Cryptozoologists of the world, rejoice. If you haven't seen it already, the blogosphere and real-world-o-sphere alike are buzzing with excitement about an amazing find:

Seriously, what the hell is that thing?
I raise the issue here because I want your feedback. If this little guy is more than just an everyday cryptid, more than just a previously unknown species or some sort of freakishly mutated cat, if it's a scout—I've always believed that, should an alien invasion actually come to pass, SF fans are the ones to keep company with if you want to survive.
As we all know, those stodgy scientists, locked into their rigid, academic paradigms, simply don't have the imagination to accept the paranormal or extranormal when they're face to face with it, which is why they usually shout something like "But, that's impossible!" before ending up as a blood-soaked pancake in the back of the lab, while their so-called mutant cat—in reality a flesh-eating, wall-crawling predator from the star next door—runs amok.
The geeks are always the first to figure out that an attack is afoot, and the first to figure out a countermeasure. I think it's too much to hope that Tauky, as I've nicknamed him, and his kin are vulnerable to water, despite the fact that his corspe was found on the beach. That would be too easy. So let's get logical about this. Let us know your thoughts about the following in the comments:
It's probably a good idea to bookmark this post in case the Tauky attack actually occurs. That way, you can check back in the comments for advice from your fellow SF aficionados—on your EVDO-enabled laptop, during a break from running for your life. And remember, if you find a baby Tauky, no matter how cute it is, don't lean in for a closer look.
Really, if you're a nerd, you should know better.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 04:07pm EDT
Friday August 01, 2008 04:25pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 04:28pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 04:48pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 05:08pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 05:18pm EDT
People aren't used to seeing doc skulls from the side, and find it hard to imagine what bones are below the fluffy snout; that doesn't make it any less so.
Do a test - put your hand over the skull and look at the rest of the animal. Then look at just the teeth while ignoring the rest of the picture. I think the juxtaposition of the body and the defleshed skull is what confuses most people.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 06:10pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 06:15pm EDT
However, a shell-less turtle has been suggested by others and that seems a bit more plausible.
But seriously people, don't let the alien's camouflage fool you. Let's start thinking defense strategies.
Friday August 01, 2008 06:56pm EDT
My first inclination is this is a hoax. I'd like to see if a Vet or other scientist has examined the body. So far all we've got is a picture and no facts. Personnally I have a little difficutly in rectifying what looks like a crab front end and what looks like hooves on the rear end.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 07:03pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 07:16pm EDT
That's all I see: dead.bloated.dog.
Friday August 01, 2008 08:32pm EDT
I might guess it's a fetus that got delivered premature or the mother was killed and this fell out of the mother prematurely, which might explain lack of hair.
Seth
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 10:37pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 11:16pm EDT
Now, I must get back to my dinner please. ;)
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 11:37pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 11:45pm EDT
Screw Gawker.
VIEW ALL BY · Friday August 01, 2008 11:48pm EDT
Saturday August 02, 2008 12:24am EDT
The sea vole is a hairless cousin to the garden vole. They are common around the Jersey shore but not usually seen as they feed only at night. What you cannot see is the vole's very long, elephantine snout (it appears to have been eaten off or perhaps rotted). The snout, usually over 10 meters long, is extended up to the surface of the water and used by the vole to breath while they graze on the seabed. During the day most voles find a hidden place to sleep and then enter a sort of state of suspended animation which enables them to live off of one breath during their sleep phase.
It isn't commonly known but Australian animal pestering expert Steve Irwin was actually killed by a sea vole, not a stingray. If disturbed in their sleep phase a vole will be roused with a vicious temper and they have been known to kill on more than one occasion (besides Irwin they have been implicated in the deaths of Yves Cousteau, Bert Kennedy, Amelia Earhart, several early members of the Beach Boys, Left-Eye Lopez, the guy who created Spongebob Squarepants and Tashkent Hilton... Paris Hilton's older brother... the Tashkent Hilton rocks, by the way).
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 01:25am EDT
*Rebel without a clue!*
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 09:15am EDT
No, it's not. The body plan is clearly that of a tetrapod, a terrestrial lineage that is quite well known [1]. It's not from amphibia or sauropsida, and that hind leg sure looks canine or feline to me. Decayed (and possibly photoshopped) house-cat would be my guess but it might be a dog.
1: One of the problems with Larry Niven's Known Space claim that humans come from another planet is that our skeletons mark us as part of a purely local group of animals that go back in the fossil record than 365 million years (well, and farther once you get into the lobed fish). ET isn't going to have our internal structure of supports.
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday August 02, 2008 09:17pm EDT
Hair may have been lost in the decaying process or some have suggested the corpse was exposed to fire.
Mystery's gone off it for me, I've heard and seen enough I'm convinced the poor thing was once a doggy. Question now is how did the poor fellow die :(
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday August 03, 2008 10:21am EDT
Ever wonder how Dr. Gregory House got so good at *almost* killing his patients before revealing the proper diagnosis (which he obviously had in mind since he first saw the patient)? Animal experimentation, that's how.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday August 03, 2008 11:17am EDT
Sunday August 03, 2008 11:01pm EDT
It's a dog or a raccoon. Immersion in moving water strips away hair and the moisture and rot bloats bodies adn distorts proportions, fish eat soft parts like noses, and sometimes soft bits get worn away by, say, getting dragged over a beach by waves. It has no upper teeth because teeth fall out in water frequently as decay loosens them. Ask anyone who has ever macerated animal skulls for fun. The "beak" is the front part of the toothless upper snout, sans flesh, lying at just the right angle to look creepy.
I have seen animal corpses after they've been in water long enough to lose their fur, and yes, some still had their eyes and lids intact, and their ears.
It is not a turtle. Please.
It's not a rodent. Look at the dentition.
It's not a cat. It's teeth are wrong.
It's either a dog or a raccoon. I could tell you for sure if I could see more of the lower teeth, or more of the paws. It certainly is not some sort of alien being or unknown animal.
The second picture, which may or may not be of the same animal (I believe it is, taken possibly before the other), gives more credence to this theory, as you can see the animal's penis. That's not how cats or rats or turtles are hung. Again, please, people. Let's not forget basic animal anatomy in our rush to believe in the next big mystery.
I love cryptids, and I do believe there's stuff out there we haven't identified. Sadly, this isn't one of them. It's a perfectly ordinary creature.
Let's all back away slowly and go study our osteology and anatomy, shall we?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 02:45pm EDT
The fact that there's this silly controversy over a bloated animal corpse on the beach is simply an indication of how isolated our urbanized population is from actual nature.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 03:15pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 03:52pm EDT
The fact that there's this silly controversy over a bloated animal corpse on the beach is simply an indication of how isolated our urbanized population is from actual nature.
Really? I think it says a lot more about the human imagination and our inherent eagerness to believe fantastic stories. It's an exercise in science fiction.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday August 04, 2008 06:16pm EDT
Tuesday August 05, 2008 09:43pm EDT
And vampire myths. The Eastern European vampire, before the romanticism, fit the description of a bloated corpse. Decaying bodies can emit bloodlike fluid from the mouth, or produce sound when staked or decapitated. So I hear, I hasten to add.
Tuesday August 05, 2008 10:17pm EDT
...Oh, wait, it's from the Procyon *genus*. Well, that certainly explains the resemblance to terrestrial lifeforms.