thread started by last reply
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Rewatch: “Penumbra” 27 replies | 1473 views krad
3 days 8 hours ago
2 minutes 45 seconds ago
Dear, Star Trek — Please Pay Attention to Doctor McCoy Now 47 replies | 3950 views EmilyAP
2 months 2 days ago
JanKafka JanKafka
16 minutes 59 seconds ago
Pirates, Poisoning and Still More Singing: Galavant Wraps Its First Season 8 replies | 448 views MariCats
10 hours 38 minutes ago
25 minutes 56 seconds ago
Follow Your Arrow: When Orthallen Plans Your Vacation 7 replies | 301 views EllenMCM
9 hours 8 minutes ago
49 minutes 3 seconds ago
Disney and Del Rey Announce New “Unified Canon” for Upcoming Star Wars Expanded Universe Novels 91 replies | 33472 views Stubby
9 months 2 days ago
Pissed of Star Wars fan
58 minutes 48 seconds ago
The Sasquatch Hunter’s Almanac Sweepstakes! 139 replies | 1462 views Sweepstakes
4 days 9 hours ago
Peachesncream887 Peachesncream887
1 hour 5 minutes ago
Gemini Cell Sweepstakes! 107 replies | 1118 views Sweepstakes
3 days 12 hours ago
Peachesncream887 Peachesncream887
1 hour 5 minutes ago
Marvel Casts David Tennant as Villain Kilgrave on A.K.A. Jessica Jones 9 replies | 425 views Stubby
9 hours 29 minutes ago
Mason T. Matchak
1 hour 15 minutes ago
This is Why Obi-Wan Lied to Luke Skywalker About His Father 40 replies | 848 views EmilyAP
13 hours 38 minutes ago
digrifter digrifter
1 hour 32 minutes ago
Seveneves of Neal Stephenson 8 replies | 1350 views niallalot
3 days 11 hours ago
AlanBrown AlanBrown
1 hour 33 minutes ago
A Read of Ice and Fire: A Dance with Dragons, Part 7 78 replies | 2492 views leighdb
4 days 10 hours ago
1 hour 34 minutes ago
Whatever Happened to the Boy Wonder? Bring Robin Back to the Big Screen 40 replies | 5210 views EmilyAP
5 months 1 week ago
2 hours 8 minutes ago
Story: Damage 15 replies | 3066 views davidlevine
5 days 14 hours ago
2 hours 12 minutes ago
Five Books About Deeply-Flawed, Despicable People 42 replies | 816 views MykeCole
12 hours 8 minutes ago
2 hours 35 minutes ago
Morning Roundup: Is It Just Us, or is the Term “Bleeding Edge” Creepy? 5 replies | 483 views Stubby
15 hours 8 minutes ago
sps49 sps49
3 hours 25 minutes ago
Words of Radiance Reread: Chapter 25 67 replies | 2182 views Wetlandernw
4 days 11 hours ago
3 hours 58 minutes ago
Story: Kia and Gio 8 replies | 5704 views Daniel_Jose_Older
2 weeks 6 days ago
Pam Adams Pam Adams
4 hours 19 minutes ago
The Illogic of Fairy Tales 13 replies | 2391 views G_Cogman
5 days 12 hours ago
shellywb shellywb
4 hours 25 minutes ago
“Nothing quite clarifies your thoughts like thinking you’re about to die.” Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Justice 10 replies | 12462 views hawkwing-lb
1 year 4 months ago
AlanBrown AlanBrown
5 hours 5 minutes ago
At Last! The Secret Origins of Chas are Revealed in Constantine: “Quid Pro Quo” 4 replies | 308 views ThomDunn
8 hours 8 minutes ago
Ellisande Ellisande
5 hours 18 minutes ago
Marking Time: Ben Aaronovitch’s Foxglove Summer 11 replies | 4194 views hawkwing-lb
2 months 2 weeks ago
Kelly Sinclair
5 hours 35 minutes ago
Story: Classical Antiquity and Western Identity in Battlestar Galactica 1 reply | 217 views V_Tomasso
7 hours 8 minutes ago
6 hours 13 minutes ago
Rereading the Empire Trilogy: Servant of the Empire, Part 19 3 replies | 367 views TansyRR
7 hours 33 minutes ago
TorChris TorChris
7 hours 9 minutes ago
Emma Watson Will Play Belle in Disney’s Live-Action Beauty and the Beast 6 replies | 524 views Stubby
10 hours 52 minutes ago
SunDriedRainbow SunDriedRainbow
7 hours 25 minutes ago
Earn Loyalty and Live. Agent Carter: “Time and Tide” 30 replies | 2690 views TorChris
1 week 5 days ago
anthonypero anthonypero
8 hours 3 minutes ago
Elon Musk Names SpaceX Drone Ships in Honor of Iain M. Banks 14 replies | 2632 views Stubby
3 days 6 hours ago
8 hours 33 minutes ago
Words of Radiance Reread: Chapter 24 47 replies | 3725 views CarlEngle-Laird
1 week 4 days ago
8 hours 48 minutes ago
Mark Helprin’s Winter’s Tale is a Failure that Genre Fans Must Experience 36 replies | 24200 views TorChris
11 months 2 weeks ago
9 hours 56 minutes ago
Winter 2015 Anime Preview: Season of Sequels 6 replies | 1404 views KellyQ
3 days 13 hours ago
KellyQ KellyQ
10 hours 21 minutes ago
Dangerous Neighbors: “The Cats of Ulthar” and “The Other Gods” 24 replies | 1972 views R.Emrys
6 days 13 hours ago
DemetriosX DemetriosX
11 hours 55 minutes ago
BritMandelo's shoutbox
7 recent messages | show all
MatthewB MatthewB said (5 months ago):
Have you discussed or do you plan to discuss any of Jo Clayton's books in queering or post-binary gender? I started re-reading "Wild Magic" the other day and was reminded of how eye-opening and formative it was for me as a young white cis male suburban reader back in the late 80's, early 90's.
mp2014 mp2014 said (9 months ago):
beby4oo beby4oo said (3 years ago):
Hello !! I Hope you are in good health? Dear,i wish we could be friendly in good lovely relationship , if you could be sincere and lovely, well i do cherish your profile age and distance no problem, privately send me a reply to my email address ( while i get back at you including my picture. I shall hopefully wait for your reply. Yours, REBEKAH BABY THANKS
mrjennings mrjennings said (3 years ago):
Brit, I just conducted an interview of Richard Bowes that I thought might be of interest to you and the Queering SFF series. I've posted it here:
dianeduane dianeduane said (4 years ago):
Brit, apropos of nothing -- were you looking for copies of these? They're available as ebooks now. , ,
welovetea welovetea said (4 years ago):
Hey! I love this series of Queering SFF you're doing! Keep up the good work!
Longtimefan Longtimefan said (4 years ago):
I wrote something in a ranty moment and while I do not want to impose upon your time I value your opinion and want to share my quickly formed and perhaps not well finished words with you. It is long and you can just skip from here. :) An observation that may get my "gay" card revoked. Well several. Firstly, I am tired of the term "gay". It has too many meanings for too many people and it is only common because it is easier than saying "person (or people) interested in a relationship with someone of the same gender." It is important to use the word "relationship" and not the word "sex". While physical attention on many levels including (but not always guaranteed) the most intimate is part of a "relationship" it is not every minute of a relationship. Otherwise married people would never go to work. Physical intimacy is an action not a definition of who someone is. Those actions may be repeated with the same person for a long period of time (monogamy) they may be engaged in with a few or many people of the same gender leading many people to believe that they are "straight" or "gay". They may be actions shared with people of either gender leading people to become confused because both "straight" and "gay" social groups get really irritated if they cannot slap a label on it and stick it on the shelf. Shockingly, in my philosophical view, there are no "straight" or "gay" people. Heterosexual and homosexual describe actions not nouns. Because it is a mouthful to say "I am a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender." or "....of the opposite gender" the quick and lazy way to define people is by the occasional actions they take with people who are usually not in need of knowing that label. My boyfriend does not need to know I am "gay", other people do. Not that they need to know that any more than I need to know other people are "straight". However in the course of conversation, socialization and personal actualization people refer to the person they are having a relationship with. Instead of living in the logical moment and thinking "this person is in a relationship with this other person right now." social norms have developed short hand labels that build stereotypes like walls around every thing people think until it is a maze so complex that people forget it is there and just assume that they are just walking along a garden path instead of being penned in by a labyrinth not entirely of their own design. People are not their actions but they are constantly judged by them even if they chose to change them. I have dated women, I have dated men. I am currently dating a man. This does not make me "gay", this makes me a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender. So all of that was just to get to this. There is no "gay rights" movement. There is a movement for the equalization of value on relationships with people of the same gender. It seems like way too much to say but I thought of this when I realized this... The "gay rights" movement is not like the "civil rights" movement. It is similar too but still different from the "Suffragette movement" I can see where people would balk at that comparison because it links "gays" with "women" and that is already a false parallel that is difficult to break as a negative stereotype socially. However the point I would like to make is that when women were asking (well demanding) the vote it was because they wanted a relationship with government. They were subject to the laws, they were affected by the politicians, they were smart enough to know how they felt about those things. They could not say anything about it. Well, not legally in a way that would matter. Men who said women did not need to vote were not affected by women not voting. They did not have to live with the consequences of their actions. The women did. The thing is there are a lot of men who want women to like them. In the end to keep the affections of women they had to admit that they had the intelligence to vote and therefore should be allowed to vote. Still only 35 % of Americans vote and only half of those are women. Even if all of those were women that is not all of the women in America who can vote. Just because they can do something does not mean they will do something and when they do it does not make another persons vote less valid. (I am not getting into the "one vote cancels the other" argument. It is statistical not logical) There is not, however, the majority of the voting population interested in having people who want to be in relationships with someone of the same gender liking them. Many of them do not care. Not in a callous way (although there are those) but in a "it does not affect me so if I do not do anything about it it is no big deal" way. The people who do care have not done themselves any favors. They still place it in common social terms which as I said before have way to many definitions and do not clearly state what it is people are trying to accomplish. They have even started using the term "sexual minority". I loathe that term. It is many kinds of wrong that I will not expound upon here. It is not about getting our "10% quotas" in the work force or throwing off melaninistic segregation. It is about receiving the same social value on the relationship because two people want to be together. People are in relationships with people they care about. They share intellectual pursuits and social interests and moral foundations. Women wanted their vote, their opinion, to have the same weight socially as a man's. They did not stop being mothers or wives or workers or teachers. It changed what they could do and how they were perceived not who they were as people. People in same sex relationships want their relationship to have the same social weight as anyone else. They will still have the same jobs. They will still be relatives, they will still be friends. No opinion is perfect, no relationship is perfect but they should not be dismissed out of hand because it is socially acceptable to give them no merit in the first place.