I read The Chrysalids when I was a kid, and I read all the rest of Wyndham when I was about twelve, but I never managed to own a copy of The Kraken Wakes. Iâve re-read the others occasionally over the years, but Iâm pretty sure this is the first time Iâve re-read The Kraken Wakes since it went back to the library in 1978. Iâd remembered it as being a cosy catastrophe where the world is destroyed by sea monsters, and rather second-tier Wyndham, but Iâd done it an injustice. The Kraken Wakes is quite an unusual cosy catastrophe, and really much more interesting than Iâd remembered it.
To start with, itâs an alien invasion. The first things are âred dots,â fiery meteors landing in the deep sea, which are actually alien craft. Itâs speculated that they might come from Jupiter or Neptune and like living at high pressure under water, and itâs speculated that humanity could share the planet with them, since they need different things. The rest of the book is a series of attacks by the aliens, never called krakens in the book, culminating in the scene that starts the novel where rising sea water and icebergs in the Channel have entirely changed the climate and landscape of Britain and the protagonists are trying to escape. This is essentially the story of how some very unusual aliens conquer the world in 1953, and itâs much closer to The War of the Worlds than it is to Wyndhamâs other novels.
The action takes place over a period of about ten years, which is very unusual for a cosy catastrophe. You kind of have to assume itâs ten years of 1953, or ten years in which the social, political, and technological themes of 1953 continue unchanged. The eagerness with which the Americans, British and Russians use âthe bombâ against the dwellers of the deeps, and the blithe indifference to radiation (and the quaint spelling âradio-activeâ with the hyphen) date attitudes precisely. Thereâs also the âEBC,â the English Broadcasting Company for which the protagonists are reporters, and the running joke about how people thought they said BBCâthe first actual British commercial TV network was launched in 1955. Wyndhamâs ideas about how such a thing would work, without having seen any commercial TV, and in an era before TV became widespread are quaintâpeople writing scripts for news rather than live reporting, reporters having days and weeks after an event to write long thoughtful pieces about it before it becomes news. The way in which it is 1953, or the day after tomorrow in 1953, is one of the things thatâs most interesting about reading it nowâitâs an alien invasion of a very specific and very different world.
The events of The Kraken Wakes take place all over the world. The protagonists even visit some other parts of the world to report. This is unique in my experience of cosy catastrophes, most of them take place in a âfog in Channel, continent cut offâ England, where at best it will be noted that radio broadcasts from the rest of the world have gone silent. The rest of the world is necessary to The Kraken Wakes because of the sea-based nature of the menace. That the rest of the world seems to consist of teeth-grittingly clichĂ©d cartoon locations and countries is regrettable, but I suppose Wyndham deserves points for trying.
Wyndham always had very odd attitudes towards women. Phyllis, the narratorâs wife, wheedles, stockpiles, flirts, and has hysterics. Thereâs no use saying I shouldnât notice this kind of thing, itâs like a colour-blind person saying I shouldnât notice that a very nicely shaped chair is a screaming shade of puce. I canât turn my awareness of it off, though I certainly can roll my eyes and keep going. Wyndhamâs treatment of Phyllis is repulsive and patronising, and much worse than average for 1953, or even 1853. It would be just barely possible to read it as the narratorâs misogyny if one hadnât read any other Wyndham, and I recommend this if possible. Phyllis does have a job and sheâs good at it, but sheâs good at it because she flirts and wheedles her way into interviews more scrupulous people wouldnât get. Itâs just ghastly, but you just have to accept it as ghastly and keep reading. Thereâs another awful woman, Tuny, short for Petunia, who serves as a kind of comedy anti-Russian chorus. She keeps insisting that itâs the Russians doing everything that the aliens are in fact doing. Sheâs like the comedy character in The Day of the Triffids who keeps insisting the Americans will rescue us, except not funny.
That leads me to another odd thing about The Kraken Wakes, the fact that it keeps trying to be funny, or perhaps âlightâ would be a better word. It seldom achieves humourâthough I am notoriously hard to amuseâbut thereâs a consciously light tone about a great deal of it. Tuny and her constant accusations of communist plots that are mirrored by the Russian constant accusations of capitalist plots are almost satire. I called the âEBC, not the BBCâ thing a running joke earlier, and thatâs clearly just how itâs intended. There are also things deliberately phrased to be amusingâthe only one that made me laugh was about the scientist who equipped himself with a brand new cat every time he approached a flock of pigeons. And when Phyllis does some relaxing bricklaying, actually as a blind to disguise the fact that sheâs hoarding food, thereâs a joke about the âarbourâ sheâs built looking like an outside toilet which is so old-fashioned and coy that Iâm not sure modern readers will even get it. Itâs as if Wyndham felt constantly aware of the need to entertain, and wanted to stress that this wasnât supposed to be taken seriously. He doesnât do this at all in The Chrysalids, and very little in Triffids, but some of his short work does it. I think itâs a flaw here, and the story works best when it isnât being facetious. I think all stories, no matter how much they are intended as comedy, work best when the writer takes them seriously. Trust to the reader to figure out that itâs light entertainment.
The book is divided into three âphasesââthe first one where the aliens are landing and doing mysterious underwater things nobody knows about, the second when the aliens are attacking in âsea tanksâ that send out sticky tentacles and drag people into the water, and the third where the aliens raise the sea level and change the climate and civilization collapses. The obligatory empty London scene is excellent, the characters look across the flooded Trafalgar Square from the steps of the National Gallery and wonder what Nelson would think of it nowâclassic. Thereâs a brief epilogue in which you get the ânormalâ situation of the latter part of a standard cosy catastropheâthe aliens have been defeated offstage and civilization is being put back together on modern scientific lines without all those inconvenient working-class people who have so regrettably been killed off.
Thereâs something weirdly introspective about considering why I enjoy something. Thereâs a particular sort of pleasure of dissection and analysis I get from reading something clearly flawed. A lot of what I was enjoying here was the deviation from the standard cosy formula, which Wyndham had just invented and was already playing with. I was also really interested in the invasion of 1953, in a way that Iâm quite sure wasnât intended, or even possible for the original readers in 1953. I also like the way the aliens were never explainedâeverything about them is hypothetical, except what they actually do, and there are lots of potential explanations for that. Theyâre not so much âvast, cool, and unsympatheticâ as utterly mysteriousâat one point thereâs a comparison between the way they are upsetting the world and the way we destroy an anthill. Yet what they do makes sense, assuming theyâre Neptune-forming, or perhaps Europa-forming Earth. The oceans of Europa hadnât been discovered in 1953, but they make a fascinatingly plausible place of origin for the krakens now.
This isnât Wyndhamâs best work, but itâs better than I remembered. If youâre fond of cosy catastrophes, if you like reading something weirdly flawed but very interesting, if youâre interested in the idea of the invasion of 1953, or if you like mysteriously alien aliensâno, I have no idea whether anyone else would like it.
Jo Walton is a science fiction and fantasy writer. Sheâs published eight novels, most recently Half a Crown and Lifelode, and two poetry collections. She reads a lot, and blogs about it here regularly. She comes from Wales but lives in Montreal where the food and books are more varied.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday October 13, 2009 03:50pm EDT
Coincidentally enough, today is my Birthday. And interestingly enough, I still haven't read the Kraken Wakes.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday October 13, 2009 04:12pm EDT
I'm interested that you have such a negative reaction to Wyndham's women: I always read them as fallible but real people of their time. I must take another look!
Tuesday October 13, 2009 05:01pm EDT
It's interesting you mention the portrayal of women in this; I'm notoriously oblivious to gender issues, and it even struck *me* as being unpleasant.
Still, this was a pretty great story with some memorable concepts and moments. I enjoyed your take on it a lot.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday October 13, 2009 05:45pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday October 13, 2009 09:50pm EDT
The parenthetical word, satire, is where I think you've missed the key thing about this novel and Wyndham's work in general.
I think Wyndham wrote serious political satire disguised (most often) as "cosy catastrophes", not cosy catastrophes per se.
In his constant references to how the various left, right and centre versions of the popular (and the elitist) press dealt with the ongoing crisis, and even in Tuny's (and other, male, characters) belief the Russians were behind everything - remember, this was written during the height of McCarthyism in the States and of Cold War hysteria throughout the Western world - there is (or at least, I see) a quiet but devastating portrait of human short-sightedness, stupidity and good old fashioned avarice that is anything but "cosy".
Similarly, I saw Phyllis as probably the strongest character in the book. Her arbour may have been made fun of, but the supplies hidden within it saved her and her husband's lives; she was a highly talented writer in her own right who kept up her work even after she got married; and she only (briefly) went into "hysterics" because Mike spent weeks (months?) having nightmares about Muriel Flynn, depriving her of sleep and creating a tremendous amount of stress for her. And, she spent maybe two weeks taking the rest-cure, while Mike spent - what? A month? Two? Long enough to completely lose touch with the outside world at any rate.
Well. That was quite a rant; I hope I've been coherent, at least.
Thursday October 15, 2009 03:13pm EDT
Thursday October 15, 2009 03:54pm EDT
I read The Day of the Triffids when I was 8 or so, when I innocently assumed that if a book got published, it must be because it was not only extraordinary but exemplary as well. Accordingly I was very puzzled by the plot. So you have triffids, which are sort of walking, deadly plants that can talk to each other, and the narrator just happens to get blinded temporarily by triffid venom just in time to avoid being permanently blinded by a green meteor shower, which affects nearly everyone else? And then mumble, mumble, the end. Was that how you wrote a story? And what made this a story, anyway, as opposed to just one damned thing after another? I was confused about what to learn from this. Still am, I suppose.
Wednesday October 21, 2009 06:18pm EDT
And "Out of the Deeps" is an utterly horrible title. For a start, they go "Into the Deeps".
William Hyde
Wednesday January 13, 2010 04:28pm EST
I'm late coming to this thread - the trail is probably significantly cold - but I just wanted to say that I am somewhat obsessed with this book. I have read it three times in so many months and it stills fascinates. Unfortunately, I find it hard to pin down why it's so good...
Is it...
1) the fact that the 'kraken' are never revealed in any meaningful sense having dominance of the sea and leaving no real enemy to fight back against
2) the perfect three phase structure
3) the grim 'survivalist' post-catastrophe England
4) the slowness of it all
5) the extreme violence - not described in any real detail - of the ship sinkings
6) the awful crushing and drowning deaths of all those caught in the psuedo-coelenterata's tentacles
I have no idea!
Thursday January 14, 2010 06:25pm EST
Do not think it is /meant/ to have that magical ending.
The original ending has both a foreword and an afterword from the "International Renaissance Commission", saying that they are publishing this "account" from a found manuscript and that they do not know if the authors are dead or alive.
Secondly, there is no ultrasonic weapon, and there is a suggestion that the Xenobaths have simply entered a dormant state or had trouble breeding in Earth's oceans, rather than have died out.
That's a brutal, short summary of it, but the "Oh hey the Japanese saved us" ending was added as an "alternate" ending, apparently for Ballantine books.
Anyhow, just a head's up.