“A frail old man lost in space and time. They give him this name because they don’t know who he is.” —BBC’s background notes for Doctor Who, from 1962
The BBC has a terrific article about the original concept notes for Doctor Who that are now available digitally on the BBC Archive Project. The concept notes, written in 1962 by Cecil Webber (the BBC’s children’s writer), reveal the uncertainty about this new project. “We are not writing science fiction...neither are we writing fantasy...in brief, avoid the limitations of any label.” Another document in the archive details what kinds of science fiction stories the BBC considered suitable for adaptation—no robots, no “BEMs” (Bug-Eyed Monsters), no outlandish settings. io9.com has more in-depth coverage, especially on the Beeb’s wariness of science fiction.
Before Star Wars and the age of special effects blockbusters, the TV and movie industry didn’t see science fiction as a guaranteed money maker. BBC Archivist Jim Sangster says that in the 1960s in England, science fiction “was seen as niche and American.”
On the Doctor Who concept pages, Sydney Newman, head of BBC drama, had scribbled emphatic notes. Newman is credited with shaping the Doctor Who concept into the show it became. For example, the TARDIS was originally conceived as “an absence of visibility, a shape of nothingness” but Newman quickly nixed that idea. Instead, Webber’s mention of “a night-watchmen’s shelter” became the police call box. The original notes suggested that the Doctor “malignantly tries to stop progress (the future)...while searching for his ideal (the past).” Newman objected, “Don’t like this at all...I don’t want him to be a reactionary.”
The archive, titled “The Genesis of Doctor Who: The Creation of a Television Hero” is a revealing look into the origins of a science fiction television mainstay. It also contains the original concept for another series called The Troubleshooters, which became the spin-off Torchwood, as well as some rare behind the scenes images.
[Image from the BBC Archives, © BBC]
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 20, 2008 05:15pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 20, 2008 05:46pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 20, 2008 10:23pm EST
At several points in the show's history, the Doctor indicated that he was less than good before he became known as "the Doctor." Certainly Hartnell's Doctor improved with time. At least once he admitted to Barbara that he valued her company as as he "learned by observing" and one reading of the show is that exposure to these initial companions is what makes him into a hero over time.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 21, 2008 11:37am EST
2. ecmyers: it's so interesting looking at those notes and seeing how different the original concept was. TV really is a stew with a lot of cooks.
3. LouAnders: there's kind of a dark side to the guy, isn't there. I felt like Eccleston and Tennant's picked up on that part of the history, the colder, remote, dangerous side of him. The companions do humanize him.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday November 23, 2008 04:46pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 24, 2008 01:30pm EST
On the other hand, it could all just be Pretend and the differences have more to do with the differences among the various eras of writers than any alleged "reality" within the world of the story. But that would be much less fun to contemplate, wouldn't it?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 24, 2008 02:05pm EST
I was always fascinated by the Valeyard, who shows up in "Trial of a Time Lord," as he was said to be "an amalgamation of the Doctor's darker nature, culled from between his 12th and final incarnation.