Recently, I wrote a little bit about my obsession with the mail. It’s literally the first thing I ask about when I get home from work, “Did we get anything interesting in the mail?”
I think my wife thought this was a passing fad, something I was asking only because there actually was something coming in the mail. But no, I want to know what came in the mail, regardless of what it is. I often spend time looking through worthless catalogs (OMG, not too long ago I got Oriental Trading Company and ULINE catalogs on the same day...HEAVEN!) that do not sell anything I would buy.
Sometimes, I get things in the mail that are actually useful and cool. The other day, I received copies of the Library of America Philip K. Dick books: Four Novels of the 1960s and Five Novels of the 1960s and 70s. Jonathan Lethem selected the books to be collected and wrote notes on the text.
I will admit that I’d read only a a little Philip K. Dick before I got these books. My big experience has been with movies based on his work, like Bladerunner, Total Recall, and A Scanner Darkly (I’ve missed out on Screamers so far), all of which I’ve liked with varying success (Total Recall is completely a guilty pleasure that I find hard to watch today, but the other two I really enjoyed). I liked what I read, and wanted to read more, but wasn’t sure what to get next. These books solve that conundrum nicely.
The first book collects the novels The Man in the High Castle, The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, and Ubik. The second book collects Martian Time-Slip, Dr. Bloodmoney, Now Wait for Last Year, Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said, and A Scanner Darkly. With these two books you get all the major novels that Dick wrote.
On top of that, you get a comprehensive timeline of Dick’s life, and notes based on the text, which speaks to the English/Philosophy degree that I earned in college. The books from Library of America are archival quality, so they’ll last a long time.
Now, I will admit, these books aren’t cheap, running $35 for the first book and $40 for the second, and Amazon typically doesn’t offer any discount on them (although you might be able to get a discount through other means like a Borders or Barnes & Noble card).
But think about it, if you bought the four novels new in the first book separately, you’d pay anywhere from $25 - $30 for them. And they’d likely be paperback. With these books, you’re getting superior quality hardcover editions of all these books. I’m very impressed with these editions, and I’m excited that they’re now part of my collection.
Even more important, these are the first science fiction works collected by the Library of America other than Lovecraft. Which makes them the first modern science fiction work collected. My hope is that they bring out more science fiction works in Library of America editions. Some Asimov, or Leiber, or Silverberg would be very cool.
[Image taken from my Flickr account; used with my permission.]
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday September 27, 2008 11:59am EDT
I hadn't realized that Dick was the first science fiction author they had done as I also have two volumes of Raymond Chandler from them.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday September 27, 2008 03:01pm EDT
Now if I only had enough time and quiet to properly digest them... stupid work.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday September 27, 2008 04:29pm EDT
If/when money ceases to be an object, however....
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday September 28, 2008 12:17am EDT
I haven't read the short story it's based on, so I don't know how faithful it is, but I liked it -- very classic, psychological sci-fi. I guess the reviewers weren't on the same wavelength. Anyway, it's well worth Netflixing.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday September 28, 2008 07:39am EDT
My PKD books don't match. Some are Gollancz, some are Vintage, some are ancient, most are paperbacks, one's a hardback...eh. It's what's inside that counts! :D
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday September 28, 2008 04:39pm EDT
Well, both the short story and the movie develop and end in a very similar way.
The movie has a nice Gary Sinise vs. Vincent D'Onofrio theme, and the whole setting is quite nice.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday September 28, 2008 06:42pm EDT
Monday September 29, 2008 02:11pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday September 29, 2008 03:01pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday September 29, 2008 03:47pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday September 29, 2008 04:51pm EDT
I'm not sure that I want to watch all adaptations of PKD stuff...
VIEW ALL BY · Monday September 29, 2008 05:02pm EDT
What?! You didn't like Minority Report? How is that possible? I loved it, though I haven't read the story. But as a movie it's fabulous: good pacing, solid characters, great world-building, some genuinely funny moments, and a coherent plot. Does it deviate heavily from the source material?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday September 29, 2008 09:03pm EDT
I try to judge movies and the books they're based on as different entities.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday September 30, 2008 11:42am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 01, 2008 12:39am EDT
Well, I admit it's a fairly new project with me to have them match. I have some massive short story collections, and a beautiful TPB of Do Androids Dream? that doesn't match. That was the first TPB I ever bought, flabbergasted that an airport bookshop* had something I wanted to read but amazed at the price for a paperback. But recently I've been shelling out for Vintage.
*Airport bookshop, rather than a real bookshop that happens to be in an airport.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday October 07, 2008 12:57pm EDT
I thought Minority Report started strong, but it lost me about halfway through. I watched the film on fast speed just to see where it went. It just felt like too many disparate points being forced together. I like the concept, and I like that even knowing the 'future' that Cruise's character can't change enough things to avoid the prediction...but it just didn't hold together for me.
As @13 states, it's hard to make a several decades old story into a modern film without changing it. I usually consider the two things as separate beasts or else I wouldn't be able to watch most film adaptations. So, it wasn't differences between the story and the movie that shot it down for me. It was mostly Cruise.