Elizabeth Bear had an interesting post recently (heck, she ALWAYS has interesting posts, but this one was relevant to what I talk about here) wherein she posits that each generation of SF short fiction writers only reads within its own generational short fiction boundary. Or in more succinct, Bear fashion: "We don't read them. And they don't read us."
I'm sure there are exceptions. I'm sure there are writers of short fiction who belong to one generation that read fiction written by people of another generation, but I think in essence bear has hit upon something here. Again, in her succinct fashion, "I wonder when the last time was that Bob Silverberg read a story by Benjamin Rosenbaum, David Moles, or Yoon Ha Lee?"
I agree with her sentiment because I've had the experience of when I see/hear Gen X writers talk about other writers, they tend to refer to people from within their generation, and vice versa for the older generations. Now, I think a lot of this comes from the fact that writers talk about their peers. And not that Elizabeth Bear and Robert Silverberg aren't peers in the sense that they are both talented science fiction and fantasy authors. But it's more that they aren't peers in the sense of when their careers started and where they are in their career. Silverberg's published something like 5,000 books* and Bear has published slightly fewer**.
I think when you're on the outside, i.e., not a writing professional, you read what you read. You read everything. You read read read. But once you cross that line into becoming a professional, you start to make friends and relationships and connections with other professional. It's no different than how you make friends and connections anywhere. You gravitate towards people similar to you. A new writer isn't necessarily going to approach Silverberg and become best friends. But a new writer will approach another new writer. And as careers burgeon, and you read what your friend is writing, you want to talk about it to other people so that the public supports your friend, your friend can keep writing, and you can continue to see them at conventions, etc.
Obviously new writers garner their interest in writing by reading already established authors. Somewhere along the line this slows down and in some cases stops. We all get busier as we get older, and as you're filling up your days with writing (or your spare time outside your day job writing) and you have less time for reading. You become choosier with what you read, and the choice you make will often be generational peers for the reason laid out above. This is no less true for older generations.
Now why does it matter if writers aren't reading each other across generations?
Younger generations are missing out on seeing how established writers continue to hone their craft. If we take Silverberg as an example, what makes his writing fresh to keep selling new material? What keeps him writing? If you're very lucky as a writer, you will have a career as long as Robert Silverberg's. In my opinion, part of learning how he's accomplished this feat (other than talent) is to read what he writes and to learn from what he's done and is still doing. In some respects, a younger writer reading older writers is akin to an apprenticeship.
As for the older generations, there's something to be said for seeing where the future of a career is going. Are there things getting published today that could inspire an established writer to try something new? Look at the impact that Moorcock's tenure with New Worlds or Ellison's Dangerous Visions anthologies had.
It's a dangerous thing to limit who you read when you're a writing professional. Unless you know what's being done, there's no way you can do something that ISN'T being done. This is called environmental scanning, which is vital to being successful in your field. You see what everyone else in your profession is already doing. You can learn whether what you're doing is similar to others in the field that are already successful. You can also learn what people like from what's being done. But, more importantly, if you do your scan correctly, you can see what's lacking from your environment. And if you can define what's lacking, you can fill it.
But you can only do that by being thorough. So this is my assignment to all the writers out there: find a writer from a different generation than your own and read a short story from them. Report back in one week, tell me what you've learned. I'll make it easier for eveyone, in my Weekend Getaway later today, I'll give you a link to a story from each generation.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 04:15pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 04:24pm EDT
Friday August 01, 2008 05:12pm EDT
Like all gross generalities, the one I made is riddled with exceptions. I've been reading a lot of Carol Emshwiler lately, for example.
But I do think there's a tendency, as one gets busier and one's time gets more constrained, to read things ones' pals are talking about.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 05:27pm EDT
I don't really know that this thing about authors not reading across generations is generally true, looking beyond Silverberg, though I'm sure there are plenty of examples that support it.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 07:23pm EDT
The youngest short fiction writer I'm excited about is Lila Garrott, who's about 24, and whose short work has been published in _Not One of Us_ and _Cabinet des Fees_. She's a friend, and she's brilliant. The oldest still working is probably Silverberg -- William Tenn isn't still writing, really -- and of people whose short work will cause me to buy a magazine it's in there's also Eleanor Arnason, Robert Reed, Ted Chiang, Marissa Lingen... all ages, all over the map.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 08:01pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 12:06am EDT
So I guess I'll be the guy who continues to contribute little to conversations (but keeps an open ear).
As far as grabbing older works--- I just discovered a treasure trove of fantasy works from chapbooks dating in the late 16th-early 17th century... that's probably not what you were asking for was it John?
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 01:58am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 10:56am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 11:45am EDT
So, if the younger generation of writers is also reading a lot online, as opposed to print venues, they would by necessity read younger writers.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 12:03pm EDT
However it sucks that I've been going to these conventions lately and don't know any of the more popular and recent writers. *shrug* I've always been a conundrum.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 04:04pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 07:45pm EDT
My first exposures were when I tore into my parent's science fiction and fantasy collections, which had been banished to the shed during my early childhood at some point.
But often, it is difficult for me to find books by older authors which are either new, or interesting, to me. My main issue is getting more exposure to writers of my generation - especially those who have little bookstore presence, or who are not in the genre sections that I enjoy.
Possibly the opposite effect: Many authors, especially those not enormously popular at the time of publication, are not reprinted or their rights are held by those with no interest in reprinting. Add to that low quality paperbacks and their rate of decay, and you have quite a thorny path to find older books in s/f and fantasy.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday August 03, 2008 03:53am EDT
It's an unfortunate vacuum for any fiction to fall into--too young to be out of copyright, yet old enough for authors to be hard to trace, or even dead. The effort and expense involved in reprinting would probably far outweigh any hope of a return.
Where's that sticky tape?
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday August 03, 2008 09:37am EDT
John, not sure your google-fu is too good?
What do you want, Asimov, Clarke, Heinlein? Silverberg, Pohl, Anderson, Harrison (for recent grandmasterness)
Later? Benford, Haldeman? Earlier? Smith, Breuer, etc.?
Free SF Online
Free SF Reader
This should keep you going for a long time.
:)
Sunday August 03, 2008 11:19pm EDT
is so much good stuff to read.
http://fictionfascination.blogspot.com/
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 06:58am EDT
Some of that's what Bear said -- you read the people your friends are talking about. Some of it's impatience with another generation's view of the future, or of the present. Some of it's irrational prejudice against sharp writers who are just as far ahead of the curve as they've ever been.
That said, there are a lot of 21st-century writers in the Year's Best tables of contents whose stuff I haven't read either.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 12:47pm EDT · amended on Monday August 04, 2008 05:10pm EDT
Now, I was looking for Silverberg initially, and I was going to do Bear and Silverberg, however, none of the available Silverberg fiction online was from this century.
And yes, I knew that would be limiting since some of the writers you mention were not alive in this century. And also limiting since many of the older generation of writers are not publishing at online magazines.
This was partly done to give a recent example of fiction, i.e., what is the person doing now. That was part of what I wanted to get across in this post; while it's important to know what/how Robert Silverberg wrote in the 1950s and 1960s, it's possible more important--from the standpoint of a writer, which is what I'm talking about, not a reader--to know what he's doing now.
How is Silverberg et al remaining relevant today? How do these people who have been writing for four or more decades keep themselves and the reader interested in their words?
Some of that is writing talent, but there's something to be learned, I think, from seeing how an essentially canonical figure (you can insert Grandmaster here, if you like) keeps their writing skills up to date.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 02:36pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 07:49pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 08:58pm EDT
I think reading outside the genre helps my writing tremendously and reading non-fiction keeps me thinking up new unique ideas.
But then again maybe I'm only saying something other writers already know.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 11, 2008 11:59am EDT
Also, it was comforting to know the authors featured at Worldcon were many of the ones featured at the last Denvention, even if that freaks the younglings out. Their continued output gives me a reference point to reenter fandom, and a seat, like starting from Shakespeare or Shaw, to see where the art form is going. The only limitation is my time and attention, so if I don't catch up to new authors and their works, that's my fault.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 11, 2008 12:18pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday August 13, 2008 11:02am EDT