thread started by last reply
19 Strange Things Hiding in The World of Ice and Fire 13 replies | 3940 views TorChris
1 day 23 hours ago
ValMar ValMar
31 seconds ago
Spoiler Thread for A Read of Ice and Fire, Part 6! 371 replies | 14107 views
3 months 1 week ago
Lyanna Mormont
44 seconds ago
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell Reread: Part 4 1 reply | 99 views katenepveu
1 hour 12 minutes ago
GormanGhaste GormanGhaste
4 minutes 4 seconds ago
Malazan Reread of the Fallen: The Crippled God, Chapter Twenty-Four (Part Three) 31 replies | 1609 views ALRutter
1 day 23 hours ago
Wilbur Wilbur
17 minutes 48 seconds ago
Game of Thrones Actors’ Contract Negotiations Reveal a Potentially Major Spoiler 15 replies | 1208 views Stubby
18 hours 42 minutes ago
19 minutes 53 seconds ago
Halloween Prize Pack Sweepstakes! 85 replies | 667 views Sweepstakes
17 hours 42 minutes ago
sraun sraun
20 minutes 58 seconds ago
Morning Roundup: Halloween is the Universal Language! 3 replies | 212 views Stubby
3 hours 12 minutes ago
Mayhem Mayhem
29 minutes 57 seconds ago
The Slow Regard of Silent Things Sweepstakes! 239 replies | 1517 views Sweepstakes
1 day 22 hours ago
Loud2004 Loud2004
33 minutes 3 seconds ago
Everybody Scream! Team’s Favorite Halloween Specials and Movies 20 replies | 4861 views Stubby
1 hour 42 minutes ago
Neuralnet Neuralnet
37 minutes 30 seconds ago
Why Horror is Good For You (and Even Better for Your Kids) 42 replies | 15261 views GregRActual
5 months 2 days ago
38 minutes 23 seconds ago
Waistcoats & Weaponry Sweepstakes! 195 replies | 1698 views Sweepstakes
3 days 21 hours ago
Benita Benita
48 minutes 6 seconds ago
Let’s Ruin Some Childhoods: Charlotte’s Web 19 replies | 1069 views MariCats
20 hours 12 minutes ago
April Brown
51 minutes 27 seconds ago
You Don’t Know Poe: 10 Weird Things About Edgar Allan Poe 28 replies | 83696 views Matt_Mercier
2 years 5 months ago
austin berger
1 hour 23 minutes ago
Interstellar Remembers the Moon Landing Differently 8 replies | 1029 views Stubby
21 hours 26 minutes ago
1 hour 45 minutes ago
Doctor Who: The Secret Lives of Monsters Sweepstakes! 101 replies | 914 views Sweepstakes
1 day 19 hours ago
L Cromas
2 hours 52 minutes ago
Now You Can Finally Watch the Avengers: Age of Ultron Mjolnir Party Scene 18 replies | 2836 views Stubby
1 day 23 hours ago
Aeryl Aeryl
2 hours 54 minutes ago
The Goatman Bleateth! Gotham: “Spirit of the Goat” 6 replies | 1580 views ThomDunn
2 days 23 hours ago
bhaughwout bhaughwout
2 hours 56 minutes ago
We Have to Save Belgium! Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.: “A Fractured House” 38 replies | 1600 views TorChris
1 day 20 hours ago
bhaughwout bhaughwout
3 hours 2 minutes ago
A Read of Ice and Fire: “The Mystery Knight” Part 3 34 replies | 1403 views leighdb
22 hours 12 minutes ago
zambi76 zambi76
3 hours 7 minutes ago
Has Tom Hanks Written a Cautionary SF Story? On “Alan Bean Plus Four” 4 replies | 1337 views ryancbritt
1 day 21 hours ago
3 hours 11 minutes ago
Sleepy Hollow: Children of the Revolution Sweepstakes! 42 replies | 417 views Sweepstakes
1 day 1 hour ago
3 hours 16 minutes ago
Rothfuss Reread: What Can We Learn From The Name of the Wind Playing Cards? (Part 3) 158 replies | 15484 views bluejo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Aesculapius Aesculapius
3 hours 50 minutes ago
The Wheel of Time Reread Redux: The Eye of the World, Part 6 39 replies | 2284 views leighdb
2 days 22 hours ago
Randalator Randalator
7 hours 3 minutes ago
Words of Radiance Reread: Chapter 16 22 replies | 1111 views CarlEngle-Laird
23 hours 12 minutes ago
birgit birgit
7 hours 14 minutes ago
This is What Happens When George R.R. Martin and Tom Doherty Visit H.P. Lovecraft’s Grave 8 replies | 1857 views Stubby
1 day 19 hours ago
Randalator Randalator
7 hours 40 minutes ago
Raising Steam Sweepstakes! 123 replies | 1274 views Sweepstakes
2 days 22 hours ago
Tim A
9 hours 24 minutes ago
Not with a Bang: True Blood’s Powerfully Unsexy Series Finale 24 replies | 6603 views theresa_delucci
2 months 6 days ago
9 hours 46 minutes ago
Red Eyes and No Eyes and Dreamboat Eyes in A Wrinkle in Time: The Graphic Novel 1 reply | 5168 views KelseyAnnBarrett
2 years 4 weeks ago
10 hours 7 minutes ago
The Harry Potter Reread: The Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapters 21 and 22 28 replies | 1151 views EmilyAP
22 hours 42 minutes ago
bad_platypus bad_platypus
10 hours 13 minutes ago
Twelve Books to Bewitch You! 10 replies | 1156 views Stubby
1 day 12 minutes ago
10 hours 56 minutes ago
BritMandelo's shoutbox
7 recent messages | show all
MatthewB MatthewB said (2 months ago):
Have you discussed or do you plan to discuss any of Jo Clayton's books in queering or post-binary gender? I started re-reading "Wild Magic" the other day and was reminded of how eye-opening and formative it was for me as a young white cis male suburban reader back in the late 80's, early 90's.
mp2014 mp2014 said (7 months ago):
beby4oo beby4oo said (3 years ago):
Hello !! I Hope you are in good health? Dear,i wish we could be friendly in good lovely relationship , if you could be sincere and lovely, well i do cherish your profile age and distance no problem, privately send me a reply to my email address ( while i get back at you including my picture. I shall hopefully wait for your reply. Yours, REBEKAH BABY THANKS
mrjennings mrjennings said (3 years ago):
Brit, I just conducted an interview of Richard Bowes that I thought might be of interest to you and the Queering SFF series. I've posted it here:
dianeduane dianeduane said (4 years ago):
Brit, apropos of nothing -- were you looking for copies of these? They're available as ebooks now. , ,
welovetea welovetea said (4 years ago):
Hey! I love this series of Queering SFF you're doing! Keep up the good work!
Longtimefan Longtimefan said (4 years ago):
I wrote something in a ranty moment and while I do not want to impose upon your time I value your opinion and want to share my quickly formed and perhaps not well finished words with you. It is long and you can just skip from here. :) An observation that may get my "gay" card revoked. Well several. Firstly, I am tired of the term "gay". It has too many meanings for too many people and it is only common because it is easier than saying "person (or people) interested in a relationship with someone of the same gender." It is important to use the word "relationship" and not the word "sex". While physical attention on many levels including (but not always guaranteed) the most intimate is part of a "relationship" it is not every minute of a relationship. Otherwise married people would never go to work. Physical intimacy is an action not a definition of who someone is. Those actions may be repeated with the same person for a long period of time (monogamy) they may be engaged in with a few or many people of the same gender leading many people to believe that they are "straight" or "gay". They may be actions shared with people of either gender leading people to become confused because both "straight" and "gay" social groups get really irritated if they cannot slap a label on it and stick it on the shelf. Shockingly, in my philosophical view, there are no "straight" or "gay" people. Heterosexual and homosexual describe actions not nouns. Because it is a mouthful to say "I am a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender." or "....of the opposite gender" the quick and lazy way to define people is by the occasional actions they take with people who are usually not in need of knowing that label. My boyfriend does not need to know I am "gay", other people do. Not that they need to know that any more than I need to know other people are "straight". However in the course of conversation, socialization and personal actualization people refer to the person they are having a relationship with. Instead of living in the logical moment and thinking "this person is in a relationship with this other person right now." social norms have developed short hand labels that build stereotypes like walls around every thing people think until it is a maze so complex that people forget it is there and just assume that they are just walking along a garden path instead of being penned in by a labyrinth not entirely of their own design. People are not their actions but they are constantly judged by them even if they chose to change them. I have dated women, I have dated men. I am currently dating a man. This does not make me "gay", this makes me a person in a relationship with someone of the same gender. So all of that was just to get to this. There is no "gay rights" movement. There is a movement for the equalization of value on relationships with people of the same gender. It seems like way too much to say but I thought of this when I realized this... The "gay rights" movement is not like the "civil rights" movement. It is similar too but still different from the "Suffragette movement" I can see where people would balk at that comparison because it links "gays" with "women" and that is already a false parallel that is difficult to break as a negative stereotype socially. However the point I would like to make is that when women were asking (well demanding) the vote it was because they wanted a relationship with government. They were subject to the laws, they were affected by the politicians, they were smart enough to know how they felt about those things. They could not say anything about it. Well, not legally in a way that would matter. Men who said women did not need to vote were not affected by women not voting. They did not have to live with the consequences of their actions. The women did. The thing is there are a lot of men who want women to like them. In the end to keep the affections of women they had to admit that they had the intelligence to vote and therefore should be allowed to vote. Still only 35 % of Americans vote and only half of those are women. Even if all of those were women that is not all of the women in America who can vote. Just because they can do something does not mean they will do something and when they do it does not make another persons vote less valid. (I am not getting into the "one vote cancels the other" argument. It is statistical not logical) There is not, however, the majority of the voting population interested in having people who want to be in relationships with someone of the same gender liking them. Many of them do not care. Not in a callous way (although there are those) but in a "it does not affect me so if I do not do anything about it it is no big deal" way. The people who do care have not done themselves any favors. They still place it in common social terms which as I said before have way to many definitions and do not clearly state what it is people are trying to accomplish. They have even started using the term "sexual minority". I loathe that term. It is many kinds of wrong that I will not expound upon here. It is not about getting our "10% quotas" in the work force or throwing off melaninistic segregation. It is about receiving the same social value on the relationship because two people want to be together. People are in relationships with people they care about. They share intellectual pursuits and social interests and moral foundations. Women wanted their vote, their opinion, to have the same weight socially as a man's. They did not stop being mothers or wives or workers or teachers. It changed what they could do and how they were perceived not who they were as people. People in same sex relationships want their relationship to have the same social weight as anyone else. They will still have the same jobs. They will still be relatives, they will still be friends. No opinion is perfect, no relationship is perfect but they should not be dismissed out of hand because it is socially acceptable to give them no merit in the first place.