Apr 20 2009 11:02am

J. G. Ballard, 1930-2009

One of the greatest and most peculiar SF writers has died. Henry Farrell’s post at Crooked Timber is a concise look back:

I preferred his early novels, and (even more) his short stories to his later work. I read “The Voices of Time” (probably in one of the old Spectrum SF collections) when I was seven or eight, and didn’t understand it at all, but somehow, it caught me and haunted me. Much of his later work read like different versions of the same novel. But they were often very funny–his over the top plotlines with their garden-turned-into-chaos and insane reformer-cum-dictator-wannabes were intended to be satirical. I have a particular fondness for Super-Cannes, if only because of how it jumps up and down in glee on the corpse of the notion of social capital. His work had its problems–most obviously in its depiction of women which was at best chilly, at worst rather worse than that. But he was genuinely a great writer, in the sense that Borges described Kafka as being a great writer–he created his own precursors (but these summoned ancestors were to be found less in literature as such than in what he perceptively called “invisible literature”–all the bureaucratic forms and minutiae that define our lives). We all live in the decaying aftermath of the Space Age that he, better perhaps than anyone else, described. If he was a novelist who was better at describing landscapes and extreme social situations than people, he captured, as a result, something important about an era in which individuality simply doesn’t mean as much as it once seemed to. There are bits of the world (and not-unimportant ones) that are Ballardian–if you’ve read him, you experience the shock of recognition when you see them.
1 comment
Iain Coleman
1. Iain Coleman
If you took a trip in the Tardis to, say, the mid seventies and someone asked you what the future would be like - let's face it, you'd just tell them to read Dick and Ballard.

Ballard had an uncanny ability to peer beneath the surface of society, to discern its driving forces and map out the often disastrous direction in wich they were pushing. It's a gift better appreciated in retrospect: now, living in a Ballardian future, we can understand the truth in his novels perhaps better than the contemporary readers.

When Cronenberg made his movie of Crash, I thought he'd missed a trick. The celebrity crash victim - Elizabeth Taylor on Ballard's novel - should so obviously have been Princess Diana. Cronenberg didn't go down that route, and his movie was poorer for it.

Some months later, Diana died in a car crash while being chased by paparazzi, the most Ballardian end imaginable.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment