Log In Using
Facebook
Twitter
Google

Your tor.com Acct
Thu
Sep 9 2010 3:51pm
The Dark Passenger: Secretly Speculative?

It’s hard not to have heard of Dexter, what with the very popular television show. I don’t mind the show; it’s one of the two or three things I actually watch on the TV. For the time being, though, let’s pretend it doesn’t exist, because I want to talk about why Jeff Lindsay’s Dexter novels are some of my absolute favorite books off of the “mystery/thriller” shelf. (If you’re curious, I also deeply enjoy Gillian Flynn and Chelsea Cain, and you may spy a pattern there.)

But they’re not purely mystery, by my standards, and that’s been one of the best narrative surprises. The construction of the Dark Passenger, especially the depths of which Lindsay explores in the third book, strikes me as… Well, as Dexter might say, secretly speculative. (The alliteration and lyrical games in these books make them a treat for writers, by the way.)

It would be safe to say that mystery novels about psychic detectives, for example, have a certain level of the speculative. Ditto your ghost-whisperers, magical tattoo artists, and all the other sorts who show up in the cozies. They’re still mystery novels at their heart, and so are the Dexter books, but there’s something else lurking in there, too, in the form of Dexter’s inner guide and monster-friend.

I can’t decide if I’d call the Dark Passenger (or, as Cody refers to his own, Shadow Guy) a science fictional concept or a fantastical concept. It’s described in the third book in very evolutional, scientific terms: these things that have grown up out of people are no longer people, really, and they hunt the regular types—brought on by trauma, generally, but it’s the trauma that opens a door. The Dark Passenger in its reptilian, winged, hissing and chuckling glory is what comes through.

So—it’s definitely speculative. The way Lindsay writes the Passenger wouldn’t necessarily be so if it was limited to Dexter’s internal psychosis. He could imagine anything he wanted; it could be his way of describing the urges he feels as a serial killer. However: every predator in the series with a touch of the Passenger reacts the same way and contains the same Other. They can recognize each other by the rustle of wings and the contact of eyes. If it worked that way in real life, well, I don’t know: would we have more serial killers, or less?

Having just finished the newest book, Dexter is Delicious, I’ve started thinking on this again. What makes a book cross from mystery with speculative elements to full-on speculative fiction? After all, the only speculative element of the series is the Passenger. But, it’s a huge part of the series. Its existence drives the plots of the books, the development of all the characters and how they interact with each other, whether they know that they’re conversing with a “monster” or not.

It seems to me that books cross the line into supernatural noir when there are outwardly distinguishable paranormal agents involved—vampires, werewolves, fairies, whatever. I’d never call the Dexter series supernatural noir—it’s definitely labeled “mystery/thriller” in my head.

But, but... really, they kind of are supernatural, at least in part. I suspect it’s what makes me enjoy them so much, beyond the witty writing. The Dark Passenger is a sibilant whisper for our dashing Dexter, and so it is for the reader, as well. It adds a level of scary, surreal description to the books that the TV show willingly ignores, posits a universe very different from ours in a fundamental way—after all, if all predators have a Dark Passenger guiding them, where do they come from? If they are really alien, Other, what do they want, beyond carnage and satisfaction?

They’re interesting questions. And, if Lindsay chooses to turn the series in a direction to answer them more than solve murders and do detective work, the books might make the jump to a different section of the bookstore.

Genre is such a fun toy.


Brit Mandelo is a multi-fandom geek with a special love for comics and queer literature. She can be found on Twitter and Livejournal.

9 comments
mbg1968
1. mbg1968
The Dexter books are amazing! I'm anxiously awaiting #4.

They fall into mystery/thriller category for me as well, but the supernatural elements ARE very interesting. I think the series would be much more boring if that element hadn't been introduced. The uncertainty heightens the suspense--for me at least.

I really like the introduction of the children! Dexter as a family man just 'works' for me.
mbg1968
2. LAJG
I have to admit I was a bit disappointed by the supernatural element in the books. This may be because I wasn't expecting it and I was trying to, I don't know, expand my horizons or something with a genre other than science fiction and fantasy.

That being said, I agree that the books are a fun read.
Brit Mandelo
3. BritMandelo
@mbg1968

I think it sets it far and above the other serial-killer!mystery/thrillers.

@LAJG

*g* It surprised me, too, when I first happened upon it. Like Dan Wells's "I am Not a Serial Killer" was surprise!specfic, though it was published by Tor, so not really? I was still surprised when the supernatural element came in.
mbg1968
4. iucounu
Brit, I thought it was an interesting and brave swerve into SF / Dark Fantasy - in fact for me there were strong echoes of IT and DESPERATION (King) in the story of the Dark Passenger. But unfortunately I think the Dexter books have been seriously deteriorating.

Book 1 is a classic psychological thriller with a clever and unique premise. Book 2 is basically a shaggy dog story with a good punchline. DEXTER IN THE DARK, sadly, is a total mess; and DEXTER BY DESIGN is completely unmemorable (I cannot recall any plot details and I read it only about a year ago, whereas I could rattle off the plots of the first two books at the drop of a hat.) It feels like the relative lack of supernatural elements in book 4 has helped a little, though.

I suspect that transferring Dexter so successfully to the screen has been a mixed blessing for Lindsay. A team of very good writers are now turning out plots and characters that are consistently better than what he's coming up with. The Jimmy Smits series! So much more interesting than whatever was going on in BY DESIGN.
mbg1968
5. The Saddling Saint
I really enjoyed the books, but I didn't the direction the third book took. I like the Dark Passenger, as a metaphor, but it's explanation felt a little like a cop out.
Does anyone else feel like the Dark Passenger takes the responsibility away from Dexter. Now he's not a man with an uncontrollable desire, a man who struggles with himself, but a puppet to another entity. He isn't responsible for what he does.
mbg1968
6. T.N. Tobias
I really hated Dexter in the Dark. The first two books, and the first season of the T.V. show were so spectacular, it really killed my thirst for anything Dexter after that horrible little book. Luckily, my wife convinced me to stay on with the show and they haven't taken any of Lindsay's ideas from that book.

I love SF/F as much as anyone but why drop the bomb like that in book 3? Just felt like a dirty, silly cop out.
Brit Mandelo
7. BritMandelo
@iuconu

The show is better written in many ways, but for me, the Dexter books are one-day fun reads. I can let a lot go in a one-day read. *g*

@The Saddling Saint

Actually, the new book dealt a lot with his culpability and control over the Dark Passenger--I wonder if Lindsay considered that it was taking too much responsibility away from Dexter?

@T. N. Tobais

Hmm--I saw that coming from the first book, because the way Lindsay described it in the first two was pretty speculative. The 3rd book provided a deeper explanation, but it wasn't really a surprise. I like both the show and the books.
mbg1968
8. Bill Patterson
I also enjoyed the writing of the series. The alliteration is a nice writerly echo of the kind of compulsive, obsessive mentality this kind of serial killer must have.

I also thought the third book went off the rails. For me it destroyed the world of the series by making it Other. That series really only works if the world Dexter lives in is our consensus world, in my opinion, and this is an aspect the Showtime series does much better than Lindsay, with strict boundaries drawn.

What this means for me is that they are two entirely different creations using the same material.

So I will happily buy and read the new book, and I will happily enjoy the new season when it appears on TV later this month.
Brit Mandelo
9. BritMandelo
@Bill Patterson

Yes, this. I sort of consider the TV show a more "real-life" AU, if that makes sense. They take inspiration from the same basic idea but go wildly different directions with it. (I really would have liked the show to have kept Cody and Astor's, ahem, inclinations. It makes them so much more interesting in the books and provides a tighter connection between them and their new "dad.")

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment