DCSIMG
Tor Forge

Science fiction. Fantasy. The universe. And related subjects.

Latest Posts

› archive

Latest Comments

› show all

Hot Bookmarks


Blog Archive


posted Wednesday January 13, 2010 03:37pm EST

Moffat's Women #1: Nancy

Teresa Jusino

On the BBC America website’s Doctor Who page, the description of Karen Gillan, the actress who will be playing 5th series companion, Amy Pond, contains this quote from Who’s new showrunner, Steven Moffat:

We saw some amazing actresses for this part, but when Karen came through the door the game was up. [She’s] funny and clever and gorgeous and sexy. Or Scottish, which is the quick way of saying it. A generation of little girls will want to be her. And a generation of little boys will want them to be her too.

OK...well, I’m glad he has so much faith in his new leading lady, and I’m very much looking forward to seeing her. At the same time, when I first read that quote, something hit me the wrong way. Funny. OK, great! Clever. Awesome! We like clever! Gorgeous. Well, duh. Just look at her. And sexy. Um, OK, I get it. She’s hot. And then he throws in the bit about how all little boys will want all little girls to be her, and that’s when my panties started to bunch. Will those little boys want little girls to be her because she’s funny....clever....or gorgeous and sexy? I mean, hopefully all four of those things (which are really three), right? Right? *sigh* I decided not to be such a whiny girl about it, unbunched my panties, and thought nothing more of it. Surely, I was overreacting. I mean, they’re not trying to market this new series of Doctor Who the way SyFy is marketing Caprica, right? Then I started seeing the tribute videos on YouTube with the hot photos and all the *drools* and the “I'd bone her”s and the “She's totally hot”s, and I thought Oh my God, this really IS all anyone cares about, isn’t it?

But then I decided to breathe. After all, it’s the writing of the show that will determine whether or not Amy Pond is a fully realized character or a pin-up that gets lines, and on that score, I have oodles of faith in Moffat. After all, he’s responsible for not only some of the best Doctor Who episodes (“Blink” and “The Girl in the Fireplace,” for starters), but for some of the most interesting, complex, and powerful female characters on the show. And so, to remind myself, and the world, of this, I’ve decided to spotlight Moffat’s Women! Because, well...what the hell ELSE are we supposed to do until the spring?

Allons-y! (*sniff*)

NANCY

In the 2005 Series 1 episodes  “The Empty Child” and “The Doctor Dances” (a two-episode story), the character of Nancy could have easily been a caricature in the wrong hands. In it, The Doctor and Rose end up in London during The Blitz, having chased a mysterious cylinder through space. They end up coming across a little boy in a gas mask (the titular Empty Child, whose name is Jamie), who keeps asking for his mother. Meanwhile, there seems to be an epidemic of people in gas masks who have lost themselves, everything in their heads wiped clean and replaced with a single question, “Are you my Mummy?” The Doctor and Rose, together with Captain Jack Harkness (making his first appearance in this episode!) attempt to piece together the mystery of the strange malady and figure out what connection it has to the fallen cylinder. And then there’s Nancy, a London girl who is the leader of a band of homeless children, all orphaned or having escaped evacuation. She, too, is connected to Jamie, who seems to be following her and the children, and whose touch causes the strange illness.

Nancy is brave and resourceful, providing for her makeshift family by going out to scavenge for food in people’s homes during air raids, when all of London’s citizens are in their bomb shelters. When The Doctor’s TARDIS phone rings despite it not working, Nancy happens to be passing by and warns him not to answer it. When he surprises her and the children by turning up at dinner, despite the precariousness of her situation, she remains collected, addressing The Doctor’s questions, being firm with him when asking him to leave, and coolly ushering the children out of the house when Jamie finds them yet again. Despite her own fear, which is clear all over her face when she is alone with Jamie, she never lets it show in front of the children, for whom she has to set a calm example. Instead, she tries to instill civility into them, despite their “living rough” during wartime, by reminding them to do things like “chew [their] food.”

It is clear from what we see of her in “The Empty Child” that Nancy is symbolic of England during WWII: persevering, remaining civilized, keeping a stiff upper lip, and fighting back when necessary. Or, as The Doctor puts it:

Nothing can stop [the German war machine]. Nothing. Until one tiny, damp little island says “No!” No, not here! A mouse in front of a lion. You’re amazing, the lot of you. Don’t know what you do to Hitler, but you frighten the hell out of me. Off you go, then. Do what you’ve got to do. Save the world.

We see more of what keeps Nancy from deteriorating into Clichéville in “The Doctor Dances.” She is caught stealing food red-handed by the family’s patriarch, who’s called the police and reprimands her saying that “the sweat of his brow” put that food on his table. Instead of becoming flustered, or resorting to feminine wiles or crying to get out of her situation, she reveals that she’d been casing the house and watching him for weeks, and suggests that if the gentleman doesn’t provide her with everything she asks for, she will correct the neighbors’ assumption that he has so much food because his wife is sleeping with the butcher by informing them that it’s not the wife that’s doing the butcher-shagging. When he looks at her, clearly defeated, she delivers one of the best lines of the episode: “Ah. There’s the sweat of your brow.”

Her wit is something else that sets her apart and makes her memorable. In a scene where The Doctor has followed her, they have this fun exchange:

Nancy: How did you follow me here?
The Doctor: Good at following, me. Got the nose for it.
Nancy: People can’t usually follow me if I don’t want them to.
The Doctor: My nose has special powers.
Nancy: Really? Is that why it’s so...
The Doctor: What?
Nancy: Nothing.
The Doctor: What?
Nancy: Nothing.
[pauses]
Nancy: Do your ears have special powers, too?

When she’s captured by the military, and handcuffed in the same room with an infected soldier, she demands to be set free, trying to tell the soldier while he still has a mind that “It’s too late for [him], but not for [her].” When he finally transforms completely, becoming another Empty Child, she buys herself time and keeps safe by singing the “child” to sleep with a lullaby. What’s interesting about Nancy, too, is that later, she’s smart enough to believe Rose when she tells her that she and The Doctor are time travelers, but she’s so jaded by the war that she doesn’t believe they’re from The Future, because she doesn’t believe there’ll be one.

And lastly, there’s the heartbreaking reveal at the end of the episode that she isn’t Jamie’s sister, as she’s insisted throughout the entire story, but his mother. Pregnant as a single teenager in 1941, she hid, and when the child was born, she lied to him to protect them both by telling him he was her brother. And so we realize that all this time, as painful as we've thought it was that she has to run from her empty shell of a brother, she is actually running from the empty shell of her son. And how much more of a burden is that to bear? In the end, the survival of humankind as they know it is on her shoulders, and she bravely, without knowing what the consequences will be, steps forward to face Jamie and answer his question. I am your Mummy. I will always be your Mummy.

These episodes were blessed to have a finely-etched performance from Florence Hoath in the role. However, it was Steven Moffat’s writing and the very specific way in which he took great care to give her a personality that make Nancy the successful character she is.  These two brilliant episodes of Doctor Who demonstrate that even supporting female guest roles can have the emotional weight and depth of a male lead.


Teresa Jusino was born on the same day that Skylab fell. Coincidence? She doesn’t think so. She is the NY Geek Culture Examiner at Examiner.com, and she’s also a contributor to PinkRaygun.com, a webzine examining geekery from a feminine perspective. Her work has also been seen on PopMatters.com, on the sadly-defunct literary site CentralBooking.com, edited by Kevin Smokler, and in the Elmont Life community newspaper. She is currently writing a web series for Pareidolia Films called The Pack, which is set to debut Summer 2010! Get Twitterpated with Teresa, Follow The Pack or visit her at The Teresa Jusino Experience.

ReddIt Stumble Upon del.icio.us Digg It Send via Mail
BOOKMARK
PRINT

categories: Social Issues, TV, ...and Related Subjects
tags: Doctor Who, sci-fi, Karen Gillan, steven moffat, Florence Hoath, women

12 comments
Mike Conley
1.  NomadUK
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 13, 2010 04:39pm EST
At this point, I think it's going to be Steven Moffatt that either saves or sinks Doctor Who for me.

I hadn't seen the BBC interview or the YouTube stuff you mentioned, but none of it surprises me. Doctors keep getting younger and younger, companions -- well, they've generally been on the young and curvy side. (Not that I have anything against youth and curves, mind you, but it does get pretty obvious sometimes.)

I wouldn't mind seeing Michael Gambon as the Doctor, and Joanna Lumley as his companion. Think that'd ever fly? Nah, didn't think so.
Gary Schaper
2.  Garyfury
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 13, 2010 04:52pm EST
I would observe that there are, relatively speaking, few YouTube videos created to celebrate deep and well-defined characterization.

Good post, and I look forward to the others.
Teresa Jusino
3.  TeresaJusino
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday January 13, 2010 06:52pm EST
@NomadUK - Actually, I don't mind the Doctors getting a BIT younger from where they started. Honestly I was surprised that William Hartnell didn't fall apart after every adventure! I think a good Doctor should be in his 40s or 50s, personally. But we'll see how this young whipper-snapper does in Series Five! :) (He's only about 3 years younger than me! I should shut up!)

As for companions, I don't mind when they're young and curvy, so long as that's not ALL they are and ALL people are interested in. I feel the same way about women, and being a woman, in general. But this is why Donna Noble will always be my favorite of the new companions (though I related to Martha WAY too much). Because she's sharp and funny, has no interest whatsoever in the Doctor romantically, doesn't take his crap, and she's a little older than the others. I love that they stuck with her as long as they did.

Though I, too, would LOVE to see the Gambon/Lumley match-up you mention! That would be AMAZING! :)

@Garyfury - oh, totally! I mean, I've sat and watched many a video devoted to David Tennant's...assets, and was not at all heartbroken that there was no mention of what a talented actor he is. :) I only mention the videos as a sign that the marketing/PR departments who sell their shows with girls showing skin or being hot are right, and that's not terribly cool.
John Elliott
4.  John Elliott
Thursday January 14, 2010 08:49am EST
William Hartnell was in his fifties, as it happens :-)

Of course, Joanna Lumley has played the Doctor. It would be interesting to see more of her in the role.
Mike Conley
5.  NomadUK
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 14, 2010 09:37am EST
I hadn't been aware of the Comic Relief outing, but I am, of course, always in favour of seeing more of Joanna Lumley....
John Elliott
6.  XtremeCaffeine
Thursday January 14, 2010 12:13pm EST
On the young/curvy companion front, I was quite disappointed that Wilf wasn't kept on as The Doctor's assistant...
Teresa Jusino
7.  TeresaJusino
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday January 14, 2010 04:30pm EST
@John Elliott - You LIE! William Hartnell was only in his 50s?! I'm sorry, but he looked like he was falling apart!

And Joanna Lumley played The Doctor?! Where?? When?? I must look it up!

@XtremeCaffeine - I had that same thought! Wilf and the Doctor traveling together would've been awesome.

I have to say, I really like the dynamic of the Doctor and TWO companions, a female, and a male. Like Barbara and Ian. Right now, there's an IDW Doctor Who comic I really like, and the Tenth Doctor is now traveling with an actress and a guy who's an AD from 1920s Hollywood...
John Elliott
8.  XtremeCaffeine
Thursday January 14, 2010 04:47pm EST
It was a Comic Relief moment... Around the time of the Who movie?

I believe this is the skit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do-wDPoC6GM



No Who villain will be quite as deadly as Bertie Bassett.
John Elliott
9.  John Elliott
Thursday January 14, 2010 05:35pm EST
@TeresaJusino: William Hartnell was born in 1908, making him 55 at the time of the first episode. So say all the sources.
John Elliott
10.  a-j
Friday January 15, 2010 09:45am EST
William Hartnell wore a wig and played the character as older than himself. In later stories ill-health made him more erratic and finally led to him being replaced. Check him out in 'Carry On Sargeant' (the first Carry On film) and 'Hell Drivers' (1957) which is worth watching if only because it also features James Bond (Sean Connery), Number 6 (Patrick McGoohan) and Illya Kuryakin (David McCallum). In fact, if you're British you'll recognise just about every cast member (Gordon Jackson, Herbert Lom, Sidney James and others too numerous to mention).

Drifting back onto subject, I would also draw peoples' attention to Steven Moffat's BBC series 'Jekyll' which has a plethora of strong female characters and I suspect might give us a preview of what his take on Dr Who might be like.
John Elliott
11.  Sihaya
Tuesday April 13, 2010 03:13pm EDT
Re: Karen Gillan - Oh dear. Well, there's always the fear that there will be a Doctor Who episode entitled "Inferno." Actually, that would be funny. I think Moffat does write some sexy characters, but I think that those characters feel the burden, benefits, and craziness that goes with being "sexy." If you look at Coupling, one woman was a beautician who was obsessed with her skin and sure that she was dying of old age in her thirties, another was a nut-job who was trying to shock and please everyone at the same time in order to get some sort of approval, and the third was was trying to maintain some facade of normalcy and control even though she was as confused and insecure as everyone else around her. She knew she was gorgeous, she knew she'd *better* be smart, and she knew that her past life and past friends would haunt her future life. Each of these characters had 'sexy' turns on the show, but those turns had alot to do with how they saw themselves or how others saw them.

I love Moffat's work on Doctor Who. I think his characters are more obviously human (even the Doctor is less bombastic and more relatable when put in his hands), and I think his plots end logically without being too predictable.
Ursula L
12.  Ursula
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday April 18, 2010 04:54pm EDT
Pregnant as a single teenager in 1941, she hid, and when the child was born, she lied to him to protect them both by telling him he was her brother.

A point on this. Nancy wasn't pregnant in 1941, that's when the episode takes place. Given Jamie's apparent age, she was probably pregnant in 1936 or 1937, before the war began. The doctor estimates that she's around 20 now, and was 15 or 16 when pregnant.

That adds a lot of potential backstory.

Nancy became pregnant before the war, before the slight amount of acceptance for young women becoming pregnant by departing soldiers was happening.

She was probably still living with her parents at the time. The cover story of a young single woman's child actually being the child of her mother was possible. The lie began not so that mother and son could stay together, but as a cover for respectability. The lie probably did not begin by her choice. And it was probably forced on her with heaping doses of shame, and threats about what would be done to her if she didn't play along.

At some point in between, Nancy lost her parents, and her home. My guess would be that they were lost to the bombs. She and her son survived.

When the evacuations began, she was an adult, he was a child, and he would have been separated from her. Playing the role of his sister, and her age as younger than it was, was for the hope that if they were caught, they would be treated as an older girl and her much younger brother, and evacuated together, rather than treating her as an adult whose young son would be sent away for safety while she remained behind. The lie for respectability became one used to maintain the relationship it allegedly hid.

Nancy isn't merely a young woman forced into responsibility beyond her age. She's a young woman whose status and responsibility as a mother was stolen from her. The love and protectiveness she felt as a mother were denied, shamed and forced into hiding. Yet she fought to meet that responsibility in spite of the obstacles of both the society around her and the war.

And she stands not just as a symbol of England standing up to Germany, but also for every young woman who fought for herself and her children in the face of a misogynistic society that would deny her agency.
POST A COMMENT Name: Email Address: Comment (bbCode allowed):