Mon
Apr 12 2010 5:36pm
Countdown to Doctor Who: Chicks Dig Time Lords!

DAYS TO DOCTOR WHO IN THE US: 5

At long last, The Doctor is making his way across the Atlantic in the premiere of the Fifth Series of Doctor Who, coming to BBC America this Saturday the 17th at 9PM EST! I know that our British readers are already two episodes into the new series, and I know that many of our American readers are, too, though I don’t know how they can enjoy the show whilst wearing eye patches and letting parrots rest on their shoulders. I, however, have not yet seen the series, so NO SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS PLEASE! The way I see it, I’ve waited this long for new Who, I can wait until two weeks after the UK gets it.

Now, new Who is finally almost upon us, and so I’ll be counting down to "The Eleventh Doctor" all this week! Here’s what you’ll have to look forward to:

TUESDAY — the final Moffat’s Women column devoted to River Song and the other women of Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead

WEDNESDAY – coverage of the Doctor Who event at the Apple Store in SoHo, NYC, as well as Part One of an interview with writer PAUL CORNELL

THURSDAY – coverage of the Doctor Who event at the Village East Cinema in NYC, as well as Part Two of the PAUL CORNELL interview

FRIDAY – interview with current Doctor Who showrunner, STEVEN MOFFAT

But right now, check out my review of Chicks Dig Time Lords: A Celebration of Doctor Who by the Women Who Love It, the recently-released anthology edited by Lynne M. Thomas and Tara O’Shea.

I was introduced to Doctor Who by a female friend. And whereas most of my geeky interests were introduced to me by male relatives or friends (my brother introduced me to Star Trek; my friend Adam introduced me to comics), Doctor Who was the first thing I’ve ever gotten to introduce to male friends. In the United States - unlike the UK, where Who fandom is still male-dominated – Doctor Who fandom is and always has been mostly female, which makes Chicks Dig Time Lords a long overdue volume.

It’s also a great read!

The best thing about Chicks Dig Time Lords is the fact that no matter what the essays contained within it discuss—there are essays that address the positive and the negative in Doctor Who—they are all written from a place of intense love of and enthusiasm for the show. Or, as I like to put it, it’s a book that is entirely devoted to *squee*! The cover alone made me giddy.

The essays come from fans and Doctor Who professionals alike. Aside from great behind-the-scenes fandom essays by Thomas and O’Shea, there’s a wonderful essay on a mother introducing her daughter to Who fandom by Amy Fritsch. Kathryn Sullivan’s “The Fanzine Factor” is an interesting look at a writer’s rise through the ranks of Who fandom, Christa Dickson’s “In Defense of Smut” is a valuable look at the importance of sex in Doctor Who fan-fiction, and Catherynne M. Valente’s “Regeneration X” is a beautifully written description of how Doctor Who grows and changes along with its fans. And then there’s Tammy Garrison and Katy Shuttleworth’s “Behind the Scenes,” an adorable essay in comic form about how they created their online comic, Torchwood Babiez.

There are a couple of essays that I think missed the mark. Shoshana Magnet and Robert Smith’s “Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Have We Really Come That Far?” seems to be working really hard to make the show fit neatly into their thesis, and I don’t think K. Tempest Bradford watched the same Martha Jones I watched based on her essay, “Martha Jones: Fangirl Blues.” However, even these essays are worthwhile in that they address important issues of sexuality, gender, and race that desperately need discussing, and often!

This book is a well-organized, fun, intelligent read that both female and male fans of Doctor Who will love!

Chicks Dig Time Lords: A Celebration of Doctor Who by the Women Who Love It is available now, and can be purchased directly from the Mad Norwegian Press website.


Teresa Jusino was born on the same day that Skylab fell. Coincidence? She doesn’t think so. She is a contributor to PinkRaygun.com, a webzine examining geekery from a feminine perspective. Her work has also been seen on PopMatters.com, on the sadly-defunct literary site CentralBooking.com, edited by Kevin Smokler, and in the Elmont Life community newspaper. She is currently writing a web series for Pareidolia Films called The Pack, which is set to debut Fall 2010! Get Twitterpated with Teresa, Follow The Pack or visit her at The Teresa Jusino Experience.

23 comments
Ian B Manc
1. Ian B Manc
I've seen 2 episodes now and well...it's good.
Very good.
Better than Tennant.
That good.

Amy Pond is an excellent character and seems to click naturally with the Doctor. The acting is a lot less campy but still fun, Matt Smith is incredible in the role. There are some very creepy moments (more in the 2nd than the 1st) and the atmosphere is a bit more horror than sf.

They also do a great job of making Wales look like England.
Alex Brown
2. Milo1313
Much chuffed about this new series. Liking it muy mucho. I miss Ten, but I'm quite pleased with Eleven.

For those who feel left behind in the massive, turgid, and completely inconstant mythology, the A.V. Club has a great Doctor Who primer up: http://www.avclub.com/articles/doctor-who,39924/2/

Ian @ 1: I wouldn't say better than Ten, but different. Ten is my Doctor, but they are all so different that it's hard to pick a "bad" one (though Six wasn't exactly "good" either). I do agree that Amy is wonderful. I was worried that since they had such a young Doctor this time that they'd be...frak, can't say anything without spoilers (I've also seen the first 2 eps).
Ian B Manc
3. Ian B Manc
Milo@2

I think she might become one of the best companions yet.

I also liked the first meeting with Amy....it would have been great if they could've done an episode at that point
Alex Brown
4. Milo1313
Ian @ 3: She has totally grown on me in the 2 eps. At first she was sorta meh but she's gotten leaps better. I couldn't stand Donna at first either, but by the end she was up there as one of my faves. Amy is definitely running close behind (Rose will always be my top, though).

Amy reminds me a lot of Sarah Jane and Tegan, and even a little like the First Doctor's granddaughter. I wonder if they'll ever hearken back to that family line?

And yes, her name totally sounds like something out of a fairy tale :)
Angel Banchev
5. Tiranas
Two weeks ago i decided to take a look and see what the fuss was all about with Doctor Who, and my only reaction is...DAMN ! That is quality TV ! Chris Eccleston was an excellent choice for the rekindling of the show, but he seemd a bit...ruff for the role. David Tennat though, he tottaly owns the role and i can definitely see how one can get entranced by some of his performances, plus he has that maniacally joyfull vibe going for him. I've seen the two episodes of the 5th season and i too agree that Matt Smith is both good and different. I wouldn't say better than David though @Ian, but if one steps just a step back and considers the different actors as a POVs on different aspects of this Time Lord's personality, yeah, Matt Smith is really good as an actor. His slapstick is also top notch. Amy definitely seems an interesting Companion, but its still early to say. Again though, damn, you british people have quality TV. Also Steffan Moffat knows what he is doing. Now that i think about it though, the writers on the past 4 seasons almost always knew what they we're doing. Can't wait to embark on another adventure with the Doctor.
Alex Brown
6. Milo1313
Tiranas @ 5: Eccleston is a lot more like the vintage Doctors, which is probably why they went with him. He's a bit more Peter Davison (Five) while DT is a bit more Tom Baker (Four). And if you haven't already tracked down some of the original series, I highly recommend it. (Oh, and, um, just to be one of those annoying people who always correct people over silly things, it's Steven Moffat...)

Glad to have you join the Time Lord fold, Tiranas :) There's plenty of room in the TARDIS for you. Good luck finding the pool though...
Ian B Manc
7. mark-p
So far they have been two very good episodes. They have only had a few of the problems Dr Who often has (small inconsistencies in the plot etc) but the acting is good and the stories are very entertaining.
I like the new Doctor and Amy seems pretty cool(and pretty) although its probably too early to tell if I wont hate them after a few shows. Her clothes this week made me think of the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy I wonder if was deliberate.
The trailer for next weeks episode looks interesting with Daleks then spitfires fighting in space like they should be x-wings.
Ian B Manc
8. politeruin
I really would not get your hopes up. Yes, it's quite entertaining and i'm really starting to get the new doc's personality now but... i'm still failing to see what more moffat is giving us. Far as i'm concerned he's giving us less; there is still the gaping plot holes and inconsistency but now the humour is far less successful and the character interaction simply not as smooth as RTD could manage. So... meh. And as for the championing of moffat's women, something i feel he consistently fails on, i don't envy you discovering amy's 'career'. This from a writer who has said he wants young girls to look up to this character, want to be her and to portray a strong woman - oh dear.
Alex Brown
9. Milo1313
politeruin @ 8: I don't really hold the plot holes and inconsistencies against Moffat or the show. Hell, the Doctor was, for a good while, half-human before that was dropped all together. And he was originally a law-breaking, cowardly, cranky old man who didn't like all those blasted rule his people kept adhering to so he stole a time machine and went about sulking on earth and living in a junkyard, a far cry from the 2005 version of the Doctors.

Also, I think it's a good thing that the tone hasn't shifted drastically between RTD and Moffat. He's trying to continue a show, not retcon it.

And we all make stupid job decisions, but I think most of us don't define ourselves in terms of our careers or lack thereof. To me Amy's proven herself as well above her Kiss-O-Gram job. I think she's like a lot of twentysomethings (like me) who are still trying to figure out who they are and what they want, but in the meantime still have to pay rent so they do whatever until the get things settled.
Ian B Manc
10. politeruin
Plot holes have to be internally consistent otherwise what's the point. Where's the drama, the suspense if anything that defies logic can happen. There are ridiculous little things like him by chance choosing to pick a fire engine which it so happens he'll be able to use the ladder because they'll just happen to be on the second floor. How did he know? He didn't of course, the writer just threw it in without considering a clever alternative.

I'm glad moffat is not straying too far from the tone of New Who i just think that he does not know how to achieve it nearly as well as RTD.

Bearing in mind this is a show aimed at young 'uns and the writers have stated they want kids, particularly girls in this case, to look up to amy and gain inspiration. Yet her job is for the benefit of, we assume, men? I can't believe there has not been more of a fuss about this. Plus there was the laboured porn joke of course, not subtly 'one for the adults' at all unfortunately.
Angel Banchev
11. Tiranas
@Milo #6 Yes, i agree with you about Eccleston, but he really was a good choice to start the show anew. I stand corrected about the spelling. Can't believe i missed that in my preview spellcheck. Thanks for the welcome and i'll try to find at least some of the original series. Also not that big a fan of pools ;] The tone of the show hasn't indeed shifted that much, but i think that the second episode showes that a little better than the first. All about that championing of the women, i disagree a bit and not just about Steven Moffat ( winks @Milo ) but about the show as general. As early as Season 2 we meet half a dosen strong female characters that act as they do, because they are persons first and women second. I can think of at least 4 or 5 just in season 2. Not to spoil anything, but that is apparent in the second episode of this season too.

@#10 Well, that's not the first discrepancy storywise, but i personaly think that those hilarious little things are to be blamed for some part of the show's charm for me. And we both know that there have indeed been a few of them so far. Also :

And we all make stupid job decisions, but I think most of us don't define ourselves in terms of our careers or lack thereof. To me Amy's proven herself as well above her Kiss-O-Gram job. I think she's like a lot of twentysomethings (like me) who are still trying to figure out who they are and what they want, but in the meantime still have to pay rent so they do whatever until the get things settled.


I couldn't agree more.Same thing for me. The bit at the end of your comment about the Kiss-O-Gramm and benefit of men, she is pretty well known in her town, so i don't see it the way you do, but enough with the pirate-y stuff.

@Teresa Jusino - All in all you are in for a blast ! I'm quite curious to see how you react to the new season.
Chris Dearman
12. ChrisD
Enough with the negativity. The new series is fantastic. Matt Smith and Karen Gillan are both excellent in their roles. The first episode is perhaps slightly light in terms of the main story (B+ rather than A) but more than makes up for it in terms of character, humour and the size of the grin it will put on your face. The second episode is still funny and has more brilliant performances but is also a proper SF story.

@Politeruin. He's called the Doctor, he travels in a police box, of course he was going to pick the fire engine.

@Mark P. I think Steven Moffat mentioned the inspiration for Amy in her Nightdress was Wendy in Peter Pan
Ian B Manc
13. legionseagle
With regard to the fire engine, that was clearly foreshadowed in the episode; like the apple, it was a nice example of Chekov's gun.
Ian B Manc
14. hopefully
You have no idea what a pain in the ass the parrot is. I am in the US with no television. Is there any legal way I can get these shows without waiting a year for them to be on DVD?
Teresa Jusino
15. TeresaJusino
It's so awesome to see so much Doctor Who conversation going on! From what everyone is saying, I'm SURE I'm going to enjoy this.

Also, my final "Moffat's Women" piece should be posting later today, comparing the women of The Library to the women in Kill Bill. Yeah, you heard me! ;)
Ian B Manc
16. emgre
hopefully @ 14:

You might try Lifehacker's workaround for accessing BBC's Hulu-style iPlayer from the US. (Or anywhere else.) Haven't had a chance to try it myself, but Doctor Who's supposed to be on the iPlayer, so it's worth a shot.

http://lifehacker.com/5504681/how-to-access-the-bbc-iplayer-and-tv-like-doctor-who-from-outside-the-uk
Alex Brown
17. Milo1313
hopefully @ 4: There is no legal way to get it without waiting for BBC America to get around to airing it whenever they damn well feel like. I'm in the States and have managed to get my greedy little hands on it (and have been endlessly teasing Teresa about it on Twitter) so if you want, track me down. I'm not a horrible person, I just can't wait. And I do go buy the DVDs, so it all rounds out in the end :)
Alex Brown
19. Milo1313
Teresa @ 18: You are a better woman than I, for in 2 weeks you'll be watching Matt Smith step out of the TARDIS for the first time while Neil Gaiman and I will be happily meeting the fourth ep. :P
Ashe Armstrong
20. AsheSaoirse
My parrot says that not having BBC America and being hopelessly addicted makes it continuously enjoyable. Cause he's The Doctor and we love him.
Ian B Manc
21. hopefully
Milo1313,

Yeah, I've promised I will buy the series even if I HATE them. But it's really hard to look my kids in the eye when we are all sitting around the computer watching with our parrots and our eye patches. "Tell me again about how we shouldn't illegally download stuff, Mom?"

So, I don't look them in the eye. I just watch the doctor.
Teresa Jusino
22. TeresaJusino
OK, OK, people! I get it. You have no problems keeping parrots! :)

All I'm saying is, it's one thing if you don't have BBC America, and can't access it any other way. (and what you should really be doing is calling your cable provider and requesting BBC America. The more people do that, the more likely it is to get added) It's another thing if you have it, like I do w/RCN, and download the ep two weeks ahead of time just because. I'd just feel bad about doing that, because BBC has already moved up when they show the eps here in the States to accommodate us. Remember when we had to wait months and months?
Alex Brown
23. Milo1313
Teresa @ 22: Some of us have called our cable providers (the evil corporate entity known as Comcast) and they want an additional $30 a month for BBC America and, like, 2 other stations that are bundled together with it that I don't want and don't need, and certainly can't afford anyway. Comcast has a stranglehold on my county due to an ill-advised contract deal, and I live in the woods with no reception so I can't switch to satellite.

And I do remember when I had to wait months and months, which is why I started dl-ing anyway. So, for me it's either wait a year and a half until they finally release the DVDs, or just snag 'em now and stop worrying about it.

But I'll stop here. This could quickly turn into a cable-debate which I don't want to have sully such a lovely Who blog :) On the real topic at hand, I am much loving this book. I've got a friend who's chomping at the bit for me to finish it so I can pass it along. I only wish I could get my library to carry it. If I can convince them to put it in our SF section, then I can buy it on my collection development budget and be golden... *fingers crossed*

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment