Fri
Jul 24 2009 11:50am
Three Reasons to Watch The Colony...Or Not


Tuesday night, Discovery Channel premiered its handy-guide-to-the-apocalypse reality show, The Colony. The show follows a “cross-section” of society thrust into Cormac McCarthy conditions as they try to build civilization from the ground up.

And you should watch it! Or not. There are arguments both ways; this apocalypse is very your-mileage-may-vary. Below, a short list of things that will help you decide if you want to tune in next week.

1. THE APOCALYPSE. Sure, having to form a society amid the apocalypse sounds like it would be awesome. However, grouping the first six survivors together before the show begins takes away a lot of the each-man-for-himself attitude that any good apocalypse needs. Bonus: shoving the last four toward the Sanctuary like they’re late to a birthday party. (What would have happened if the first six turned away the other four? World’s shortest show?)

I will say that the interpersonal drama seemed to be relatively un-tampered with, though the producer-planted “marauders” seem to wind up a few of the survivors to a degree usually only seen in Sean Penn movies. On the flip side, there’s the moment when all survivors work together to haul water, laundry day is declares, and the cameraman gleefully pans over the men standing with their hands in their pockets watching the four women wash socks. Comedy gold.

2. THE GOODS. The lack of actual apocalypse means that we can’t follow the survivors throughout a ruined city, so the show developed two other ways for them to acquire things, which makes sense, in theory. First, the survivors were pointed at a raided department store, where they had to scramble for goods before “marauders” struck (fine). Second, the survivors took up their warehouse abode, where they fond leftovers from previous survivors (okay) and a host of inexplicably-unused items raring to go (their home was apparently a Sand and Charcoal Baggers of the West Coast factory). You know, just in case anyone wanted to filter some river water for drinkability or anything.

3. THE CAST. This element frustrated me the most, and while I can see what they were going for, I think they also missed the boat on this from a sociological perspective. Let’s pro/con this.

Pro: the show did seem to select relatively stable people who would actually contribute to a new society and had some interest in being useful, as opposed to the sort of people who sign up for reality television hoping they get a spinoff, and who spend all their video-confessional time claiming to the camera that they’re not here to make friends.

Con: the “cross-section” of society includes in its entirety: a nurse, a mechanic, a marine biologist, a martial arts instructor, a doctor, a handyman who specializes in solar and renewable energy (no really), a carpenter, an aerospace engineer, a computer engineer, and a mechanical engineer.

I am no apocalypse expert (Discovery hires those to tell you about the importance of sharing meals and other things you might have missed if you were an alien visitor to our planet). However, I’m going to guess that generally, in an apocalypse situation, you won’t get a cross-section quite like that. Instead, you will be trying to rebuild the world with three executive assistants, a waiter, an accountant, a construction worker, a small business owner, a 13-year-old who skipped school, a wailing toddler, and an 85-year-old who was running errands and left her insulin at home. Your life will be short and filled with power struggle over who should be eaten first based on their relative usefulness. (Admit it, you checked that manifest again to see who you would pick.)

If you are lucky enough to be at whatever Extremely Useful People Convention these Colony people were attending when your apocalypse comes, I freakin’ DEMAND that you build a useful civilization again, you know? And make it snappy.

This show has a lot to recommend it: the mechanics of survival are absorbing, some of the participants are compelling (computer engineer John Cohn is taking an early lead for Most Relatable), and the network really does seem interested in having progress made instead of just poking the participants with sticks to see what happens. However, the previews are perfect example of what makes this show both so interesting and so totally useless for the average apocalypsian. Next week, the survivors go through a power struggle between two factions (absolutely!) and build working solar panels from things they find lying around the warehouse (...absolutely).

The Colony airs Tuesdays at 10pm EST on The Discovery Channel.

5 comments
Thomstel
1. Thomstel
Your "cross-section" sounds like the Dramatis Personae from the last 80 Stephen King novels.

And of course you're absolutely right. :)
Mitchell Downs
2. Beamish
I found the show so terribly contrived so I have trouble accepting it as remotely practical due to the production decisions they made.

The cast is right up there - but I can accept that the show would be useless as we watched a bunch of bankers and MBAs give themselves giardia by not filtering the water.

My biggest issue is the absurd way they handle conflict and violence. Firstly: no guns. They could easily have allowed the survivors to find a couple of guns loaded with non-lethal simunitions. It is completely unreasonable to think that they would not find ANY guns - even in LA. The presence of a "violence conch" or two would have made the interpersonal dynamic more interesting - and to be "shot" would take the person out of the show. Now there is risk within the group as well as without.

Secondly: The "marauders" are just silly. They let the survivors get a bunch of supplies in the store and then some people come in and take stuff like it was so much milk money. Really? In a true post-apocalyptic survival situation there would have been blood, if not bodies, on the floor. I, for one, would have resisted the "marauders" with extreme violence just as they were treating with me.

Thirdly: Related to the "marauders", there is no real threat on the show. As with the four "late additions" - some of the people made it a big issue, but it had to resolve the way it did because the participants are not allowed to chose otherwise. They may as well have welcomed them in and saved the drama. There is no personal risk even within the confines of the experiment.

Fourthly: No leaders. I mean NONE. The person with the best grasp of interpersonal dynamics and any leadership is the guy who spent four years in jail. He showed it when he showed up with the last four and he showed it when he appreciated the group dynamic around the water collection. These people are going to spend so much time trying to make "consensus" decisions they will soon suffer from paralysis by analysis or they will be violently at one another's throats.
Marcus W
3. toryx
I love post-apocalyptic fiction.

Which is why I'm sure I won't ever want to watch this show.
C.D. Thomas
4. cdthomas
And there's one issue this series has to avoid:

Assaults on women.

I know, I know, they've got a female martial arts instructor, and women can consent during an apocalypse, but even though they've got equal numbers in the cast, they'd be vulnerable to marauders in a way men aren't considered to be.

Beyond martial arts practice (which becomes irrelevant once marauders start using guns) their safety would depend on a) whether they watched out for each other b) whether they got men early on to watch out for them or c) how good were their own weapons and fortifications.

Yeah, I'm being unfair; surely in an apocalypse men would remain gentlemen, and they wouldn't lay a hand on a kid or woman during a time of horrid stress. But still, I bet there's absolutely no mention of available birth control or abortion, because in their rush to see women as equals, they don't bring up how women would be unequal in a crumbling society. That would also put a fine point of whether the colony accepts any new man -- he might be handy, but can he be trusted? Can any new woman be trusted not to spoil the gestalt by openly using sex for food or shelter?
Thomstel
5. Str8 Talker
Think of "The Colony" as "MacGyver in a Fallen World." Sure, there's alot of fluffy, made-safe drama... but the key is to learn how to open your mind, adapt, negotiate, work with others and live by your wits.

During WWII, the Nazi's were driven crazy by American "Improvisations" or "MacGyverisms" as we call them today. Americans could make anything out of anything to get the job done... especially broken stuff!

They were brave, bold, creative and so unpredictable... it proved vital against the more scientific savvy Nazi's who (in some cases) were 10-50 years more advanced with their stealth weaponry. We were within months of losing WWII if Hitler's amazing weapons had been deployed... instead of being stopped by less scientifically advance (but more clever) American creativity to improvise.

However, our soldiers proved more creative & innovative with existing technologies and baffled the Third Reich.

To survive in this unfair, cruel, moral-less and violent society (before the fall) and when it gets bad... you will need to learn basic science, mechanics and learn from those who survived before us. Just because their technology was old does not make them stupid or inferior... just clever.

Don't forget this... all the highways, technology, computers and what makes life "modern" to us is only about 50 years old. That's it... and most of our infrastructure is now collapsing due to old age.(Water, Sewage, Roads, Power Grid...etc). So, even a partial collapse of our society would prove unnerving to most people.

Learn to garden; harvest herbs for eating & medicine; how to dehydrate/rehydrate foods using simple solar powered units. Just learn the basics so you can enjoy life... regardless what happens. The new currency to barter with will be your knowledge & usefulness.

Just Be Prepared...

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment