Last month we celebrated Black History Month by reading some SF. Since March is Women’s History Month, it is appropriate that we do the same. What follows is a list of works you could read this month and as well as some links to other places to look for reading material.
James Tiptree, Jr. (Alice Bradley Sheldon): Tiptree’s work often explored gender and sexuality. The James Tiptree, Jr. Award, an annual literary prize for science fiction or fantasy that expands or explores our understanding of gender, is named for her.
C. J. Cherryh: Cherryh’s work often looks at the outsider finding his or her place in society. In particular many of the works explore gender roles and expectations. Her writing is considered some of the best in SF for any writer, to which her Hugo wins can attest.
Ursula K. Le Guin: Le Guin is an acknowledged master of the field, with several Hugo and Nebula awards to her credit. Her philosophical science fiction and fantasy novels push the boundaries of what literature can do. (See Jo Walton’s recent Tor.com review of Le Guin’s Lavinia.)
Elizabeth Moon: A former Marine, Moon is one of the few women writing military science fiction. Her works feature the themes of biology, politics and relationship issues.
Marie Brennan: Her novel Midnight Never Come is one of the best fairy stories in recent years. This tale is set in the time of Queen Elizabeth I, and its use of a historical reign as analogy for the primary narrative is both subtle and poignant.
Trudi Canavan: Australian author Canavan writes epic fantasy that is both personal and world-spanning, almost in the same sentence. She addresses issues that affect women in medieval societies in her work, and her female protagonists wrestle with them in an honest and enlightening way.
Kate Elliott: Another epic fantasist who also writes SF, Elliott’s Crown of Stars series has one of the best heroines in the subgenre. Liath manages to take charge of her life even with a horrible past that involves sexual slavery and psychological torture.
Pamela Freeman: Freeman is a children’s author still writing her first adult fantasy series. Her Casting Stones trilogy features a broad spectrum of strong, interesting female characters.
Elaine Cunningham: You have probably never heard of Cunningham, but Forgotten Realms fans are grateful for the works she produced in that shared world. Cunningham’s work shows that D&D roleplaying never was solely a male pastime.
Mercedes Lackey: Prolific and entertaining, Lackey’s works (especially Valdemar) were cutting edge in fantasy fiction when they were first published. Her inclusion of gay characters and strong, sexually liberated female heroines is particularly noteworthy.
Tanya Huff: Though Huff writes in a variety of genres, her paranormal fantasy has been especially popular, even being converted into a TV series called Blood Ties on Lifetime. The female protagonist is human, but she teams up with a vampire to stop various supernatural threats.
Lian Hearn: A pseudonym for a female author, Hearn’s work is set in a medieval Japan and captures all the majesty and beauty of imperial Japan. Hearn’s graceful and beautiful prose is some of the best in literature.
Kit Reed: Reed has a unique voice, and her works take a hard look at a lot of aspects of our current culture. Her most recent novel, Enclave, is a dystopian Harry Potter meshed with Orwell’s Animal Farm.
These are just a few of the female authors that can be found writing speculative fiction. There are many more and Wikipedia has a good (though not very comprehensive) list.
You should also check out Book View Café, “a consortium of over twenty professional authors with extensive publishing credits in the print world,” all of whom are women.
And if you are looking for fiction that is specifically feminist, then Aqueduct Press “dedicates itself to publishing challenging, feminist science fiction.” They have links to other resources that promote women in speculative fiction, as well.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 10:54am EST
That also strikes me as a very odd list.
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 11:14am EST
If folks would like to contrast it, maybe check out the list of under-read/obscure feminist books over at Feminist SF ....
http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=528
The Hathor Legacy almost makes a good practice of spotlighting SF/F books worth looking at in this context as well...
http://thehathorlegacy.com/
Sunday March 01, 2009 11:57am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 12:49pm EST
I've also always been highly suspect of these "it's [insert so-called minority here] month" deals. For example, if February is "Black History Month", does so-called black history not matter the other 11 months of the year?
@bluejo, @slickhop:
If you will indulge my ignorance, and in the interest of further educating Tor.com readers: how is it an odd/problematic list?
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 12:53pm EST
Also, I know its an easy tag, but McAffrey? yeah...
Not touching the "non-WASP" month thing. That's a slippery slope to get away having an excuse to enjoy different flavors of genre fiction and into nasty politics. yay women writers!
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 12:53pm EST
But now, 40-some years on? Aren't roughly half our best writers women?
(I also find the selection a bit odd, after the first three obvious ones.)
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 01:07pm EST
I'd start my list with two giants of the field, Andre Norton and Leigh Brackett, include the neglected Margaret St. Clair, and perhaps end it with Le Guin and Tiptree, who shattered the notion that "only men could write that" and danced on its rubble. Who else belongs on that historic list? (Until I glanced at the Feminist SF list upstream, I had no idea that Charlotte Gilman had written a F/SF novel.)
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 01:15pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Sunday March 01, 2009 01:30pm EST
It isn't "a history of significant women in the field" and it isn't "Some new women in the field" and it isn't "Some examples of women doing really different things from each other" and it isn't "A list of nifty women writers you might not have heard of" any of which could have made quite a long list. It is just, as I said, an odd mix. I can't see what John was trying to do here, but even putting aside the faint flavour of condescension in doing a list like this at all (as opposed to, for instance, what Clifford suggested, a piece on the history of women SF writers) it strikes me as odd. It isn't 1950. Most people now surely (even men!!) read stuff by women normally, without especially thinking about it. I mean who would decide to read Cherryh or Le Guin because of those paragraphs in this list? They must have heard of them before! Have they been shunning them for years because they have girl cooties? Would they change their minds now? I just don't get it. And obviously you can't put everyone in a list, but why leave out the Hugo winning and very much discussed Elizabeth Bear? And why isn't Octavia Butler on it? Oh, right, we did people of colour last month. Yuck.
Sunday March 01, 2009 01:34pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 02, 2009 12:00am EST
-Jeff
...just don't call me sir, I work for living.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 02, 2009 06:59am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 02, 2009 08:04am EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday March 02, 2009 11:32pm EST
And half of our best authors? Belike, but tell it to Hugo, he hasn't gotten the memo.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday March 03, 2009 04:28pm EST
A few points of clarification:
1. I wanted to post authors who usually do not make lists like these. Honestly, the significant women writers lists have been done to death, and my goal was to be fresh. (i.e. what MadelineF said)
2. I also limited myself to authors I have actually read.
neutronjockey - you are right of course, I apologize profusely.
bluejo - no condescension intended, just a helpful , interesting and/or unusual list based on a month the US has announced should be used to recognize women particularly. This does not preclude such lists any other month nor is it meant to demean the contribution of women throughout the year. If you felt it was condescending that is my fault though it was certainly not my intent.
And just because most people are reading women writers now does not mean that we should stop recognizing the unique contribution women make to SF.
I do recognize that this is easily considered an odd list.
Ultimately, folks, I was just trying to be helpful and different from the norm.