Mon
Apr 26 2010 5:55pm
Blogging Wagner’s Ring Cycle: Die Walküre, Act II

In short, Act II is where things get crazy.

As it begins, Wotan and Fricka have returned, their storyline picking up where we left off at the end of Das Rheingold. As in the production of the first opera in this cycle, their godhood is signified by the fact that the singers who portray them are suspended in the air by cranes.

Here Wotan is figured as the lord of treaties, while Fricka is the lord of wedlock, and Fricka’s angry because of the adulterous goings-on between Siegmund and Sieglinde in Act I. She is willing to call their incestuous relationship by its name and is horrified by it, whereas Wotan, rather shiftily and expediently, suggests that love in all its forms is stronger than mere law and taboo, and so Fricka’s handwringing is unjustified.

At one point during the argument between Wotan and Fricka, the cranes that hold them aloft are lowered, and they step off the platforms so that they can walk around the stage freely. When watching this company’s staging of Das Rheingold, I thought the cranes were a great, imaginative idea; I have to say, though, that when temporarily freed of her crane, the singer performing Fricka, Anna Larsson, really took the brief opportunity to control the stage. Her aggressive, flirtatious body movements and facial gestures took what could easily read as a thankless part on paper—a scorned woman incessantly berating the husband who’s cheated on her again and again—and turned it into something more, investing Fricka with a smoldering sexuality even as she verbally emasculates Wotan. I was almost sad to see Larsson have to fasten herself back into the crane again, to be lifted into the air and carried offstage.

The second section of this act involves Wotan and Brünnhilde on stage together, and here’s where the plot gets crazily complicated. Honestly—even though this isn’t my first time through the Ring, I’m not sure I caught all the nuances. I’m not sure that the narrative hangs together completely anyway, but since when was tight plotting the first concern of opera?

If in most operas the aria is a form that’s usually used to portray an emotion, here we’re treated to a strange instance of aria as exposition. As Brünnhilde listens attentively, Wotan sings, and sings, and sings some more, first recapitulating the entire plot of Das Rheingold—the theft of the gold from the Rhinemaidens; the forging of the ring; its subsequent fate—and then filling in the rest of the events between Das Rheingold and Die Walküre.

In the period between the first and second opera, Alberich, the dwarf who once forged the Ring of the Nibelung, has amassed an army, and is now making preparations to march on Valhalla. Wotan has been preparing for this by filling Valhalla with heroes, harvested from the living by the Valkyries, his daughters by Erda (who gave that chilling warning about the coming end of things at the end of Das Rheingold). But if Alberich gets his hands on the ring of ultimate power, Wotan and company are done for, no matter how many heroes he has. So Wotan must acquire the ring first.

Unfortunately for Wotan, being the lord of treaties means that he, above all, is bound by treaties—even though he cut the Ring off Alberich’s hand himself, he can’t just steal it from Fafnir, one of the two giants who acquired the ring in trade for the construction of Valhalla. (Fafnir has since killed his brother Fasolt, and now keeps the ring for himself.) The ring has to somehow find its way to Wotan by accident. And so Wotan’s extraordinarily convoluted method of encouraging that accident to happen is to father Siegmund and Sieglinde by a mortal woman, also leaving a magic sword in an ash tree where Siegmund might conveniently discover it (and then, presumably, decide to slay Fafnir and take the Ring, instead of doing one of a million other things that one might choose to do with a magic sword). The reasoning behind this sounds as absurd and transparent to Fricka as it does to the audience—she calls Wotan out on it, and after Wotan admits to his self-deception regarding Siegmund’s free will (or lack thereof), he feels that his only choice is to allow his son Siegmund to die at Sieglinde’s husband Hunding’s hand.

Now then. In the third part of Act II we return to Siegmund and Sieglinde, having temporarily escaped from Hunding—driven mad by fear for her fate, Sieglinde collapses into a deep sleep, and it’s then that Brünnhilde appears to notify Siegmund that he’s marked for death (and in a beautiful moment during this staging she literally marks him for death, smearing deep blue paint on his forehead and cheeks and hands that begins to run down Siegmund’s face). But Siegmund refuses to leave for Valhalla if it means abandoning his sister and bride on earth, especially since she’s—surprise—now pregnant. As Siegmund prepares to slay his sleeping sister, Brünnhilde, touched by this display of love, relents and stops him. He will have his victory against Hunding, she says, and she’ll deal with Wotan’s anger, somehow.

Wotan, however, isn’t having this. When Hunding finally appears, Siegmund suddenly finds that his sword is deprived of its power. Without that, Hunding (the only person on stage at this moment who isn’t related to Wotan) finishes off Siegmund easily, but Brünnhilde escapes with Sieglinde just before Wotan arrives. With a gesture of contempt, Wotan kills Hunding (and Juha Uusitalio pulls this off perfectly, snarling the word that drops Hunding dead rather than singing it), and then chases after Brünnhilde in pursuit.

Is that one of the most densely plotted acts of an opera I can think of offhand? I think maybe it is—all that storytelling is done with only about 100 minutes’ worth of singing. But later on in the cycle, if memory serves, the narrative becomes even more complicated.

Next: Act III.


Dexter Palmer is the author of The Dream of Perpetual Motion, published by St. Martin’s Press. (Take a look at the book’s online gallery.)

8 comments
Gabriele Campbell
1. G-Campbell
Heh, I come from the Italian opera; I'm used to plotholes. ;) Wagner mixed his own mythological coctail out of the Edda, Völsunga saga, Song of Nibelungs and whatever he thought was cool. But it's a fascinating mix.

I noticed you didn't say anything about Brünhild's costume. Too scared? *grin*

And because the old post is pretty deep down the line, here's that tidbit of info for our German members again:
Siegfried in the La Fura version will be on ZDFtheaterkanal Germany May 2nd, 19:40.
Gabriele Campbell
2. G-Campbell
Thomas Mann, German writer, Nobel Prize winner and Wagner fan, has written a novelette, Blood of the Walsungs, which is an interesting albeit somewhat disturbing take on Wagner's incest motive. If someone here enjoys early 20th century literature, there's a collection of novelettes and shorter stories by Thomas Mann avaliable which contains not only his famous Death in Venice, but also Blood of the Walsungs and several other stories.
j p
3. sps49
Sounds like this may be (one of) the first series published that used a "What Happened Before" exposition. Few series authors (or publishers) are brave enough to assume someone watching/ reading Part 2 has read Part 1.

Is this the part based on events in Burgundy?
JP_ppbh
4. JP_ppbh
Hey, you forgot totally about Brunhilde, and you need it if you want to understand Act III at all!.

At the beginning, Wotan orders Brunhilde to fight for Siegmund and slay Hundig. But after his discussion with Fricka, Wotan has to, very bereaved, countermand this order and he tells Brunhilde to give the triumph to Hundig, upholding the holy vow of marriage.
Dexter Palmer
5. dexterpalmer
I noticed you didn't say anything about Brünhild's costume. Too scared? *grin*

See, the thing is, based on what you told me before, when I saw Brünnhilde, I was expecting cleavage from here to Tuesday. But instead, her chest is sheathed in a (yes, okay, rather large) false bosom of plastic. I do appreciate that the singer cast as Brünnhilde was somewhat stout, though. This production seems to be cast for looks as well as talent, and so that strikes me as a deliberate decision.

Hey, you forgot totally about Brunhilde, and you need it if you want to understand Act III at all!

Holy crap: you're right! I was sure I'd managed to fit that in there somewhere. But you can't blame me.
Gabriele Campbell
6. G-Campbell
A false bosom of plastic with painted on nipples. :) I thought it looked ridiculous and I would not wear anything like that if I were a singer.

But if it works for you, the better. After all, there are several good Ring versions avaliable on DVD now, and everyone can pick what he/she likes best (for me, that's the Met/Levine version rather than the Fura one). Though I'll (re)watch Siegfried on Sunday because the singing is good overall, only the group Valkyrie scenes came across a bit shrieky, and Brünhild's voice tends to get metallic in the high notes - and the latter is totally a question of taste.
Dexter Palmer
7. dexterpalmer
The thing I like about the Ring cycle in general is that it's such an undertaking to stage that it's impossible to have a definitive version, which at the very least gives people something to talk about. I still think I prefer the Solti audio recording so far, but I'm only halfway through this new version (I'm working on my post for Act III of Die Walkure in another window at the moment). Though I am dying to know what this new 2011-12 Met Opera production of the Ring is going to turn out like—it seems like they're also heading in the direction of minimalism and electronic gimmickry, but we'll see how far they go with that.

I know what you mean about the group Valkyrie scenes—I'm watching these operas on Blu-ray with lossless audio and surround sound, and those bits were the only part of Die Walkure that seemed to have less than perfect audio fidelity (though I couldn't tell if it was the sound mix, or the singers, or the acoustics of the hall).

As for Brunnhilde, I quite like Nilsson in the Solti recording, but Jennifer Wilson is by no means unpleasant.
Gabriele Campbell
8. G-Campbell
I can imagine that the Met will try for something different than the very traditional Levine/Schenck version this time. I actually don't mind video effects like the tree in the Fura version - I think Wagner would have used them if they existed - but I have some issues with the costumes*, those funny cranes the gods are hanging out on, and especially the acrobats. I know these things are meant as symbols, but I don't need that in an opera if it's overdone. While I like _some_ modern takes of operas (I have the Zürich version of Macbeth, for example, and the Munich Norma with Gruberova which is not my dream version but still enjoyable enough that I invested the money), I usually prefer the more traditional versions like the older Met performances and most of what the Italian houses do.

* Albeit the costumes are still better than Siegmund in a business suit and Brünhild as nurse.

I agree that Wilson is not unpleasant, and she _gets_ the high notes. It's just that I prefer a different sort of voice; I've never been a Callas fan, either.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment