Skip to content
Answering Your Questions About Reactor: Right here.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter. Everything in one handy email.

The 100 Could Be Worse, But It Could Also Be A Lot Better

Home / The 100 Could Be Worse, But It Could Also Be A Lot Better
Movies & TV television reviews

The 100 Could Be Worse, But It Could Also Be A Lot Better

By

Published on March 21, 2014

97 years ago, humans on Earth decided the Cold War wasn’t enough and nuked the frak out of each other. The planet was rendered uninhabitable, and billions died, save colonies of 400 farmers, scientists, and engineers from 12 nations who made their way to their space stations. Over the decades, the space stations joined up and formed the Ark. But as time went on, the resources dwindled as the population grew to 4,000. To keep a lid on crime and so as to not waste precious oxygen, all misdeeds were punishable by death—getting chucked out the airlock into the cold clutches of space, specifically. Since even in the apocalypse you can’t go about killing kids willy nilly, anyone under 18 was kept in lockdown. The adults in charge make the difficult decision to pack up 100 teenage lawbreakers into a dilapidated shuttle and drop them back on Earth, because science.

Once they land, chaos ensues. Most of the kids, drunk on freedom and independence, get crazy, including a budding psychopath named John and a secretive assassin named Bellamy. A few kids, including sensible Clarke, wild child Octavia, love-triangle interest Finn, and a pair of hangers-on, recognize their best chance of survival is to find food and shelter. According to all the smarties, Earth is supposed to be uninhabited by sentient life, and for a time it looks like they might be right. Until the kids come across a 2-faced deer and another gets a spear through the chest from an unseen creature with a really weird footprint. Clearly the nuclear holocaust caused some serious damage, but not what anyone expects. Earth may be habitable again, but it’s not welcoming.

Will the kids survive the hostile environment? Will the kids survive each other? Will the kids knock boots in the woods? Will the adults stop shoving people out of airlocks long enough to have a planful conversation? Tune in next week to find out. Or not.

Once upon a time, The CW planned to make a Battle Royale series. Obviously The 100 (CW, Wed. 9p) isn’t that show, but it does share its genetics with other stories of pretty teenagers fighting, killing, and sexing each other in a dystopian future ruled by tyrannical political leaders who want to use their fighting, killing, and sexing in manipulative ways. The downside to that mold is that it doesn’t allow for much unpredictability, and The 100 suffers for it as far as the pilot goes. From what I’ve read in other reviews, the show gets better as the cast and crew settle into their roles and sort out the more problematic elements—the terrible CGI is a major gripe, the science is shoddy but forgivable, the plotting is plodding, and the characters are less developed than those on The Walking Dead (ZING!)—but the pilot… I can’t decide if it’s bad, really bad, or just insanely stupid. I didn’t outright loathe it for reasons I’ll get into in a moment, but it’s also really far from good.

Clarke may be a princess, but she’s also clever and no-nonsense. She has the remarkably rare ability to think ahead and weigh her options for the most efficient outcome rather than just goofing off and getting into fights like the rest of her ilk. Ilk like impulsive Octavia, whose sole purpose in life seems to be boys. “Before you get any ideas,” Octavia purrs, “Finn’s mine.” Without skipping a beat Clarke retorts, “Before you get any ideas, I don’t care.” She’s like a less interesting, less witty Veronica Mars. Wells, the son of the Chancellor who commits a crime to ensure he gets sent down to Earth with Clarke, is fascinating by virtue of being the show’s Piggy and also for only having 1 leg. Also, his dad is a slumming Isaiah Washington, so there’s that. Bellamy is up to no good for his own selfish reasons, reasons which will probably backfire very soon. There’s some other people doing other people stuff, but so help me I couldn’t tell you their names or backstories to save my life. Some guy is a jerk, another is a nerd, another a stoner, and most go where the crowd takes them.

The 100 is based on a YA book (one that’s on track to be a series) by Kass Morgan, but for The CW it’s the perfect storm of tame sexiness, angsty sarcasm, and the over-inflated sense of self-importance only youth can provide. But the show is also darker than you’d expect, with deep waves of brutal violence and cruel behavior rippling between the scenes of sexy people doing sexy things in as few articles of clothing as network television will allow. Too bad that complexity is cribbed from other sources. Very little of the show is truly unique. The 100 is cobbled together from fragments of Battlestar Galactica, Lord of the Flies, 1984, The Hunger Games, Lost, Lost in Space, and Land of the Lost (sensing a theme here?), infused with a seemingly endless array of possible love triangles, and populated with young actors harvested from The CW’s Hottie McHotterson factory.

There’s a weird dichotomy going on with this show. On one hand, you have a bunch of generically sexy actors playing hot-for-each-other teenagers who are more heavily vested in going skinny dipping than finding food, and on the other you have a gaggle of super-serious adults mulling over the ethics of killing hundreds of people in order to save thousands. Hell, they send the kids down to earth partly as a scientific mission but mostly to buy those still in the Ark an extra month of oxygen—the kids are criminals and thus expendable. Even the 100 are a rather polarizing bunch, with a fraction who want to survive and explore and a much larger portion dedicated to doing “whatever the hell we want!”

But what little teases there are of class struggles, ethics, and scientific exploration are buried under all the moony eyes and high school politics. I can’t decide if the teenagers’ mob mentality—they tend to side with whichever loud hot person has the plan that requires the least amount of responsibility—is an intentional comment on society or lazy writing. I suspect it’s the latter. Same goes for exposition, which has a disconcerting habit of being revealed by some off camera random shouting out key bits of information. Octavia and Bellamy are siblings, and since it’s illegal to have more than 1 child on the Ark, she’s now a criminal. Her backstory is revealed by an unseen teen calling out to no one in particular “Hey! That’s the girl they found under the floor!” *deep exasperated sigh*

Like every other CW pilot, there’s way too much going on, not enough substance, and a whole lotta potential. Most recently, Arrow and The Tomorrow People got off to rocky starts but have improved by leaps and bounds—the former is consistently engaging, entertaining, and emotional, making it one of the better shows currently on air. While I can’t in good conscience recommend The 100’s pilot, I will suggest the show as a whole. There’s a lot more going on than beautiful people looking at beautiful irradiated fungi, and I’m curious to see them peel back the layers. They’re clearly building to something, and I think that something could eventually be worth delving into. If it isn’t cancelled first.


Alex Brown is an archivist, research librarian, writer, geeknerdloserweirdo, and all-around pop culture obsessive who watches entirely too much TV. Keep up with her every move on Twitter, or get lost in the rabbit warren of ships and fandoms on her Tumblr.

About the Author

Alex Brown

Author

Alex Brown is a Hugo-nominated and Ignyte award-winning critic who writes about speculative fiction, librarianship, and Black history. Find them on twitter (@QueenOfRats), bluesky (@bookjockeyalex), instagram (@bookjockeyalex), and their blog (bookjockeyalex.com).
Learn More About Alex
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments