Thu
Nov 18 2010 10:27am
The Ivory Tower meets Social Networking

Ivory Tower

When I was a young reader I didn’t know much about the authors I was reading, barring maybe a blurred photograph, or a polished paragraph of biography.

I was always curious about the way authors went about their arcane art. I wondered at the fact that they spent years toiling on each tome and the first I knew of them having finished their mighty work was when I walked into the local bookstore. I remember the feeling of delighted incredulity as I found one of my favourite authors had released their latest book, and would walk home clutching it to my chest, determined to crack the spine as soon as I got in the house.

I’m talking about being an avid reader before the rise of the Internet. A time when release schedules were not readily available. And a time when authors seemed to exist in little ivory towers of creativity, their work done behind a veil of secrecy. Sometimes we were invited to contact the author via their publisher or through an anonymous P.O. box by posting an actual letter, but this is all the contact we had.

And I found this somehow magical and exciting.

Times have changed.

These days I follow authors on Twitter; at times I make comments in reply to something they’ve said. Sometimes they reply! I see little snippets of information about their writing process. I know when they are suffering a lack of muse; I am delighted to see their progress towards the completion of a new book, which is sometimes detailed chapter by chapter. (Brent Weeks, I’m looking at you!) Occasionally they throw out pages and pages of completed manuscript because it is not working right and I despair that they will ever finish.

Alongside this, I read author pages on their websites where they answer all those familiar questions: how did you start writing? Where do you get your ideas? Will you please read my story?

I see release schedules on publisher websites, so that I know months in advance about when my favourite authors are releasing new books.

The interaction between author and reader is greater than ever—does this mean the magical secrecy, the untouchable nature of authors has vanished?

In my opinion, no. Well, sort of. The authors are touchable (if you’ll excuse the slightly ribald-sounding term!); there is little secrecy these days. But the magic is there in other ways. I love knowing that writers are interested in their readers; I love watching new authors court well-known bloggers; I enjoy the bantering and the information that authors now freely release. I find the release schedules and teaser reviews of new books impossibly exciting—although it does mean my to-read pile resembles a mountain to be climbed now that I have more knowledge about books coming out.

It amuses me that these days I am actually disappointed when an author doesn’t have a webpage and doesn’t make an effort to interact!

There is, of course, a flipside to all this interaction: some authors are finding themselves subject to vitriolic attack because they don’t spend their days writing to complete an expected book. When authors do suffer writer’s block their affliction is discussed via messageboard, sometimes in a callous manner. Readers now assume that writers are public property.

We also see occasions when authors hit back—when they decide to interact with their fans in a negative manner. Candace Sams learnt to her cost that sometimes authors should remain behind that veil of secrecy, especially now that such situations go viral and are re-tweeted with a vengeance!

Overall, though, I think I prefer these days to when I was younger. The fantasy and science fiction field is thriving at the moment, with new and exciting authors emerging all the time, and part of the enjoyment is the fact that these authors are prepared to talk to their readers.

What do you think—did you enjoy the “ivory tower” nature of writing and authors before the rise of the Internet? Or do you prefer the heightened interaction now?


Amanda Rutter contributes reviews and a regular World Wide Wednesday post to fantasyliterature.com, as well as reviews for her own site floortoceilingbooks.com (covering more genres than just speculative), Vector Reviews and Hub magazine.

16 comments
Christopher Palmer
1. Christopher Palmer
I learned this lesson, to some extent, back in the dawn on the Internet. Back in the old days, when the web was in its infancy, people still used gopher, and USENET was the primary "social network."

I'd just read a SF TV series tie-in novel (I won't reveal which one). Or, I'd tried to read it, but in the very first chapter it was talking about hot it was on a non-terraformed Mars. I posted on rec.arts.sf something to the effect of, "I couldn't make myself finish reading the book, no matter how good the plot or characters were, because the author must be a moron to publish a SF book when he obviously didn't know the first thing about science and was too lazy to do a little bit of research." I still agree with that sentiment, but at the time I hadn't realized the semi-anonymity aspect of the Internet and how it makes people be assholes by saying things in a public forum that they wouldn't say in person, particularly to the face of the person they were criticizing (note that way too many people on the net today haven't realized that).

The first person to respond to the comment was the author of the book, who made a sincere apology, but was a bit hurt that I attacked him with such vitriol over something he wrote quickly, on spec, as one of his first books, and (he claimed) he realized the error after the book went to the publishers, but no editors in between knew any better either.

That was years ago, but since then, I've tried to be a little more understanding about the fact that (a) authors are real people who, in many cases, don't really make that much money and, like all of us, are fallable, and (b) when you write something on the Internet in a public forum, there is a very good chance that the person you are writing about will read what you've written (particularly in the age of vanity Googling).

With Twitter, email, forums, and blogs, I have communicated directly with many of my favorite authors and sometimes carried on lengthy "sidebar" conversations via e-mail and chat. Everyone from low-volume SF authors to people who top the bestseller charts to famous scientists and researchers. I still feel a certain degree of awe around published writers and it makes my quite happy to get a personal response to a comment or e-mail.

Of course, going to SF conventions, particularly smaller regional cons, is a great way to meet and talk with authors in person. Unless the con is so big or the writer is so famous that they're whisked into panels by handlers and disappear afterwards.
Ashley McGee
2. AshleyMcGee
I used to want to climb right into that ivory tower and demand answers to the questions I had. I'm not a stalker, though, and maintained my distance nicely, content to watch skies for my favorite author's anticipated new arrival. Now that the Internet and my personal life has made that tower not so tall, I find that I miss it a little. When my authors sat in the tower, I had something to aspire to. "One day I'll be as great as Brian Lumley," "One day, I'll right a story like Neil Gaiman" (which to be perfectly honest, will never happen).

I jumped onto the Internet band wagon and started following Neil Gaiman on Twitter. I watched the Twitter board avidly each day, avoiding homework or waiting for my teachers to get to class (After all, Dan Simmons only writes one "Writing Well" a month and when its over its over). Then in March of 2010 I actually met both of my heroes and felt the invisible ivory tower come down around me.

I stopped following Twitter (though I still read Mr. Gaiman's blog), but I also stopped worrying about my aspirations. I'd met the men in real life, and now that I had set out to accomplish all that I wanted from my young adult life, I felt I had nothing left to do. But I was wrong. I do have something to do. I have to keep on reading and keep on writing. One day, they might read my story and like it, perhaps even comment on it. My next decade is now completely spoken for.
Christopher Palmer
3. kid_greg
@C. Palmer- I appreciate your comment. That's something I try to keep in mind as a reviewer, where as years ago, when I was younger and a more careless, I wouldn't have been as considerate.
Regardless how bad I think a book is, I try to respect the fact that this is someone's dream and they had the sand and did the hard-work to get published, where I've done little more then just daydream about being a writer.

In regards to the internet; all these authors' blogs and websites dedicated to sci-fi/fantasy is paradise to a book-worm old enough to know what it was like before the internet. It's always been my situation that only on a very rare-occassion I'll get to socialize with others who share a passion for fantasy/sci-fi books, ( or any other genre for that matter). So not only was it kinda lonesome, it was a real task to find books that I liked. Now, thanks to the internet, I have an ever growing TBR list and little cyper-cafes where I can always talk books.
Christopher Palmer
4. assassineric
Hmm.

A moderately different perspective on an interesting subject, but it's odd how similar some this post's phrasing and thought process is to another blog I read just a few days ago.
Christopher Palmer
5. Kev McVeigh
In 1983 the internet was a dream but I walked into a small SF bookshop in Manchester and met the late Bob Shaw signing The Ceres Solution. Through that I found the BSFA, conventions and fan meets. At my first convention, in Coventry I played pool with Kim Stanley Robinson, argued cyberpunk with David Brin, drank at the bar with Iain Banks, and met other authors including Lisa Tuttle & Gwyneth Jones. A few years later at an even smaller con in Derby Neil Gaiman played piano at 4am whilst Geoff Ryman and Mary Gentle were amongst those singing along. For those of us that were part of that generation this was nothing new, just as Arthur C Clarke attending The White Hart or Asimov and Pohl the Futurians was normal for their generation.

The internet generation of bloggers repeatedly demonstrate their naivety and ignorance of SF/F history by insisting that they invented the wheel. Sorry Amanda but you didn’t. You may tweet Mark Charan Newton (for example) but I got postcards from Bruce Sterling (for example). The internet makes a certain form of often shallow communication easier, but signings like that Bob Shaw event in an independent shop or the various ones in Lancaster which ended up with a group of us taking Terry Pratchett for a curry are rarer now with the rise of Internet bookshops. So you can facebook friend writers who are active in self-promotion but can you meet them any easier than I could 25 years ago? No.
Christopher Palmer
6. kid_greg
@Kev McVeigh-
I don't think anyone here is claiming to have invented anything but you then again, maybe I'm just another naive and ignorant blogger. I know I sure don't have the ability to name-drop like you have.
Christopher Palmer
7. N. Mamatas
Clive Barker once told me, "Don't be a namedropper."
Christopher Palmer
8. Christopher Palmer
Orson Scott Card told me the same thing, but via e-mail, so it doesn't count :-)
Mieneke van der Salm
9. Mieneke
I see what you mean Amanda. When I was a kid (and we're much of an age, that would have been at the same time :)) it really was exciting to see that NEW book on the bookstore's shelves :D

And while it may have been possible to meet authors at signings and at cons in the past, I'm from the Netherlands. Most SFF authors I love, do not come to my country for signings and I think there are only two SFF cons and they don't feature that many authors. And unfortunately I don't make that much money that I can easily travel to cons in the UK or the US. So for me Twitter, Facebook and the internet is as close as I'll ever come to meeting and interacting with my favourite authors.
Yes some of the mystique may have disappeared, but in exchange watching the process from a little closer up has a magic all of its own.
Christopher Palmer
10. Adam Christopher
Hmm. I think there is a difference between getting a postcard from Bruce Sterling and jumping on Twitter to ask a favourite author a question (or better yet, having one engage you out of the blue online). They are different things entirely. Nobody is trying to compete with anything here. Curry with Terry Pratchett? Cool! But thanks to conversations on Twitter I've then gone and met some of my favourite authors in person and gone for a meal!

Anyway, going back to the original post - I think interaction is good. Like Amanda, when I discover someone hasn't got some kind of internet presence (and I mean an active one, not just a website) I kinda half-think they're not trying hard enough!

However, it has a down side for writers. A big agent said earlier this year that he had noticed 40% of his writers were late with manuscripts this year, and it was all down to Twitter! I think this might be quite true - I had a deadline to meet and turned Twitter off for a few days last week, and suddenly I had an awful lot of time for work!
Federico Bianco
11. talen
@Kev McVeigh: I have come back home (Italy) just yesterday from Paris, France, where I'd gone specifically for a signing with Brandon Sanderson. He was so great that he invited me and other 4 fans to join him for dinner after the signing.
I'm citing this not for "name dropping", but only because without internet and twitter I:
a) would almost have not known who Mr. Sanderson was;
b) would never have known he was planning a signing at *only* one thousand kms from my town
Not everybody can be born in a culturally rich area like you did; there's literally not one convention Italy-based that I know which will facilitate me knowing any world-wide famous author. So ... yes, I agree with Amanda: the internets *has* changed something in the world, maybe not so much in *your* already happy and author-filled one ;)
Christopher Palmer
12. Innbranna
@talen: Ooh! I was there too! *waves in the crowd*
To be fair I discovered the event purely by chance and in the old fashioned way, by seeing an actual poster in the actual shop which I happened to visit a few days before. But I would certainly not have known who Brandon Sanderson was if not for the internet.
Christopher Palmer
13. kev mcveigh
@kid_greg (and others) The names I 'dropped' were chosen to prove that it has always been possible to meet authors and socialise with them, many came through the fan communities and remain part of fandom, others less so. The basic tenet of Amanda's post was 'this didn't happen before the internet, it does now.' and that is tantamount to claiming to have invented the reader-author links we all enjoy. I don't mean to belittle your enjoyment of such contact by pointing out that it is neither new nor exclusive to the internet, rather to enhance it by bringing the wider historical perspective to view.
@adamchristopher There are differences between a tweet and a postcard (even if both were out of the blue.) You could argue that writing a card, buying stamps and walking to a mailbox is more involvement than a simple tweet, but conversely the speed of e-communication allows potentially deeper communication. The principle that you can and could communicate somehow with authors then as now remains the same however.
@talen Last year's Eurocon was in Italy with GoH Brian Stableford.
http://www.esfs.info/esfs-eurocons.html
That you didn't know about it does not mean it didn't happen. Whether that is your fault for not looking in the right places or the organisers for not promoting in the right places who can say.
josh BERNHARDT
14. larkask
my problem is that i find myself spending more time in authers blogs etc then actualy reading their books!
Cathy Mullican
15. nolly
There are definitely authors I won't pick up due to negative interactions, online or off. One in particular writes hard SF about the future of technology, yet posted a rant a while back demonstrating he didn't understand current tech. Why should I care about how he sees the future? The same misunderstanding from a fantasy author doesn't bother me, though.

I found myself uninterested in reading some of the newer books by an author I liked, after a negative experience with her blog, but I got an ARC of her newest through LibraryThing and quite enjoyed it (except I wish I'd known it wasn't a stand-alone when I started it, and that the second one were coming sooner). So I'll probably read the ones I haven't gotten to yet, and just avoid her online presence.

As for impact of the internet, it's hard for me to seperate the impact of the rise of the internet with the impact of moving from the rural south to urban SoCal. There, I had limited bookstore access, wasn't aware of any cons, and probably couldn't have gotten to any if I did know about them, since I was too young to drive. The first author I met was Orson Scott Card, who spoke at my high school graduation -- but that was in a city, not the small town where I grew up.

I now count several authors as friends, and the internet makes it easier to keep up with my author friends, just like all my other friends. Knowing about new releases is a mixed bag; I end up with a big to-read backlog. :) Having a wonderful local genre bookstore (Mysterious Galaxy) also means that I sometimes buy books sooner than I would otherwise, so that I have them for a signing, especially if it's a ticketed one. And then there are the books that wouldn't have crossed my radar, except the author is speaking and signing alongside someone I do know and follow, and the book sounds interesting. And the ones someone handsells me...
Christopher Palmer
16. kid_greg
@Kev McVeigh-
I'm sure there have always been fan communities and some authors who were available to socialize with. But you have to admit, its been no where near the same level that its been since the internet and the social network, blogs etc.
For one thing, in order for someone to interact with sci-fi/fantasy authors like you did, first means to even get to these conventions or whatever, are required. Some kid that grew-up in the West "by God" Virginia, like I did, was almost completely out-of-luck. Many times, fans of the genre in that situation were very fortunate to have any friends in the local area to talk books with at all.

I imagine any kind of sci-fi/ fantasy fan club before the internet consisted of small membership fee that intitled one to a regular newsletter that came by mail Now, its as simple as entering an email address. So when you look at it from that perspective, the internet is revelotunary to the genre.

For my own case, as few as 5 years ago it was difficult to even find fantasy books that I even liked. But with regularly updates posted by authors, publishing companies, booksellers, and fan websites, its become a whole new experiance. Now, my TBR list is so long that I may never get to them all. And I’ve been fortunate enough to become a reviewer on one of these website. I now get ARCs on a regular basis and even the occasional interaction with authors (plus the even more rare blurb on a book cover). That would have never came about for me, without the ability to post personal reviews on Amazon.com.
So, again from that perspective, the internet has opened up a whole new world for genre fiction, just like it has for countless other things.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment