Wed
Aug 17 2011 5:00pm
At Strange Angles: An Appreciation of Dark City

Alex Proyas’s Dark City (1998) is science fiction wearing the skin of noir, riffling through its drawers and playing with its accessories as misdirection — or commentary? — while the actual plot unfolds. The “neo-noir” is a popular film style in SF; Dark City is only one of the movies to use it but was among the most effective and lasting, possibly because of the film’s intense pace and highly memorable setting.

As for me, I’m a pretty big fan of Dark City and also of the noir genre — I’ll read Raymond Chandler any day, and I have a weakness for the theatricality of noir, the exaggerated grittiness and world-weariness of it. (Plus, I have a thing for unsympathetic or unpleasant characters, and noir tends to deliver on that score.)

Dark City isn’t quite noir, as I said before — instead, it’s a movie about aliens and the triumph of the human spirit and psi-phenomena that implies noir through setting, dialogue, stock characters (at first) and a sort of tonal resonance. Proyas uses the trappings of noir that will be familiar to the viewer to create a claustrophobic, steamy, polluted cityscape, always seen in darkness. The fact that, in the narrative, this was the city the aliens chose to create to examine humanity makes it even stranger. Did they, in their dissection of the humans’ memories and culture, find a representation of the city they later created for their zoo? Did the aliens read Chandler?

It’s fun to think about.

The plot itself, however, is more familiarly science-fictional. It’s about a human, shepherded by another human who may as well be the aliens’ pet (but a deceitful one!), evolving similar powers to those of his alien captors to take them out — with lots of talk about the uniqueness of the human individual mind, what makes a soul, “tuning,” and memory. The real story — the aliens chasing down the dangerous but evolved human to attempt to use him to perfect their own existence — could take place in any number of environments. So, if not the main plot, what screams “noir!” about Dark City? It’s the story within the story. Remember, the good doctor and the aliens are “writing” lives for people, putting together backstory like an author does for a character and then injecting the stories into those real live people. So, for every story they write and impose over the actors, there’s a theme and an arc. (The more time one spends thinking about the analogues of storytelling to physical creation in Dark City, the more mind-bending it becomes.) Those layers of story in Dark City are part of what makes it so fascinating, especially to me.

The noir story-elements come in as the shape of the aliens’ concocted plot for John Murdoch: they’ve created memories of him as a killer, memories for his estranged wife the lounge singer, memories for the detective who will hunt him — the thing that they didn’t count on was the failure of his imprinting. The killer personality doesn’t stick. Instead, he’s a lost man wandering through a police investigation of himself, chased by his wife and the detective at turns, as well as the aliens. In a more typical noir story, the lone wolf detective who’s getting close to the killer’s wife would be the protagonist, so we the viewer are experiencing that storyline sideways, from a strange angle. We know the story isn’t real, but it’s still driving the characters as actors in their own created, false lives — and that created story, thanks to the Dr. Schreber and the aliens, is pretty damn noir, which fills out the simple thematic resonance of the setting and filming techniques. Hence, “neo-noir.” It is, and it isn’t.

There are layers in which to enjoy Dark City, from the sheer cinematic quality of it — a perfectly shot film with some of the most beautiful uses of light and dark I’ve ever witnessed on screen — to the twistiness of the implications about creation, to the slightly cheesier bits like how what makes us human is our hearts not our heads (I would disagree, Mr. Murdoch, but all right). It’s a fine movie, and provides a fabulous sideways use of the trappings of noir to tell a science-fiction story; aficionados of either genre who have managed to make it this far without seeing the film should go out and find a copy right this minute. It’ll leave an impression.

I, for one, will always remember the moment Murdoch and Inspector Bumstead break through the brick wall.


Brit Mandelo is a multi-fandom geek with a special love for comics and queer literature. She can be found on Twitter and Livejournal.

This article is part of Noir Week on Tor.com: ‹ previous | index | next ›
15 comments
John Coulthart
1. John_Coulthart
Some of the noirish quality here can perhaps be traced to co-screenwriter Lem Dobbs when you see this film in the light of the extraordinary run he had with Kafka (a cult fave of mine), Dark City and then The Limey. All three films have a detective/mystery slant to their narratives, in Dark City the trappings are somewhat more overt.
seth e.
2. seth e.
This is a great take on the noir elements in Dark City--I was wondering what tor.com would say about it. The trappings of noir are very well used in Dark City; noir stories are all about events spiralling out of control, which makes a nice ironic contrast with the tight control the aliens are maintaining over their storylines. Very meta.
seth e.
3. narmitaj
I saw this in the cinema when it first came out and though I liked the film and its setting and cinematography and so on, what didn't work for me was that different people had their memories messed with at differtent times, instead of everyone at the same time. So in the film environment, you would expect that people with completely different past lives one day would bump into other people whose memories had been continuous for several days or weeks or months or years, and there would be a dispute.

When the aliens remodelled the city every now and then, only those people whose memories had also been remodelled at the same time that night would not notice. But everyone else would.
seth e.
4. Joseph Chandler Cain
Dark City was a triumph to me on many levels. It is great to see "some love" going its way. A bit before its time (see Matrix) this complex world showed me something that I couldn't quite get from the likes of Blade Runner...somehow, it gave me a sense of believability. Could someone be tapping my brain while I sleep? I don't know, but it taught me to run as fast as I could from a sniveling, limpy Kiefer Sutherland!
Either way, this has been a momentous week for me on Tor. Thank you for the Noir coverage, and for pointing me in the direction of films and books I had overlooked.
seth e.
5. Petar Belic
Very enjoyable movie. The nice thing is I went to see this movie totally without the media noise we get now. I had no idea what it was... and as it unfolded I was very pleased to see where we were, exactly.
seth e.
6. Umbardacil
Managed to catch a re-run of Dark City just now and upon a second (much delayed) watch, it holds up just as well, if not better, than the first watch. The things it has to say about memory and its relation to personality are intriguing. I honestly didn't catch the obvious relation to storytelling process, but it makes me appreciate the movie more. This movie needs more love.
seth e.
7. wizard clip
This is a fantastic movie on many levels, but for me it has one major problem. If I recall, there's hardly a single shot in the film that is held for more than 2 seconds (yes, after a while I began to count), which became for me a major distraction. Some might argue that this reflects the protaonist's fractured psyche, but really I think it has more to do with Proyas coming from a music video background. Given the noirish elements, this is especially irritating. I want the camera to linger lovingly on rain-slicked alleys and the weary faces of the characters. I still really enjoy this movie, but I think it would have been stronger if it didn't feel like the director was on a sugar high.
Rich Bennett
8. Neuralnet
Great movie, and I remember being surprised about how good Kiefer Sutherland was inthe movie. If I remember correctly he had kind of gone off the deep end at the time and this movie revived his career
Steve Hussey
9. deihbhussey
While I greatly enjoyed Dark City, it also made me a little mad. The potential was there for it to be one of that decade's greatest movies instead of just a good movie. The first 10 minutes were taken up by an in depth infodump designed to ensure that the lowest common denomonator could follow the film and not lose interest. That's hollywood for you. I would've much preferred having to figure everything out during the progression of the story.
Brit Mandelo
10. BritMandelo
@John_Coulthart

I didn't realize the same person had worked on Dark City & The Limey - interesting!

@Neuralnet

He really is one of the best parts of the movie - great acting.

@all

Thanks!
Tucker (just some guy)
11. jazzfish
The shot of Murdoch putting the goldfish in the bathtub is one of my favorite images in all of cinema.

deihbhussey @ 9: blame the studio for that %&$ voice-over. It's been removed in the recent Director's Cut DVD.
Brit Mandelo
12. BritMandelo
@jazzfish

Yup, that's the one I have. *g* Also love the goldfish scene.
Ashe Armstrong
13. AsheSaoirse
I picked up the Director's Cut that came out 2008 on a whim. I vaguely remembered seeing ads for the movie when it came out and thought it looked interesting then and so decided, with the movie having jumped into my view somehow just prior to this, to get it. One of the best impulse buys I've ever made.
Bob Blough
14. Bob
Brit,
Excellent review. I remember seeing the original version and being a bit disappointed but was intrigued enough to watch the director's cut when it was released. Far superior and another view of the "dumb it down to the people with brains the size of a pea" Hollywood thinking. Happens in all kinds of films. I love movies and I love SF but I rarely like what Hollywood considers "SF movies".
seth e.
15. Yenvious
I haven't seen the film in a long time, but the story you describe sounds to me (contrary to your take on the sideways viewpoint) a lot like the original story The 39 Steps. A man is accused, but in his own mind clearly not a murderer. He eventually bulls his way behind the scenes of a major enemy offensive against the Homeland, and plays a key role in taking those enemies down. So, perhaps the film is more Noir than we might think?

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment