Wed
Dec 30 2009 10:59am
There is now...

On Christmas afternoon, my son pointed out that much hilarity can be had by typing question words into Google and seeing what Google thinks you’re going to ask. (We made our own entertainment in them days.) Everybody else has probably been doing this since Google instiuted the feature, if you type “how to” you get a list of “how to tie a tie, how to get rid of fruit flies, how to get pregnant” and so on, it’s autocompleting what you type with the most popular searches. If you type “is it weird” you get a list of things people think it’s weird to do. We elaborated—if you type “how to” and then a letter of the alphabet, you get all the queries that go with that, so we played linking them together as if they were one person’s queries over the course of an evening. “How to r” begins with “how to roll a joint”, goes on to “how to roast pumpkin seeds” goes through a lot of other things you might want to roast if you’d rolled a joint, and ends with things that would be a terrible idea when stoned, like “remove wallpaper” and “reformat hard drive”.

The thing that’s oddest to me is that I never format my queries that way. Despite the fact that I wrote a story from Google’s point of view, I don’t actually think of Google as being alive. I use Google to find things out all the time, but if I want to know how to roast pumpkin seeds, I’d type “pumpkin seeds roast recipe”. I do not talk to Google the way people in old science fiction stories talk to their computers, in complete conversational sentences. However, it’s clear that a lot of people do, and that is in one way cool and in another way just weird. I grew up reading stories where people turned to the computer and said things like “Computer, what is the temperature in Addis Abbaba?” and the computer would give the information in a synthesised voice. Google’s almost all the way to being that computer, but of course nobody guessed the skill we’d need of sifting through unreliable data. 

We moved on to “are” and letters. A huge number of people want to know whether things are real. It led me to think of compiling a FA—“Are unicorns real? No. Are vampires real? No. Are  zombies real? No. You’re welcome.” The one that threw me was “Are volcanoes alive?” I mean no, but who could possibly ask that question? If you type “are volcanoes” the first four questions are all about this “Are volcanoes alive? Are volcanoes living things? Are volcanoes living or not living? Are volcanoes a living thing?” I would never have guessed anybody had any doubt on the matter. Well, at least Google will set everyone right on that one.

As you’d expect, a lot of queries concern sex, pregnancy, childcare, healthcare, relationships, shaving, and what to do about zits. Others concern matters of information—how to roast garlic, what days are statutory holidays.

You can perfectly reasonably ask Google if Greenland is part of North America, or if voles eat insects. There’s a question and an answer, it’s discoverable. You can also reasonably ask if tylenol is safe in pregnancy. Twenty years ago one of my books said no tylenol and the other said no aspirin and I had to check with my doctor, now the Mayo Clinic website is right at the end of my fingers. You can ask how to get pregnant, and well, you’ll have to sift some information but I think there’s a reasonable chance of you figuring it out from information Google will provide. But you really can’t ask if your partner loves you, or whether they’re cheating. Google won’t know. You might be able to find out online, but you’d really need a more sophisticated search string.

Beyond those much too personal questions, it starts to get metaphysical. “Are people good or bad? Are people good or evil? Are people born good or evil?” If you’re asking Google this, you trust it too much. Which leads me to the last question—I mean Isaac Asimov’s famous short story “The Last Question”. In that story, people build a computer. It was a long time ago, so it was one super computer with all the information in the universe, but apart from that it was just like Google. As soon as they had it running, they asked a question that I found as number one on “does g” and number two on “is g”. “Does God exist?” they asked. “Is God real?” Or, as Asimov formatted it, and number one on “is there”: “Is there a God?”

And the computer replied “There is now.”

25 comments
Stephen H. Segal
1. earthling
Great column! I have been wishing for years that Asimov could have stuck around long enough to see Multivac realized in the form of Google. I suspect he would have noted that once again, just as with his positronic robots, he got the concept spot-on, only mistakenly based the intelligence in hardware instead of in software.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
2. Maria Bear Mountain Books
WAIT. What do you mean unicorns aren't real? That must have been a typo.
Michael Grosberg
3. Michael_GR
People don't realize that Google doesn't index common words such as "I", "are", "the", "that" and such.

As for the living volcanoes... I followed that up a bit, and it seems people ask the same question about rivers, the wind, the sun and moon and pretty much every other inanimate force of nature. I guess animism is here to stay!
Maria Bear Mountain Books
4. Nooks
The story you're trying to remember isn't Asimov's "The Last Question" (though it ends in a somewhat similar way, but much more upbeat). It's Frederic Brown's "Answer".
Rick Rutherford
5. rutherfordr
More fun with google:

Type the phrase "French military victories" in the search box, and click the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

;)
- -
6. heresiarch
I'm waiting for the war between atheists and fundamentalists over who can get the top Google result for "Is there a God?" "No." "Yes!" "NO!" "YES."
David Goldfarb
7. David_Goldfarb
I format my Google queries the same way you do. (For example, last week I wanted to make a flourless chocolate cake and entered "flourless chocolate cake recipe". [We didn't have enough cocoa powder, so we made it with more melted chocolate and less cocoa powder, but it turned out well enough.]) I confess it never occurred to me to make it an actual question, still less to make a game of that. Neat.

I see someone beat me to Fredric Brown, alas, although I can point out that it's spelled "Fredric" not "Frederic". Also that the first link (to the Subterreanean magazine issue) is malformed.
Mike Conley
8. NomadUK
Type the phrase "French military victories" in the search box, and click the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

Meh. Goes to show just how useful search engines can be. I seem to recall Napoleon had one or two victories somewhere in there, and the wearer of the English crown hasn't been styled 'King/Queen of France' for a few centuries, despite Agincourt and Harfleur.

Not too many countries managed to stand up against the onslaught of the Wehrmacht; France did what it could. Britain had the good fortune to be an island.

And Indochina turned out not to be such a cakewalk for the Americans, either, seems to me.

Humourous, yes, but there do seem to be people in policy-making positions in the US government who actually believe and act on this sort of crap.
jon meltzer
9. jmeltzer
Asimov's last question is "how can the net amount of entropy in the universe be massively decreased?"

First answer in a Google search: "I haven't a clue".
Adam Sampson
10. atsampson
Looking for songs to sing at Christmas, I went hunting for the lyrics to "When A Child Is Born". If you search for that on Google, the first result it gives you is that singer Lupe Fiasco, known as "The Child", was born on February 16, 1982. Not quite what I wanted to know...
Jo Walton
11. bluejo
Frederic Brown? Damn, I should have Googled!
Maria Bear Mountain Books
13. Paul Cornell
So... *are* volcanoes alive?
Maria Bear Mountain Books
14. Samantha Bello
I don't know if anyone can answer this, but are those suggested search terms based upon the most frequently entered searches by people somewhere on earth, or are they just magically, logarithmically assembled?

For example, start off a query with "why do Asians" and it displays search terms that are amazingly racist. You can do this with ethnicity du jour and amazingly racist and stereotypical searches are shown. Are there people who a) enter searches in the form of a question and b) are asking Google to answer their questions about racial stereotypes? Just... bizarre.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
15. Samantha Bello
As an aside, if you start out with 'how to r' yes, 'how to roast pumpkin seeds' is one of the suggested queries but interestingly, if you start off 'how to b', one of the suggestions is 'how to bake pumpkin seeds'

Which leads me to ask - is there a lot pumpkin seed baking going on these days? Is there some new trend I missed out on?
Maria Bear Mountain Books
16. De Novo
- ya, "how to c" also suggests "how to *cook* pumpkin seeds"

It's the new sensation that sweeping the nation!
Mary Aileen Buss
17. maryaileen
I'm a reference librarian. A while back, I had a young man who wanted information about "unicorn-horses--the ones with horns." I don't think he believed me when I told him that they don't actually exist.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
18. Ludon
My first exposure to search engines was with Alta Vista on Charter's short lived WorldGate Web-TV. I worked my way through different titles - TV shows, movies and books just to see what would come up. When I searched for "On The Beach" I got nothing but hotel and real estate listings. So, the next title I searched was "A Canticle for Leibowitz." The top result was titled "On The Beach and other great books I've read." I learned a secret of the universe that day - Aiming wide of the mark can sometimes lead to a more interesting target.

Mike
Maria Bear Mountain Books
19. thanate
I had friends in college a decade ago who went around trying to convince people that the internet was God. And that was before google, permissive search syntax, and most of the content that's out there these days.
Andrew Mason
21. AnotherAndrew
jmeltzer@9: That is the answer one would expect at the current stage of development, though Multivac would have stated it more formally.

I seem to remember that Asimov includes the 'There is now' story in Asimov's Treasury of Humor, simply as a traditional joke, not credited to any author, but then mentions that some people thought he had borrowed the idea for 'The Last Question' from it.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
22. HelenS
Is there really a difference between roasting and baking anyway, or just a difference in which term is used depending on which thing you're putting in the oven? For instance, you roast a whole chicken, but you bake pieces of chicken.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
23. Andrew Wheeler
And, as with everything else, there's a blog about funny (or just weird) Google search results, called Autocomplete Me.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
24. William H Stoddard
I haven't read the story in years, but I certainly don't remember it that way. The question was, "Can entropy be reversed?" and in the end AC figures out how and answers the question by demonstration:

And AC said, "Let there be light."

(I see somebody else remembers it that way too.)

My favorite use of google is to check the spelling of scientific terms: enter both the author's spelling and the one I think is right (when they differ) and see which gets more hits. Though if they're within 10% or so I'll usually figure the author shouldn't be overruled.
Maria Bear Mountain Books
25. Kevin Marks
Did you see Neil Fraser's Google as Multivac? - quotes from Asimov's 'All the troubles of the world' illustrated by pictures of Google. He misses the existential question in both Asimov's and your 'What a Piece of Work' completely though...
Maria Bear Mountain Books
26. dmg
God, what an excellent and witty essay, Jo. Thank you.

Did you see this article?

http://searchengineland.com/can-google-tell-us-what-men-and-women-are-really-thinking-33691

I think you will get a kick out of it...

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment