
With Tor.com’s steampunk month now behind us, I would like to ponder what may come next. Certainly, steampunk as a genre and as a subculture is here to stay, there’s no doubting that; in all ways, steampunk is still heating up and will probably continue to grow for years. However, trends naturally evolve and new ones come into being, and I have pondered what the next aesthetic of interest will be. There is no doubt in my mind that the whole neo-vintage trend is still going strong, so the next big genre will be another subset of retro-futurism.
Simple chronology would suggest that the next trend will be pulp, which is a genre of sci-fi and adventure fiction drawn from the 1920s through the 1950s. As a style of story, a pulp adventure can be found in just about any setting, but in terms of an aesthetic pulp is inspired by the interwar period and the Second World War. Pulp sci-fi enjoys ray guns, rocket packs, fighter planes and over-the-top adventure heroes. Examples of the genre include many well-known films, like Indiana Jones and Sky Captain. However, as many fans of steampunk will note, there is already a great deal of interest in pulp (in some cases, it is even mistaken for steampunk, although the two are distinct genres). One might say that pulp is already enjoying a burst of interest alongside steampunk. So what then can the next trend be?
I would like to take this opportunity to officially predict that the next big trend to follow steampunk will be mod-era spy-fi. Now, I hear you asking, what is “mod” and what is “spy-fi”?
Mod is an aesthetic style and subculture that came into being around the turn of the 1960s. Historically, the mods were young people in urban Britain who put a great emphasis on appearance and fashion trends, and who stayed at the cutting edge of 60s fashion. “Mod” as an aesthetic style can be expanded back to cover the beatniks of the 1950s (among whom the mods may well have had their origins) and forward into the cutting-edge trends 1970s (though at this point it culturally runs into other non-mod subcultures, like the hippies and the punks). In all, the characteristic sharp aesthetics and fashions of the atomic age blend together to encompass a truly unique look that is mod.
Spy-fi is a genre of fiction that combines espionage themes with science fiction, often in the form of gadgets and spy devices. It is perhaps best known for its associations with the Cold War, which was the heyday of the genre. In spy-fi, characters (often but not always spies) become embroiled in a world of adventure and espionage, where they struggle against the agents of an opposing power, which may be something as realistic as a foreign government or as fanciful as a diabolical mastermind. Technology is ultra-modern for the time and place of the setting, and it is often disguised as innocuous objects. While the most famous examples of the genre reach incredible heights of fanciful science fiction (Moonraker and many other Bond films), the genre can also include the realistic and serious (I Spy and Danger Man), the humorous (Get Smart) and even the philosophical (The Prisoner). The British television series The Avengers covers a wide range of spy-fi’s themes depending on the season and corresponding female protagonist, ranging from the gritty (1962-1964 with Cathy Gale), to the witty (1965-1968 with Emma Peel), to the semi-absurd (1968-1969 with Tara King). Other major examples of the spy-fi genre include The Man from U.N.C.L.E., Charlie’s Angels, and even Austin Powers (which is a parody of certain more ludicrous aspects of the spy-fi genre).
So, there you have it. I predict that when the next trend surfaces it will be spy-fi with fashions inspired by the 1950s-1970s. I can already see a mod fashion influence surfacing in the form of the television program Mad Men, and numerous modern spy-fi stories are already in public view (consider the current incarnation of Bond films or the TV show Chuck). It is only a matter of time before the two are rejoined.
Or perhaps this is merely wishful thinking, because I desperately desire people to understand what I’m talking about when I make an Avengers or Prisoner reference. Either way, I intend to enjoy the continued growth of steampunk and the parallel development of pulp (though when people start tossing around the combined word of “steampulp” I may well head for the hills).
G. D. Falksen enjoys reading, watching and writing all of these genres. He is firmly convinced that John Steed could take James Bond armed with nothing but an umbrella and a bowler hat. More information can be found at his website (www.gdfalksen.com) and his Twitter (twitter.com/gdfalksen).
Friday November 06, 2009 12:19pm EST
Spy-fi does have a chance, though. There are plenty of forerunners showing up all the time. Aside from the things you already mentioned, there are books like Tim Powers' Declare (although that's on the fantasy side, really) and the up-coming remake of The Prisoner (which I am dreading). Are there really people who don't get Prisoner references?
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 01:14pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 01:35pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 01:59pm EST
Oh and yes that means I would not get references.
Friday November 06, 2009 02:18pm EST
Not to say that you won't see a good deal of it produced on the pro/semi-pro level, because it is fun to watch.
And you left out the biggest recent spy-fi - the French OSS 117 films - OSS 117:Cairo, Nest of Spies and OSS 117:Lost in Rio. And they showed the problem of reproducing the genre - the period and style were amazing - but it ended up taking me almost a week to watch the first one because I could only take it in small doses. I kept hoping the pace would pick up. Haven't watched the second one.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 03:53pm EST
@NomadUK and DemetriosX: The remake of the Prisoner is going to make me weep, that's all I have to say. Even if it turns out to be "good" it'll be a case of "why didn't you just make your own bloody setting instead of butchering this one?"
@Mary Arrr: I think that there's enough diversity of material in spy-fi and in the mod era to appeal to a wide range of people (enthusiasts will probably end up blending in the detective stories of the 70s, like "Shaft" and "Starsky and Hutch" as well). Steampunk's big subculture appeal is that is offers something for everyone, whether it's literature, fashion, technology, etc.; and mod-era spy-fi has the potential to offer all of these just as easily.
Friday November 06, 2009 04:15pm EST
I would say that the era reflected by dieselpunk came to an end somewhere between John Campbell taking full control over Astounding (1938) and the US entry into WWII. Pulp continued on into the 50s or even early 60s.
In any case, I think dieselpunk makes a logical successor as a paeleofuture subculture. There's lots of room for costuming (tight-fitting jumpsuits, fancy headgear, etc.) and elaborate equipment (ray guns, control panels). Flash Gordon, Doc Smith, it's a different vibe from the post-war era. I see the appeal of mod-era spy-fi, but it may not stand out well enough visually.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 04:56pm EST
No. Sorry to be pedantic, but no.
Pulp is a medium, not a genre. (It began with the October, 1896 issue of Argosy, not "the 1920s"). I realize that playing fast and loose with terminology is part of blogging, but I would hope that those blogging on Tor could be a trifle more precise in their posts. We'd never equate comics with superheroes--let's not do that with pulps.
Pulp magazines featured all sorts of genres, including science fiction, action/adventure, fantasy, horror, westerns, mysteries, etc etc etc. But there was no pulp genre.
Friday November 06, 2009 04:57pm EST
The word "Dieselpunk" came from a RPG game called Children of the Sun. The term was coined by game designers Lewis Pollak and Dan Ross.
This odd fetish of renaming everything and putting the word punk at the end of it is kinda silly.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 05:08pm EST
@jessnevins: I'm sorry, but you are incorrect. You cannot argue that the pulp genre is not a genre. You can argue for subdivision between pulp adventure and pulp sci-fi, you can point out the distinction between the general use of pulp printing and the specific style of stories written during the golden age of the pulps, but you cannot simply dismiss the genre because it is inconvenient for you.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 05:22pm EST
Again, there were many genres which appeared in the pulps. But we don't say "the pulp genre" any more than we say "the comic book genre." The medium is not the genre. Never has been. You cannot simply claim that something is a genre because it is convenient for you.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 06, 2009 05:57pm EST
Sunday November 08, 2009 10:31am EST
sfsignal.com is having a giveaway contest for the complete original Prisoner shows, with all kinds of extras. You must be a U.S. resident, and the contest ends Monday.
McGoohan trivia: He was offered the lead in the James Bond series, but felt it was too silly and gimmicky, so he turned it down. The studio went with their second choice == Sean Connery.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday November 08, 2009 12:12pm EST
By strict definition, Pulp is a genre. But it is also full of sub genres. Personally, I think of pulp more as an aesthetic, than a genre because of the wide selection of sub genres - from Westerns to Romance, Science Fiction, the Hero Pulps, and Mystery.
While strictly true, I feel that calling pulp a genre is like calling paperback books a genre, or comic books a genre. Yes, they share a particular form, but the content is so different it doesn't really make sense to put them all in one box.
Being a writer of adventure pulp, I am encouraged in any increased awareness of pulp stuff.
- Pete Miller
Sunday November 08, 2009 01:44pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday November 08, 2009 07:11pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 09, 2009 12:07am EST
Of course the medium is not the genre but I would not say that calling "pulp sci-fi" pulp is the same as calling all paperback books a genre.