Mon
Feb 20 2012 4:00pm
The Walking Dead S2, E9: “Triggerfinger”

The Walking Dead episode

At this point in the game I’ve given up hope that The Walking Dead is ever going to be anything more than a way to kill an hour on Sunday night when nothing else is on, but that doesn’t mean I don’t want that time killer to be enjoyable. Sometimes fun pops by and kicks some undead butt. More often than not it gets drowned in favor of the Rick and Shane Glower-Off Variety Hour.

But the midseason eps have thus far managed to pair hefty doses of horror movie thrills with the never ending soliloquies on life, liberty, and the pursuit of shooting things in the face. And they’ve done it pretty well. Could it be that Frank Darabont simply wasn’t up to the challenge of running a weekly zombie television show? Maybe Glen Mazzara made all those boring, chatty Cathy eps last year as a way of saving money to go big on the back half of the season. Or maybe it’s just dumb luck. Whatever the reason, “Triggerfinger” was a fine ep that didn’t leave me feeling drunk on rageahol.

Like the final sequences in the bar at the end of “Nebraska” last week, “Triggerfinger” ratcheted up the fear with the arrival of Tony and Dave’s heavily armed backup. Hershel, Glenn, and Rick spent a good chunk of episode 9 trying to get out of Hershel’s old drink joint alive while the Yankee gang sought revenge against the deaths of their friends. Can you honestly blame them? If the situation was reversed and Rick was the one outside looking for his friends, he would have shot up the bar just the same. Do I care that Glenn hid like a coward behind a dumpster instead of playing Robocop and mowing down everyone in sight? Not really, even if his reasoning was a little on the kittens and unicorns side. Yet it was a nice touch to balance out Rick and Hershel’s love of firearms.

The Walking Dead episode

It’s amazing what a little change in lighting can do. Looking back, having all those episodes focusing on the daylight hours is a good part of what sucked out a lot of the suspense (the shoddy dialogue didn’t exactly help, either). And sure, doing night shoots (or day-for-night) are überexpensive, but it’s a great shortcut for establishing tension very quickly. You do this same ep at 2 in the afternoon and it becomes as flat and unnecessary as “Bloodletting.” Or as monotonous as the latter 15 minutes of tonight’s ep. It’s one thing to have a bunch of characters stand around talking without moving the plot forward, but it’s a whole different can of worms when it’s pitch black and you’re trapped in an abandoned redneck bar.

Now, I’m no fan of Shane. At all. I think the show would’ve been better off if he died in season 1. But twisting him into this love-crazed broken heart is almost as pathetic as turning Lori into Lady MacBeth. What the scene in the tent at the end was probably intended to do was show that Rick and Lori care so deeply for each other they’re willing to do horrible things in order to protect their family. (Not sure why she didn’t let it slip that Shane tried to rape her. That would be the easiest way to get Rick to go after him.) But because we don’t really know anything about these characters beyond vague outlines, we don’t care about the emotional dynamics of a wife asking her husband to kill her lover in order to protect her unborn child. And because we don’t care about Lori and Rick as people, she comes off as a meddling, conniving, exploitative shrew who would rather Rick off Shane so she doesn’t have to deal with his incessant puppy dog/serial rapist eyes.

The Walking Dead episode

In fact, we don’t really know anything about any of the characters. Yes, we have some basic facts — Glenn is a nerdy pizza delivery boy, Dale is old, Hershel likes to drink and is also old, Carol breathes and occasionally blinks, Daryl likes long walks on the beach and collecting zombie ears — but beyond that there’s nothing. I don’t have any real grasp on any of them as people. It’s a bad sign when you’re over halfway through your second season and all of your characters aren’t much more than faces and names, and I still can’t remember who is who of Hershel’s crew.

Giving us a reason to care what happens to the Grimes Gang is going to be key in sustaining the show through the years. As cool as seeing a zombie get KO’d by a screwdriver to the eye socket is, eventually you want to get to a point where your audience isn’t actively rooting for the big bads to eat your merry band of survivors. To do that we have to be invested in and empathize with them. And that means figuring out how to make the non-zombie scenes at least remotely interesting.

Final Thoughts

  • “It was real...it was the one good thing. You know it’s true.”
  • “I’m sure we’ve all lost enough people, done things we wish we didn’t have to, but it’s like that now. You know that!”
  • The zombie trying to chew his way through the car glass brings up an interesting wrinkle in the science behind the undead. The more we see of them the more it becomes clear that there are two very distinct breeds: the lamebrains are the shuffling corpses that can’t do much more than moan and get stuck in wells, and the walkers who actively hunt their prey. I’m very curious as to what causes these distinctions, is it how much humanity they have left or how they died/contracted the zombie curse, or what?
  • Hands up, how many people were disappointed when Lori wasn’t eaten alive?
  • No one notices Lori’s missing? Really? Hours go by without someone wondering where her stupid ass is?
  • Well, lookie here. Carol’s got a backbone. And Hershel, too? Go team second tier characters.
  • Daryl, I know you’re pissed about Sophia being dead, but calm down, dude. You said all of two words to her the entire time you knew her and now you’re so distraught you almost hit her mom? Take a chill pill.
  • That’s cold, Maggie, seriously cold, passing over your dad for your boyfriend.
  • Andrea, Dale is incapable of insinuating anything. The man is a megaphone in a dopey hat. If you propped him up next to a neon sign saying “I HATE SHANE” he’d still be more obvious.
  • T-Dog had a line again tonight! Wow, I’m sure glad the writers kept him around. He’s so vital to the plot. I mean, who else would be able to dispense the crucial information that they also hadn’t seen Lori in a while?
  • Quoth my friend Adelle and seconded by me: “Glenn’s ‘I don’t like what your love does to me!’ speech made me want to punch him in the neck.”

 


Alex Brown is a research librarian by day, writer by night, and all around geek who watches entirely too much TV. One of these days she will go out and have a life, but right now she’s too busy re-watching Roar. You can follow her on Twitter if you dare.

9 comments
David Goldfarb
1. David_Goldfarb
The stuff about zombies having two distinguishable types comes from the comic -- in that, they call them "roamers" and "lurkers" (lurkers just sort of sit there, while roamers actively come after you). There was actually a noticeable shoutout to that in this episode, when the guys outside the bar said something like "there's roamers everywhere". No explanation for it yet in the comic, either.
Alex Brown
2. Milo1313
@David: Yeah, I remember that from the comics, but since the show has been adamant about not dealing with the zombies in any way except as something to run away from (unlike the comics, which bring the undead directly into the plot mechanics), I'm curious to see how they break down the breeds.
Improbable Joe
3. Improbable Joe
TEAM SHANE!

Is it "attempted rape" or "crappy plot device" when said "assault" is ignored 99% of the time even though the people involved are around each other 99% of the daylight hours, allegeded "attempted rapist" is begged to stay by his "victim" when she's not encouraging her husband to murder him in his sleep, and anyways the kid likes him?

If the writers aren't going to actually give us characters, they have to give us solid stereotypes/archetypes. Is Shane going to be the "rogue with a heart of gold" or "tragic figure turned bad by good intentions" or "psycho rapist/murderer" or "good but makes the hard decisions that make him hated" or what? The writers need to pick one thing and stick with it. If he's going to be any those things depending on the hour of the day, it not only makes things muddled but it makes us hate the other characters for not having consistent or rational reactions to him. There's no reason for Dale to hate him so much, considering how many times Shane has saved them all and how many times Shane could have killed Dale and didn't. There's no reason for Lori to have multiple conflicting reactions to Shane in consecutive episodes depending on the needs of the plot. Are Shane and Andrea hooked up, and if so then why does Shane care about Lori, and why isn't Andrea at least a little miffed that they've been a mini team except when the writers forget that they are paired off?

Zombies got to the writers and ate their brains!!!
David Thomson
4. ZetaStriker
While I do disagree with their mismanagement of Shane to an extent, I do think Dale has probably the most consistent and believable opinion of the man to date. With the exception of Lori - who has no opinions of her own, only opposition to other people's opinions - he's the only character who's seen/noticed the full extent of Shane's dark side. I think he's probably been suspicious of him since he caught him pointing a gun at Rick, but gave him the benefit of the doubt until Otis. Now he's dead set against the man, and fears he might go further and act out what he may have interrupted in the woods during season 1.
Alex Brown
5. Milo1313
@Improbable: I'm going to assume that your attempted rape comment was sarcasm and leave it at that. As for the rest of your post, I agree. With the exception of Glenn (not counting his foray into Captain Sexist Pig) everyone flip-flops depending on the needs of the storyline. That, along with no one being defined as people in any way, shape, or form, makes it unpossible to connect with any of the characters.

@Zeta: My problem with Dale is that he's suddenly become psychic with regards to Shane. There's no way he could know that Shane killed Otis. Sure, he can certainly assume that's what went down, but he's got nothing to back it up. Ok, fine, so he believes that Shane killed Otis, but going around screaming that all the time with absolutely nothing to support it makes him come off like a jerk. It's no wonder why Andrea and co. don't believe him. Hell, if I hadn't seen him shoot Otis, I wouldn't believe it. The whole thing makes Dale look like he's got a personal vendetta against Shane, like he's purposefully picking on him, and that won't do him any good in the long run.
James Whitehead
6. KatoCrossesTheCourtyard
I enjoyed the episode & did like that Glenn 'froze' like one of Fiver's cousins under some serious 'tharn' (sorry, reading that book to my youngest).

I agree that Glen's inaction balances out Rick & Shane. Also, he is just a pizza delivery guy trying not to get eaten. Not as if he went to Zombie Survivalist Camp on his free time. Not everyone will be able to go into shooter mode in this new world order.

Overall, even though I don't know a lot about these people, I am still rooting for them over the zombies. Unlike my experience with Battlestar Galatica when I started openly rooting for the Cylons if for no other reason than to shut the humans up. ;-)

Maybe the writers need to start using Lost's flashback technique so you get an idea about where these people come from & while we should care that they don't get eaten; excpeting Lori, of course. Hell, the Dr. Who writers were able to humanize Mickey, the walking punchline, just by having him talk about how his gran died.

Kato
Alex Brown
7. Milo1313
@Kato: The Lost comment is one that's been cycling around recently in regards to TWD. They did a bit of flashbacking for a few eps, but they were such pointless scenes that I think they actually detracted from the show. If they were going to do it well then they could really take off, but well is never something TWD has managed to achieve.
John Ginsberg-Stevens
8. eruditeogre
Yeah, I thought the same thing about Laurie as Lady MacBeth. She is just a cluster of roles for the writers: need a mother? A woman in danger? A provocateur? Just use Laurie!

Andrea and Maggie are good characters, but although Carol is getting a bit more interesting, women are getting the shaft in this show.

Shane is just a parody at this point. I have this feeling he'll get offed in the finale. Which would be fine by me.

I like how they have diverged from the comic, but I want less idyllic farm-life soap-opera and more characters-going-through-crises-of horror.
Alex Brown
9. Milo1313
SPOILERS!



@erudite: Berenthal was cast in Darabont's new show L.A. Noir, set to premiere next season. And given what happens to Shane in the comics, I suspect he's not long for this world. Also, the Governor is set to arrive next season and you simply can't have the two of them exist simultaneously. You can't have two Big Bads attacking the same hero, and the Governor would take out Shane straight off, making his death totally anticlimactic. So, yeah, he's got to go, and soon.


END SPOILERS

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment