Is there anybody out that truly believes they don’t judge books by their covers? In our visually dominated culture, it’s sort of impossible not to make some flash judgments. The use of images is the primary way to get a consumer’s attention and has been for a long time. We scan, we search, we browse, we flip through, we glance over and only pause when something catches our eye. Non-visual art forms such as literature and music are not immune to it. Everyone in the industry knows the cover can make or break a book.
As an author, this sometimes can be more than a little frustrating. Partially because you want your work to be discovered for its written worth and not some random image, but more so, it’s frustrating because you’re aware of the importance and weight that image holds. Though I don’t buy books because of their covers, it’s often the cover that causes me to pick up an unknown book and read the summary. And though, depending on the publisher, an author usually has some input on the cover image, it’s not necessarily a comfort because the input you’re giving is not on your field of expertise.
In my career, I’ve experienced both ends of the spectrum. I have had covers that I thought were brilliant and ones that I hated with every fiber of my being. There’s nothing worse than the feeling of having a book go out with a cover you don’t think does the story justice or misses the mark. If such a cover is caught in the early stages, the author usually has the leverage to change it. However, once the all-holy Marketing Departments put their stamp of approval on something, you can forget about changing anything. If they think they have something they can sell...they run with it, regardless if the image fails to properly represent the title.
On the flip side, there’s nothing quite seeing the cover for the first time and falling in love with it. I had that feeling with Zombie Blondes. We were lucky enough to get the extremely talented fine artist Sas Christian to allow us to use one of her paintings. It was a cover that I would pick up in a store and look at and most importantly, it makes sense. It captures the feeling of the book. And, it’s eye-catching. I think that should be every publisher’s goal. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case.
An author’s relationship to a book after it’s published is a strange one. By the time it hits store shelves, your involvement in it is long gone. It’s out in the world on its own. A common metaphor for the experience is that of a parent sending their child out into the world. Taking that metaphor, the cover would be the child’s clothing. You want your child to look presentable and you want them express themselves. Too often books, like kids afraid of not fitting in, are simply dressed to look like everyone else even if that’s not who they are on the inside.

A good example to illustrate my point of view on the subject is the novel Fay by Larry Brown. It follows the character Fay from his previous novel Joe. I loved Joe and couldn’t wait to read Fay. But alas, when it came out in hardcover, I was a poor student and decided to wait for the paperback. When the paperback came out, I’ll admit that I refused to buy it because of the cover. The hardcover image is evocative while the paperback is cheese and the girl on the cover seemed so far from the Fay I remembered. I eventually bought the hardcover and my suspicions were right. The paperback image doesn’t feel like the book at all. Granted, this is an extreme case. It’s rare that a cover can prevent anyone from buying a book unless they’re snobbish about their collections such as I. But it can. That’s how powerful the sole image connected to a written project can be.
Because of my experiences, I softened my stance. Now when I go to a bookstore, I try to pick up and browse through a few books every time whose covers I despise. In the past year, I read Bloodrock by Richard Ferrie. Had I never gone through the process of getting a cover slapped on a book of my own that I didn’t like, I probably wouldn’t have read this title despite the positive things I’d heard. My flash judgment would have written it off as trash fiction. In reality, it was a publisher trying to cash in by getting their book on a trash fiction spin rack somewhere.
I think it’s important that readers, at least occasionally, pause to thinking about how the selling of covers affects them personally. Because it affects all of us and anyone who tells me it doesn’t, I will tend to disbelieve them. Of course, all of that could go away if people actually do start reading downloaded files...but the thought of that makes me shudder and grow cold, so very cold inside.
Brian James is the author of several notable books including Pure Sunshine and Dirty Liar. He lives in a small town in upstate New York that may or may not be overrun with zombies. His new book, Zombie Blondes, is now available from Square Fish.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 03:27pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 03:50pm EDT
It looks like it's out in paperback today, at least per amazon, with the same awful cover. And the kindle edition is still $15, so almost twice the paperback cost, so sorry Charles, I won't be buying it still.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 05:08pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 05:22pm EDT
Wow, Irene! You're pretty punk rock. That's very surprising advice, considering what you do for a living. I'd have thought you'd find an act like that offensive.
Tuesday June 30, 2009 05:31pm EDT
There's a book by Katherine Kerr (I think) that has a Mercedes Lackey cover. It confuses me every time I see it. If you've gone to the trouble of branding an author, stay branded!
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 05:43pm EDT
THE COVER ART IS VERY IMPORTANT, and for me there is definitely a correlation between the quality of the cover art & the quality of the book.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 05:58pm EDT
ces: These days though, I think that the cover art IS very important - I'm PAYING for it, I'll see it many times, and if it sucks (establishes a negative pressure differential), I might well just not buy it.
Tuesday June 30, 2009 06:27pm EDT
Pick up the Saturn's Children Science Fiction Book Club edition. Much better cover, though not exceptional, but something I wasn't embarassed to be seen reading. The story is too good to miss out on completely.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 06:33pm EDT
Jason,
Not at all. Covers are advertising first and foremost. When they are great, then they can stand as artwork on their own. But some bad covers do their job well. And sometimes, despite hard work, it just doesn't come together the way we hoped.
As for books as fetish objects, I love to look at _other_ peoples beutiful books. Maybe it's because I'm such a damn slow reader but I love to _live_ with the books I'm reading. Scrunch them into pockets, drop them in the tub, I once bore a two inch hole through The Sportswriter while riding my bike into Paris, (Not the mention putting a nail through The Watchmen just to rag on Pablo .)
The thing is, just because I don't shelter books, doesn't mean that I don't want them to lovely in every aspect. A great cover on a great book is all the more comfort when getting caught outside in the rain.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 06:42pm EDT
That alone would make an interesting topic for a post!
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 06:52pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 08:50pm EDT
Long story short, Irene reminded me that with such a wealth of cover art that was no longer on the shelves, I started buying cheap used books and ripping their covers off without even reading them, often tracing the careers of some illustrators I admired and keeping them in envelopes. They're probably in storage now.
I guess, given the original post, I feel a little guilty about not reading those books, but I did read a lot of stuff that was out of print, that I never would have, on the strength of some cover art among those sweet-smelling piles. However, with used book stores disappearing left and right (at least where I lived), I'm sorta glad I did it--I'm guessing a lot of those piles and piles of old paperbacks ended up in a landfill/recycling bin anyway. :,-(
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 30, 2009 08:59pm EDT
I have a rule not to buy anything with a dragon on the cover. This may have been broken for George RR Martin and "The Hobbit", but that is all.
The unicorn on the cover rule is more rigid.
I will buy a book just for it's cover and for consistency also. I have purchased books in the Gollancz Future Classics series and Space Opera series because they have some of the best cover design that I have seen. I have drawn the line at purchasing titles in this series that I have already got in the Sci Fi Masterworks series. Yes, some of these authors are not may favourite, but I have purchased them anyway.
I do like Penguin Essentials also. No cover artwork. Title and author. All look the same.
Tuesday June 30, 2009 09:26pm EDT
Seriously. Make this happen for me.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 10:14am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 10:25am EDT
I've found that in its literal translation the ''don't judge a book by a cover'' chestnut is advice that I've done well to ignore. I'm sure that there are several books I've missed out on, but the majority of my reading over the last four years all stemmed from the cover of Knife of Dreams by Robert Jordan.
Whenever I walked into the bookstore, I was perpetually drawn to the cover art for KoD. Up to that point, the furthest I had gotten into sci-fi/fantasy was Harry Potter and the first two books of The Inheritance Cycle (a blatant violation of saunter's no dragon rule). When I realized that KoD was book 11 in the series, I bought The Eye of the World. I'm currently on my third read through of the series.
Another book I picked up just because of the cover was Good Omens by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett. Loved that one. Recommended and loaned it to a co-worker, then she moved to another state and I never saw it again.
In comparison, I thought about getting into Terry Pratchett's Discworld series, but the paperback covers just turned me off for some reason. Combine that with my reluctance to get into a nearly 40 book series, led to me passing on the series as a whole. I'm sure there are plenty of other excellent books that I've missed because I haven't been drawn to their covers at the store.
Finally, a couple that prove the truth of the aforementioned words of wisdom. Catch-22 by Joseph Heller. The simplicity of the cover drew me in. When I realized it was a classic, I bought it, and quickly lost interest about two chapters in. The other was Jonathon Strange and Mr. Norrell by Susanna Clarke. Another simple cover design, another award-winner, another book that simply could not hold my interest.
Final finally, those of you that can't bring yourselves to rip the cover off a book, I recommend giving them the College textbook treatment. Create a cover sleeve from heavy paper (grocery sacks work great) and put your own artwork on it. This maintains the integriy of the book, gives you an artistic outlet, and spares you the agony of looking at a disastrous cover every time you grab an old favorite off the shelf.
Wednesday July 01, 2009 11:38am EDT
From my own view, I usually am not be able to justify the purchase of books that use stock photography for the covers. (Stock photography seems to diminish the importance given to the book when next week a different book can be published with the same photo cover.)
For the bestsellers, the names sell the books (Patterson, King, Koontz, Evanovich, Grisham, etc), but viewing their most recent covers, I would choose to never purchase their books, past or present. (The covers make my eyes bleed.)
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 12:57pm EDT
I also dont find her work atrocious.. her character depictions reasonably well reflect how they're drawn out in the books, I think.
As for others: Sarah Monette's series that starts with 'Melisune' have cover art reminiscient of trashy romance novels. Not to say its bad art; its not, its well done. They simply dont reflect the books well at all. Had I merely seen them in the store I would have, to my loss, passed them right by in scorn. Fortunately I read a review first that engaged me.
Once I know enough about a book to be interested, the cover ceases to matter to me. Allowing yourself to be held back for that reason alone is unfortunate.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 02:24pm EDT · amended on Wednesday July 01, 2009 02:26pm EDT
Actually in the 80s I discovered Michelle West, Jo Clayton AND Mercedes Lackey (later on Fiona Patton) on the strength of her covers, which I love, so the more Jody Lee the better ^^
Quick Reference Painting section of her website
Oh, and Tanya Huff as well. DAW had her as a favoured cover artist for quite a while. In her way I think her work as strong as Michael Whelan and do not understand why she doesn't regularly get nominated for sf&f artist honors.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 02:29pm EDT
On the Sony Reader the pretty covers are black&white though.
Wednesday July 01, 2009 05:46pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 05:48pm EDT
Wednesday July 01, 2009 06:16pm EDT
I'm perfectly serious about having a nice-sized digital display for the really amazing art, and something like that could only help with sales.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 07:22pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday July 01, 2009 10:14pm EDT
With a smaller apt. than ever, I don't much like warehousing books like I used to, but I'm not at all interested in digital reading, either, which keeps a certain amount of reading down. Toss in a handful of great illos and I might find myself looking for a Kindle or similar. Actually, comics are starting to look like a good alternative again, especially after loving reading Watchmen last year.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday July 02, 2009 08:56am EDT
Portrait of a Noob eReader
Thursday July 02, 2009 10:26am EDT
That being said I generally prefer a sleek cover with a symbol ex. Jonathon Strange and Mr. Norrel- great cover. Or Martin's Fire and Ice paperback series.
The Stolen Child- that was good too.
Thursday July 02, 2009 12:40pm EDT
Thursday July 02, 2009 12:41pm EDT
That said, I usually at least open up a book that looks even vaguely interesting and read a few paragraphs or page from somewhere in the middle of the book. If the writing isn't clunky and the back blurb is intrigueing, I may well buy it.
Thursday July 02, 2009 01:24pm EDT
This applies even to eBooks (I'm a huge fan of eBooks). If anything, I think on-line eBook web sites should display a larger image of the cover and not just the tiny thumbnail image.
Thursday July 02, 2009 02:29pm EDT
Also, has anyone noticed the change in the cover art for the Dresden Files series? They used to have interesting covers, now they all have the pictures of Harry in weird places. I actually preferred the old cover art.
Jim
Thursday July 02, 2009 03:19pm EDT
Thursday July 02, 2009 04:50pm EDT
But I don't seem to be as good at selecting books as I once was. Maybe SF has changed and I am not keeping up or maybe it is heading in a direction I don't want to go. Too many sci-fi readers act like understanding science is not important.
But I would think that e-books would be the logical direction for people really interested in what I regard a sci-fi to go.
I am using my Archos PMA400 to go through the Gutenberg Project. There is lots of stuff I missed in the good olde days.
psik
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday July 02, 2009 04:51pm EDT
Thursday July 02, 2009 06:56pm EDT
If the cover suggest to me that the book is a drama about a mother that tries to raise three children while dealing with a horde of ninjas I probably won't ever go and read the back side description, left alone open the book to read the inside blurb or a random sampling of the first chapters.
Nah, actually I would probably.
There are some Sci-Fi authors I picked up later in my life than I naturally would have because the publisher insisted on using indecipherable pieces of modern art looking illustrations for the cover, the simple truth is a that I do tend to assume that a lazy cover holds a lazy novel until somebody I trust tells me different, and on the other hand I believe that a intricate cover, or one that makes me believe that the art team needed more than half a hour for it's conception or at least actually though something when doing the selection, holds a novel that was equally carefully selected.
Pure eBooks, apart from being something that I barely can get used to, almost always fall in the 'dreadful' category for cover art (if there is any to speak of) which makes me believe it to still be an inferior form of literary.
I'm afraid I'm as prejudiced a consumer as they come. *shrug*
Friday July 03, 2009 02:34pm EDT
I remember being 13 or 14 and being really happy that Tanya Huff's books were being packaged with Jody Lee covers because I figured it was a deliberate attempt to get her some of Mercedes Lackey's market.
The one time I can remember resisting a book because of its cover art and then later coming back to it was Barbara Hambly's The Silent Tower, which I believe had a Darrell K. Sweet cover in mmpb. I'd always believed that by and large Darrell K Sweet art was used to signify a type of epic fantasy that rarely clicked for me, so I passed it by. The 2nd book in the series had a Michael Whelan cover and I picked it up to look at and so bought both.
I think judging a book by its cover is very productive as long as you remember that what you're judging isn't the book but the marketing. IE - this book is being marketed to someone, on the basis of other books with similar covers. Based on that, does it fall into a marketing category that appeals to me?