Tor.com content by

Chris Isaac

Why So Much Backlash? Ready Player One is Basically Twilight for Nerds

In 2005, as many of you will recall, one writer’s wildly popular story created a gigantic cultural rift, even while many readers strongly identified with its teenaged protagonist. Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight had appeared on bookshelves everywhere and quickly gained mainstream attention for its depictions of fraught romantic relationships, and especially for turning horror icons like vampires and werewolves into romantic objects. The story strongly resonated with its target female demographic, and three sequels and a series of film adaptations followed, but this success nagged at people who took umbrage at the allegedly mediocre writing, overwrought love story, and sparkly monsters. Even while people endlessly mocked the divide between fans of Team Jacob and Team Edward, the true battleground was located between people who loved Twilight and those who had contempt for what many perceived as blatant indulgence in a cocktail of melodramatic romantic clichés.

Which brings us to 2011, where two more stories that struck an intense chord with readers’ fantasies—allowing many to picture themselves in the lead roles—hit our collective radar: E.L. James’ Fifty Shades of Grey, and Ernest Cline’s Ready Player One. The former has been lambasted as literal pornography, while the latter is frequently labeled “nostalgia porn.” And yet they are also two of the most popular and widely-known books to come out in recent years, and both have strong fan bases despite all the criticism. That’s not so surprising when it comes to Fifty Shades, since the story started out as fan fiction based on Twilight—some cross-over between the fans and critics of Meyer’s books and those following James’ work is to be expected. But why Ready Player One? What did Cline do to get caught up in this very familiar looking crossfire between haters and rabid fans?

[Read more]

Stop Pushing For Comic Book Movies To Win Best Picture

Seeing a picture from the Wonder Woman movie underneath a title implying that comic book movies haven’t been good enough to be the best movie of the year might make you feel annoyed and dismissive. So it’s probably best if I preface my point by clarifying what this article is not. This isn’t a criticism of the entertainment value of comic book movies, since this year alone has put out some very enjoyable and successful superhero films that have earned tons of money. This also isn’t anything against the Wonder Woman movie in particular, as I enjoyed it, and was very happy to see such an iconic character overcome the cynicism about whether or not female protagonists hurt marketability. What this article is about is the significance of the Best Picture award.

The name sounds so self-explanatory: an award that should go to whatever movie was the best of the year. But the word “best” is also open to interpretation. Is your idea of the best movie the one that was the most fun to watch? The one that was the most thought-provoking? The one with the most original concepts? Ideally a movie would have all of those qualities, but frequently the nominees are each strong in one way or the other, and we’re all left with our own preferences on which quality deserves the highest praise.

[Fans of comic book movies have already found two new candidates for Best Picture: Logan and Wonder Woman.]

Our Privacy Notice has been updated to explain how we use cookies, which you accept by continuing to use this website. To withdraw your consent, see Your Choices.