Sun
Mar 7 2010 10:03am
Irritation, the Step-mother of Invention

In the comments following my post on YA fairy tale fiction, contributor Patrick Garson remarked that we can’t know the “original” meanings of fairy tales that have been transmitted through the oral tradition. It’s not until a version has been recorded—or composed, in the case of literary tales like those by Marie-Catherine d’Aulnoy or Hans Christian Andersen—that a text exists to which subsequent storytellers can respond.

Thinking about this point, I realized that my fairy tale novels are less like a conversation and more like an argument with established canon. Stories I already love don’t provoke me enough to spend the effort required to build a novel around them. A source of irritation, not fondness, must provide the necessary energy.

Why was the villain so mean? And what happened next? These and other questions are vital to get the process started. Several times now, I’ve discovered that when enough “how comes” turn into “what ifs,” story threads will start spinning out of a cloud of dissatisfaction.

Case in point: my first novel, The Swan Maiden, sprang from a story traditionally seen from the male protagonist’s point of view. In folklore classification, it’s tale type 313, “the girl as helper in the hero’s flight.” Helper? Hello—she drives the action forward and does all the heavy lifting for the lucky (and clueless) hero. That we never heard her perspective raised my feminist hackles. I wanted to know why this capable young woman would help a random guy remove her from her family, why she dumped him once the tasks were done, and why she went to so much trouble to get him back after that. Answering those questions shaped the emotional dynamics of the novel, though the structure conforms to a traditional plotline. There are over a hundred versions of the story in French; I had plenty of “impossible” tasks to choose from.

For my latest retelling for teens, Toads and Diamonds, its origin is clearly outrage, since the message I’d read in the 17th century version by Charles Perrault had bothered me for years. The story is simple. Two stepsisters meet a fairy at a well. The younger girl treats the fairy politely, and is rewarded with a gift for speaking jewels and flowers. The elder is rude (because fairy-tale older sisters are inevitably stupid, cruel, jealous, and ugly. Ahem.). She is punished with toads and snakes leaping from her mouth at every word. One guess as to which sister perishes alone in the forest, and which hooks up with a prince for her happy-ever-after. Oh—does that sound bitter?

As the firstborn child in my family, I always wished that just once, the outcome could be different. Yes, big sisters have bad days, but might we manage to grow out of our adolescent angst, if given a chance? It’s a rare fairy-tale girl who doesn’t persecute her younger (wiser, gentler, more beautiful, etc. etc.) sister and pay a hefty price. Kate Crackernuts, Snow White/Rose Red, and the twelve dancing princesses are the few counter-examples who come to mind, and even there, the eldest dancing princess is snarky to the youngest one.

But I digress. The story I chose to retell is a rather slight fairy tale to bear the full weight of the grudge I’ve carried since childhood. If I wanted the older sister to have a future (and the book to have a plot), I had to let my irritation spark some questions. What would motivate the fairy to give such disparate gifts? Under what circumstances could speaking toads and snakes be as important—or as dangerous—a gift as pronouncing jewels and flowers? How best to sustain dramatic tension if the two sisters weren’t in conflict with each other? The Perrault story is a couple of pages long, and features five characters. Who was missing from the story?

The answers I arrived at involved doing major damage to the simple ideal of the good girl rewarded and the bad one punished. It also necessitated transplanting the action to another continent, but I think that’s a topic for another post.

If you’ve followed me thus far, here’s my question, Gentle Reader: when other writers set out to retell a classic story, are they driven as much by frustration as admiration? Or should I be signing up for some fictional anger management classes?


* Illustration of the older sister meeting the fairy at the well comes from the Sur La Lune Fairytales website: Toads and Diamonds, by G.P. Jacomb Hood, published in Lang, Andrew, ed. The Blue Fairy Book. New York: Dover, 1965. (Original published 1889.)


Heather Tomlinson lives on a sailboat in southern California, where she reads and writes fantasy novels for teens. Her latest book, Toads & Diamonds, is forthcoming March 2010 from Henry Holt.

17 comments
mairreading
1. mairreading
Most of us just get irritated and annoyed and wish for authors like you to fix it up for us! I'll have to check out your books.

Your post makes me wonder if there was a bit of irritation goading UKL into writing Lavinia, too.

Come to think of it, irritation about the female characters in comics and manga has goaded my daughter (with some help from her brother) to the quixotic pursuit of producing 20–40 pages of comics per month since 2004 (for two different ongoing series) for no more remuneration than the faves and comments on deviantArt.

Irritation is the stepmother of invention, indeed!
mairreading
2. nchashim
I think that is why I liked Gaiman's "The Problem of Susan" also. I was still a child when I read the Narnia books, but I still remember thinking that Susan was ill-treated.
Gray Woodland
3. Greyhame
Feel the same way, and think it wholly reasonable. I would, wouldn't I? Nonetheless...

If a story is already told true, there is no earthly call to revisit it and hang bells and whistles all over it. Conversely, if the story is complete cobblers, who cares about revisiting it anyway? There is one case and only one that provides the right kind of grudge: the tale with the power to cut deep, and the aim that seems to cut all wrong, or turn aside with a last failure of nerve. Because so nearly the maker gave you something wonderful, that you glimpsed it - and then they bottled or botched it at the last moment.

What other answer is there to that but, We wantsss it, yessss Precious!?

Fairy tales, unsurprisingly given their usual stock of elements, do this to me too on lots of levels. There's no good talking details about the proceeds until-unless I've published them, but suffice it to say that genre provides a lot of the grit in my personal mantle.

And way back, I remember being so enraged by some stupidities in Mercedes Lackey's Valdemar milieu, that I spent rather a lot of time spinning a yarn of a mediaevaloid world which did have Herald/ Lensman types minus anything ex machina, and playing a diabolically brilliant symphony with the defects of its virtues. - At least, I achieved that as far as 'diabolical'. Thereafter I put the big steaming result in to compost, and waxed less loud about other people's stupidities which I hadn't demonstrated any wit to better. A bit less loud. Mostly.

I still say the best way to interrogate a shifty-looking story is with another story told better, though. Or even just as well, and haring off sideways.

I really like the idea of speaking toads and snakes being a needful gift, and not a merely spiteful one. You are distinctly whetting my appetite, with that one. More power to your elbow!

(Signed, An Eldest Son.)
mairreading
4. Santone
> we can’t know the “original” meanings of fairy tales that have been transmitted through the oral tradition. It’s not until a version has been recorded—or composed, in the case of literary tales like those by Marie-Catherine d’Aulnoy or Hans Christian Andersen—that a text exists to which subsequent storytellers can respond.

Oh, it's much worse than that, because, even after there's text, subsequent storytellers will retell the story, alter the original text, insert their own POVs, etc, etc. Check out the many forms of biblical criticism that have developed in the last 150 years to see how all that works.
Anita Croft
5. AnitaCroft
Well said! I agree with you wholeheartedly. I am often incredibly irritated with fairy tales, especially with how the female characters are portrayed.
This irritation is one of the main reasons I decided to write.
Your book is definitely on my "to read" list now!
mairreading
6. pambelina
For my thesis novel for my MA I wrote a re-telling of the Irish folktale, The Corpse Watchers. My desire to re-write it didn't come from frustration so much as curiosity. All through the 2 1/2 page tale I found myself asking Why? to this, that, or the other. So I began writing down my answers, which turned into a plot, which turned into a book!
mairreading
7. Val^2
Diana Wynne Jones tackles the older sister complex in Howl's Moving Castle. Highly recommend it.
mairreading
8. SJW
My seven-year old daughter brought home a library book telling the traditional story of the Princess and the Frog: the frog extracts promises from the Princess to let him eat from her plate, sleep on her pillow, etc. in exchange for getting her golden ball out of the well.

The Princess reneges, the King makes her fulfill her promises, and she gets so mad she throws the frog against the wall. He bursts open and becomes a handsome prince--who rewards her lying, capricious, violent nature by marrying her. And it isn't a punihsment, because they live happily ever after.

This story infuriates me. So on the spot I invented a maid for the Princess who is kind to the frog and feeds him her supper and gives him her pillow, and when the Princess kicks him out of the way the next morning and breaks the spell, guess who gets rewarded? Not the Princess, that's for &$%#^& sure.

My daughter stared at me through my rant and then said in stunned amazement, "You can change stories?"

Why, yes. Yes, you can.
mairreading
9. SJW
Sorry for the spelling mistakes--I was so happy the italics worked, I didn't scan for the important stuff . . . sigh . . .
mairreading
10. dritch
As to why the hero/heroine of all those tales where always the younger brother/sister: That's because there were so many of them. As for the eldest: There can be only One! (If there were someone older than the eldest brother or sister, then THEY wouldn't be the eldest.)

As the oldest of three brothers, I was the one always put in charge, and correspondingly, held responsible for the three of us when Mom and Dad were out.

As for the role of the younger sibs as heroes, the eldest were always to busy taking care of younger sister and brothers to be wasting time telling stories. There was always another mess to clean up while the artistic one was over in the corner thinking up how to get even with elder sister for not letting her get away with ....

Like most parts of family dynamics, this can be adequately chalked up to Jealosy ("You were always Mom's favorite, so I am going to get even with you by making you the villian in my story and I'm going to become famous and they will always think you were a toad!! So, there!!").

'Nuf said.
mairreading
11. Alleya
This reminded me of a story mentioned in "The Lark and The Wren" by Mercedes Lackey.

It's the one where two sisters are in love with the same man. He starts out by sleeping with the older sister, who thinks that he's going to have to marry her - but of course he proposes to the younger one.

The older sister gets so angry that she ends up killing her younger sister by shoving her into the river. Then a wandering bard comes along and makes a harp out of her bones (why??). He heads over to the court where the harp starts playing by itself and tells the whole sordid story.

The older sister is killed and the guy who started everything gets off scott free.

Lackey asks the same questions here. Why didn't the older sister go after the the guy who betrayed her in the first place? And why didn't she tell the younger sister about the betrayal? Surely if the younger sister had any brains at all, she'd help her older sister get back at the cheating man as well!
mairreading
12. Ericket
This, from an eldest's perspective, has always irritated me too, but as I read the comments it occured to me that perhaps the youngest got the reward in the fairy tale because the eldest got the "reward" in real life, i.e. The Title, The Lands, the first marriage to perhaps a higher title, the larger dowery, etc.

Is this a valid POV for the time period when they were first written down?
Paul Andinach
13. anobium
I think Ericket is right: We get stories about younger sons going out to seek their fortune because the oldest son doesn't need to, he's already got his fortune coming to him.

I second Val^2's recommendation of Diana Wynne Jones's take on fairy tale sisterly dynamics.

Getting back to the original question (Are there other writers who retell classic stories out of frustration?), I immediately think of Vivian Vande Velde and The Rumplestiltskin Problem, a collection of short stories that are all different takes on the story of Rumplestiltskin. As the title suggests, the inspiration was quite explicitly a belief that the story as usually told just doesn't work.
Gray Woodland
14. Greyhame
Ericket and anobium: there's more to it than that. It's the youngest of several (traditionally three): the second son is seldom any better, and he hasn't got the estate coming to him. As for daughters, well, there being no money for a girl's dowry wasn't generally considered a good reason for her to go out having adventures.

A pleasant exception to the usual pattern is maybe Prince Ivan (he of the Firebird): he and his three sisters and magical brothers-in-law are all good friends and true. Peter Morwood brings this out very nicely in his retelling.

To extend the dodgier pattern, what about those non-familial triads, where the two more eligible people who fail are invariably mean-souled and nasty? Wouldn't it be more interesting, and speak more for the Humble Hero, if at least one of them were really attractive and impressive, but failed by the defects of their virtues, instead of by lacking any? The strong suitor frank and gallant rather than stupid and brutal, the rich suitor witty and Epicurean rather than coarse and greedy?

The sort of people, in a word, who could be the hero's rivals for heart as well as hand?

With modern fairy-tales and retellings well able to run to book length, they have more weight to carry than a short fireside story, and there's one kind of timber I think could bear it.
Paul Andinach
15. anobium
"Do not be jealous of your sister. Know that diamonds and roses are as uncomfortable when they tumble from one's lips as toads and frogs. Colder, too, and sharper, and they cut."

-- "Instructions", Neil Gaiman
Paul Andinach
16. anobium
Greyhame, there's a modern-invented fairy-tale by Pamela Freeman, in which a group of princely suitors are told that instead of a more traditional impossible quest, the princess's hand will go to whoever produces the best garden in a certain space of time. (The princess winds up marrying the gardener's apprentice, which is of course what she intended all along.)

I mention it because, although none of the princes genuinely rivals the hero for the princess's heart, there is one who, apart from being a poor gardener and a bad match for this particular princess, is clearly a brave and well-intentioned person, and Freeman subsequently wrote a follow-up tale of how that prince found a quest and princess for which he was better suited.
mairreading
17. Chandra Lewis
I know precisely where this article is coming from. I am a practicer of frustration writing. In fact, part of the novel I'm working on now got a lot of inspiration from them. One is over how Western stories always portray snakes and lizards and such as evil, slimy creatures, no matter what; i.e., Slytherin house in Harry Potter. Thank you Rowlings!

Another thing that toasts my cookies are accepted stereotypes of characters. Like teen African Americans have to be cool, streetsmart guys that like to party, instead of something like a geeky, glasses-wearing programmer into WoW.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment