Fri
Jan 29 2010 9:37am
Only in Silence the Word: Ursula Le Guin’s The Farthest Shore

The Farthest Shore is the third in the Earthsea series, set years after the other books, when Sparrowhawk has become Archmage, head of the magic school on Roke.

In the Court of the Fountain the sun shone through young leaves of ash and elm, and water leapt and fell through shadow and clear light. About that roofless court stood four high walls of stone. Behind those were rooms and courts, passages, corridors, towers, and at last the heavy outmost walls of the Great House of Roke, which would stand any assault of war or earthquake or the sea itself, being built not only of stone but of incontestable magic. For Roke is the isle of the wise where the art magic is taught, and the Great House is the school and central place of wizardry; and the central place of the house is that small court far within the walls where the fountain plays and the trees stand in rain or sun or starlight.

Arren comes to Roke to report trouble, and finds the archmage, and more trouble than he thought, and a hard road to follow.

When I was a child, I didn’t understand this book, and though I wanted to love it because I loved the other two, there was always something in it that wouldn’t warm to me. I didn’t want to read about magic going out of the world and Earthsea becoming horrible. Ged being Archmage was good, going off on an adventure in Lookfar was good, a king coming back was good, and yay for riding on dragons, but there were two things in it I couldn’t bear. One was the bit which seemed to last forever and which is in sober count four pages, where the madman Sopli, the dyer of Lorbanery, is in the boat with Arren and Ged, and Arren is mad too and doesn’t trust anyone. The other is the moment when the dragon Orm Embar loses his speech. I don’t know why I found this so peculiarly horrible, but I did—worse than all the joy going out of everyone’s craft and names losing their power. I hated that, but I found the dragon without speech and reduced to a beast far worse. Probably I could understand that properly while the rest went over my head. I can remember thinking that it was too old for me and I’d understand it later.

Le Guin says this is about death, but it seems to me it’s about the way the fear of death sucks all the joy out of life. This is, to put it mildly, an odd subject for a children’s book—and it’s an odd subject for fantasy too. In some ways this is much more like a conventional fantasy novel than the first two, which are small scale. Here we have a dark lord promising eternal life and offering nothing but dust and ashes, but finding followers. The whole world is in peril, and is saved, and Arren is crowned at last. The message, that life is a word spoken in the darkness and to accept that and laugh is the only way to go on, turned out to be terribly useful to me a few years later when I had to deal with death close up. The Farthest Shore gave me far more consolation than religion when it came to it. So while I didn’t understand it at nine, it saved me from feeling suicidal at eleven. I don’t say it’s an unsuitable book for children, only an odd one. I can hardly think of any other books on this subject for people of any age.

So, I still don’t like the bit in the boat with Sopli, and I still hate hate hate Orm Embar losing his speech. I noticed again how beautifully it’s written. These books are gorgeous. There’s a bit near the beginning where the text lists the people who know Ged’s true name—or in other words, his friends. There are, after all this time, only seven of them, and two are dragons. As a child I was glad to recognise all of them. Reading this now, I think how terribly lonely he must have been. Arren is the viewpoint character, but he’s far less interesting to me than Ged—and this was also true when I was a child. I didn’t need a young viewpoint on the world, I’d have been happy in Ged’s middle-aged head. Arren’s a much less realised character than Ged or Tenar, he’s supposed to be learning to be an adult and a king, but he lets the plot push him around as neither of them did.

The book ends happily with magic restored, all the mages returned, Arren ready to be crowned and Ged gone to Gont on dragonback. I never questioned that this was the end of the story—we’re told it’s the end of the Deed of Ged, and it’s a very ending kind of end. Also, I had these three as a boxed set, and that’s all there was. Imagine my surprise sixteen years later when a sequel came along.


Jo Walton is a science fiction and fantasy writer. She’s published eight novels, most recently Half a Crown and Lifelode, and two poetry collections. She reads a lot, and blogs about it here regularly. She comes from Wales but lives in Montreal where the food and books are more varied.

17 comments
Kate Nepveu
1. katenepveu
I hope Ms. Le Guin sees this or otherwise has the content communicated to her, because I should think that "saved me from feeling suicidal at eleven" would be a really wonderful thing to know about one's book.

I know I read these too young because I don't remember them at all; it's very likely that this book had something to do with the series as a whole not sticking. I should really re-read them.
Intertext
2. Intertext
As always, you say exactly what I feel about a book! This was always my least favourite of the series (at least of the first four). Like you, I hated seeing the darkness overcoming Earthsea, the wizards losing their power, Orm Embar losing his speech. But there are moments of sharp and startling beauty - Ged sailing and turning to Arren with complete joy in his face. The episode on the rafts with the celebration of Sunreturn (was that it?) with them all dancing and swimming between the rafts.
Tudza White
3. tudzax1
It took a while, but it finally came to me that the afterlife of the people of Earthsea was truly grim and useless. While I dislike most of the later books and stories, the one that deals with this problem was a welcome one. If I recall the solution was, let all the dead souls fly free again.

Really though, this third book should have been the end. Ged leaves in triumph. In the next book he's a powerless person like everyone else.
Intertext
4. ELaine Thom
Jo, you must have read the UK edition, right? I remember LeGuin writing somewhere that after the first US publication her UK editor said "Ged is talking too much" and so LeGuin 'shut him up, much to the improvement of the whole." (from memory.) I've read both and do think the Uk edition is slightly better, although it's been a long time since I looked at either.

Anyway, until Tehanu and the others appeared, this was my least favorite, too, because it was cold. I couldn't relate the way I had to the other two. But I thought the ending was a perfect ending, and wish she'd stopped there.

I can sort of understand a writer's desire to explore what happens after the end of the story and magic. BUt I wish she'd chosen to set it in a new place, not to use someone named Ged in a place that looked like Earthsea.
Jo Walton
5. bluejo
I have only read the UK edition. (I still have, and re-read, my old Puffins.) If the US edition is different, I want it! It's -30 outside with windchill, and the library shuts in an hour and ten minutes, but I just seriously checked whether I could get hold of it tonight. For what? The possibility of more words.

I have a theory about the afterlife and etc, but I shall save it for my post on The Other Wind.
Intertext
6. 6 penny
The image of Arren with the stone from the Land of the Dead in his pocket and how painful it was has always stuck with me.
This book seems to me to deal with the depression that fear causes -and the forms it takes, and how contagious it can be, as mych as with the death issues.
For me this book was, not a light in a dark place, but a support as I staggered through it.
Intertext
7. Joel Polowin
I, too, was horrified by Orm Embar losing his speech. It's the horror of senility -- loss of self, with the body still lurching around -- magnified by its application to that great ancient creature who should never ever have had to face it.

Ben Newman has written a lovely round for "The Creation of Ea".
felipe lopez
8. lupercus
Jo: I assume you'll also read the stories from Tales from Earthsea. Are you reading them in order of publication (beginning with "Dragonfly") or in the order they are in the book (with "Dragonfly" being the last)?

And what about the two old Earthsea stories from The Wind's Twelve Quarters?
Jo Walton
9. bluejo
Lupercus: In the order they're in in the book, it never occurred to me to do anything else.
Melita Kennedy
10. melita
I consider it the toughest of the trilogy and don't often reread it compared to the other two books. I was surprised a few years after first reading it to discover that I'd internalized the view of death/afterlife. I was taking one of those pseudo-psych things ("You are on a path..."). My visualization of the "wall" was almost directly from The Farthest Shore.
Intertext
11. skinnyiain
It's odd - I think this has always been my favourite in the series - both back when it was a trilogy and now that it's a still-expanding universe. I never realised before that this made me out of step.
Of course the loss of speech is disturbing and terrible - but that's not a reason to dislike the story. It's one indication that the story works.

Jo, you say 'Le Guin says this is about death, but it seems to me it’s about the way the fear of death sucks all the joy out of life. This is, to put it mildly, an odd subject for a children’s book—and it’s an odd subject for fantasy too.'
Isn't The Lord of the Rings a fantasy novel that deals with these themes? I'm sure Tolkien said that it was about death but the more recent times I've read it it's seemed to me that it's about the various characters' attitudes towards death, and ways of dealing with the fear of death. So to say that this is an odd subject for fantasy also seems odd to me. As for children's books - doesn't His Dark Materials have something to say about these things? For that matter, isn't fear of death and its ability to distort character a major theme in Harry Potter? As I write I'm also reminded of the recent episode of Dr Who that ended David Tennant's tenure as The Doctor - both fantasy and for children, I think - in which three different villains all failed to deal with the fear of death while The Doctor felt it and dealt with it, something noted on this site, I think.
Jo Walton
12. bluejo
SkinnyIain: I don't think that's what either LOTR or _His Dark Materials_ is about. HDM seems to me to be about feat of growing up, which is a common theme of children's books. Can't speak to Doctor Who as I don't watch TV.
Intertext
13. skinnyiain
Bluejo: Thanks for replying. If we're trying to identify just one thing that HDM is 'about' then you're surely right that it's growing up. But I think it also addresses other themes. It's a clear implication of the 3rd book, I think, that to die a true death is preferable to 'living' on after death in the underworld - an underworld that I found reminiscent of LeGuin, which may be why I thought of HDM at all.
In a similar way there is no one thing that LOTR is about, but fearing death, and allowing that fear to dominate and corrupt you, is commented upon more than once. It seems to be the Achilles' heal of the Numenoreans - both the cause of the drowning of Numenor and a major contributor to the decline of Gondor. The Gondorians are said to have given more care to the houses of the dead than to those of the living, IIRC. So I still think that attention to death and the fear of death is less unusual than you find it to be.
Intertext
14. Thomas Lindgren
Joel, good point.

On consideration, I think I always found the Earthsea books to have the nature that I ought to have loved them, but could not. (The wire-mother of children's fantasy? Mm, perhaps that's possibly taking it too far, maybe.) Even so, they did fascinate me for a while.
Intertext
16. Darwinista
I adored these books. A few years ago I had the opportunity to tell Le Guin how I got the box set--my mother bought me what she thought was a great school outfit and I found appalling: a double-breasted suit jacket. While it may have looked great, this is not what a 12-year-old wants to wear when her normal attire is jeans and t-shirts. So, I returned the jacket and took my cash to the mall bookstore.

As for The Farthest Shore in particular, I found it frustrating and creepy and disturbing and compelling. Favorite? No. But I felt at the time that it might have had the most to say--or at least the most complicated things to say. Orm Embar was heartbreaking. But for me, the scene that I kept returning to was the dyer's house.
Intertext
17. allisondek
Some years ago, our church did an adult education Bible study (part of the Kerygma series) on the texts of Handel's Messiah. I got to lead the session on "the trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised incorruptible." The subject was the Christian doctrine of the resurrection of the dead. I wanted to compare it with the image of Sheol, the place of departed spirits, found in some of the earlier Hebrew scriptural books (references in the book of Psalms, for example).

I'm not ordained, and I'm not a theologian. I can't claim to know anything about Jewish theology more than 2000 years ago. But the materials I was given seemed to described a Sheol as a place of spirits without passion. So I dug out my copy of The Farthest Shore and read aloud to the class the passage where Arren observed the people on the far side of the wall. "Those who had died for love passed each other in the street." It is the bleakest passage I can think of. Did it make my point? I'm not sure, because I know it wasn't actually a description of Sheol. But the contrast felt right.

Of course, in The Other Wind, a different solution to death is found altogether. It will be interesting to see your take on it.
Nicholas Alcock
18. NullNix
allisondek: the Earthsea afterlife is pretty explicitly Mesopotamian / Babylonian. Gilgamesh would have recognised it.

(Also, _The Dry Land_ is perhaps some of the finest writing I have ever read. It makes me tear up every single time.)

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment