Wed
Feb 23 2011 4:24pm
SyFy’s Being Human Proves It: The Remake is Dead

Being Human U.S. remake

In case you hadn’t noticed, we’re running out of ideas.

I am speaking, of course, about the dismal state of television in the United States. Many people would scold me for making this claim, and I understand. I have my favorites too, my guilty pleasure shows, as I call them. Burn Notice and White Collar are my go-to for pure, silly fun, and I frequently mainline the Food Network like it is actually made of artisanal chocolate. No, what I’m speaking of is our penchant for taking fantastic ideas from our island of formerly-redcoated brethren, and proceeding to turn those ideas into... I’m trying to find a phrase that’s a little more expressive than “utter garbage.”

If you stop to think, the examples are endless for U.K. shows that turned rotten when they were remade for U.S. audiences. Many will cite The Office as an occasion where it went right, but that’s basically the accident that proves the rule (and also depends entirely on your sense of humor). The sitcom Coupling didn’t fair anywhere near as well. Blackpool became the joke that was Viva Laughlin. Life On Mars, oh, don’t get me started on what they did to that poor, brilliant show. Stateside producers are already trying to get their hands on Misfits, despite the fact that the showrunner isn’t sure it’s a good idea. Unsurprisingly, the MTV version of Skins lost its sparkle in the first half hour. And now, adding insult to injury, the SyFy channel has decided that it’s time for them to offer their own take on the BBC hit Being Human.

For those of you unfamiliar, I will give you the quick pitch of the show: Being Human is an urban fantasy yarn in which a werewolf named George and his vampire friend, Mitchell, decide to share a flat together and have a go at being normal people. This gets complicated when they discover that their new residence is already occupied by a ghost named Annie. So much for trying to avoid the weird things in life.

Now, I’m not being quick to judge here—I have kept up with this show, much as it has irked me, and given it a fair shot. It has a few bright spots and it is trying very hard. I suppose my frustrations with it can be summed up in a point made at last year’s San Diego Comic Con. It happened during the British Invasion panel, in a room populated with writers the likes of China Miéville, Paul Cornell and Toby Whithouse (the man responsible for Being Human in the U.K., and author of two wonderful Doctor Who scripts). In fact, it may have been Mr. Whithouse himself who shed light on one of the key differences between U.S. and U.K. television: the budget.

This panel of beautifully-accented gentleman was giving voice to an impossible suggestion: that this lack of funding actually led to better entertainment. The fact that they had less money to work with meant the writers had to come up with more creative solutions to prevent inflation that they could not afford. The result was interesting, character-driven television.

Being Human U.S. remake

Sam Witwer, who plays the vampire in the aforementioned SyFy rip-off has gone on record to say that he believes viewers should think of their Being Human like Ron Moore’s Battlestar Galactica redux. He thinks that the backlash that the show is currently receiving is similar to what BSG had to go through in its first season. There are two problems with this analogy: 1) Ron Moore didn’t do a basic remake of the original Battlestar, he completely reinvented it. The fans were reacting to how new everything was—Starbuck’s a girl! Cylons look like us! Apollo has a brother instead of a sister! (Okay, had a brother. Sorry, Zak Adama.) That is a very different situation. 2) It is one thing to remake something that originally aired over 30 years ago. It is quite another thing to remake something that is still on the air.

Oh, I forgot to mention that, didn’t I?

That’s right, Being Human is currently in the middle of its third season in the U.K. What’s more, the SyFy Channel has been airing it on their network. I find it hard to believe that someone isn’t going to get confused, and even harder to believe that this is the new Battlestar Galactica.

I’m not going to say that the little things about this remake are its downfall. That would be like those Harry Potter fans who insist that the Goblet of Fire movie was somehow ruined by Hermione wearing a pink dress to the Yule Ball when the book clearly stated it was periwinkle. I’m just not one of those people. So I can handle the fact that they changed the character names (even though turning George, Mitchell and Annie into Josh, Aidan and Sally makes me feel like I’m watching an episode of Full House). I think that the CGI for the werewolf transformation looks cartoonish next to the old-school prosthetics used on the BBC version, but I can deal with it.

I may be a little more upset than necessary about the obligatory Twilight joke (because, apparently, that’s the only thing Americans think about when you bring up werewolves and vampires), but one day, I’ll get over that too.

It’s the budget that kills this show in so many places, along with a few poor choices. To begin with, it seems that someone decided that Josh and Aidan shouldn’t know each other very well before moving in together. Part of what made the UK show so interesting right out of the gate was the clearly established affection between a werewolf and a vampire. George and Mitchell were buddies. They were at home together even with their Odd Couple vibe. You wanted to understand that relationship, and so you kept watching them.

Being Human U.K. cast

The show’s iconic house was treated badly in the do-over as well. Rather than a quirky pink number on the street corner, the house that the U.S. trio lives in is massive, so massive that the directors seem to be at a loss figuring out how to block scenes effectively in the space. The show is full of awkward close-ups and no one ever seems to be standing where they would if they were having an actual conversation. The set is overdone, and all just to be sure that it looks like a dreaded haunted mansion. It doesn’t need to—it already is one by virtue of its tenants.

But where the show really fails is in its portrayal of Sally, the ghost with a mysterious death. The creative team on this show seems to have traded her character development for a lot of ghostly special effects. In the first episode of the BBC version, George gets locked in a cellar with his former girlfriend just as he’s about to transform. Mitchell is AWOL, so he calls Annie for help. Annie tells him she can’t do it; she hasn’t left the house since her death and she’s terrified. George begs and screams, and Annie finally runs out of the house and saves George’s ex.

Then there’s the U.S. version: Josh calls Sally and begs, but Sally literally can’t do anything. Her hand passes right through the doorknob. Aidan finally gets Josh’s message on his cell and runs at super-vampire-speed (because again, Twilight is all Americans understand about vampires) to save the day. Removing a character’s vital development and taking away her agency so that you can show off some flashy see-through tricks? That equals bad television. I don’t care what country you come from.

Bottom line, the show is called Being Human because that is what the characters are struggling with, the same as the rest of us. If Sally’s problems all stem from her inability to touch a doorknob, then you might as well rip out the show’s beating heart and replace it with a heart-shaped candy made of high fructose corn syrup. It might be satisfying at the start, but afterwards, your stomach hurts and you’re still hungry for something that will actually feed you. So the SyFy Channel can keep their little remake; I’m going back to follow the original gang to the end of the third season and whatever comes next. Because I’m in it to find out what it really takes to be human, and I know they’re going to show me.


Emily Asher-Perrin still hasn’t gotten over what they did to Life On Mars, and no, Harvey Keitel’s presence did nothing to make up for it. She will always have a special soft spot for werewolves. She writes for a few websites, and tweets and all the rest of it.

31 comments
Lindsay Ribar
1. Lindsay Ribar
A-frigging-men. That is all.
April Moore
2. aprildmoore
Ditto! You summed up a lot of it, and I'm not even going to go into how much better the BBC is at using the English language. It makes me feel sorry for the actors in the U.S. remake - it's not their fault.
Lindsay Ribar
3. ZacharyG
I'd agree that the British TV remakes need to stop before someone gets it in their head that it'd be a good idea to do an American Doctor Who, but I mean... "The dismal state of television in the United States?" What about Mad Men, Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, Boardwalk Empire, and Dexter? Yeah, the market is waaaaay oversaturated with half-hour dramas, but I would hardly go so far as to call the situation "dismal," especially compared to, say, 2004.
Ian Turton
4. ianturton
I haven't watch all that many of the US version but I did catch two episodes on Saturday. The biggest issue for me was that we saw the female vampire on the DVD - not being able to see Mitchell on CCTV becomes vital at several points in the UK version so I can see problems ahead for the US version.
Alex Brown
5. Milo1313
I still haven't seen the show. I hate watching things on SyFy because their previews are drenched in spoilers...that and their commercials are obnoxiously jarring when contrasted with the shows. Honestly, though, even without those aforementioned issues I still wouldn't be inclined to watch it. I REALLY hate the ad campaign they did for it. Nothing pisses me off more than shitty puns and to be bombarded by them day in and day out on every website I visted for a month makes me want to punch SyFy in the face.
Alex Brown
6. Milo1313
Zachary@3: I don't know that I'd use the word "dismal" to describe tv today (unless you were talking about network tv instead of cable)...maybe mostly uninspiring and derivative (see the dozen reworks of How I Met Your Mother and The Wire currently clogging the scheduling).

Also, Dexter? Really? Have you seen the last several seasons? I mean, if you like it you like it, and I'm not going to hate on your personal tastes, but, man, not even the wonderful Kat Stratford could drag me back to that show.
Edward Hooper
7. dokhebi
We had great ideas here, but they were canceled: Caprica, Stargate: Universe, Crusade (B5 sequel). It's not the ideas that are bad, it's the audience. They are too stupid for modern television. They get their fill of dumbed down shows like "Friends" and "Glee" and don't go for the brain stimulation of better TV. Also, the original Doctor Who was way to hard for my fellow Americans to comprehend. The new show is good but it still plays to the lowest common denominator.
Edward Hooper
8. dokhebi
Why do the American TV networks try to remake good UK shows instead of just throwing money at the over-seas producers and raking in the profits?
Edward Hooper
9. dokhebi
Sorry, I fogot to mention Firefly. Great American TV that was to good.

Also, Torchwood is now being co-produced by an American company, but instead of making a complete set ofchanges they are giving it the "Sparticus" treatment, which will mean nudity with the sex and blood with the bullets. And most people thought it was already racey.
Lindsay Ribar
10. a-j
As a Brit your kind comments on UK TV are appreciated but I do think you are a touch hard on US TV. I understand there was a show called The Wire that some people seemed to have liked.

It works the other way as well. This side of the pond we are suffering the pretty appalling Outcasts, a British SF show that seems to be using old props and costumes from BSG. And Torchwood were pretty ropey too, though all was redeemed with the excellent Children of Earth series.
LL S
11. scepter
It's not so bad - really I expected worse. I didn't think George (or his scream) could be re-produced and it hasn't but the rest is not too bad. Okay, I don't like the name change from Annie to Sally. Plus, the vampire is cute.
Lindsay Ribar
12. Maac
US shows come in seasonal packages of 22-26 episodes. UK shows come in packages of 6-10. In syndication, a network can make more money off a US show. This is why this remakeage keeps happening and why U.S. shows are so, very, completely, untterly unavoidable no matter where you go on the planet, almost: Capitalism.

It's also, I'm thinking the root of your issues with Sally/Annie. Because they've got to stretch it out for more episodes, they're making her character arc far, far longer, her discovery of her power to affect things, her agency, her history, and her future, etc. They're extending everything by miles, and at times it can be WILDLY disorienting. I watch the N.A. version and I'm like "Didn't we cover that already, aren't we past this yet?!?" And I rewatched the full-run UK "Being Human" marathon in preparation for the Series Three premeiere last weekend and it was like having whiplash -- lots more covered in voiceover or filling you in through dialog instead of having each scene played out onscreen as they're doing in the North American version. (The voiceover is of the nice, poetic variety, not the obnoxious variety, though. Not knocking anyone's voiceover.)

Having just come from watching prolonged the situation-setting for the N.A. version and (re)seeing the same scenarios being set up in 1/3 the time for the U.K. version was fascinating -- what they chose to pick out from the original and dramatize, how the original telgraphed things and dropped you right into the action and then caught you up subtly, that sort of thing.

In contrast, I couldn't sit through a single episode of North American "Skins" (let us please not forget our Canadian brethren and... sisteren? who are rather intensely involved in both enterprises :-D). I haven't been quite as soured on N.A. "Being Human" yet. I don't think the vampire's got quite as much of a personality as his UK counterpart, at least not yet (which means he angsts a little less, so far, but also is a little scarier -- I have never been scared of Mitchell for two seconds together, even when the narrative wants me to bebe). But so far, Sally has not made me want to shake her by the shoulders quite so much as Annie. Yet. (This is not to say I do not like Annie. I do. Lots. Plus Lenora Critchlow is charming. But she makes me feel very helpless as a woman at times -- not in a good way -- especially when they get to the "oh so that's how I died" parts. And the series three premiere, to be honest. Sally hasn't gotten that far in the storyline yet, so I'm waiting to see how they handle it. What with the "how I died" business, I think they are setting her up to be a bit crueler. I don't have a problem with this.) And I believe in the Yank werewolf's "woman problems" more than I believe in George's. :-) George is very much doing the "glasses"="shorthand for awkward and/or homely" thing, and I don't buy it. (I do buy George's menace and on-the-edge danger more.) I like that we got to see a little of Josh's family. I like that they didn't have his werewolf mentor fellow attack Sally, I was very pleased with that deviation from the UK version. Jesus. I hope they continue with this wonderful trend of not having living men attack Sally. Bad enough she's been ghosted, no?

However, I think I prefer the British supporting cast hands-down.

Basically, I don't hate the remake yet, and I'm shocked. I expected to -- in fact, I wasn't going to watch it at all. But I'm willing to see where they go. They've got the same situation, but they're not the same characters, and I'm okay with giving them that. For now. And I'm amazed that they've pulled off this feat of having me watch the two shows at the same time, more or less, and unavoidably comparing the two without me wanting to swear at the screen. :-)

Skins, on the other hand... they entirely missed the point. Entirely. All the angst, double the "drama," and none of the heart, at all. (At least of Series 1 Skins, which was a difficult balance to achieve -- no subsequent season of Skins achieved it, even in the UK.) And kind of... well, they've done some whitewashing and some unpleasant stereotyping from what little I saw, and suddenly everyone's kind of wealthy, it seems (backyard pools for everyone!) and I'm not keen to dip back in the pool, really.
Lindsay Ribar
13. RobinM
New and unnecessary remakes are not limited to U.K. and U.S.A. I've read somewhere that there is going to be a U.S. remake of the Canadian show Being Erica too. Why ? We can already watch the Canadian version on U.S. stations.
Kate Shaw
14. KateShaw
I've never seen the UK version of Being Human, although I have friends overseas and here in the states who love it. I'm also not much of a TV watcher. But I really like Syfy's version of Being Human. I think it's very well written and acted, with interesting character arcs and a pretty well-thought-out world.

I don't have a problem with remakes, if they're done well--even if the original series is still going. It's not like we're only allowed to watch one and have to choose which. I've decided not to start watching the UK Being Human until after the first season of the US version because I don't want to compare the two and find one wanting. I expect they're both good in different ways.

And anyway, complaining that OMG remakes are BAD! and then complaining that OMG this remake isn't exactly like the original! seems a bit, hm, confused.
Steve Oerkfitz
15. Steve Oerkfitz
Milo-On Dexter-this season was weak but the previous season was the best yet with a terrific performance by John Lithgow. And Kat Straford wondeful?-shes kinda creepy looking. Also recommend Breaking Bad, Boardwalk Empire, Southland and Justified.
Lindsay Ribar
16. Jay in Oregon
I may be a little more upset than necessary about the obligatory Twilight joke (because, apparently, that’s the only thing Americans think about when you bring up werewolves and vampires)

Hey, that's not fair! I thought of Underworld first...
Lindsay Ribar
17. Speaker To Managers
I couldn't watch the entire first episode of the American travesty of Being Human after having watched the British version from the beginning and really enjoying it. It was flat, as if it had been left out overnight and all the fizz bubbled away.

To see why American remakes suck so mightily, you need to watch a TV show called Episodes on Showtime in the US and BBC2 in the UK. It follows the adventures(?) of a pair of TV writers who've just finished several seasons of a hit comedy show about a school headmaster as they attempt to migrate the show to American TV. It's very funny, very sarcastic, and not just a little bit nasty towards the large crowd of typewriter-wielding monkeys who perpetrate network television in the US>
Lindsay Ribar
18. cranscape
While Outcasts probably didn't warrant the money or the hype leading up to it, I find it completely watchable if you pretend it is the Fleur and Cass show. I'm not sure if there is any other way of watching it actually. The show shot itself in the foot with the whole Jamie Bamber situation. Most people I know stopped watching because of that more than anything. The old bait and switch thing rarely leaves people happy. It is a media punching bag, but if you are still watching it the show has picked up a lot.

When I look a at American TV it is a pre-2004 vs post 2004 situation. Actually some of it goes back to around 2001 with "24" and "Alias". Prior to those shows TV was a wasteland of uninspired game shows and ER for the most part. There were the occasional X-Files, S:AAB, etc but for the most part just an hour or two a week. Since then though the game shows have been beat back or at least shared room with hours of good shows over the years. Perhaps not as many as there aught to be, but if you were picking through the lineup in 1998 I doubt you'd be as pleased with your options as you are now.
Mike Conley
19. NomadUK
cranscape@18: I've only seen the first -- what? -- three episodes of Outcasts so far, and I'm reserving judgement. I like most of the characters, though the dramatics dial seems to be cranked over to 11 rather needlessly. And the chronology seems off (how is it that Jamie Bamber looks as young as he does if he was in charge of evacuation 25 years ago?). But, meh. My 16-year-old enjoys it, and it gives us a chance to spend some time together when he's not off with his mates, so, yay.
Lindsay Ribar
20. cranscape
NomadUK - It hasn't been 25 years for Mitchell. It's been ten. 25 years was first landing which Mitchell/Bamber and the rest of our characters were not around for. He landed 10 years ago along with Stella and that age group. The trip to get there took 5 years which is why Stella hasn't seen her daughter in 15 years. It does all add up in an internally logical way, though if I thought of it in a real world sense I am still not sure how we'd manage both space ships and finding a planet like that in such a short jump in our future. Oh well. I'm a sucker for human survival/colony shows and Amy Manson so I'll keep watching.
Joseph Kingsmill
21. JFKingsmill16
After SciFI Channel decided to cancel SG:U I refuse to watch anything new on the channel. This channel has broken my heart one too many times. When they canceled Farscape and replayed it with the Tremors TV Series I was disgusted. Against my better judgement I watched and liked Warehouse 13 and even though it is cheesy and it is hard sometimes to suspend disbelief that Secret Service Agents would act this silly in serious situations. It is only a matter of time before even this show is canceled.

And why wouldn't SciFi Channel cancel these truely original shows when they can put on fake reality TV like Ghosthunters, Face Off or Smackdown. Hell... they even ruined MST3000 when it moved to the channel from the Comedy Channel.

I also personally find it offensive that they advertise that thier version of Being Human is an "Original Series".

@ZacharyG - They did try an American Doctor Who back in 1996 with one TV Movie on FOX with Eric Roberts as the Master and it was a failure

Sorry about the rant...
philip hodgson
22. hodgsopg
I think part of the problem with US remakes of UK shows is the development model. UK shows tend to have a small number of writers (many have just one or two), who are in charge of the story, the producers just facilitate them. Whereas US shows usually have a team of writers, but the producers are in charge of the story.

US shows can be good, particularly if they have a producer in charge who knows their craft, but a producer who remakes a UK show is less likely to be as good. So the people who made the UK show good are not in charge, so decisions are made other people and the vision of the show is diluted.
Lindsay Ribar
23. dsecoombs
As a fan of the original Being Human since the very first pilot went on air (before they recast the whole show), I was very dubious about a remake. I had visions of another Life on Mars ("Did you have a successful gene hunt?" ....!), or worse still Red Dwarf.
Actually I really like the remake. They exist alongside each other very well for me. Tonally they are quite different. I find that fascinating. Particularly now that they are starting to deviate more from the orginal.

I hated the pilot. It was a sub-par blow by blow Americanisation of a brilliant show. But it really gained legs for me after that. Sam Witwer is a stunning actor. His portrayal of Aiden is a subtle one, I think. I love the overt drug parrallels, and the Sid and Nancy relationship with Rebecca.

Visually, it's stunning. The opening sequence to episode six, and then later on in the same episode, Sally's revenge fantasy, are beautifully directed. the use of music is exquisite. Likewise the 'vampire porn' sequence. Strangely compelling stuff.

The chemistry wasnt there at the start. But it wasnt supposed to be. In the British show they were already together as a trio by the time we pitch into the story. In the SyFy version, we see them at a much earlier point in those relationships and it takes a couple of episodes for them to start to gel properly. I think it's been done really well.

There have been a few odd moments that I cringed. Don;t like the comedy guitar note after a major joke. Don't like the level of exposition that is there in the dialogue sometimes. And the werewolf transformations, though technically lovely, are nowhere near as visceral and shocking as ion the original.

Tonally different and with a different narrative rhythm. I think it works in its own way. I'm delighted to have two brilliant shows to watch.
Emily Asher-Perrin
24. EmilyAP
Hey all,

Great to see such lively discussion going on here! Just to clarify: for everyone who seems upset at my bashing U.S. TV, I wasn't saying that every telelvision show that we make in the US is inherently awful. I like Dexter too. The point I was making within that paragraph was the issue of consistently copying UK shows poorly. And there is definitely a difference between network and cable television in regard to US programming as well. Whereas in the UK, shows like Being Human, Sherlock, Merlin and Doctor Who are all on the BBC, where everyone can watch them, provided that they have a television license. ;)
Lindsay Ribar
25. Tony B.
In the case of Being Human I actually enjoy the US version BECAUSE it's different than the UK one. I like the tone of the US version much more and the comedy hits me better.
Lindsay Ribar
26. Maac

I also personally find it offensive that they advertise that thier version of Being Human is an "Original Series".


I make loud mockery every time they say it. :-) It is beyond obnoxious. I suppose it's technically true -- it's not a syndicated Xena episode from the 90s or something, the episodes are new things being created that have not aired before -- but they should find a new, third term.
That said, BBC America is expensive (especially for a channel currently over-relying on Trek:TNG and Xfiles marathons -- how is this British?!) and SyFy is basic cable -- the two audiences are probably not overlapping that much, at least not yet.

I think the North American "Being Human" strikes the right tone (so far) for the North American audience, at least the ones who are not already sworn Anglophiles. It's okay for audiences to respond in different ways to different things. The American remake of Coupling failed grossly because they tried to duplicate the original exactly, from dialogue to cameras to blocking to mannerisms, and you got Americans acting, talking, and using social cues like Londoners and it was awkward, forced, and fake. Coupling in turn was a conscious duplicate of Friends, but worked very well (better, I think) in part because it reflected its own cultural milieu with the expertise that comes naturally. And another famous American remake, "All in the Family," worked brilliantly because they DID Americanize it, instead of slavishly copying its (simpler and rather less political) British template "Til Death do Us Part." The situations begin similarly, but the shows go their own way: Adpaters should adapt, not copy, and I think that's what's happening here.

So far.

And yeah, I really do like that (so far), aside from the incident that obviously drives her plot, there are fewer supporting characters waltzing in to abuse Sally than they do Annie. (And it was sweet of them to name the vampire "Aidan" after the actor who plays Mitchell--probably a nod to the fact that there are some behind the scenes people who are in fact working on both shows.)

(I confess I am a little worried, in terms of people potentially coming in and throwing Sally around, now that I know series adapter Jeremy Carver came from Supernatural. If that happens I'm going to whip out DVDs of something else and pretend this show never took place.)

And can we please stop excising the Canadians from this? This is properly a North American adaptation, or a "Canada/U.S" adaptation. Canada lives in the U.S's shadow quite enough without us taking credit for ALL their work.


Lindsay Ribar
27. gregthings
Best summary review of the US version I've heard so far. And I had a hard time forgiving the BBC for recasting their show.
Ruth X
28. RuthX
My Dad really got into the British one and I've been planning to watch it with him one of these days. It really threw me when I heard about Syfy's. Remaking a show while it's still on the air takes balls.

(btw, Zak Adama's actually got a role in the original BSG. He dies because of the same person, just in different circumstances in the first episode. Still, no sister.)
Lindsay Ribar
29. Jen88
I agree one hundred percent The UK Being Human regardless of what's happened since is the best, as you summed up the chemistry is just better and the US seems to think they have to chenge it to fit some mold we have in our head guess what I don't like the mold and I'm sure many others would agree but that's what the majority wants, right? hmm I'd disagree. There are some good shows though I do love walking dead but am totally destroyed by being human british version is so awesome I can't get over it, oh mitchell....so much more believable than the bs version in the US one.
Lindsay Ribar
30. Pris
Oh, Mitchell, you're just too sexy!
Lindsay Ribar
31. Maebh
Here is a thought. If you do not like the US version of Being Human - don't watch it. What a concept!

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment