Thu
May 9 2013 1:00pm

Celebrating Girl Power: Matilda

Celebrating Girl Power: MatildaThe second movie based on a Roald Dahl novel to be released in 1996 was Matilda. Like the novel, Matilda tells the story of a precocious young girl who, after severe emotional abuse from her parents and the school principal, develops powers of telekinesis. It’s one of the rare films that focuses on girl power, and it’s a pity that—thanks largely to its source material and some surprisingly uneven directing from veteran Danny DeVito, it doesn’t quite work. At least for adults. Nine year old girls, I suspect, will be grinning.

Matilda follows the narrative outline of the novel fairly carefully, which accounts for many of its problems early on and later, while adding some elements to make the movie a movie—including a chase scene through a large house with a marvelous staircase and balcony that I instantly coveted, a subplot with two cops, one played in deadpan style by Paul Reubens, a scene where Matilda creeps back to Miss Trunchbull’s house (well, really Miss Honey’s house, but that’s giving too much away, and whoops!), and a really wonderful bit where Matilda, having honed her powers, merrily dances away in her house while making things dance around her.

In many ways, the film is stronger than the book. This is helped by a simultaneously obnoxious yet charming performance by Mara Wilson as Matilda, who comes across as, well, a kid, making her immediately easier to identify with. (The rest of the kid cast is also adorably cute.) This also explains several of her decisions, some of which just seemed too childlike for the adult-in-a-child’s-body Matilda from the book, but work quite well here. It helps, too, to see a Matilda flat out enjoying herself, whose main thought after developing telekinetic powers is to think, what can I do with THIS? and then go for it. 

Keeping that childlike feeling is important, too, since Matilda is far more powerful in the film than she is in the book. (No way could the Matilda of the book manage the entire ghost haunting scene of the movie, although to be fair she’s helped by a couple of wires, sadly visible on the Netflix download version. Somebody with CGI talents want to clean that up a bit?) Her childlike joy also reassures us that her rage won’t last too long—and this Matilda uses her powers to keep her fellow classmates from getting seriously injured when Miss Trunchbull starts tossing them around again. And the Matilda of the film is properly rebellious and considerably braver, answering or responding to her father’s taunts almost immediately. 

(Watching this also helped crystallize another small problem I had with the book: the Matilda of the book is sneaky, which is all very well except that Dahl also wants us to believe that she is sweet. Matilda of the book goes out of the way to hide her reactions from her family. This Matilda is not sneaky in the slightest. She openly giggles; only the complete self-absorption of her parents prevents them from noticing.)

Other small changes help alleviate the novel’s somewhat uneasy ending. Here, Matilda’s brother is presented as almost as unpleasant as his parents, tormenting Matilda right along with them, and does not watch Matilda when they drive off. He’ll be fine. Ok, he won’t be fine, exactly, since his parents are on the run from the FBI (and why on earth they think Guam is safe from the FBI is an open question, since last I heard Guam is still most definitely under the FBI’s jurisdiction, but to be fair, they have not been shown to be the brightest people on the block, and maybe they realized that stopping to get passports while on the run from the cops is a good way to get arrested), but at least he and his parents have a sort of mutual understanding and similar personalities. 

Matilda’s mother is even more neglectful in the movie than in the book, and even more dismissive, if possible, which makes her one moment of mothering in the film all that more poignant, and, eventually healing: “You’re the only daughter I ever had, Matilda. And I never understood you, not one bit.” It’s a nice wrap up of their storyline. I also loved the bits where Miss Honey and Matilda flat out enjoy themselves with picnics and Hula hooping. And the decision to raise Miss Honey from her near starvation in the book to pleasant lower middle class in the film both strengthens her character and her scene where she argues for the value of education and books.

And two small changes go a long way to alleviating the misogyny of the book, which oddly comes across more strongly in the film: one, Miss Honey becomes the school principal (in part to prevent the need to hire another actor), and two, even after getting rid of the Big Scary Woman, Matilda keeps her powers. Miss Honey is considerably more proactive and brave here, as well as having a lovely scene where she explains that yes, adults can get scared too. And as hateful as Miss Trunchbull and Mr. Wormwood are, seeing them both get taken down by a girl is decidedly satisfying—and I was glad to see that she didn’t have to lose her powers just so she could read Moby Dick

Some bits play better on the screen than in the book—notably the scene where poor Bruce Bogtrotter has to eat all that cake. The film makes you realize just how terrifying and disgusting this is. The only slight negative—and it’s a quibble—is that I think I preferred it when a random student, not Matilda, is the first to cheer Bruce on, though of course this does help keep the emphasis on Matilda. And one bit not in the book adds a singularly creepy note as a doll seems to take forever to float through the air.

So given all this, why doesn’t the film completely work? Well, in part because in some ways it’s too close to the source material, which was absolutely not written with a screenplay in mind. The opening bits dither, and although the film distinctly improves once Matilda enters school, the pacing is still completely off. DeVito seems to realize this, but some scenes (notably the chase through the house, needed to add some action to the film) still linger way too long. 

Which, incidentally, is why I’m paying unusual attention to the source material here, instead of judging the movie as a movie: pretty much every complaint you can make about it—its possibly questionable message for young children, the misogyny shown in the depictions of Miss Trunchbull and Mrs. Wormwood, the way the film lurches between cloying and terrifying, the way the film as a whole really struggles to keep a solid narrative arc, and so on—can be traced back to the book. With just two exceptions: the performances of Danny DeVito and Rita Perlman, here putting on a voice as different from Carla on Cheers as possible.

It’s not that the two aren’t having fun; they are. The slimy character of Mr Wormwood seems to be one that DeVito was born to play—indeed, it’s his signature sort of role. But something seems off in comedic timing and their delivery. It’s occasionally funny, but usually not over the top enough, and frequently falling flat.

It’s an odd miss from two such usually great comedic performers, and I’ll be honest, it’s possible that part of my reaction is because my expectations are so high. I’m not sure what the issue was—if DeVito reined himself in to keep from scaring his child performers, or if he had difficulties directing his wife, or if both decided not to follow their comedic instincts, but apart from a few moments here and there, many of their moments are missed.

It took me some time to realize the other problem: DeVito both narrates the film and portrays one of its major villains, which makes the narrator rather, how shall I put this, untrustworthy at best. I think another narrator might have helped the film immensely. And I was thrown by a short scene where Matilda decides to help out her father by reminding the cops that they don’t have a search warrant, but it’s a nice civics lesson and perhaps it’s thanks to family loyalty.

Some parents may be bothered by scenes where a four year old Matilda walks from her home to the library by herself (crossing busy streets along the way), cooks pancakes without adult supervision, and gets away with playing pranks on her parents—however much Matilda and the audience may believe her parents deserve what they get. And others may object to the end, where Matilda’s reward for defying her parents and principal is to get the all time dream parent who essentially allows Matilda to do anything she wants, taking Matilda on picnics, moving furniture out of the way so the two can Hula hoop, and so on.

But I suspect their kids will be responding instead to a film with two strong, happy messages for kids: you are not alone, and eventually, yes, you will be as powerful as an adult. And maybe you’ll even have a chance to get back—or just maybe, you won’t need to anymore.


Mari Ness has never yet managed to gain the useful skill of telekinesis. She lives in central Florida.

5 comments
Lee A Harris
1. Lee A Harris
I agree with much of this review. I do believe that - despite its problems - both the novel and the film are excellent. It's possibly the best Dahl children's novel, and - for me - without a doubt the best filmed adaptation of a Dahl book. My daughters (5 and 9) have seen it dozens of times, and I'm often happy to sit through it yet again with them. They've also heard the audiobook (brilliantly narrated by Joely Richardson) many times, and my older daughter has read the book at least 6 or 7 times. We're fans in the Harris household.

What Dahl excelled at is creating monster-adults. Miss Trunchbull isn't a real person - she's a charicature. This person couldn't possibly exist, but there's enough of her to recognise in all the horrible people we know in our day-to-day lives that this amalgam immediately fits the role of all-purpose villain. Dahl also excelled at creating strong child characters. Again, we're not expected to believe these children exist, but to acknowledge enough of their spirit and childlike glee to cheer them on.

The stage version of Matilda is even better than the film, and I would urge everyone to see it. Even without Tim Minchin's quite brilliant score, the script and the book - while very close to the rather linear narrative in the book - make us want to cheer Matilda and Miss Honey and to boo and hiss at the Trunchbull. And the music? Oh, the music is superb. Even before I saw the stage show for the first time, the soundtrack became the most-played album on my iPod, and for those familiar with the film or the book, just listening to the songs makes it easy to imagine them at exactly the right places in the story.

So, a big thumbs-up for Matilda - in whatever medium you choose to enjoy it!
Jack Flynn
2. JackofMidworld
Just to make sure, I doublechecked my driver's license and, nope, not a nine-year-old (though I'm sure some people would argue that) and also not a girl. Still, I loved Matilda. There's not a lot of what I would call 'kid-movies' that I'll sit down to watch by myself (I don't even do it with Pixar movies), but both of my kids were asleep, it was about 11pm, and darned if I didn't watch the whole thing.

One theory that I've heard (but it takes away from some of the magical charm of the movie and probably the book, too, though it's been years since I've read it) is that the unrealistic parts were all realistic things that were seen unrealistically through Matilda's eyes. As in, the cake was just a cake, it just seemed that way to the kids, and and the chokey wasn't really that bad, just how they imagined it to be.

That said, I can definitely agree that there is some uneven pacing in it, and, yes, Danny DeVito as both the bad dad and the narrator was a bit of a miss. Somehow, I think it'd be just plain awesome if it had been Sir Ian McKellan doing the voice over.
Lee A Harris
3. StarryEyed
It's so funny to see this review, since I just rewatched this movie a couple days ago. Matilda is my go-to movie when I am sick or under the weather, since it never fails to cheer me up. Thanks for the thoughtful review.

Like both of the previous commenters, I always viewed Dahl's characters as caricatures, whether that be because it was seen through a child's eyes or if that was just the world he created. Miss Trunchbull's character can be problematic in some ways, but I really do think she represents a conglomerate of all the terrible things a person can be. Matilda herself is a strong character and so is Miss Honey, even though her strength is more of the quiet and kind variety.

This is one of my favorite movies and books, because the story is fun and really emphasized reading as a powerful way to escape and find solace. I like that Matilda takes terrible situations and finds solutions on her own. It is a very empowering movie for a young girl. Matilda was the hero because she was so smart and learned to control her power. She didn't need anyone's approval or encouragement. Since adults weren't handling things right, she took over and fixed the problems she saw.

It's such a great movie and totally worth rewatching even as an adult!
Fade Manley
4. fadeaccompli
Heh. I remember when I saw this movie. I got to the end, and saw she got to keep her powers, and thought indignantly, "That's not the way it went in the book!"

...immediately followed by, "Huh. Actually, I like it better this way."
Lee A Harris
5. John Cowan
People are routinely smuggled into Guam from Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia; it's a major route into the U.S. I'm sure that smuggling people out wouldn't be particularly difficult. (Yes, this is fan-wankery.)

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment