thread started by last reply
The Serpent of Venice Sweepstakes! 104 replies | 615 views Sweepstakes
18 hours 48 minutes ago
Vanesmantha Vanesmantha
10 minutes 53 seconds ago
Alien and Aliens Sweepstakes! 46 replies | 473 views Sweepstakes
14 hours 48 minutes ago
16 minutes 5 seconds ago
The Wheel of Time Reread: A Memory of Light, Part 57 46 replies | 1152 views leighdb
18 hours 18 minutes ago
Randalator Randalator
31 minutes 37 seconds ago
Don’t Worry—the Star Wars Expanded Universe is Not Going Away Because of Episode VII 24 replies | 1259 views EmilyAP
18 hours 58 minutes ago
1 hour 5 minutes ago
Post-Binary Gender in SF: Writing Without Revealing Gender 26 replies | 1043 views Alex Dally MacFarlane
21 hours 48 minutes ago
GardenGnome GardenGnome
3 hours 7 minutes ago
Game of Thrones Episode Review: “Breaker of Chains” 71 replies | 2116 views theresa_delucci
1 day 21 hours ago
Gregor Lewis
3 hours 33 minutes ago
The Wheel of Time Reread: A Memory of Light, Part 56 77 replies | 5381 views leighdb
2 weeks 18 hours ago
GardenGnome GardenGnome
5 hours 24 minutes ago
The Dark Between the Stars Sweepstakes! 3 replies | 1170 views Sweepstakes
3 days 20 hours ago
Laurie Avalon
6 hours 3 minutes ago
The Return of Zita the Spacegirl Sweepstakes! 99 replies | 1295 views Sweepstakes
4 days 14 hours ago
Karen Deva
6 hours 24 minutes ago
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Rewatch: “The Muse” 24 replies | 3250 views krad
2 weeks 4 days ago
totalperspec totalperspec
6 hours 48 minutes ago
Malazan Reread of the Fallen: Dust of Dreams, Chapter Nineteen (Part One) 21 replies | 1779 views Billcap
4 days 19 hours ago
GoodOldSatan GoodOldSatan
6 hours 54 minutes ago
A Read of the Dark Tower: Constant Reader Tackles The Dark Tower, In This Haze of Green and Gold, Chapter 2: “Ves’-Ka Gan” 14 replies | 996 views SuzanneJohnson
1 day 20 hours ago
7 hours 17 minutes ago
Visit Neo-Hogwarts in Harry Potter’s Cyberpunk Adventure! 1 reply | 680 views Stubby
15 hours 18 minutes ago
AlcairNovall AlcairNovall
7 hours 21 minutes ago
The Wheel of Time Reread: A Memory of Light, Part 54 61 replies | 4969 views leighdb
4 weeks 18 hours ago
GardenGnome GardenGnome
7 hours 34 minutes ago
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Rewatch: “Broken Link” 24 replies | 834 views krad
16 hours 18 minutes ago
ChristopherLBennett ChristopherLBennett
7 hours 41 minutes ago
The Wheel of Time and the Hugo Voter Packet 39 replies | 2346 views
1 day 18 hours ago
9 hours 49 minutes ago
Announcing the 2014 Hugo Award Nominees 98 replies | 3995 views
3 days 15 hours ago
DanielClouser DanielClouser
11 hours 9 minutes ago
Spoiler Thread for A Read of Ice and Fire, Part 5! 633 replies | 25764 views
4 months 2 weeks ago
AeronaGreenjoy AeronaGreenjoy
12 hours 8 minutes ago
Story: Wakulla Springs 22 replies | 16707 views Andy_Duncan
6 months 2 weeks ago
12 hours 35 minutes ago
2014 David Gemmell Award for Fantasy Shortlist Announced 2 replies | 968 views
1 day 17 hours ago
12 hours 49 minutes ago
Journey Before Destination: Words of Radiance Spoiler Review 1031 replies | 28957 views Wetlandernw
1 month 2 weeks ago
ZenBossanova ZenBossanova
12 hours 55 minutes ago
Sleeps With Monsters: How About Those Hugos? 46 replies | 1873 views hawkwing-lb
1 day 19 hours ago
Jessica Burde
13 hours 26 minutes ago
Like pop rocks for the brain: Samuel R. Delany’s Stars in My Pocket Like Grains of Sand 21 replies | 11225 views bluejo
5 years 2 months ago
Pam Adams Pam Adams
13 hours 35 minutes ago
A Read of Ice and Fire: A Feast for Crows, Part 11 53 replies | 3412 views leighdb
5 days 18 hours ago
LilRedHead LilRedHead
13 hours 38 minutes ago
The Way of Kings Reread: Chapter 68 21 replies | 2453 views Michael_Pye
5 days 19 hours ago
Rybal Rybal
14 hours 31 minutes ago
A Library In Your Pocket: How Having an E-reader Has Changed My Reading Habits 126 replies | 10567 views bluejo
1 month 2 weeks ago
bluejo bluejo
14 hours 31 minutes ago
Rocket Talk, Episode 5: The Hugo Awards 10 replies | 740 views Stubby
20 hours 18 minutes ago
Braid_Tug Braid_Tug
14 hours 43 minutes ago
Robots for Dummies? The Real History of Science Fiction 10 replies | 1117 views ryancbritt
1 day 16 hours ago
15 hours 8 minutes ago
Morning Roundup: Power Boys Deserve Windows, Too! 3 replies | 947 views Stubby
23 hours 18 minutes ago
Oronis Oronis
15 hours 19 minutes ago
“How Frozen Should Have Ended” Shows Us a Better Way to Bring Up Elsa 12 replies | 11521 views Stubby
1 week 1 day ago
Bethany B.
15 hours 49 minutes ago
BritMandelo's shoutbox
6 recent messages | show all
mp2014 mp2014 said (3 weeks ago):
beby4oo beby4oo said (2 years ago):
Hello !! I Hope you are in good health? Dear,i wish we could be friendly in good lovely relationship , if you could be sincere and lovely, well i do cherish your profile age and distance no problem, privately send me a reply to my email address ( while i get back at you including my picture. I shall hopefully wait for your reply. Yours, REBEKAH BABY THANKS
mrjennings mrjennings said (3 years ago):
Brit, I just conducted an interview of Richard Bowes that I thought might be of interest to you and the Queering SFF series. I've posted it here:
dianeduane dianeduane said (3 years ago):
Brit, apropos of nothing -- were you looking for copies of these? They're available as ebooks now. , ,
welovetea welovetea said (3 years ago):
Hey! I love this series of Queering SFF you're doing! Keep up the good work!
Longtimefan Longtimefan said (3 years ago):
I wrote something in a ranty moment and while I do not want to impose upon your time I value your opinion and want to share my quickly formed and perhaps not well finished words with you. It is long and you can just skip from here. :) An observation that may get my "gay" card revoked. Well several. Firstly, I am tired of the term "gay". It has too many meanings for too many people and it is only common because it is easier than saying "person (or people) interested in a relationship with someone of the same gender." It is important to use the word "relationship" and not the word "sex". While physical attention on many levels including (but not always guaranteed) the most intimate is part of a "relationship" it is not every minute of a relationship. Otherwise married people would never go to work. Physical intimacy is an action not a definition of who someone is. Those actions may be repeated with the same person for a long period of time (monogamy) they may be engaged in with a few or many people of the same gender leading many people to believe that they are "straight" or "gay". They may be actions shared with people of either gender leading people to become confused because both "straight" and "gay" social groups get really irritated if they cannot slap a label on it and stick it on the shelf. Shockingly, in my philosophical view, there are no "straight" or "gay" people. Heterosexual and homosexual describe actions not nouns. Because it is a mouthful to say "I am a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender." or "....of the opposite gender" the quick and lazy way to define people is by the occasional actions they take with people who are usually not in need of knowing that label. My boyfriend does not need to know I am "gay", other people do. Not that they need to know that any more than I need to know other people are "straight". However in the course of conversation, socialization and personal actualization people refer to the person they are having a relationship with. Instead of living in the logical moment and thinking "this person is in a relationship with this other person right now." social norms have developed short hand labels that build stereotypes like walls around every thing people think until it is a maze so complex that people forget it is there and just assume that they are just walking along a garden path instead of being penned in by a labyrinth not entirely of their own design. People are not their actions but they are constantly judged by them even if they chose to change them. I have dated women, I have dated men. I am currently dating a man. This does not make me "gay", this makes me a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender. So all of that was just to get to this. There is no "gay rights" movement. There is a movement for the equalization of value on relationships with people of the same gender. It seems like way too much to say but I thought of this when I realized this... The "gay rights" movement is not like the "civil rights" movement. It is similar too but still different from the "Suffragette movement" I can see where people would balk at that comparison because it links "gays" with "women" and that is already a false parallel that is difficult to break as a negative stereotype socially. However the point I would like to make is that when women were asking (well demanding) the vote it was because they wanted a relationship with government. They were subject to the laws, they were affected by the politicians, they were smart enough to know how they felt about those things. They could not say anything about it. Well, not legally in a way that would matter. Men who said women did not need to vote were not affected by women not voting. They did not have to live with the consequences of their actions. The women did. The thing is there are a lot of men who want women to like them. In the end to keep the affections of women they had to admit that they had the intelligence to vote and therefore should be allowed to vote. Still only 35 % of Americans vote and only half of those are women. Even if all of those were women that is not all of the women in America who can vote. Just because they can do something does not mean they will do something and when they do it does not make another persons vote less valid. (I am not getting into the "one vote cancels the other" argument. It is statistical not logical) There is not, however, the majority of the voting population interested in having people who want to be in relationships with someone of the same gender liking them. Many of them do not care. Not in a callous way (although there are those) but in a "it does not affect me so if I do not do anything about it it is no big deal" way. The people who do care have not done themselves any favors. They still place it in common social terms which as I said before have way to many definitions and do not clearly state what it is people are trying to accomplish. They have even started using the term "sexual minority". I loathe that term. It is many kinds of wrong that I will not expound upon here. It is not about getting our "10% quotas" in the work force or throwing off melaninistic segregation. It is about receiving the same social value on the relationship because two people want to be together. People are in relationships with people they care about. They share intellectual pursuits and social interests and moral foundations. Women wanted their vote, their opinion, to have the same weight socially as a man's. They did not stop being mothers or wives or workers or teachers. It changed what they could do and how they were perceived not who they were as people. People in same sex relationships want their relationship to have the same social weight as anyone else. They will still have the same jobs. They will still be relatives, they will still be friends. No opinion is perfect, no relationship is perfect but they should not be dismissed out of hand because it is socially acceptable to give them no merit in the first place.