Tue
Oct 26 2010 10:24am

The Common Ground of the Punk

Difference Engine steampunkMore than once, I’ve heard that steampunk is a reaction against the world that cyberpunk gave us. The argument is fairly straightforward. Modern life is smooth and plastic and seamless. We’ve created a life out of near constant connectivity, powered by endlessly upgradable and ultimately disposable tools that are themselves mass produced in some distant territory. Our friends are online profiles that we refresh, our communities are by subscription service. For many of us, the work of our days and our lives comes down to little more than lights on a screen. Disposable.

Steampunk means to put that on its head. The hope is to build an enduring community of Makers and musicians and writers who dream of yesterday’s future that never happened. The intention is to create some kind of permanence in our increasingly fractured lives, to ground ourselves in things that we’ve made with our own hands, to find solace in the act of creation.

So, yes, in some ways it’s easy to see that steampunk is a refutation of the world cyberpunks dreamed of and eventually created. But it’s important to note that the modern steampunk movement is inextricably linked to the cyberpunk movement. Gibson and Sterling introduced a lot of folks to this era with The Difference Engine. And we all share a common fascination with technology. One of the things that is very appealing about the Victorian era is that it was the last time the sum of technology could be re-created in your garage workshop. An educated person (whether classically trained or an autodidact) could be on the forefront of science by working with their hands with tools that they could purchase locally or, at worst, from a catalog. The airplane was built in a bicycle shop by two brothers, not as the result of an international consortium on aerodynamics, funded by the U.N. Even such modern pie-in-the-sky projects as the X PRIZE require some hefty funding and a handful of doctorates.

The last time cutting-edge technology was in the hands of the common man, working in garages without funding, motivated by nothing more than a love of that technology? The computer science scene of the ’80s. And what did that inspire? Cyberpunk.

In fact, I think steampunk isn’t a refutation of cyberpunk so much as the culmination of it. One of the most important aspects of the original movement was appropriation of technology. The idea that the street will find its own use for things. What the internet does today is not what the internet was built to do. The internet is what we’ve made it into. So it doesn’t run on steam, isn’t fitted with brass, doesn’t peel open into a symphony of cogs and clockwork. It’s a technology of the common, of the community. It is available to us all (with unjustifiable exceptions), created by us all, and enjoyed by us all. If our fantastically imagined steampunk forefathers could build a Babbage powerful enough to do anything they wanted and then turned it loose on the world, I think they would have ended up with something a great deal like this. And I think our actual forefathers, our cyberpunk instigators, would have approved.


Tim Akers is a science fiction and fantasy writer in deeply suburban Chicago. His days are spent with databases, and his nights with fountain pens. His next book is The Horns of Ruin, coming from Pyr in November.

8 comments
T. Andrews
1. T. Andrews
Well said. If the purpose of steampunk is to reassert creation and human interaction as haptic experiences, then I'll throw in my lot with the rest of the closet mechanics and steam junkies. The smaller the world gets, the more disconnected it seems to become.
T. Andrews
2. Gavin G Smith
Isn't Steampunk Cyberpunk with all it's teeth pulled to make it nice and non-threatening? A comfortable stroll through a fantastical halcyon yesterday that was actually pretty unpleasant, rather than the warning that much of good Cyberpunk seemed to be.
Jaymee Goh
3. Jha
Gavin: Not Gibson and Sterling's Difference Engine. I mean, I get where you're coming from, but I'm not sure it's fair to characterize all of steampunk that way.
Tim Akers
4. TimAkers
@Gavin Sure, there are steampunk cozies, but there were cyberpunk cozies as well. Plenty of them. It's an easy generalization to make but, as Jha said, I think it's an unfair characterization of the genre.
Ryan V
5. JesterJoker
I consider steampunk the same way I consider alternate history - it usually doesn't interest me unless it's deliberately going /forward/ somehow. I'm not a big fan of "what if" history games, more interested in pursuing the future.

That said, I do keep my eyes out for secondary world steampunk, because it looks more similar to fantasy than anything. :D
Russ Gray
7. nimdok
"The last time cutting-edge technology was in the hands of the common man, working in garages without funding, motivated by nothing more than a love of that technology? The computer science scene of the ’80s."

I think the linux/free software movement from the mid-1990s through about 2004 also fits those criteria. It's different now, but there's still a lot of that ethic floating around.
John Massey
8. subwoofer
I'd be happy if someone invented underwear that would stay in the same spot by the end of the day. All the wonderful modern tech can't stop my Hanes from riding up:(

Am awaiting your new book patiently as well... also figure I've commented on everything else, so what the hey? Hey?

Woof™.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment