Wed
Jun 9 2010 3:52pm
Splice: The best (and only?) quirky, cross-genre horror flick this year

I took a friend to see Splice on opening night, at the Court Street Theater in Brooklyn, where crowds regularly hoot, holler, and shout “Oh no he didn’t!” In short, the perfect venue for a science fiction-horror-sub nuclear family satire-hybrid. Nobody in those stadium seats knew what had hit them.

“You’re kidding!” I shouted toward the end, furious at the director for going there, and also stunned, that a guy who could write such whip-sharp dialogue would take his characters the direction he chose. It’s a dark, godless, place. But maybe that’s what they deserve.

Splice concerns a high power hipster couple, Elsa and Clive (Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley), who’ve got a bad case of arrested development. They make the cover of Wired Magazine when they splice together a new species that looks sort of like a huge, skin-covered Tribble. Only these Tribbles, a mated pair just like our own Clive and Elsa (the symbolism!), produce disease-curing proteins which The Company, NERD, hopes to patent and mass-produce for profit. Our lovely Clive and Elsa have no moral quandaries with cloning; it’s fun, and their salaries pay for lots of cool things, like rent, ridiculous plaid suits, a bright red tie donned by Elsa, and a crazy-ass clown car that in hipster land, is so bad it’s good. They’re pissed, however, that NERD won’t green light their next project, the creation of a similar species, using human DNA for the first time.

Elsa, the relentless, ball-busting Frankenstein of the duo, convinces Clive to help her splice and incubate human hybrid despite direct orders from the boss—a skinny foreign woman who sounds kind of like Boris’ Natasha. Elsa and Clive plan to abort the new species before it’s born (who needs moral dilemmas?), but their plans go awry. Dren (nerd backwards; also children) is born.

Though Elsa has long refused to get pregnant, her maternal lady parts quickly squirt her full of crazy, and she’s suddenly in love with the cute little thing, which is unnerving, since, once again, she’s got no remorse for having created it. Dren is aging at an accelerated rate, and will live her short, possibly painful life in captivity, as a secret. Much like the other Frankenstein’s monster, it’s got no love to call its own.

By now, Clive’s reservations surface, and we learn he’s not the total jerk that Elsa has proven to be. But, like his brother observes, he can’t say no to his girl. Even if his girl is really mean, and looks like she might shotput him down the halls of NERD the second he voices his own opinion. Props to director Vincenzo Natali for making the dynamics between these two believable, and wincingly painful.

Onward. Clive and Elsa hide Dren in the basement. They give her a little girl’s dress to wear, and as she grows, she appears increasingly human, only smarter, stronger, and less predictable. She has a poison-spewing stinger for a tail, after all. When Dren gets sick, Clive shoves her under a tub of water. It’s unclear whether he’s trying to put the monster out of her misery (and rescue Elsa from la-la, pretend mommy-land), or he knows that Dren actually has gills, and needs to submerge in order to survive. He swears by the latter, but I vote the former.

Onward into really creepy land. The couple’s relationship degenerates. They move Dren to Elsa’s deceased mother’s farm, and lock her in the barn, where she’s free to swim, wear dresses, and sleep by herself in a dirty pile of hay. Sounds about right, once we see that Elsa’s mom was a genuine nut job, and Elsa’s old bedroom contains a dirty old bucket and a mattress full of holes. At this point, I’m wondering about the time Clive and Elsa had unprotected sex, and hoping it was unproductive. Elsa as a human mom is terrifying. I realize that this movie suddenly got really scary, and not for the reasons I expected. Very cool.

Meanwhile, Dren is reaching sexual maturity. She’s gorgeous, in a kangaroo kind of way, and falling in love with Clive, who has come to love her back, like a daughter. This sits badly with mean Elsa, who takes away Dren’s pet cat, and ultimately, does much worse. Things really degenerate. The sub-nuclear family explodes in a wincing, grit-your-teeth, can’t help but shout, “Oh no you didn’t!” kind of way.

****SPOILER WARNING: The next section is a summary of the ending, and some notes on what it meant to me****

Highlight the text to read.

****A quick summary:

We learn that Dren’s human DNA comes from Elsa, which is why Clive is starting to have funny feelings for his would-be daughter… The female Tribble turns male, and attacks its male mate, which bodes badly for Dren’s future development. Dren kills her pet cat, so Elsa castrates Dren by cutting off her stinger. She’s good at castration, which isn’t surprising. Using Dren’s live tissue, Elsa solves the mystery of the secret protein for NERD, proving that she’s a better scientist than hubby.

Meanwhile, while Elsa’s at work, Dren and Clive have sex. Somehow, Dren knows exactly what to do, and has none of those pesky virgin problems—probably her rabbit DNA, going manifest. What’s nuts about this scene is that it’s shocking, but seems right in the context of Elsa and Clive’s world. As he later says in his own defense, “we changed the rules.” The audience is willing to forgive him. Anything to punish ball-busting, bad mother Elsa.

In the end, Dren morphs into a male, and goes bananas. (S)he attacks and kills some people, including Clive, and rapes Elsa. Elsa, the only survivor, turns up eight months later, pregnant, and agreeing to work for NERD to help them produce and patent all the human super genes from Dren’s samples that they’re able. Pregnant Elsa (Clive’s baby? Dren’s?) stands at the window, overlooking the anonymous city. The head of NERD, another bossy lady, joins her. They nearly embrace. Two ladies and a clone, about to change the world.

All this is cool, but makes me a little sad. Is the real fear here of powerful women, who are turning into men? Who’ve lost their maternal instincts, compete in the corporate world, and win? Who’ve even gone so far as to reproduce without getting married, or finding a mate? People! Really. Trust me. A matriarchy wouldn’t be that bad.

****END OF SPOILERS****

Much of Splice is sharp, and fun, and begs questions not often asked in the human cloning debate. It gets relationships down right, and gives Polley and Brody some beautiful lines. Both glow. They’re real and flawed and sympathetic in ways that most Hollywood films would never allow.

The resolution frustrated me—it shows a real fear of women in power that hearkens back to Cronenberg’s The Brood, and more recently, LaBute’s remake of The Wicker Man. It’s as if, in denying a biological child early in the film, and dominating her partnership with Clive, Elsa has transgressed. She gets punished for that, and because she stinks, I want her to get punished. So I’m not sure why I’m left, at the end, feeling so very shat upon. Maybe because I want more characters like Elsa in films, only I want them to be less mean, and more cool. I want them to represent.

Anyway, kudos to Hollywood for releasing an intelligent, ambitious film like Splice. Wish they’d done more for the director’s predecessor, Cypher (2002). Lucy Liu, doesn’t Hollywood understand we need femme fatales? They’ve got to represent, against the Frankensteins.


Sarah Langan is a Brooklynite, author (The Keeper, The Missing, Audrey’s Door, all currently available from HarperCollins), and curmudgeon in training. She can be found online at www.sarahlangan.com and @sarahvclangan on Twitter.

19 comments
Alison Sinclair
1. alixsin
I've been looking forward to it since I heard about it - it's been getting exposure in the mainstream press up here in Canada. I suspect I'll have the same reaction as you do, being a woman in science with an interest in the portrayal of women scientists.

Have you run across Women scientists in fifties science fiction films by Bonnie Noonan. She looks at the 50s monster movies as expressions of cultural anxiety about woman's role and women taking in into their hands tools of power (ie, science). Which might sound dry, but is not; she describes the films in loving detail and is clearly having great fun.
Alex Brown
2. Milo1313
It's strange to me to think of Sarah Polley in a non-Avonlea way. And, given your review/spoilers, this film is absolutely NOTHING like the trailers.
samuli
3. kalma
I've seen some stills from this movie, and they look absolutely amazing!

I'm just worried its your average run-of-the-mill cheesy horror movie where everything's based on gore. I mean, don't get me wrong, I like violent movies, but nowadays it just seems like the focal point is to get to show as much blood and entrails on screen as possible, with no regards to the actual story or plot
Sam Mickel
4. Samadai
Brilliant geneticist creates monster by combining Human and Animal dna. Can we say Trolloc
Garett Harnish
5. garett
I really enjoyed this movie when I saw it last night and I was surprised to realize this was the same writer/director who did Cube (another amazing movie I'd recommend btw). In the end, both of these films come down to the characters; the sci-fi elements are secondary. The horror elements in Splice would have worked just as well if the sci-fi elements were removed, which to me is a good thing. As you said in your review above, "Elsa as a human mom is terrifying." It's the humans in the story that are truly frightening; it is the human element of Dren that make her scary (and sympathetic).

Anyway, kudos to Hollywood for releasing an intelligent, ambitious film like Splice.


I think this had more to do with Joe Silver/Dark Castle than Hollywood (or Warner Bros. specifically). And I like how you limited it to releasing; they definitely didn't help it along with funding. They just waited for it amazing run at Sundance and sniped it.

In an interview with Entertainment Weekly Natali talks about how the sexual component of the film caused him a lot of trouble finding funding for the film, in particular a scene in the spoiler section above. "That scene was the reason I wanted to make the film," he said, "And that’s why it's such a miracle this film exists. No studio wanted to make it, because of sexual part of the story. So we had to go to France. And the French, of course, had no problem with it."

It had to raise it's $26 million budget the hard way. According to the wikipedia article, 75% of that funding came from Canada, the other 25% from France. Giving Hollywood any credit other than realizing it was an amazing film and promoting it is probably undeserved.
N. Mamatas
6. N. Mamatas
kalma @3: Though the trailer makes it look like a creature feature, really almost all the monsterish-violence is in the trailer (except for the spoilered material in Sarah's review). It's not the usual run-of-the-mill nine-people-enter-one-leaves sort of horror movie.
Brian Kaul
7. bkaul
Sounds much more interesting than the Species knock-off that the trailer made it out to be...
N. Mamatas
8. S.S. White
You know, rightly or wrongly, I interpreted that ending from an Octavia Butler angle. Dren is to Clive and Elsa as the ooloi were to the males and females of whatever species they interacted with. Of course, I'm not saying I'm right, but that's the first thing I thought of when I saw the ending of the movie. :)
David Bilek
9. dtbilek
I thought the last act (not the post-script with Elsa... before that) was a terrible error on the part of the writer. Yes, the development was telegraphed earlier in the film, but that doesn't make it better. What had been an interesting and disturbing character study turned into your typical B-grade monster flick. Dumb.

That doesn't mean the movie wasn't worthwhile. But it makes it, in my opinion, a much lesser film than it might have been. A cheap, tawdry way to wrap things up.
Madeline Ferwerda
10. MadelineF
Catheryne Valente thought the movie was badly done/boring and she was not at all OK with the rape at the end. She has a great critiquerant here: http://yuki-onna.livejournal.com/586183.html
Ian Gazzotti
11. Atrus
It's interesting how this review by Cat Valente reads the movie in a totally different way
N. Mamatas
13. JoeNotCharles
Is the biology in this movie even remotely plausible?

Much as I love Sarah Polley, I was going to pass on it after I found out that the little girl had a stinger, because if you were going to make the first human-something hybrid ever, WHY would you give it a poison stinger?

If it's set up in a way to make me believe that these people are actually researchers and not just a set up for a monster story, maybe I'll consider watching it.
N. Mamatas
14. JoeNotCharles
I don't even mean, "Does the biology make physical sense," I mean does it make narrative sense? From the Cat Valente review it sounds like it emphaically does not.
N. Mamatas
15. N. Mamatas
@13 The characters don't give the hybrid a stinger; they were as surprised as anyone else. Pseudogenes from junk DNA are blamed/credited for a lot of Dren's appearance and attributes within the film—it made sufficient narrative sense to me.
N. Mamatas
16. Scott, too
Aye, what N. said. This was an unpredictable soup that was never meant to be brought to term.

Also, the matriarchy element seems one part "open-endedness" or sequel necessity and one part Rosemary's Baby. I also think Natali had more narrative interests in mind with the ending, rather than symbolic ones. The ominous tone was sci-fi 101, really, and the fact that we're dealing with two women here probably felt more interesting to him in a mother/daughter parallel, personal exploratory and atypical trope sense. He definitely embraced a strong hormonal theme with the story, and let's face it, leaving Clive to cover that would have forced the film into something like Porky's meets Alien. ;)

Great review, and great stuff all around. And whether this makes me a creep or not, I don't care: Dren–Billy Corganisms notwithstanding–was sexy.
Sarah Langan
17. sarahlangan
The Noonan book sounds great. I'm a Mulvey/Studlar fan (or at least I was, in college).

Milo: I haven't seen the trailers, but directors don't have much control over publicity.

Garett: Hollywood releases so little that's actually got real worth, that I want to recognize when the stars align. But yeah, I agree.

Re: Valente's review: "Splice" is easily offensive. I was offended. But that doesn't necessarily make it bad. If it was stupid and offensive, sure. But it's not stupid, and, for me, it was far from boring.

The biology read to me like a MacGuffin.
N. Mamatas
18. Roxann33
I don't think this is a warning against matriarchy. Instead, I see the end as a criticism of the rejection of "female" attributes in order for women to survive in a patriarchal society.
Granted, I didn't see the movie and am basing this only on the summary.
N. Mamatas
19. airplane
What does Dren use to get Elsa pregnant? his stinger right?
N. Mamatas
20. drenchild
*spoilers****

Well when I saw the ending I thought, Elsa is pregnant with Dren's child. But then when the woman asked her if she wanted to go through with it she said 'whats the worst that could happen?' this is exactly what elsa said when her and clive were about to have unprotected sex. So was she making an inside joke to herself - that maybe she knows dren couldn't reproduce and her baby is clives, only she's scamming the corp for money? They surely can't do any 'tests' in case it puts the pregnancy at risk. If the baby looks like a normal baby... they still won't know for sure until it grows. Also Dren was early, elsa looks like she is full term... but this is not explained either.
Plus elsa's smile at the end is weird - she's either reminiscing about her dead husband or she's got some sneaky plan.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment