Whenever I talk about steampunk, I usually wander around to the issue of race (you may have noticed this; it’s kind of a thing). Sometimes I use the term “person of colour,” or “steampunk of colour,” or “visible minority.”
I was thinking of the latter term: “visible minorities” and I realized that there has been a subset of people who are definite visible minorities, as well as invisible minorities, that aren’t often thought about.
The terms are various, according to region: people with disabilities, disabled person. Each term has its own socio-political implications. A bit like how steampunk means something vastly different to various people, heh. I'll be alternating between the two in this article, because I find pros and cons in both terms.
Before I move on to how this intersects with steampunk, I’d like you to take a minute or two to read about the Spoon Theory and the Social Model of Disability. The former offers a metaphor for able-bodied people to understand their privilege in relation to those suffering from disabilities. The latter is a model which offers a mindset with which to understand the social structures in place which continue to hinder people with disabilities. It will also enable you to understand the purpose of writing this article in the first place.
Steampunk, as we all are aware, draws its inspiration from the Victorian era, which, for all its accomplishments, wasn’t very good to people with disabilities. Halifax, where I live, has a few Heritage Houses, many of which were built during the era, and it doesn't take much to see that most of them are wheelchair-inaccessible. By and large, disability issues fall off the steampunk radar. That doesn't mean there aren't any steampunks with disabilities. Out of curiousity, I put out feelers on Brass Goggles.
In fact, there are quite a few, and disabilities don’t really stop anybdy — Mark F. has been living with chronic muscle and join pain for 30 years (plus osteoarthritis; we should note that for many, it's never just one illness, but a whole clusterfuck of problems which exacerbate each other), and yet has managed to refurbish an entire work cubicle, among other projects. Many other steampunks with disabilities also involve themselves with the physical side of steampunk: DIY, costuming, conventioneering.
One might think that disability issues would be fairly straightforward in steampunk — wheelchair-bound? Build steampunk contraptions around mobility devices. “I typically use a cane to walk,” MarkF said, “but a plain one just screams tediousness.” So he built himself a Sherlock Holmes-themed umbrella-cane, with weaponized ice-tips:

This is one walking stick you do NOT want to mess with.
Which only goes to show — improvements are the order of the day, not a return to the olden days, as another BG member, Thistlewaite, notes, “I used to own an antique wheelchair, wicker seats, made of oak, ornate metal appointments, etc. When my lady became disabled, I invested in an excellent, modern folding wheelchair, made of nylon and space-age materials, not motorized (power by Thistlewaite, don’t y’know) but the best chair I could find.” Everything else in the Thistlewaite household, however, is decorated according to their own steampunk tastes.
Among other challenges are costumes that can be worn even when the wearer is wheelchair-bound. “I have to build costumes that will hold up to my collapsing to the ground at any moment,” Jordan, or Dr. Oliver Cross on the Brass Goggles forum, tells me. He also admits, “it is mildly frustrating to see people inventing incredibly impressive contraptions built around mobility devices and adaptation devices, although in my case, what frustrates me about them isn't that they're being built, but that I wasn't the one who invented them!”

Functional steampunk'd motorized wheelchair at Dragon*Con, photo by Michael Eades
So what improvements can be made at steampunk gatherings and conventions? In order to answer that adequately, we have to figure out the nature of the disability first, and some of the answers are, of course, obvious. Miss Groves, suffering from myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and depression stemming from CFS, points out that being limited in movement means she cannot get out to gatherings, which leads to her feeling out of the loop. In the event she does manage to get out, she loses energy quickly, so being able to sit down quickly becomes an issue.
Just being able to have plenty of spaces to sit down immediately available is a wishlist across the board, alongside other “regular” problems:
wheelchair-accessibility
parking availability close to entrances
gentle slopes (stairs can be a trial), and
walking distances between locations.
Claire Bradley told me, “what prevented me from attending the Asylum gathering was that the accomodation was too far away.” In January, Claire suffered from bronchitis, which led to post-viral fatigue and then escalated into ME/CFS. “[If the accommodation had been closer], I could go to the gathering for an hour or so, sleep/recover for a bit, then go out again, but i can't manage a whole day without lots of breaks in between.”
But these are problems which anybody with disabilities would have. Steampunk-wise, there are some problems which can be rather surprising. Dr. Oliver Cross suffers from a slew of conditions: epilepsy, fibromyalgia, asthma, synesthetic with Asperger's syndrome, deteriorating audial and optic nerves, and two rebuilt ankles. As an epileptic, he points out that strobe lights in steampunk inventions and props can trigger a seizure. (I'm fond of strobe lights myself, so this was particularly jarring. I never thought of strobe lights as anything more than entertaining at best, annoying at worse; to be reminded that it is a health hazard for someone else is discomfiting.)
For others, though, steampunk activity is not so much a hindrances, but a help, or a complement. “Neuro-atypical” types (such as those with Asperger's) may find that steampunk accommodates their energies. (I use quotation marks because I don't want to pretend there's a set standard for “neurotypical.”) The creativity in steampunk can be a welcome distraction, a boost for those suffering from depression. To be able to get out of the house, expend energy on projects and having a goal that can be set, worked on, and accomplished, be it a costume, accessory or modification, can be uplifting. (Also, it is, as always, a surprise for people who suffer from depression come out to admit it and find others who have the same trouble. We may all suffer varying levels and forms of depression, but if you're out there, know this: you are not alone. The stigma surrounding mental illness is enormous, and I find most of us suffering from depression are leery of calling it a disability.)
Like racial diversity, representations of people with disabilities are far and few in between. There is only one major character with disabilities in the steampunk canon: Dr. Miguelito Quixote Loveless, from Wild Wild West (Dr. Arliss Loveless in the movie remake). “[T]he first Dr. Loveless is doubly frustrating,” Oliver Cross told me, “as he was originally introduced as a sympathetic, if somewhat delusional, character, only to be transformed into a lunatic megalomaniac by the end of the series.“ MarkF reminded me that disabilities simply did not factor into 1800s science fiction literature, since technological workarounds weren't available. As such, there's very little to draw on for inspiration from typical steampunk canon, besides Dr. Loveless' steam-powered chair. Seeing as most disabilities are not visible, he continues to point out to me, there's really very little motivation on the part of most steampunks to consider disability issues.
Sounds rather depressing, doesn't it? I asked MarkF if he thinks there should be more representation of disability issues in steampunk, and he surprised me by saying, “actually, disabilities are addressed extensively throughout Brass Goggles.”
Huh?
“They're just not called as such,” he explained. And then he continued to explain, and I shall just copy-paste the entire thing here because I don't know if I could even word it better: “Because steampunk is a mix of Victorian era sci-fi, much of the literature, clothing, and props require its members to build/write these things from scratch, since there are essentially none of these items available commercially. BUT — does the greater steampunk community think of these creations in terms of overcoming real disabilities? No, or rarely so. Why? Because steampunkers have the mindset of Victorian sci-fi — using post-industrial technology (which never actually existed) to enhance the ‘normal’ human condition. They create mechanical devices to enhance strength, vision, hearing, etc, of normal people, but of course they don't think in terms of the disabled except that normal folks are themselves disabled compared to steampunkers enhanced by Victorian gadgetry. But in fact much of the steampunk paraphernalia are simply neo-Victorian disability aids. Even the one true steampunk symbol, goggles, are vision enhancers” (emphasis mine).

Steampunk'd Bluetooth device by Nicrosin.
It's a prop, but it looks like it could be a hearing aid. Yoinked from Slippery Brick
So, there are alternate narratives for people with disabilities after all. The wishful thinking of your average, able-bodied (or temporarily able-bodied, since we'll all grow old eventually and gain all the joy of ill health that Father Time bestows) (or “disability-impaired”) person to build devices that will make them stronger is the same wishful thinking of a disabled person who wants to be, well, “normal.” Yet, even as most of our stories hash out the issues of the disadvantaged, especially of the poor, why don't we consider the disadvantages of people with disabilities? If anything, our stories would only be all the more richer for the inclusion of such characters, just as our stories would be richer with racial diversity. We don't because for most people, disabilities just aren't something we think about, and we usually expect those with disabilities to work hard just to keep up with us normies.
I could go on about general attitudes towards disability issues, the assumption of “normalcy” that affects how we treat those with disabilities, and other things which affect a disabled person's right to live with the same dignity as everybody else, but that would make for a long, tedious, un-steampunky post, so if you want to educate yourself, there are plenty of resources online.
This isn't a post designed to make you feel guilty about the privilege you have in being able to move unhindered, or to have infinite spoons at your disposal. A few years ago, I was close friends with a dude who had (and still has) muscular dystrophy disorder, which meant that he was wheelchair-bound. It didn't stop him from making the best of life in his motorized wheelchair, and he was much more interesting than I ever will be, but occasionally, I would say, “this place is so awesome! We should go!” and he would point out, “I can't go there. It's not wheelchair-accessible.” I would feel rotten, both for having forgotten this very crucial point, and for not being able to do anything to make places more wheelchair-accessible for him. But we both moved on, and found other things to do together that were accessible to us both.
Disability issues are real, even if we use steampunk as a form of escapism — it's a human rights issue and it stands to reason that at a steampunk convention or gathering, we would want everyone to have as much fun as possible. Steampunks with disabilities are part of that everyone, and while it may seem, at first glance, to be a huge use of resources accommodating their immediate needs, remember that what's good for one subsection of the community can be extended to all other subsections of the community. Making a place accessible, even if no one we know who is coming has disabilities, is only smart thinking, since in case shit happens, at least we were prepared, and no one has to stay stuck at home. Toning down on our strobe-light usage can't possibly take that much effort (seriously, surely aesthetics don't override another person's health?) and making space to someone who has mobility issues is just a sign of consideration.
Anyways, I think that's enough thinky for the day, so, I'll just end with a general conclusion: we may not be able to cure diseases, nor make actual steam-powered prosthetic limbs, nor wish away the disabilities faced by our fellows, but we can always do our little bit to make sure that everyone is afforded the right to mobility, dignity and consideration. Disabilities are disadvantages only in the face of an able-ist world, after all.
And no, I personally don't need a steam-powered prosthetic arm. You should totally invent one, though, just in case someone needs it.
Jaymee Goh is a freelancer living in Halifax, Nova Scotia. She likes writing to promote diversity and draw attention to intersectionality.
Wednesday October 28, 2009 02:45pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 02:57pm EDT · amended on Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:05pm EDT
And for Piechur, if you're bored here, why not read something else instead?
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:14pm EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:19pm EDT
And the internet consists of only Tor.com?
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:21pm EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:21pm EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:26pm EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:36pm EDT
Glad some of us gave you some insight.
As to 'Piechur' and being 'fed up with this blogger's deep socio-political, racial, psychological, gender & health aspects of steampunk. She'll bore us to death'.....
Why not try a 'Buffy' site instead.
Rockula.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:38pm EDT
Troll somewhere else, please. Just because you didn't enjoy the post doesn't give you the right to harass folks who did. If you're bored, there's a great big internet out there.
Wednesday October 28, 2009 03:39pm EDT
I'll stay here for a while.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 04:17pm EDT
I use a power wheelchair and a prosthetic arm (look me up if you ever need a prototype-tester, eh?) I am frustrated by the rarity of strong, non-villainous characters with disabilities in speculative fiction.
This is not to say there are none - Jenny Casey from Elizabeth Bear's "Hammered" comes to mind - but I would love to see more of them.
Life with a disability is challenging, but it is also fraught with the same conflicts and struggles all humans face - plenty of action for a protagonist to deal with. And since Steampunk gleefully provides devices and technology that can be used to enhance sensory or physical function, it seems a perfect venue to highlight literally "differently abled" characters who attack some dire situation with bravery, intelligence, and the very determination they've drawn on to thrive.
Wednesday October 28, 2009 05:24pm EDT
"Troll somewhere else, please. Just because you didn't enjoy the post doesn't give you the right to harass folks who did."
Just because you enjoyed the post doesn't give you the right to harass folks who didn't. So don't call me a troll, troll.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 05:37pm EDT
The ticking!! Help me please, I can't make it stop!!
Wednesday October 28, 2009 05:42pm EDT
I have arthritis and two of my kids have autism; I have a disabled sister and a wheelchair-dependent brother-in-law. My life seems filled with disability, but you're right--my reading certainly isn't!
Hopefully more novelists (and event-planners) will take up the challenge. I'd love to see what happens.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 05:45pm EDT
So, there, Piechur; when you say "...bore us to death..." you're clearly speaking about you and the little voices in your head, because I see more "us" enjoying Jaymee's contributions.
Wednesday October 28, 2009 05:57pm EDT
Wednesday October 28, 2009 06:11pm EDT
Thanks again for your kindness, and your insight, Jaymee!
~Thistlewaite
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 06:24pm EDT
On a rough count, there have been circa 200 posts this month on tor.com, only 13 of which (give or take) have been by Jaymee. If the first 12 had led you to suppose that the 13th would not be to your taste, why waste your valuable time reading it? And then even more of your time whining about it, and showing everybody else how self-centred you are?
Wednesday October 28, 2009 06:34pm EDT
When I get older and hard of hearing, I want that hearing aid! Even if it is really a Bluetooth. It's much nicer than the ear trumpets that actual Victorians used. One of Steampunk's appeals is often technology that is BIG and jazzed up, but sometimes smaller is better.
Wednesday October 28, 2009 07:04pm EDT
Having recently attended a convention with a disability, I have to say that sufficient seating in public areas would do a great deal to help make lives easier. Sitting on the floor was often the only available seating, and that sucked.
And it's probably not a fun or interesting topic for many people, but for those who have (or had, in my case - back to 86% of normal function, woo-hoo!) a disability, it's one of those things that's simply impossible to ignore. I find the connection to steampunk a way to stuff it on topic, but it really cuts across all science fiction & fantasy genres.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 09:21pm EDT · amended on Thursday December 17, 2009 08:57am EST
Hm, now I'm wondering about steampunk treatments for mental health problems. The problem with steampunking up the historical ones, though, is that they're already absurdly and grotesquely strange to us, from brass-and-leather vibrators to trepanning. At least experimenting on your own brain is pretty damn punk.
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday October 28, 2009 10:44pm EDT
Thursday October 29, 2009 12:02am EDT
Thursday October 29, 2009 12:02am EDT
Thursday October 29, 2009 04:23am EDT
On a rough count, there have been circa 200 posts this month on tor.com, only 13 of which (give or take) have been by Jaymee.
We're talking about Steampunk Month on Tor.com, remember? There have been only about 70 posts in this category, 13 of which by Jaymee (!). Enough.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 08:02am EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 08:37am EDT
To summarize, some people have things others don't; they're privileged in that way. The average human being has fewer limbs & eyes than Michelangelo's David, so a "normal able-bodied human" is better off than average.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 08:40am EDT
You're right; it's being the moderator that gives me that right. You've been warned twice now: move on from this thread. Future posts of yours here will be deleted.
@ 24 @ 25 Anon E. Moose
Real nice, right to the ad hominem attacks, complete with sexist language. Same goes for you: move on.
Take some pointers from @26 AsheSaoirse for how to disagree with a post without insulting the blogger or your fellow commenters.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 10:05am EDT
Odessa: Thank you, but I can't claim credit for thinking it up. Without talking to others, I wouldn't have considered it that way myself.
CousinJessica: It really does. You may see more posts about disabilities in other subgenres of fantasy and scifi in the future (one hopes) and I thought about it in relation to steampunk because it occurred to me that steampunk has become very much an out-and-about sort of subculture, rather than one where it's focused solely on literature.
Piechur: Duuuuuude! Did you just try to diss the editor of this site? OMGWTFBBQ!
Eithin: Girl Genius features a mad social scientist. He.... doesn't seem to do much to really address mental health issues tho.
Anon E. Moose: I'm sure GD really appreciates having a troll in his fanbase. /sarcasm
AsheSoirse: One of the key features of having privilege is that you don't notice it. However, if you were to compare yourself to someone who has disabilities, you would find yourself somewhat better off. Have you read the Spoon Theory? That illustrates really well the kind of ease you would have. It's not to say your life is going to feel easier ("life is pain, princess... anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to sell you something") but your challenges will be, however marginally from your point of view, somewhat lighter than someone with disabilities.
Thursday October 29, 2009 10:46am EDT
1)She says "we" a lot in her articles and I think that's a problem; no one person can speak for all steampunks, and she should know that based on her own statements. It's offputting. I'd suggest either narrowing the scope of her articles to her own perspective, or stick exclusively to objective facts.
2)She has a way of using unnecessarily pedantic language that gets in the way of some otherwise very good points. It's important for someone to bring these issues up, but it's hypocritical to talk about equality while talking down to one's audience as if they were illiterate boors.
3)She does give some interesting food for thought, but I have the feeling that there will always be a problem for this young lady; I doubt steampunk culture will ever be inclusive to her standards. There will always be a lonely Asian kid in the corner someplace, or someone who can't find the wheelchair ramp at the convention center. I'm sure that she wants to positively influence the actions and thoughts of the steampunk community, which is okay, but this is not the forum to press for such widespread social changes, or even to begin pressing for them.
4)I would encourage her to continue writing and hone her skills, but also to research her audience a bit more and take care not to alienate them, lest she be a rabbi with a congregation of one.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 10:58am EDT
I appreciate the calm tone with which you approached this, but don't attack the blogger; discuss the post. If you disagree with her ideas, disagree with her ideas, but disagree with an argument and not a person. If you have issues with the post, say so, but don't make this about her--it's antagonistic and borders on ad hominem attacks.
Thursday October 29, 2009 11:32am EDT
...
Are you serious?
You know what, I get that there will always be injustice where we are. And I don't mean petty crap like a lonely Asian kid sitting alone in the corner -- I mean there will always be people who... I don't know, will never learn to read. Will die under under the age of 5 due to inadequate medical care. Will never do the things you take for granted because they have FMS, or osteoarthritis.
But that doesn't mean you throw your hands up in the air and give up. It means you work on your expectations and focus on what you can do, not what you can't do.
And who asked you if this was a place to press for social change? There are people who are happy to see Jhameia post. They want her to continue, because they like how her perspective is more than just "ooh look shiny gearz and funny clothez".
There are people here, I suspect, who would have dismissed the steampunk movement as vacuous and empty, and are now revising their thoughts, thanks to what Jha writes. Isn't that a good thing? That's what some of you want, right? More mainstream relevance?
If you don't like seeing her stuff, there's always the "Back" button. Or get GD or someone else to post more.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 12:05pm EDT
Thursday October 29, 2009 12:16pm EDT
-Th Ms
Thursday October 29, 2009 12:55pm EDT
Throwing one's hands in the air is exactly what not to do; my point was simply that this is an issue that is in no wise limited to the very small and relatively insignificant world of steampunk, but in my view she makes it seem as if it is. It's a global problem. Granted, change can be sparked even in small corners, but why should steampunks be charged with a greater responsibility to be inclusive/mindful of others' challenges than the general population?
@Torie:
Though my criticism was blunt, I did not intend it as an attack. An author needs to be able to accept and process criticism and feedback from readers, and whispering sweet nothings is not really my style. I'd like to see her writing improve so her articles can be stronger and more effective at getting her points across. I'm not sure how you can address someone's writing style without referring to the person themselves.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 01:07pm EDT
I'd expect any population or community to meet these standards, not just the steampunk community.
Thursday October 29, 2009 01:18pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 01:24pm EDT
I'm confused. Are you agreeing with me that Jaymee is justifiably challenging the steampunk community to meet those standards? Or suggesting that, because other communities don't always meet them, that steampunk should be exempt from the challenge?
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 01:36pm EDT
Amen. I am someone who needs to follow the "Spoon" method through life, but I really dislike using the word "privileged" to describe those who don't. Hard to describe why... guess for me it has the connotation of being angry at the healthy folk for being healthy.
"Lucky" - that's the word I prefer to use. Unlike the race discussion, everyone is just a patch of bad luck away from being on the other side of the disabled discussion...
Thursday October 29, 2009 01:38pm EDT
The former. My original point, however, was that steampunks are not so special as to need more nudging/guilt-tripping about this than anyone else! Disability awareness is not a specifically steampunk issue; it's a human issue. Yet it seemed to me by the way this article is written that that is her perspective.
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 01:48pm EDT
Hatgirl: "Lucky" has the connotation that it's just a matter of chance. The word "privilege", however, indicates that challenges that people with disabilities face are tied into social systems. It's not something to get angry about - it happens to be a fact of life. Although you bring up an interesting point! I think the term "lucky" would make me mad! Different people, different strokes, different words =)
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 01:48pm EDT
Thanks for explaining.
We're in agreement that it's a human issue. It doesn't seem to me that Jaymee's perspective is different, only that she feels the issue is worth exploring in the context of steampunk, but I understand that you don't read it the same way.
Thursday October 29, 2009 02:55pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 03:02pm EDT · amended on Thursday October 29, 2009 03:03pm EDT
Oh, you've got that right! That's why the use of the term "privileged", which personally gets my hackles up, didn't make me disagree with the article as a whole.
I quite liked the article - I've read a bit of steampunk but haven't been that involved in the community around it, so I was suprised to learn that disabilites aren't that commonly referenced. I would have thought that given the prevelence of amputees, deafness etc. in Victorian times that steampunk would abound with cool cyborg-ish replacements. It seems not!
Thursday October 29, 2009 04:25pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday October 29, 2009 08:07pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Friday October 30, 2009 12:25pm EDT
VIEW ALL BY · Saturday October 31, 2009 11:17pm EDT
@Hatgirl: I've gotta agree with OP on the term "lucky" with regards to lacking disability. It almost seems like a slap in the face but I realize where you're comin from, given you agreed with my statement.
I guess when ya get right down to it, I kinda look at it like, "Alright, fuck it, let's move on, get things rollin the way they should and stop worryin about what makes us different so much." Race, disabilities, gender, sexuality, whatever. Work yo thang, nah mean? Admittedly, I have a habit of breaking things down to the point of over-simplification.
PS- Given this discourse, I'm rather glad I stumbled upon (literally, not using the feature) this site, especially during steampunk month.
Wednesday November 04, 2009 07:30pm EST
I'm also a person of color and some of hostility I've seen from some folks also isn't helpful. Luckily, the community where I am is pretty nice.