Mon
Jun 28 2010 3:36pm
Who Wants to Buy a Lightsaber?

I want to show you this before it is declared illegal to own. This is a Wicked Lasers product shaped like a lightsaber that emits a blue beam. It’s not a “blade” or anything, but it’s extremely hazardous to your health and probably not a good plan to own if you have children!

The warning specs for blue laser light on the website include:

  1. Permanent, irreversible blindness in direct exposure to eyes for even a millisecond.
  2. Even indirect exposure can affect your ability to see the color green.
  3. It will burn flesh.
  4. Did I mention that it will burn flesh?

The warnings page which clarifies repeatedly that this Arctic Series (lightsaber) Laser is “Class 4” and restricted and not to be used as a toy ever, at all. So why would you shape it like that if you don’t want people to play with it? Better question—what the hell is the purpose of actually owning this? If you can’t play with it, and it’s extremely dangerous to you, your pets, your family and any airplanes flying above you, why would you buy it? Home defense, I suppose.

So at the moment, since it’s not illegal yet, you can buy the closest thing we’ve made to a lightsaber. And maybe wield it as a home defense article to at least terrify and blind robbers. That’s honestly the only purpose I can imagine using this for, but it is pretty awesome, and it means we’re one step closer to making a real one that works like a blade and everything.

Between this and that Doctor-Who-sky-rift, it’s starting to seem like reality and epic scifi are drifting closer and close together…

(Full safety disclaimers and warnings.)


Brit Mandelo is a multi-fandom geek with a special love for comics and queer literature. She can be found on Twitter and Livejournal.

20 comments
Marcus W
1. toryx
I read about this last week, and personally it scares the crap out of me. From the sounds of it, people don't want to own it to actually use it for anything. They just like how cool it is.

But I can't help but think of all the emotionally immature people in the world who could order it and play with it without any thought for the consequences. And the thought of all the pets that will be burned, blinded, or killed by this thing horrifies me. Not to mention the sure possibility of driving down a street and getting struck in the eyes by some moron playing with one.

Maybe I'm just paranoid but the thing is, I've known far too many people who would use it just because they thought it was funny.
Chris Meadows
2. Robotech_Master
Did you know that Wicked Lasers sponsored a webcomic a few years back about a team of superheroes who used Wicked Lasers products to fight evil?

Yeah.
ChrisG
3. ChrisG
I'm with toryx. I find this horrifying, and awesome only in its foolishness.
ChrisG
4. JoeNotCharles
If you're worried about being struck by a high-powered laser at the side of the road, why not be worried about being struck by a Molotov cocktail, which is much easier to get ahold of? It's not like destructive weapons are rare. The number of people who are crazy enough to use them just for kicks is surprisingly small, though.
Marcus W
5. toryx
JoeNotCharles @ 4:

I'm more worried about the laser than a Molotov cocktail for a couple of reasons.

1. A Molotov cocktail is nowhere near as "cool" as a laser that looks like a lightsabre.

2. The handmade explosive takes a little more work. You just need to press a button with the laser. Lack of aim just leads to a potential for more destruction.

3. The laser is a lot more discrete. You throw a Molotov Cocktail and people will notice the results. Spilt gas or alcohol, the flames, glass or rag that may still have fingerprints. Someone randomly firing a laser off a highway overpass (or while crouched behind a picket fence) is going to be a lot less noticable and will be leaving a lot less evidence behind.

Yeah, maybe the instances of abuse won't be all that high, but I still don't like the possibility of it.
ChrisG
6. N. Mamatas
Mollies are a tiny bit easier to see coming and dodge, I suppose.
T C
7. Freelancer
I'm with toryx on this one. Insane to offer such a device for sale to the general public.

The fact that this beam is blue places it in the shorter end of the visible wavelength spectrum, around 450nm. That means it can damage every part of the eye; retina, macula, cornea, lens, everything. A class IV laser should never be offered for sale to the public without first requiring acknowledgement of completion of a laser safety course (approved by ANSI) from the intended users.

Within the U.S., military and commercial application of class III and class IV lasers requires at least one individual on site to have been designated as a Laser Safety Officer, who is functionally responsible for any injury/damage due to misuse of laser light.
Brit Mandelo
8. BritMandelo
@all

To clarify: I don't think that offering this for sale is awesome. In fact, I think it's remarkably stupid, especially since there's absolutely no use for it. I just think the invention is interesting.

I would point out the price tag--that's going to be a considerable deterrent to all the morons who might aim it at their pets or your car, when they can buy things at Wal-Mart that are equally dangerous and cost about fifteen dollars.
Dru O'Higgins
9. bellman
Even if the person who buys it can be trusted and just wants it as a conversation piece, you just know that some geeky friend is going to see it, shout "cool!" and start waving it around. Seriously bad idea.
j p
10. sps49
I was dazzled by idiots (*) who were playing with a little red laser in a car parked against the curb. I couldn't see enough to pull over without hitting another parked car, so I sat in the middle of the road and dialed 911 by touch.

The po-po didn't show; I didn't think they would.

And I still think this item is cool.

* Yes, idiots. One was too stupid to not have his felonious drinking buddies over when his probation said no to felons and beer (which got him out of my hair or a while), the other was proud of being a copper thief and introduced himself to law enforcement that way.
peter kumar
12. peter415
i read about that in one of article, and it is very dangerous i would say.
Mike Conley
13. NomadUK
Arthur C Clarke wrote a short story, 'The Light of Darkness', in which

(highlight to read)
***********
an apparent assassin instead uses a high-powered laser to blind an African dictator.
***********

I'll bet he would have been both pleased and horrified that we've arrived at the point where someone might actually get away with this.

Don't worry, libertarians. I'm sure nobody will pass any onerous laws until someone who counts gets blinded.
Marcus W
14. toryx
Well it is pretty expensive. But even idiots have ways of coughing up large amounts of money to satisfy their cravings.
Michael Arnett
15. Darmad
Adding to Freelancers comment @7:

ANSI standards require a key switch and safety interlock for Class 4 lasers (generally accepted by FDA and OSHA). I have a hard time imagining a meaningful safety interlock for a hand held laser.

Also of interest: they have a link to a document "proving" the lasers are legal, but the document only lists their line of Class 3B lasers (the document specifically identifies product lines and that they are all class 3B). So is this laser actually consumer legal?
Marc Houle
16. MightyMarc
This may be a practical tool for scientific and educational use. The fact that it's portable is a big plus. However, it's clearly not designed for (or marketed towards) the science lab.

I give them a month. Then they'll be shut down.
Marc Houle
17. MightyMarc
I think I got retina damage just from watching that video. Ouch.
ChrisG
18. alreadymadwithhanddrill
I am reminded of a certain cutting and drilling tool they carried as standard equipment on a ship called the Lying B*****d.
Jeff Soules
19. DeepThought
I am not a lawyer and it would probably depend on your jurisdiction anyway, but I am pretty sure permanently blinding someone, even a robber, would be likely to result in adverse legal action.

I would not recommend anyone consider "defending" their home with this thing.
ChrisG
20. Macula @ EyeScience
That's definitely a neat toy.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment