In a misguided attempt to make the Sci Fi Channel a “broader, more open and accessible and relatable and human-friendly brand,” the network is changing its name to a made-up meaningless configuration of letters that appear to be pronounced exactly the same as Sci Fi.

Discuss.
Edited to add:

VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 10:49am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 10:54am EDT
This is a classic case of some idiot suit wanting to distance themselves from "those mouthbreathers who dig spaceships and aliens and live in their parents' basement".
As a fan of science fiction, I find this incredibly insulting. It's like now that they're doing well, on the coat-tails of shows like Battlestar Galactica, no less, they feel they don't need us anymore. I'm sure they won't change their SEO tags from "Scifi" to "syfy", though...
You know what becomes irrelevant after this Friday's BSG? Syfy does.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 10:57am EDT
But ultimately, there are legions of fans that go into seizure when anyone says scifi, isn't SciFi Channel just complaining about the same associations that many of "us" do with the term?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 10:59am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 10:59am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:00am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:04am EDT
What about "Caprica"?
Hell, to think of a BSG franchise with a "syfy" logo makes me wanna throw up.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:05am EDT
More substantial reaction will be forthcoming once the mouth foam evaporates.
Monday March 16, 2009 11:06am EDT
This reinforces my first tweet on this, that SyFy sounds too much like syphilis - "SyFy: Imagine Greater insanity coming from corporate HQ"
http://twitter.com/wdonohue
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:08am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:09am EDT · amended on Monday March 16, 2009 11:10am EDT
When I tried to pronounce that I came up with something that reminded me of the word syphilis.
Funny.
sigh. I always wanted to rename that station the Horror network (couldn't believe the number of B-grade horror movies that is on.. maybe my timing is just bad?)
Jennifer
Edit- I see William Donohue's comment now.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:09am EDT
Did you miss this quote?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:09am EDT
Want fries with that?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:15am EDT
I totally agree with your post. I read the article you mention. Ugh. I think I won't be watching "Warehouse 13" after all.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:18am EDT
syphilis...
Waaay to go.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:20am EDT
...that disassociates them from the very genre that brought them the success in the first place.
Monday March 16, 2009 11:27am EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 11:27am EDT
http://spacesick.blogspot.com/2009/03/evil-megacorporation-rebranding.html
Monday March 16, 2009 11:30am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:31am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:32am EDT
Is there any chance that this was planned to coincide with the end of BSG?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:37am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:40am EDT
I actually LOL-ed at work.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:40am EDT
That link needs a disclaimer: "May cause out-loud laughter, which will make your coworkers look at you like you're insane... even more than normal."
Er, not that I had any experience anything like that just now. Of course.
Monday March 16, 2009 11:45am EDT
That this also alienates and pisses off SF fans doesn't worry them because where else are we all going to go? They are the only SFF dedicated cable channel in the U.S. and related markets, they re-run other channels' SFF shows and films, they've got no direct competition. They're competing against TBS and ABC Family and things like that, hence bizarre line-ups like those reality ghost chasing shows and specials about psychics, because they're trying to drag the general cable audience in. And it's working, which means they can branch into other products. In their view, all us SF fans will get over it, just like we got over their doing a remake of Battlestar Galactica. We didn't want it revived, but then, oh look, we did and liked it better. So they'll ignore any grumblings now over the name change.
The SF business is booming, and so they aren't going to follow the book model of maintaining genre purity and viewing the SF as all separate from the rest of the world. I think the name change they picked is stupid. I think their approach is often stupid. But if we can get a wider universe going on t.v., maybe we could have some competing SF channels that would be better at it.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:46am EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 11:53am EDT
In the same vein, MTV should have change their name years ago when they quit showing music-related programming and decided pseudo-reality, game, and teen shows were more important to them.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:56am EDT
Although, I do not expect this rebranding to help their numbers. Yes, their viewership might continue to increase as it has, and they will say it is because they are spiffy syfy, but we will all know it is a lie, and will cry into our blankets, and they will cry into their beds stuffed full of cash money.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:57am EDT
Nice post...
"That this also alienates and pisses off SF fans doesn't worry them because where else are we all going to go? "
....And the above is what I keep coming back to. They _already_ showed that they are either ignorant or uncaring of core fan concerns by not understanding the baggage that "scifi" has in the community. (Ressonable or otherwise..i;ve fought both sides of that fence)Coupled with the fact that the core community doesn't like the phrase for the same reasons they stated, I'm wondering why there is so much anger towards them now.
Again, it's a DUMB name, they now have had two dumb names. Good going guys.
(As an aside -- my one and only expierience with a real focus group had just about the same results SyciFiy has had....lots of money spent to end up right where we started.)
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 11:59am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:02pm EDT
Of course, they chose a stupid name to change to. But hey, BSG is ending soon and then we won't have to watch it anymore anyway. It's totally going to be "siffy" from now on.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:08pm EDT
"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network."
Uh. I would think with the recent rise in 'cool to be geek' culture, that's exactly what they'd want to be aiming for.
As far as easier to text, well, f him if he just couldn't type out an extra 'c' and 'i' on his Iphone.
Geek.
Err. I mean...
What the FRAK!
Also, as far as the "female audience"... I don't think I'm alone here when I say I'm not the only one who was upset when shit horror flicks, daytime soap operas and wrestling took over my well written dystopian futures set in space!
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:11pm EDT
I don't think it's just the name change that the community is reacting against. While it's a stupid name, there are other ways they could have pitched it that would have gotten our support.
They could have said, "Hey guys, we know this is kinda silly, but it's a copyright thing and we just need to appeal to a bigger audience. We're still on your side, but we want to educate the world that there's more to SF than aliens and spaceships. And hey, here's some more BSG and Caprica for you faithful while we revamp."
Had they said that, then maybe it wouldn't be so bad. But instead, they felt the need to insult their core audience and say explicitly that they want to distance themselves from us. Fine, I'll just take my money elsewhere, away from them and their sponsors.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:14pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:15pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:21pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:37pm EDT
Er.
Lay Sy.
KatG's argument makes sense from a branding perspective, and I'm not sure I even disagree with Sci-Fi feeling the need to rebrand and develop a new corporate image.
But SyFy?
Really? That's the best they could come up with? The name continues to evoke Sci-Fi in its pronunciation but looks like some exec's 4 year old came up with the spelling.
It's the worst of both worlds.
I mean, if you're going to rebrand, then just rebrand for frak's sake.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:49pm EDT
SciFi is SciFi! Join the revolution!
http://tinyurl.com/scifiisscifi
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:51pm EDT
They definately could have at least been tactful. Did they ever think "SciFi is associated with basement-nerds, I wonder why?" Maybe the execs have gotten so out of touch with the world that they forgot basement-nerds are still around. Iunno.
So, instead of Saturn, will the new logo be a stylized close up of "Syf"? *snerk*
Monday March 16, 2009 12:52pm EDT
I would have hoped market research would comprise, not stereotypes, but actual research.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 12:53pm EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 12:54pm EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 12:54pm EDT
See, this is why naming a product is such a fine line to tread.
I've been shouting for years for people to stop with the acronyms and start making up their own words. Don't call it HDDVD, call it bluray or something.
HOWEVER, you have to be VERY CAREFUL when you make up words so that THEY DON'T SOUND COMPLETELY LAME AND RETARDED.
Also, if you are trying to distance yourself from a word, it may help to actually use a different word -- not the same word with a different spelling.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 01:01pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 01:36pm EDT
What if they just decided that the network should now be known as "Frak"? Anyone? Anyone?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 01:42pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:04pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:26pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:39pm EDT
Like I said, they're just making explicit what their programming has been implying for years! :)
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:44pm EDT
I think if they want to "re-vamp" their brand they should consider, you know, better programming. I could think of a million better uses of the WWE timeslot!
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:47pm EDT
I spend lots of money on books, comics, movies and other things related to science fiction. I haven't paid much attention to the Sci Fi channel and now I know why:
They don't want anything to do with me.
Well I guess they're going to get their way, because after the way they went about explaining the change of name I don't want anything to do with them.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 02:50pm EDT
I was discussing this with my friends on-line, and at first I was rather upset with it. But then my friends led me to realize there are actually two fundamental issues involved: what the Skiffy-spokesman is saying, and what the network is actually doing.
What he's saying is annoying, yeah. ("Boys in basements"? I'll have them know that I'm actually living on my parents' first floor—because I've got a Taylor spatial frame on my broken leg and couldn't make it up or down stairs.) The whole bit about trying to distance themselves from science fiction is insulting.
But oddly enough, it's also not true. SciFi is still showing a lot of science-fiction and speculative-fiction stuff even if it has mixed in a bunch of non-SF. Battlestar Galactica, Doctor Who, Eureka, Farscape, Stargate, Sanctuary. Even their made-for-TV shlock movies tend to have SFish (or fantasy or horror, which are closely related) elements.
I really don't like the insulting tone that the representative takes in the article. In fact, it seems to me like SyFy needs to SyFyre its publicists and get new ones. But it doesn't necessarily mean this is the end of science-fiction programming on the channel.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 04:39pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 04:58pm EDT
I know, it took me forever to find this site. Tour.com has NOTHING to do with SF! ;)
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 05:03pm EDT
So, hello peoples that work at "Syfy-no-c-or-i"! I feel your pain.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 07:10pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 07:23pm EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 07:34pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 08:06pm EDT
It is Tor, pronounced like "Taur", but you'd be surprised at how many non-genre people don't apply Occam's Razor, and expect a more complicated spelling.
As much as this "SyFy" idiocy really pisses me off, I too, feel for the "Syfy-no-c-or-i-but-lots-of-y's" people.
But not too much. They brought it on themselves, after all.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 08:49pm EDT
Yes, they're both pronounced the same, but seeing SyFy makes me go "Huh?" and I need a moment to make the connection...which really takes me back to SciFi anyway, just to understand WTF they're talking about. Even though I know what it's supposed to be, I still look at it and say "Siffy" in my head. Extremely frustrating.
Did they really think that a genre controlled by the most intelligent of audiences is going to accept such a dummified version of an abbreviation?
It's insulting, to say the least, and it makes me glad I don't have cable.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 16, 2009 09:40pm EDT
Monday March 16, 2009 11:36pm EDT
They're not just dealing with the channel -- the channel is a platform. If you're buying BSG, Eureka, etc. DVD's, they're getting a cut. Their web channel and other websites using their content -- they get a cut. Buy a Stargate T-shirt or a tie-in novel, they get a cut, and so on. A network does a SFF show -- they pick up the re-runs and get a cut.
I think that we can say that they do some good things -- things that have helped promote SFF -- but they go about it in a bad way. Another SF channel as competition would help. But this is the syndication market now -- a multimedia octopus, and the former Sci Fi Channel was in there first.
Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:10am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:21am EDT
Meebee up yer neck of the woods pardner... ;)
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:28am EDT
Seth
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:46am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 01:37am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 11:14am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 11:17am EDT
Tuesday March 17, 2009 11:39am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:37pm EDT
also, re: tor/tour, my sisters say i pronounce things funny, i say sure with almost 2 syllables, shoe-er. so i can see people who have short clipped phrasing confusing the 2 tors tho i wouldn't be able to
Tuesday March 17, 2009 12:46pm EDT
I could have told siffy, for much less $, that the name they were looking for was "OnSpec."
To fans, it would have looked like an evocation of SpecFic. To writers, it would have looked like a rare moment of truth telling. As in, "Where do you guys so consistently find so much (other than BSG) utter garbage?"
"On Spec."
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 01:07pm EDT
Tuesday March 17, 2009 02:22pm EDT
Plus, the made-up word SyFy has already been used by other groups and companies. SyFy Portal is a fan/news website as has already been noted. Didn't anyone in the marketing company they hired run an Internet search? Which means that their quest to have a name that no one else can trademark/use -- probably going to fail legally. I think it's the stupidity as much as the insults that have SF fans stunned.
It will be interesting to see if this ends up New Coke or Exxon.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 17, 2009 03:45pm EDT
They apparently did do at least a little bit of internet search. Or someone did. Since NBCU apparently bought the rights to the brandname SyFy Portal in February.
Wednesday March 18, 2009 11:15am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 23, 2009 09:26am EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 06:52am EDT
gift ideas