Aug 19 2009 10:41am

Creating The Matrix, Part I

All right, this is at least partly Pablo’s fault. He sent me an e-mail, a while back, saying that he thought people might be interested in how I do my research and where I get my background for the novels. He was looking specifically at the military and especially naval aspects of them, I think, but I got to thinking about his question in my copious free time.

(Oh, about that “free time.” If you've noticed that it’s been a while between posts for me, that’s because I’ve been looking at terminal deadline pressure. For reasons with which I won’t bore you (but which include having a collaborator who suddenly requires emergency bypass surgery) we were running just a little late on a book with a November release date. If you consult your calendars, you will observe that it is currently August, and we have only just turned in the completed manuscript. I leave it to you to visualize just how calm and laid back my life has been while we worked on this particular little problem. :-) It's had a sort of concertina effect on my life in general for the last, oh, month or so.)

But I digress.

Getting back to Pablo’s question, I got to thinking about building universes and societies in general, but since I write almost entirely military science fiction, Pablo obviously had a very valid point about the centrality of military history and the military “mindset” to my novels. I’d love to tell you exactly how I went about doing all the basic research for the Safehold novels. The problem is that I don’t really know. Or, rather, I can’t separate it out at this point.

I’ve done some specific, directed research on particular points as I got into the books, but by and large that research has been directed at clarifying something which I already “knew” in a general sense. That's because military history, and especially naval history, have been special interests of mine literally since grammar school. I have a rather extensive library centered around those interests, and pretty much all of the items in it are on the shelves because I’ve actually read them. For example, I don’t know how many people have actually sat down and read Norman Friedman’s design histories of the United States Navy from cover to cover. I have. I happen to find them fascinating, and I really read all of that technical stuff in there. As a more specific example, pulling one of them off the shelf pretty much at random, there’s US Amphibious Ships and Craft: An Illustrated Design History, which runs to 659 pages (with bibliography) and includes, among other things, an appendix (99 pages long) listing every amphibious warfare ship the U.S. Navy ever built, complete with launch date, commissioning date, decommissioning date, and notes on what finally happened to them. Now, I’ll admit, I haven’t read all the appendices word-for-word, but I find this kind of stuff fascinating. Especially when you get into the debates on design philosophy.

Why did Teddy Roosevelt create the Navy’s General Board, and why did the General Board issue a specific set of characteristics for a proposed new design of warship? How did the General Board’s position on what constituted a destroyer’s mission (and what characteristics were necessary for that mission) evolve out of input from the War College; the Bureau of Ordnance; the Bureau of Construction and Repair; the Bureau of Engineering; Commander, Destroyers Atlantic; and Commander, Destroyers Pacific? Where did the views of the battleship admirals and the carrier admirals come into play? And once those characteristics were issued, how did the designers go about trying to meet them—or, as seemed to happen even more often, explain why, “No, Admiral, you can’t do that in a ship of that small a displacement”? And how did the politics behind the design process work out? Who fought out the military operational concepts behind the national security goals the ships were supposed to satisfy? Where were the lines of battle drawn? How did budgetary considerations play into the decision process? Where did political and military leadership find itself in conflict, and where in agreement? And just how closely did the Navy finally manage to come to its carefully worked out building plans? Where did the cold wind of fiscal reality cut a class of ships short? And where did the brutal requirements of an ongoing war require production decisions that impacted adversely on the improvement of subsequent classes of ships? What ships were canceled, like the last two Iowa-class battleships, when they were already largely completed, and what happened to those unfinished hulls? When did construction costs shift to make platform costs secondary to system costs? Where and how did inflation impact procurement policies? Which congressmen and senators pushed to reactivate the Iowa-class ships in the 1970s and 1980s, and why?

I love that stuff. My beloved wife Sharon would tell you that it indicates something unhealthy about my basic personality, but I can’t help it. I’m really deeply interested in the process behind the hardware, at least as much as I am interested in the hardware itself.

I’ve used Friedman and his books about the modern United States Navy (he begins his consideration of battleships, destroyers, and cruisers with the steel-hulled Navy of the very first years of the 20th century) as an example because his books provide such a nice, concentrated, compact information source. But I’ve got a whole heap of other books on the development of armored vehicles and the concepts of armored warfare, on Republican Roman infantry tactics, on the Byzantine Empire’s cavalry tactics, the Greek phalanx, the Spanish tercios, Gustavus Adolphus and his mobile artillery, the development of the sailing merchant marine, the evolution of shipboard artillery in the age of sail, cavalry equestrian training techniques, encyclopedias of military and civilian aircraft development, Jane’s Fighting Ships, Jane’s Infantry Weapons, Jane’s Armor and Artillery. I’m an absolute geek for that kind of information, and all of it flows together when I sit down to write.

But what’s equally important—in fact, probably even more important—are military biographies, histories of campaigns, and official dispatches. First-hand accounts and memoirs by people who were actually there, and analytical history that looks at the interplay of political and military decision-making set against evolving technology bases and conflicting national policies and objectives. All of that flows together, as well, and what emerges from the other end in some ways is almost . . . I started to say “instinctive,” but that's not really the right word. Neither is “automatic,” but both of them sort of come close. This is the kind of stuff I’ve churned around in my brain for so long that when I start structuring a particular military organization, or looking at a particular challenge or threat the characters in one of my books are going to have to confront, the bits and pieces I need sort of pop to the surface.

Of course, there’s a difference between simply having lots of information bobbing around and actually using it to create a consistent and coherent literary universe, and I guess that’s what I’ll talk about in my next post.

David Weber is the author of the very popular Honor Harrington series. His new novel in his Safehold series, By Heresies Distressed, is available from Tor Books.

Kurt Lorey
1. Shimrod
Hooray! A bigger military geek than me. My wife will be amazed.

Those Friedman books sound worth a look, as they might help me to keep up with some other naval geeks I know.
Ralph Feldhake
2. feldhake
I have a rather extensive library centered around those interests, and pretty much all of the items in it are on the shelves because I’ve actually read them.

Oh, we believe you! When I pick up one of your books, I know I'm really going to enjoy them, but I also know that the two things I'm going to have to just push through are:

1) Various political rants by the characters, and

2) Lengthy lectures on the operation of Warshawski sails, Impeller wedges, naval ship design, etc.

But the payoff--for me, at least--is well worth it: intense, gripping action scenes. And I do recognize that a lot of those battles wouldn't make nearly as much sense if the author hadn't first educated me enough to understand why Cayleb's galleons or Honor's Mark Whatevers are about to kick some serious tail.
Pablo Defendini
3. pablodefendini
Lengthy lectures on the operation of Warshawski sails, Impeller wedges, naval ship design, etc.
And I do recognize that a lot of those battles wouldn't make nearly as much sense if the author hadn't first educated me enough to understand why Cayleb's galleons or Honor's Mark Whatevers are about to kick some serious tail.

These, in addition to the intricate details of political maneuverings, are partly the reasons why I enjoy Mr Weber's books (and why I pulled a bit of rank in asking him to write about this stuff. Thanks, Mr Weber!)

As a matter of fact, my first Weber novel was Off Armageddon Reef, and I remember being so taken in by his detailed descriptions of the naval technology in use, and the improvements Merlin introduced, that I immediately marked him as a "must read everything else he's done" author (I'm in the process). Additionally, as a seagoing vessel captain myself, his descriptions of naval martial maneuvers in general are fascinating.
4. greyjoy
Wow. This stuff sounds great. What's a good book to start with? I haven't read any Weber.
Pablo Defendini
5. pablodefendini

I'd say probably either Off Armageddon Reef, which is the first volume of his new Safehold series, or On Basilisk Station, which is the first volume of his long-running Honor Harrington series. Both are chock-full of this kind of stuff; where the Safehold series concerns actual nautical warfare, the Honorverse applies the same concepts to spacegoing navies in an epic space opera mileu.

If you're looking for something with less on an investment in terms of length of series, I'd say go with Safehold--there are only three books so far, compared to Honor's thirteen or so (might be more, I'm not sure, as I'm still on book 11). But then again, I'm really enjoying the Honorverse books, so I'm loathe to steer you away from those ;)
Tzut Tzut
6. WillieMcBride
The collaborator who required bypass surgery was Eric Flint (I hope he is well now, I don't have time to check the Baen's Bar fora anymore, so I'm not up-to-date); that means that the book who David Weber and Eric just turned in is Torch of Freedom, the latest book in the Honor Harrington universe (by the way the ARC it's available through Baen's Webscription).

At the moment the Honorverse includes 11 published 'main sequence' books, 2 spin-offs in the Shadow of Saganami series, 2 spin-offs in the Crown of Slaves series (including Torch of Freedom) and 4 anthologies with stories by David Weber and some other authors. The 12th book of the main sequence, Mission of Honor IIRC, should be published next year, and IIRC again there were plans for another anthology.

So, greyjoy, if you want to try Weber's books starting with the Safehold series should be less threatening. Or you could do what I did a few years ago and start with the free ebooks available through the Baen Free Library or The Fifth Imperium. That website made me a fan and a Webscription customer as well. :)
7. Fighterpilot
I'm a retired Air Force Colonel who who spent four years in the Pentagon and three in the State Department. The things I enjoy most about Weber's work are the professional and and personal relationships among the various miltary ranks, specialties, and good and bad personalities. That, along with the interplay between the military and political factions, are absolutely spot on.
Earl Kingsland
8. earlkingsland
New to the computer, but I wanted to find a way to tell you how much I enjoyed "Off Armageddon Reef" aswell as the other 3 in the series and very much looking forward to more in that series!

-Earl Kingsland

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment