Mon
Jun 25 2012 6:00pm
Three Short Novels by Connie Willis

Uncharted Territory (1994), Remake (1995) and Bellwether (1996) are all short novels. The three of them together barely make up the same thickness as Doomsday Book. Remake and Bellwether won the Locus award as novellas, but they’re not novellas — they’re more than forty thousand words, but they’re certainly not the length of a full length novel. They’re about as short as books can be and be published in the nineties, and I don’t think they could be commercially published at this length now. They are slight in the metaphorical sense too. These are all fun fast reads. Bellwether, which I’ve written about before has the most bite to it. Uncharted Territory and Bellwether are comedies and Remake is another tragedy told like a comedy. Uncharted Territory was on the Tiptree longlist, Remake was nominated for a Hugo and Bellwether was nominated for a Nebula. All three of them are written in first person, like Lincoln’s Dreams but unlike all of Willis’s other novels.

Uncharted Territory is the story of two explorers on a new planet who have to name everything and be very careful of political correctness when naming things. That’s pretty much it, except for the hidden romance that is the reason it got the Tiptree mention. It’s funny, it’s clever, and it’s out and out planetary SF, which Willis doesn’t do often. It has aliens, well, one alien. I loved it the first time I read it because of the surprise, which is something that can only be done in first person and which surprised and charmed me. The trouble with surprises is that they don’t surprise anyone on re-reading, and it suffers from that.

Remake is odd. It’s back in Lincoln’s Dreams territory emotionally — there’s a man who loves a girl who is the real protagonist, but we see everything through him. He has a job censoring old movies, cutting out the alcohol and tobacco. This is a future where digitising means that nobody is making new movies, and the heroine’s dream of dancing in the movies can’t be realised except by time travel or something else odd. The best character is Heada, the girl who is in love with the protagonist without him noticing, which is a clever trick to do in first person.

Remake is really about people unhappy because they’d like to live in a different time. They feel their own time is lacking in originality, but they don’t move towards making it more original. I’m not in sympathy with them. Okay, Hollywood is dead, but there’s probably a lot going on around the edges. Okay, you can’t dance with Fred Astaire, but I cannot see this as a tragedy. Even without the substance abuse — as he’s deleting it from the movies he’s indulging in it himself — this is a story where everyone is irritatingly passive. The characters don’t change their world, except perhaps by duplicating the original. Pah. There’s a lot going on in Remake, but I don’t like it.

Bellwether is a comedy about the process of scientific discovery, and a comedy in the Shakesperean sense as well. It’s funny and satirical, but it also contains a romance and a “rewards and weddings” happy ending where everything is tied up neatly. It’s about a scientist researching fads who gets involved in a joint project researching chaos theory and falls in love with the other scientist involved. It’s a parody of nineties management techniques, and it’s very funny. Lots more about it at the original post.

So what about Willis’s themes? All of them have telephones and communication in central. Bellwether has Flick, agent of chaos and miscommunication as central to the plot, the whole thing begins because of misdelivered mail. Remake has history, the history of Hollywood. Bellwether has constant references to historical fads and scientific discoveries. Again, in all three we have this unusual lack of violence and antagonists — bureaucracy is the antagonist in Bellwether and Uncharted Territory, and history is the antagonist in Remake, in so far as it has one. It’s as if when everyone else read the chapter about “when you’re stuck, have somebody come through the door with a gun,” Willis read “when you’re stuck, have somebody come through the door with a message that has gone astray.”

I have written in detail about To Say Nothing of the Dog before (post), so I’m going to skip it this time and go on to Passage.


Jo Walton is a science fiction and fantasy writer. She’s published two poetry collections and nine novels, most recently the Nebula winning and Hugo nominated Among Others. She reads a lot, and blogs about it here regularly. She comes from Wales but lives in Montreal where the food and books are more varied.

12 comments
Pamela Adams
1. Pam Adams
Remake also has an odd structure- between that and our narrator's tendency to be under the influence, I had to read it a few times to really see what happened when.
Soon Lee
2. SoonLee
Looking forward to the contrast between light ("Bellwether") & heavy("Passage").
Christopher Hatton
3. Xopher
Remake is probably my least favorite of Willis' books. It doesn't make sense in terms of information technology, and that annoyed me enough to distract me from its rather thin plot.

I'm a huge Willis fan, too. I loved Passage, which a lot of other people didn't. Of course it's helped along by the fact that she may be the most likeable person in all of fandom/prodom.
Bethany Pratt
4. LiC
If anyone's interested in these novels, they were released in a single hardback edition - Futures Imperfect

Re: #3 Xopher
I'm in the same boat. I got into Willis with her Blackout/All Clear duology, and have steadily been working my way through her repetoir. I found Remake to be just plain stupid. There are no more dance teachers anywhere? wtf, people don't take dance just so they can be in the movies. I'm a huge Fred Astaire fan, and while I appreciate Connie's love letter-esque novella, everything else about it is dumb dumb dumb. Also, I loved Passage. Bawled my eyes out while I was reading it on the train from Sacramento to Portland.

Bellweather was assigned reading for a class my mom took on sci-fi lit or something. I got to steal it from her while I was at home over Christmas. Quick and enjoyable. I was particularly annoyed though with that rancher - he doesn't like bread pudding anymore? Dumbass. (dumb is my favorite word right now, apparently)

I enjoyed Uncharted Territory, it was funny as hell.
Pamela Adams
5. Pam Adams
@4,

Of course he doesn't like bread pudding any more- it's no longer fashionable.
Andrew Love
6. Andy Love
"Bellwether has Flick, agent of chaos and miscommunication as central to the plot, the whole thing begins because of misdelivered mail."

It's 'Flip,' not 'Flick.' Bellwether is one of my favorite Willis novels - all the pieces fit together so well.
Kelly Kilcoyne
7. kellykelly
@6 - beat me to the name correction!

Not two weeks ago, I reread my much worn copy of Bellwether. The story's a bit dated, tech and pop culture wise, but remains both one of my favorite Willis novels and a consistent comfort read. The pieces do, indeed, fit together so very well, and it's a lovely story.
Jo Walton
8. bluejo
AndyLove, Kelly Kelly: Thank you. Flip, of course it is.
Bob Blough
9. Bob
Still love Bellweather. Never liked Uncharted Territory even when I read it the first time (the same with that awful un-reprinted story from Omni that'a a re-telling of the biblical Jonah story in space that she wrote). Remake is fine not great - much like her latest Christmas story "All About Emily"
Kevin Marks
10. KevinMarks
Xopher, I disagree about Remake and tech - given when it was written it is remarkably prescient about how the nature of filmmaking has changed, both through being able to digitally create anything at a price (like the Tupac hologram), and about the endless copyright shenanigans involved now. I was working on digital video in 1995, and the dystopia Willis describes is telling in the same way that Stephenson's Interface is about electoral politics online. The tech details are wrong, but the human themes are persuasive.

My sense is that the characters are lost inside the machine, the digital video machine and the hollywood movie-making machine. There is a better, more creative world going on somewhere else, but they're the ones drawn to that world.
ofostlic
13. ofostlic
I really like Bellwether. It's great fun, and as with a lot of Willis, the science is fairly bogus, but the scientists aren't.

I'm interested that you don't object to the fluffier Willis stories on the grounds of silliness, which you (reasonably, even if I don't agree) dislike Dianna Wynne Jones for.
John Armstrong
14. JohnArmstrong
Lincoln's Dreams is a beautiful piece of work.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment