle to about 60% of books in print, 40% solely eletronic.

Gordon Van Gelder says that it is far too early too tell, and that technology can rapidly change in ten years in ways no one can predict, while Lou Anders isn’t too concerned with the medium as long as books exist in some for or another.

The entire conversation from SF Signal can be found here. So what do you think? What wil be the dominant form of books in 10 years time? Direct download into our grey matter? What about pill form? A Kindle that comes as a contact lens?

9 comments
Nikki McCormack
1. Neyska
A Kindle contact lens. I can see the traffic problems that would cause. And we thought cell phones were bad. Try reading about Arya's hardships in A Storm of Swords without ramming the guy in front of you out of frustration.
Paul Eisenberg
2. HelmHammerhand
As long as they can be found for 25 cents at garage sales and library basement fundraisers, paper books will never go away. In fact, even if they are superceded by techology as the dominant form of literature purveyance, I forsee something akin to what's happened with vinyl records. Hipsters will start walking around with paperbacks in their pockets, looking down on the squares with their e-readers.
Bill Siegel
3. ubxs113
i'm less concerned about people using their Kindle contact lens while driving when they could be using the same tech to watch the last episode of jersey shore.
Roardawg
4. Roardawg
I believe that the paperback and hardcover books will always exist. I will not purchase a Nook or a Kindle. I stare at a computer screen for at least eight hours a day. The last thing that I want to do is sit down with another (fancy) computer screen and read. I enjoy reading books on paper and I enjoy cover art. However, plenty of people love the new technology and fully embrace it. A major contingent of those people will "illegally" download the books. It's bad for authors, bad for people's eyes and great for ebook creators. I love books that won't change and I don't think I'm alone. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that people absorb more information through a paperback when compared to the ebook readers as well. Ereaders are also selfish, because you can't see what others are reading.
Roardawg
5. Kvon
I've got books thirty years old I can still read. I can't say the same for my old video and audio cassettes, or the book I downloaded on my old PDA. Some people will choose convenience, some will choose longevity. Unfortunately I can see that affecting the price I'll pay in the future.
Roardawg
6. ScottC
I'm a tech-literate person. I build my own computers, and work with high end software that costs thousands of dollars. But I've decided that the day I can no longer purchase a physical book of something I want to read, to place on my shelf, for a reasonable price, is the day this world no longer has anything to offer me.

The place just keeps getting progressively more terrible in general, and our consumer culture in particular is constructed almost entirely of sewage...but I've always had books. Books were the one irreducible joy, the one endless resource of satisfaction which I could not possibly exhaust. How you could want to take the experience of reading a book, make it patently inferior, give it the fleeting longevity of an electronic file, and make it require batteries for pete's sake, is beyond me. It is the act of some new, base mentality I cannot possibly relate to.

So what will I do once the world no longer has anything to offer me, and I've become completely irrelevant? Probably what all such people do...spare a curse for world, and wander off into the desert or paddle my ice floe out to sea.

But I'm not going to buy your godforsaken e-books. I hemorrhage brain cells every time I even have to say the word "e-book", and I don't have many to spare (as you can see).

You kids get off My lawn!
walter tingle
7. wjtingle
Wow. That's a lot of absolutism above in the other comments. For me, I own (at least) 6 devices I can read ebooks on. I have access to at least two more. I don't think my current microwave oven can do it, but I've never read the owner's manual completely.

I read a mix of paper books, Kindle/mobi ebooks, ePub ebooks, and short fiction in a variety of formats, including paper. All things being equal, I prefer a Kindle ebook version priced a dollar or two cheaper than a MMPB. A dollar for the fact you didn't have to print it, ship it, stock it or pulp it, and another dollar for the fact I don't actually own it. That seems a fair price.

I wonder if books ran into the same complaints when codices came in, and codices with scrolls. "You kids get those damn scrolls off my lawn. You can come back when you have clay tablets like civilized folk." Wait! Was this the genesis of TPing lawns?

Regards,
Jack Tingle
Roardawg
8. Andra M.
As one who's been doing a fair amount of traveling of late and constantly chasing my 3-year-old boy, my Nook has come in quite handy. Plus the fact I've run out of book-shelf space.

That's not to say I've jumped head-first into the e-b00k pool never again to consider the paper kind. Quite the contrary. Overall I still buy more paperbacks than ebooks. It's the convenience and travelability of my Nook that I like most.

To answer Roardawg, the screens of ereaders are different from computer screens. For one, they're not back-lit, and there's no flicker that will strain the eyes. Plus the text size is adjustable. I can spend hours reading my Nook and my eyes don't complain in the slightest.

As long as people are reading, the format is of little concern or consequence.
Ian Gazzotti
9. Atrus
I don't think print (or even pen&paper) will ever truly disappear because it's basic, simple, durable technology. What I hope we'll have is a world where buying a printed copy also gives you free/easy access to a digital one: I definitely do not want to have to buy my books again just to read them on a new device.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment