Little Fuzzy (1962), Fuzzy Sapiens (1964) and Fuzzies and Other People (1984—but written in 1964) don’t seem to be exactly in print. Little Fuzzy can be purchased with a pile of H. Beam Piper’s other stories for the Kindle for 80 cents, an offer so good I can hardly believe it, but the other books don’t seem to be available at all. Well, there are plenty of copies around second hand. These are classics. They’re also charming, and have aged surprisingly well.
They’re part of my favourite subgenre of SF, the kind with planets and aliens. The books fit into Piper’s Nifflheim universe but all they need is each other. Zarathustra is a recently settled planet run by the Chartered Zarathustra Company as a Class III planet, one without native intelligent life. Jack Holloway, an independent sunstone prospector, discovers what he at first takes to be an animal and calls it a “Little Fuzzy,” and then realizes it is a member of an intelligent species—or is it? The very interesting question of the sapience of the Fuzzies, who don’t qualify under the “talk and build a fire” rule of thumb, takes up the rest of the book. The evil company will lose control of the planet if it has intelligent natives. There’s a court-case—it’s surprising how little SF has climactic court cases. This is a terrific one, funny, exciting, and ultimately triumphant.
It’s interesting to consider that date of Little Fuzzy, 1962. There’s a line in the book where a hotel is reluctant to admit Fuzzies and the lawyer “threatens to hit them with a racial discrimination case” and they immediately back off. In 1962 there were still hotels in parts of the US that didn’t admit people of all human skin colors. In some US states, people of different skin colors weren’t even allowed to marry, never mind South Africa. Martin Luther King was campaigning, the civil rights campaign was in full swing, and Piper, a white man who loved guns, frontiers, and history, chose to write about a world where these questions were so settled—and in the liberal direction—that everyone’s arguing about the civil rights of aliens and he can throw in a line like that. There’s also the question of the “childlike” Fuzzies, who have a protectorate for their own good. There’s no doubt Piper knew exactly the history of such protectorates when applied to humans other humans called “childlike” and took into their paternal protection. Holloway calls himself “Pappy Jack” for a reason.
In Fuzzy Sapiens, (and I guess the name is a spoiler for the first book!) the company turns out not to be so bad, putting together a planetary government turns out to be really difficult, and some bad people try to exploit the Fuzzies. Fuzzies are sapient, but they’re at the level of understanding of a ten- to twelve-year-old child. And they have problems with reproduction which needs human science to cure. And here Piper goes head on with a species that really does need protection, that really does need things “for their own good,” that is sapient but may not be responsible, and the difficulties of dealing with that. The answer for the Fuzzies is that they are becoming symbiotes, giving the humans something the humans want as much as the Fuzzies need what the humans can give them. That’s Fuzzy fun—and the question of whether you can get that from human children (though they do grow up...) is left aside. People want to adopt Fuzzies, and the word “adopt” is used. But what can you do if you have a whole species of sapients who are about as responsible as a ten-year-old child? We don’t have any real sub-sapients on Earth, but Piper made up the Fuzzies and made them cute and made a thought experiment that doesn’t have simple answers.
It’s Fuzzies and Other People that really lifts the series out of the ordinary, because for the first time we have a Fuzzy point-of-view. The novel follows a small band of Fuzzies who have had no human contact, as well as Little Fuzzy lost in the wilderness, and the usual human cast. The Fuzzies have agency. They are figuring out the world. They aren’t as simple as they look. When humans have taught them tricks, like making a fire or a spear, they’re more than ready to use that for their own purposes. (There’s a lovely line where Little Fuzzy is making a spear and remembers that the humans have said to use hand-made rope but he doesn’t have time so he’ll use some wire he has in his bag...) They’re still charming and innocent and childlike, but in their own internal point of view they have dignity. The book ends with a group of Fuzzies going off to Earth. I wish Piper had lived to write the books that would have come after and shown Fuzzies in the wider universe.
Piper also gets points for feminism and for cleverly using the reader’s implicit (1962) assumption of anti-feminism against them. There’s a female scientist in the first book who also turns out to be a Navy spy, and nobody suspects her, even when she thinks “a girl in this business ought to have four or five boyfriends, one on every side of the question.” My instinctive reaction to that is always “Ugh!” but it’s an “Ugh” that a lot of early SF has conditioned me to expect. When it turns out she’s a spy, why, that makes perfect sense. The pool of stenographers is as old fashioned as the viewscreens, but I think that comes under “they have an FTL drive but no iPods and everyone still smokes.” You can’t really complain about that kind of thing. All the women we see have jobs, many of them have scientific jobs, and when we see a woman sentenced in court she gets the same sentence as the others. 1962? Pretty good.
I think a lot of Piper’s best work was at short story length, but I think these are a terrific set of short novels. I didn’t read them when they were first published (I wasn’t born until a month after Piper died!) but in 1984 when the first two were republished at the time of the publication of the third. So I was twenty, not twelve, and they were already twenty years old, but they charmed me to pieces. They still do. My son read then when he was twelve, and promptly read the rest of Piper. (He especially liked Space Viking, also available in that astonishing 80 cent Kindle bundle.) These are still deeply enjoyable stories. Nobody writes things like this any more, so it’s just as well we’ve still got the old ones and they’re still good.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 04:52pm EDT
Wednesday March 11, 2009 05:21pm EDT
Wednesday March 11, 2009 05:32pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 06:06pm EDT
Fuzzy Bones is a interesting revisionist history in which the Fuzzys turn out to be from another planet (decended from survivors of a crashed spaceship)
Golden Dream is a prequel to Little Fuzzy from Little Fuzzy's perspective.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 06:08pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 07:33pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 07:48pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday March 11, 2009 09:15pm EDT
Wednesday March 11, 2009 11:11pm EDT
Thursday March 12, 2009 12:05am EDT
With luck it'll be on the Hugo ballot.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 12:17am EDT
seth
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 08:36am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 10:20am EDT
Found my copy in a milk carton on the floor of my favorite used bookstore in Brooklyn. The cover pulled me in. I also bought a copy of Clifford Simak's Mastodonia, with an equally cool old "YA" pulp cover, and read them both. Simak's another underestimated Golden Age writer -- maybe a review on Tor.com is in order.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 10:27am EDT
(Climatic court cases--Kagan's _Hellspark_, which is also about sapience, yeah?)
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 03:36pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 03:53pm EDT
And along those lines:
Are we *certain* there are no Fuzzy-like sub-sapients on earth?
I can think of at least five candidate species right off the top of my head and that's without getting into the whole "Dogs have masters, cats have staff" debate. :-)
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 12, 2009 04:24pm EDT
Come join us at Distributed Proofreaders!
Thursday March 12, 2009 10:40pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday March 13, 2009 02:46pm EDT
Wednesday March 25, 2009 08:56pm EDT
What struck me this time through, though, is something I think I just accepted as a plot contrivance, once upon a time. And maybe it is/was, but . . . did anyone else notice that the way humans react to Fuzzies is a little like the way Fuzzies react to the "wonderful food" that the humans give them? They don't just like Fuzzies, they almost crave Fuzzies. It's almost instinctive: as if the Fuzzies are filling some almost biological need in the humans who adopt them. Jo, you point out that Piper says that what humans get from Fuzzies is "fun," or that the Fuzzies are substitute children, but I'm not sure that that's all he had in mind. For one, it's the human characters who keep saying that to themselves, or to each other; though their thoughts on the subject are a bit, well, fuzzy, the Fuzzies themselves seem to hint that there is a bit more to it. Maybe.
Damn, but I wish Piper been able to write the next book, especially if it was going to follow the Fuzzies off planet. Maybe he didn't have something specific about human nature or the nature of human sapience in mind, but--given how flawlessly the first books fit together--I wouldn't be surprised if he did.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday March 26, 2009 08:35am EDT
The only evidence I can see against it is the jewel thieves' dislike of the fuzzies they have working for them. Otherwise, yes, people do seem to have a universal instinctive positive reaction to fuzzies, even when you wouldn't expect it, as in Victor Grego.
I am now thinking of Tiptree's story "And I Awoke And Found Me Here Upon the Cold Hill's Side". And George R.R. Martin's "And Seven Times Never Kill Man".
Thursday March 26, 2009 10:16am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday June 23, 2009 02:07am EDT · amended on Tuesday June 23, 2009 02:19am EDT
It was promoted as a kid book in the school library, I imagine because it had little fuzzy people in it.
--edit: went and looked it up and it's definitely a lobster, the spear is surely a scalpel (or a Steak Knife do the Future)and Fuzzy is one hell of a lot fuzzier than I remembered.
Michael Whelan was the artist
He did Friday and the cat Who Walks Through Walls and a large number of The Dark Tower books
http://www.michaelwhelan.com/catalog/home.php
VIEW ALL BY · Monday June 29, 2009 01:09pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday July 23, 2009 11:38pm EDT · amended on Thursday July 23, 2009 11:39pm EDT
>Mary Frances: I felt the same way when I first read "Fuzzies and other People", and I think it was because I had already read "Fuzzy Bones" and liked it so much, with the story line about Grego, Christiana and Diamond. (ok, I'm a romantic), and "Fuzzies & Other People" was a split off the story line. I didn't like thinking that the whole Grego, Diamond and Christiana story had... never happened!
And damn, I can't find ANY of the books except "Little Fuzzy" available as ebooks.
( Not even Kindle books, although I don't have a Kindle. I don't WANT someone else deciding to remove books from my library if they feel like it.)
Anyone spotted any of the others anywhere?