Tue
Jun 7 2011 4:45pm
It’s Not A Disability, It’s A Super Power!

A recent trend that I’ve noticed and welcomed in popular media is the treatment of disabilities not as terrible burdens to born bravely by a noble sidekick to the more typically abled hero, but instead as the source of the hero’s superpowers.

Let’s look at Sherlock Holmes, for example. In the two modern portrayals of him, both the big screen treatment with Robert Downey, Jr. as Holmes, and the BBC re-imagining of a modern day Holmes, give us a Holmes with all the signs of Asperger’s syndrome. This disorder is characterized by poor social skills, keen attention to detail and trivia that seem inconsequential to most and high intelligence and devotion to rationality. Holmes’s obsession with crime solving matches the obsessions of many of my students with Asperger’s, which have ranged from memorizing personal information of the people they meet, to drawing detailed sketches of Roman soldiers, to creating technical manuals to spaceships that don’t exist.

As far as society is concerned, Holmes has a disorder. He can’t socialize easily with his neighbors. He exasperates his roommate. He engages in bizarre behaviors in public. But the source of his oddness is also the source of his strength. Holmes would not, could not be Holmes without his talent for observation and reasoning. And these would not exist in him so strongly if he was neurotypical. It’s not a disability, it’s a super power.

This is even more explicitly done with another TV dectective, Monk. I’ve never watched the show myself, but I know that its about a man with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder who solves mysteries. Again, it’s the attention to detail, to noticing what others don’t that makes Monk such a great dectective.

But it’s not just detectives that get into the act. A slightly more fantastical version occurs in the Percy Jackson series of books. All the young demigods have dyslexia and Attention Deficit Disorder. This is explained by the characters being fundamentally different. They are meant to be heroes from Greek mythology, so their minds are hardwired to read ancient Greek, not English. They fidget and twitch and react quickly to stimuli because they have superior battle reflexes. In regular schools, they are disabled, but at Camp Halfblood they are heroes because of their differences, not in spite of them.

The being a hero “because of” instead of “in spite of” a disability is what makes these characters so attractive. It celebrates difference, rather than treats it like an obstacle to be over come. Think of how much poorer the world might be if Sherlock Holmes had spent his formative years treating his strength as a weakness and trying to become good at something he simply isn’t wired for.


Jennifer Liang is an administrator and co-webmaster of www.DRAGONMOUNT.com, the largest Wheel of Time fan site. She is the director of Wheel of Time programing for Dragon*Con and the chair of JordanCon, a Wheel of Time themed convention. Recently, she became the host of Tor.com’s Wheel of Time Facebook and Twitter Portals. When not obsessing over who killed Asmodean, Jennifer is pursuing a Master’s in Special Education and works part time as a middle school teacher and blogs about recipes, restaurants and gardening at northsidefood.blogspot.com.

23 comments
Nick Rogers
1. BookGoblin
[EDIT: Minions of Spellcheck-of-evil excised successfully, despite the distracting presence of Benedict Cumberbatch...]

Other than that, I completely agree with the theme. More heros that celebrate the strange and wonderful "edge cases" of humanity is a welcome change.
cranscape
2. cranscape
Monk is awful though. I don't mind when a show gets it right or even mostly right, but Monk gets so much wrong and it is popular culture enough it is adding to all of the bad info out there. And then that gets directed back at those of us with the popularized conditions. And now Monk is on reruns. I swear that show will never go away.
Matthew B
3. MatthewB
I apreciate the theme of removing the stigma, but as a parent, the Percy Jackson explanation of Dyslexia and ADD is kind of annoying. Yes, it can be good for a kid to see a character who has the same problems as them, but the way those books deal with it, or rather, don't deal with it, isn't helpful. Percy's Dyslexia and ADD just stop being a problem. He doesn't need to learn to read despite dyslexia because he can magically read a new language and doesn't need to worry about plain old English anymore, and their version of ADD only prevents you from focusing on boring stuff, not cool stuff like monsters and fighting.

It's a great adventure, but it won't help any real kids with Dyslexia or ADD learn to deal with it. I'm all for a little escapism now and then, but I'm not going to spend much time applauding that series for the way it handles those issues.
Bridget McGovern
4. BMcGovern
@1--Thanks for catching the typos, BookGoblin! I'm going to lay the blame on Benedict Cumberbatch. He's distracting...
Jennifer Liang
5. JenniferL
Also I fail at proofing myself.

@mrburack I don't disagree with you. I had started writing a paragraph saying much the same thing, but it contradicted my thesis of celebrating difference. I'm ADHD myself and while I've come to consider it a feature, not a bug, it still causes issues in my life I have to deal with.
C C
6. Hatgirl
Um, no. Holmes in BBC's "Sherlock" does not have Asperger's. He is a self-described sociopath. The key difference (from the point of view of discussing this specific imaginary TV show character) is that sociopaths understand social norms, but do not feel they need to adhere to them whereas people with Asperger's often don't understand society's rules, but respect them once taught. Sherlock understands exactly why people do what they do... and uses it to his advantage.

No characters have claimed Sherlock has Asperger's and neither have the TV shows creators. Sherlock is a sociopath. Cute as a button, but a sociopath. And sociopaths and Asperger's are NOT the same thing.
cranscape
7. Madison
Given your thesis, what do you think of DC getting rid of the wheelchair-bound Oracle by reverting Barbara Gordon back to Batgirl? http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/06/06/batgirl-barbara-gordon-disabled/
Nick Rogers
8. BookGoblin
If it counts for anything, I had to edit my comment because I misspelled inconsequential.

While I think there's some risk in trivializing things with easy fantasy fixes, I think Percy Jackson and Co. are a great example of how fantasy helps kids. They don't deal with their own ADHD by being demi-gods, but they do get to read stories about challenged kids that gives them a moment of hope, a moment to dream about turning being different into being special.

Like the legion of 11-year-olds that wake up waiting for an Owl with an invitation to Hogwarts to rescue them from their muggle existences; they might be stung a bit by reality, but they also escaped for a bit through the dream of something "else."

Fantasy is about bridging between what we are and what we dream of being. For challenged kids, they know they aren't normal, but their version of "not normal" just becomes "normal for them." They long to feel special, and reading about kids who feel like they do gives them hope.

There is this moment where children of a certain generation stood before a darkened walk-in-closet, held out their hands and desired with every fiber of their being to touch snow and pine needles when they took a blind step forward.

Some people think that it was inviting tragedy, that inevitably we would find the back of the closet and be crushed by the weight of our disappointment; but what we really remember was that truly wonderful, terrible, incredible moment when we stepped forward, with dreams and wishes on fire in our mind and infinite possibility brushing against our fingertips. In that moment we were as far from normal as we could ever be...we were the hero taking the first step of our own grand adventure.

I don't remember touching the back of the closet, I only remember the unmatched thrill of taking that first step. If I'd been a "normal" kid I probably wouldn't have dared to reach out my hands, close my eyes, and take that first step forward. In that moment, not being normal was the best thing about myself; which was a lesson that has stuck with me all the days of my life.

Every kid deserves to see themselves in their heroes, and we need more heroes like Sherlock Holmes, and Percy Jackson, and Jill Pole, and Lyra Belacqua, and the whole Hogwarts crew, and the Emond's Field quintet.

I think Jennifer's point was that by celebrating what makes our heroes other than the normal kid next door, we make being something other than "normal" feel a little bit better all the way around.
Noneo Yourbusiness
9. Longtimefan
I did like the new Sherlock Holmes series but I do not remember the show saying he had a disablity.

If you want a show that has a character over coming a disability it would be Doctor Who.

The Daleks greatest nemisis was stairs but then they learned how to fly.
cranscape
10. GreyScot
This may be a bit off topic, but if you look at, 'Zen in the Martial Arts,' by Joe Hyams [Bantam, 1982. ISBN 0-553-27559-3] you will see that Bruce Lee (Yes, the Martial Arts movie star.) said, "I became a Martial Arts expert in spite of my limitaions." He went on to say, "...my right leg is almost an inch shorter than the left. That fact dictated the best stance for me - my left foot leading. Then I found that because the right leg was shorter, I had an advantage with certain types of kicks, since the uneven stomp gave me greater impetus. And I wear contact lenses..." His summary is worth the read and I won't quote it all here. In short, Bruce Lee said, "I accepted my limitations for what they were and capitalized on them. And that's what you must learn to do." Best all.
cranscape
11. TOS
BookGoblin @#8 -- that was beautifully explained, thank you!
Cathy Mullican
12. nolly
There is definitely something in what you say, and it's a refreshing change, but I worry a little about the effect on those who, for whatever reason, cannot turn their disabilities into superpowers.
cranscape
13. hohmeisw
I wondered about the movie version of Holmes; I didn't know much about Asperger's, however, so I wasn't sure.
I understand that differences from societal norms are not always bad, but (you could sense that coming, right?) in many cases they are limitations. As you pointed out, Holmes cannot socialize normally (which the movie displays when he acts like a complete dick to Watson's fiance); this is his limitation to overcome. He is able to use it to greater good, but I think it is still acknowledged as a limitation.
Mari Ness
14. MariCats
I wish I could agree with this post. Really, I do.

But I have a few problems with it.

First, as other commenters have mentioned, Holmes doesn't really have Asperger's. Social difficulties - or rather, impatience with social norms, sure -- and high intelligence, yes, but this is not Asperger's. More to the point, Sherlock Holmes is not a "modern trend." The character was created in the 19th century, and the two recent portrayals were attempting to be close to that portrayal - a man with all of the mental/social qualities you mention.

On that "modern trend," Monk is one show, out of many; it began in 2002. Percy Jackson and the Olympians, one book series and one film, out of many. I really am not sure that one TV character and one book series/film counts as a trend, although if you are right in your interpretation that Percy Jackson's superpowers are because of, not in spite of, his disabilities, that's a welcome trend. (I haven't read the books; I've heard more reactions like MrBurack's - cool to have dyslexic characters, sure, less cool that it turns out to be something the kids don't actually have to deal with.)

But what is really troubling me is that this post was published in the same week where DC announced that their one major, unambiguously disabled character, who gained her current powers after the accident that put her in a wheelchair, Barbara Gordon/Oracle, will be returning as the fully able bodied Batgirl, losing the chair completely. Which means that DC will no longer be featuring a major character in a wheelchair. This was also posted in the same week where a major movie, X-Men: first Class, showed Charles Xavier (who did not gain his powers through his disability) getting pushed in his wheelchair, instead of pushing himself. And so on.

I could go on, but I need to say that I'm just not seeing this trend of disabilities turning into superpowers, or getting celebrated as something "because of" instead of "spite of." I am somewhat surprised that you did not mention the one genuine exception: Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series, where in the first few books, men could only gain their superpowers through going insane, resulting in their abilities being genuine disabilities. Of course, the counter to this is that Jordan later removed this disability from the books, and Rand loses a hand only after he gains his powers.

(I suppose a second exception is the Song of Ice and Fire series, but although that series certainly features multiple characters with physical and mental disabilities, only one could be possibly said to gain any magical abilities thanks to his physical disability - and that's arguable - and at no point is Martin celebrating differences. My own belief is that Martin just enjoys watching his characters suffer as much as possible.)

What I am seeing is the ongoing trend, particularly in television/film, to just not feature disabled people at all. Which, you know, is television/film. I'll expect that to change as soon as Hollywood gets over its "Oh my god, the woman is wearing a SIZE FOUR! SHE'S SO FAT!" pathology :)

@nolly - We'll be ok, I promise :)
Paul Lewandowski
15. Snowkestrel
As a parent of a child with Asperger's Syndrome, and someone who, through my research and attempts to seek support and socialization for him, a person who has met several people with clinically diagnosed Asperger's Syndrome, I can tell you that while the symptoms do not specifically overlap, someone with Asperger's can easily manifest superficial signs of Antisocial Personality Disorder (the present term encompassing what used to be called 'Sociopathic Behavior').

I can also tell you, that within the circles of Asperger's diagnosed and Asperger's support that I have experienced, Sherlock Holmes is held up as an example of someone who has mostly learned to cope with Asperger's Syndrome.

Just because Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock self-describes himself as a sociopath (a technically obsolete term) does not mean that he is necessarily
a) correct in his self diagnosis, nor
b) telling the truth.
Asperger's is not yet very well understood by the general public, and as someone with little patience, he may be stating that he is a 'sociopath' in order to stave off further conversation, explanation, and subsequent judgements on the matter. I have seen similar behaviors in real life.

I encourage you to do a web search for "DSM IV Asperger's Syndrom symptoms" and also for "DSM IV Antisocial Personality Disorder symptoms" and compare them. Please note that item III for the Asperger's symptoms states
"(III) The disturbance causes clinically significant impairments in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning."
This can easily encompass apparently antisocial behavior.

Just think about it before you argue that "He says he's...". In the end, we're trying to diagnose a fictional character. Regardless of that, if my son (or anyone's child) chooses to hold up a successful fictional character who consistently acts for good and for justice as a hero who has turned adversity somewhat to his advantage, I say let them, and see if it helps to develop a similar change in themselves.
cranscape
16. t0kengirl
My fiance has been diagnosed with aspergers and always get frustrated with characters that might have aspergers or an austistic spectrum disorder. He doesn't find most of them positive at all as he tells me they turn what is a daily struggle for him into an amusing character quirk. Holmes TV potrayal being his favourite rant. He also complains that if they want to potray aspergers on screen they should get an actor with aspergers to potray it.
cranscape
17. cranscape
I think Holmes usually is hinted at being a sociopath more than anything else. Aspergers seems like a near opposite to anything I've ever seen him portrayed as. If anything Holmes is too aware of everything (with perhaps a blindness to himself) and chooses to disregard convention in favor of his method of detecting which has proven superior.

Anyone watch the Canadian show Regenesis? The biochemist Bob had Aspergers and a couple PhDs in his areas of interest. I always liked Bob as a character because his strengths were also his weaknesses and he had to balance both out to be the most effective at his job. It didn't sugar coat his issues and make him an easy hero either. He struggled to do heroic things just like the other characters.

Last season of Doctor Who had a kid with dyslexia who listened to audio books instead of reading. I don't remember him being any more heroic than the next kid on Doctor Who, but I liked seeing dyslexia both out in the open as a normal thing you might see on tv as well as showing an alternative way of enjoying books. Maybe gave some people ideas.
niko Bates
18. railroad9
It's unlikely Holmes would be incorrect about his diagnosis (nearly impossible, actually), but it is entirely possible that he's just outright lying about it for whatever reason (most likely that it amuses him to do so).

Don't forget that Holmes is also a self-induced savant, avoiding the retention of any information he deems irrelevant to his capacities as a consulting detective. He reveals in A Study in Scarlet and one of the Cumberbatch films that he has no idea whether we live in a geocentric or heliocentric solar system.

I'm not sure how well that fits in with the theme of the article and thread, since it's self-induced, but it's certainly what many would consider a limitation.

I do appreciate that the the current incarnations-- especially Cumberbatch's rendition-- focus on Holmes as a thoroughly-unpleasant-yet-enjoyable character. The literary Holmes is not a nice or even really a very good person. He's completely self-obsessed and a nightmare to know. He manipulates absolutely everyone around him in order to not get bored. Previous incarnations portrayed him as simply overbearing and arrogant, but his problems go much deeper than simply arrogance.
Teresa Nielsen Hayden
19. tnh
Disability isn't a superpower. It's limiting, and those limits become part of what you are and what you do. Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock Holmes isn't brilliant because he has Asperger's; he's brilliant and he has Asperger's. Each condition reshapes the other. He's finding his way into being human via different routes than most other people use, but if he keeps it up, he'll eventually know an extraordinary amount about them.

The only real superpower I know of that comes with disability is a knack that's common among the deaf and hard of hearing. The trick is that spoken language and body language are two different channels, and they don't always match. We're taught from earliest childhood that spoken language is the important channel, so it gets most of our attention. But when you can't use spoken language, and have to concentrate on body language instead, you discover two things. The first is that people around you are broadcasting all kinds of interesting things on that bandwidth. The second is that many of them aren't aware they're doing it, so they're broadcasting in clear.

Try putting in earplugs and watching sometime. It's fun and informative, especially at reunions and large business-related gatherings.
Chris Meadows
20. Robotech_Master
@14 MariCats:

I can't really say that I agree with you about Oracle. I have a LiveJournal friend who is paraplegic and fond of ranting about just how nonsensical it is to have a character remain paraplegic for very long in a universe with as much super science, magic, and alien technology floating around as DC. (He has such issues about it, and has been so vehement in his ranting, that Gail Simone herself actually, and rather unwisely, responded to some of his journal posts. but that's another matter.)

When you get right down to it, she's basically a token paraplegic that DC can take credit for presenting as heroically overcoming her handicaps—when in fact it rather strains credulity that she still has those handicaps in the first place, as well-connected as she is to the people who have that super science, magic, and alien technology (not to mention billions of dollars in wealth).

And no minority likes to be tokenized.
Mari Ness
21. MariCats
@Robotech_Master - I think calling Oracle DC's token paraplegic is absolutely a fair criticism, and you're also right to note that it's unlikely for anyone in the DC Universe to remain paraplegic for long. And I can also see the appeal of the return of the "original" Barbara Gordon.

But, now that Barbara Gordon is back swinging through Gotham City, DC doesn't even have a token wheelchair user among its able-bodied superheroes. Which brings me back to my original point: despite the contention of this article, it's very, very difficult to find disabled superheroes of any kind, much less people who turn their disabilities into superpowers. Actually, if we are counting Sherlock Holmes (19th century), Daredevil (created 1964), some of the initial portrayals of Charles Xavier (late 1960s, which suggested that he focused on developing his mental powers because he could not heal his legs) and Rand Al Thor in the original Wheel of Time books (1990), then this trend (assuming these limited examples here and in the initial post can even be called a trend) mentioned in the original post is not only not new, but also somewhat declining. Which was my main point.
Chris Meadows
22. Robotech_Master
Stan Lee created another handicapped hero on his short-lived Flash animation site a few years back—a former defense attorney turned paraplegic Punisher-ripoff in a power wheelchair that turned into power armor.

I don't think that a handicapped superhero character makes much sense in the DC universe, where all that superpower stuff exists to make it hard are to justify keeping such a character handicapped. Of course, the DC universe isn't the only comic book universe out there, so you would think that people could make such characters in a setting where it made more sense.

Come to think of it, I am a bit surprised that nobody in this entire discussion has yet brought up the case of Avatar: the Last Airbender, which featured two such characters. There was Toph, who was blind, but could "see" by sensing vibrations through her earthbending power. I found it rather refreshing that the show did not pussyfoot around the issue of her blindness, but characters made jokes about it, and she even joked about it herself. It was treated as a fact of life, something that made her unique and special, rather than some reason to pity or cosset her—indeed, she ran away from home because her parents couldn't see that she was capable of looking after herself.

And then there was Teo, also a paraplegic, who had a steampunk-technology wheelchair with a glider wing attachment. Nobody made much of his handicap, either—about the most mention it merited was when Sokka remarked on how neat the glider chair was. (There also was not any attempt to go into the old "other senses compensating" chestnut, implying that he was only so good at flying because he couldn't walk. With Toph, it makes a certain amount of sense, but it would be pretty ridiculous in Teo's case.)

There is a remarkable contrast here to the approach taken by all the cartoons I grew up with, where the only time you would ever see a handicapped person was so that the episode could teach A Very Special Lesson about how handicapped people are people too—and whenever a handicapped person showed up, there was no way to escape the sermonizing that inevitably accompanied it. I think the "show, don't tell" approach works a whole lot better.
cranscape
23. baz-blackadder
In" The Hounds of Baskerville" ( series 2 episode 2) John Watson, comments to Lastrade about Holmes having Aspergers. It's in the scene where they meet Lestrade in Grimpen Village.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment