Fri
May 21 2010 3:55pm
The Hugo for Best Graphic Story: A Short History

Next week, we will have a Hugo nominee comics-jam, one day for each candidate. I will tell you all about your potential voting choices and offer my own two cents. (It will be awesome.) But to lead into that, I’d like to talk a little about the actual category and its short history. I think this category signals good things for writers across the board, as well as fans.

The nominees this year are all strong, for various reasons and in various genres. There are webcomics. There are also stories from the Marvel and DC universes, as well as a creator-owned story. I’d say the nominees pretty much cover all of the basic comics fields, which is cool in and of itself—it doesn’t show a preference toward any one medium/genre. I was especially surprised and pleased by the fact that there are stories from the Universes, because I’ve encountered (and sometimes participated in, I’ll admit it) a certain antagonism toward them. While some of the company-owned stories are baffling, most of them aren’t, and it’s definitely worth a shot for anyone who is otherwise afraid to immerse themselves in such a tangled continuity—made easier by the fact that the writers of those two stories are, respectively, Paul Cornell and Neil Gaiman.

Comics have had some trouble when it comes to SFF awards, despite so many of them being eligible when it comes to the actual story content. One of those often-quoted Neil Gaiman stories is about the 19th issue of Sandman, “Midsummer Night’s Dream”—the only comic to every win the World Fantasy Award for the Short Story. In a way it’s a cool bragging right, because you can say it’s the only comic to ever win the award, but the reason is a little bit less cool. In 1991, there weren’t any rules against comics (or, the more fancy grown-up term, graphic stories) winning. That changed. While comics are still technically eligible, they are only part of the “Special Award: Professional” portion, which also includes anything else you might imagine. The fact that someone felt the need to restrict comics, yet not give them their own category, bugs me quite a bit. I’d like to think we’ve gotten to a point in the speculative fiction field that we can acknowledge the craftsmanship, writing and storytelling mastery some comics embody.

And that’s why I was so excited about the Hugo Awards adding the Graphic Story category. They, for one, are choosing to recognize the year-to-year excellence in the comics field: not just once in a blue moon as part of a lump category award, but regularly good enough to deserve a Hugo. That means that they’re pretty damned sure that every year, there will be five stories told in the comics medium that are good enough to be on the same list as the Best Novel category.

The award’s first year was last year, and there were six nominees—The Dresden Files: Welcome to the Jungle by Jim Butcher and Adrian Syaf; Girl Genius 8: Agatha Heterodyne and the Chapel of Bones by Kaja & Phil Foglio; Fables: War and Pieces by Bill Willingham and a host of artists; Schlock Mercenary: The Body Politic by Howard Tayler; Serenity: Better Days by Joss Whedon and Brett Matthews, art by Will Conrad; and Y: The Last Man 10: Whys and Wherefores by Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra. Note that there are two tie-in comics, while there are none this year, which is interesting—are the fans who did the nominating branching off into more avenues in comics and therefore are reading fewer tie-ins? (Maybe. I might be reading too far into it, especially since the nominees this year are all more in the SFF field than the speculative comics field. I think there’s still a great deal of branching out that needs to be done, honestly; authors who aren’t already famous for their written fiction, for example. But we can take things one step at a time—recognizing comics at all is nice. I’ll give it a few years to grow some more variety.)

Anyway: the winner last year was Girl Genius, which was remarkably cool for a few reasons. For one thing, it’s a web-published comic that happens to have print editions. That’s a stretch for many people when nominating for awards, but it seems more and more common to recognize web-publishing. I hope that this openness continues in the coming years, because I would sure love to see Warren Ellis’s Freakangels nominated for a Hugo. (Don’t take this the wrong way, but I’m actually confused beyond belief that it isn’t a nominee—if I had to pick an online-based comic with print volumes to nominate for a Hugo award, it would be Freakangels.)

So, now we come to the second year of the Best Graphic Story Award. Our nominees are as follows:

#Batman: Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? by Neil Gaiman, art by Andy Kubert

#Captain Britain and the MI13 v. 3: Vampire State by Paul Cornell, art by Leonard Kirk, Mike Collins and Adrian Syaf

#Fables v. 12: The Dark Ages by Bill Willingham, art by Mark Buckingham, Peter Gross, Andrew Pepoy, Michael Allred and David Hahn (plus letterers and colorists)

#Girl Genius v. 9: Agatha Heterodyne and the Heirs of the Storm by Kaja and Phil Foglio

#Schlock Mercenary: The Longshoreman of the Apocalypse by Howard Tayler

If you’re not sure about your own pick, tune in next week for the run-downs. I also recommend purchasing these fine books (or, as is the case with the last two, checking them out online).

Can you guess who my favorite is before I tell you? It’s a dare.


Brit Mandelo is a multi-fandom geek with a special love for comics and queer literature. She can be found on Twitter and Livejournal.

9 comments
TW Grace
1. TWGrace
I read Girl Genius and Schlock faithfully.

I couldnt, wouldnt choose between them if you put a gun to my head.
aleistra
2. aleistra
They, for one, are choosing to recognize the year-to-year excellence in the comics field: not just once in a blue moon as part of a lump category award, but regularly good enough to deserve a Hugo.

That's an interesting interpretation (and I really do mean that, not 'interesting' as synonymous with 'bizarre')f. I've always seen it as more akin to the separations imposed by the New York Times in introducing the separate bestseller list for children's books (so that the Harry Potter books wouldn't be on the main list), or the Academy Awards with the "best animated feature" award (so that, no matter how brilliant, animated movies wouldn't win Best Picture); to make sure that, no matter what, no graphic novel ever wins the 'real' Best Novel Hugo. In my view, it would be as if they had responded to Harry Potter winning the Hugo by creating a "Best Fantasy Novel" award; not as a recognition that there were lots of great fantasy novels, but as a desire to not have the wrong sort of thing winning "their" award.

Don't get me wrong, it's better than the Nebulas not only sequestering them but not even giving them their own category, but it still smacks to me of not wanting graphic-novel cooties.
aleistra
3. Holden Carver
I’d say the nominees pretty much cover all of the basic comics fields

Not quite. Where's the manga? Yeah, there isn't any.

Anyway: the winner last year was Girl Genius, which was remarkably cool for a few reasons. For one thing, it’s a web-published comic that happens to have print editions. That’s a stretch for many people when nominating for awards, but it seems more and more common to recognize web-publishing.

Not meaning to be a wet blanket. But it's not, actually, that impressive when you look at the numbers. Far from it being a stretch for web-published comics to be nominated, the web-published comics that year actually got many more nominations than the other comics - Girl Genius overwhelmingly so.

I strongly suspect that there's a very simple reason for that. It was a new award, and comics are alien to many SF fans, and there's no (as yet) critical consensus in the SF community over SF comics in general. So the comics that pulled the most votes were the ones which on their websites said "Hey, we're eligible for the Hugos, please nominate us if you like us!"

Now, to be clear, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with this. But there does appear to be a clear correlation between this and getting nominated, so I'm not at all surprised to see the webcomics represent strongly.

I would sure love to see Warren Ellis’s Freakangels nominated for a Hugo.

Yeah. That would probably require Freakangels, like Girl Genius and Schlock Mercenary, to 'pimp itself', so to speak. Simply nominating 'Freakangels' wouldn't be enough, as the award is currently for a specific story (or story arc), so Warren Ellis wouldn't probably have to, as I say, put on their website something along the lines of "This particular story arc of Freakangels is eligible for the Best Graphic Story Hugo, be sure to put it on your nomination papers just so..."
Joseph Blaidd
4. SteelBlaidd
What Ever Happened to the Caped Crusader? was pretty good and Girl Genius is always good. Fables is interesting but a lot more umm... graphic than I really enjoy.


For next year.
Volume 6 of Megatokyo is out this year
comprising chapters 9 and 10 (starts at http://megatokyo.com/strip/983) and the art and story are truly amazing.
aleistra
5. D.B.
I was hoping the title of this post would turn out to be "The Hugo for Best Short Story: A Graphic History."
Brit Mandelo
6. BritMandelo
@aleistra

Oddly enough, I'm not terribly skeeved about comics being separated from novels--because they are two totally different ways to tell a story. Having written script and regular prose, I can say they're different skill sets. (Personally I think script is harder.) Also, comics aren't published length-wise in a way to be eligible for most "novel" awards and would generally end up in novella/short story categories. How does a person figure out the "word count" of a trade collection to figure out where it sits on the qualifications list? Is it a novella? That's where I see problems including them with everything else, much like how film can't win best short story, even if it wins best script. Too hard to quantify.

@HoldenCarver

I wasn't just talking comics on web-nominations. Ex: Cat Valente's recent Andre Norton Award win. Some of the Hugo nominees are web-published, too, in the novella/short story categories. It's getting to be more common across the board.

Manga would likely have a hard time with the nomination requirements, too; translated works are generally eligible for translated-work awards in most places, to avoid the problem of publication date.

Freakangels is, actually, divided into "books" just like the other comics that were nominated this year. It's available in print trades, too.
aleistra
7. Holden Carver
Manga would likely have a hard time with the nomination requirements, too; translated works are generally eligible for translated-work awards in most places, to avoid the problem of publication date.

The official rules for the Hugos say the following - "Works first published in a language other than English are also eligible in their first year of publication in English translation." So, contrary to what you may think, there's little to no problems with publication dates here.

It manga has a problem, it's that it's not clear to everyone what constitutes a 'story', as unlike American comics, where the TPBs are usually split by story arc, manga volumes have almost entirely arbitrary splits between volumes. So for many, confusion lies over whether a volume is a story, or whether the story is the entire series once it has finished (see Paul Cornell's post on comics for Hugo voters, where he volumes of American comics, but for Fruits Basket (a manga), he recommends the series as a whole).

Freakangels is, actually, divided into "books" just like the other comics that were nominated this year. It's available in print trades, too.

Yes. It is. I do know this. And?

This is where problems with the category crop up, and things get complicated. It may be obvious to you that Freakangels is divided into books, but it isn't to everyone. Furthermore, the particular book (or books) which may be eligible may not actually be published until after the awards, which makes it harder for people to know that they can nominate them, without being informed.

Take Girl Genius last year. It won the award for volume 8, being as that volume concluded within the year of eligibility. However, if you look at the published nominations, you'll see it also got 17 nominations for volume 7. This volume was published in book form in the eligible year, but as it collected work from the previous year, it wasn't considered to be eligible. It was when they became aware of this, I believe, that the Foglio's put a message on their website telling people to nominate volume 8 instead - a volume that, at the time, wasn't even published in book form yet - of volume 7.

Similarly, Schlock Mercenary was nominated for a book that wasn't even published yet, as the writer put a message on the site saying that the forthcoming collection would be eligible for the Best Graphic Story Hugo.

And Freakangels? That got 11 nominations last year, actually. And all 11 were for 'Freakangels'. No mention of any books (or episodes - the site splits the story into that as well). I strongly suspect that had Freakangels received enough nominations to make it on to the ballot like this, it would've been disqualified. Why? Because the award is for the Best Graphic Story, and 'Freakangels' is the comic as a whole, not a story.

This is what I am getting at when I meant to say (I notice I got a word wrong now):

"Warren Ellis would probably have to, as I say, put on their website something along the lines of "This particular story arc of Freakangels is eligible for the Best Graphic Story Hugo, be sure to put it on your nomination papers just so...""

Simply put - I know there are books, you know there are books, but on the evidence, people nominating Freakangels don't realise that there are books (or, that their nominations should be going to the books). Furthermore, I'm not entirely sure how far behind the original web publication the publication of the books is, but potentially, again, it could be that the volume people see on the bookshop shelf isn't actually eligible, while the volume that is hasn't been published in physical book form yet.
Brit Mandelo
8. BritMandelo
@Holden Carver

Ah, I see your point--yeah, if Ellis actually posted saying "hey, nominate book 4" next year, it would help, but I still can't help but feel that the readership for FA is not the same readership that is nominating Hugo awards. My comment about Freakangels was more to make a point about the SFF readership's inclinations toward comics by authors they already know, which I do go into a little bit more in the Schlock Mercenary writeup.

Good point about manga--that would be the problem I would have nominating anything for it that I've read recently because the story arcs are so spread out, generally.
aleistra
9. Holden Carver
"I still can't help but feel that the readership for FA is not the same readership that is nominating Hugo awards."

I disagree. Granted, maybe things will have changed this year, though we won't get to find out until after the awards when the figures are released, but last year 13 nominations was enough to get a book on the ballot, and Freakangels was only two short of that with 11 nominations.

So in terms of the Best Graphic Story Hugo, the readership for Freakangels is absolutely nominating for the award. In wider terms of the Hugos in general, perhaps that statement would be true. But then, it would also be true for 99% of all comics out there, give or take, so is not perhaps terribly helpful. :)

As I say, I do think that the main barrier for Freakangels is that if people knew they had to nominate a specific book (or 'story'), that would at least help people cast valid nominations. And if Ellis were to promote the eligibility in the same way that Girl Genius and Schlock Mercenary do, then that would help pull in more nominations for it also.

Mainly at this point I need to wait for this year's awards to be over so I can check the figures and see if they stack up to my theory - which is that I suspect Freakangels to have pulled the same number or votes again or more.

"Good point about manga--that would be the problem I would have nominating anything for it that I've read recently because the story arcs are so spread out, generally"

Of recently published manga, if I were to recommend one, and a compact one at that (complete in eight volumes), it would be Pluto bu Naoki Urasawa (and if you want to get the historical context for it as well, volume 3 of Dark Horse's edition of Astro Boy by Osamu Tezuka).

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment