Mon
Jul 6 2009 1:27pm
The Book of David: Kings, “Chapter One”

Dear Kings,

This hurts me more than it hurts you (dead shows have no feelings!), but after watching “Chapter One,” I have to say, it’s so awful that I think it’s best taken as an example of what not to do in an episode of television. Or, you know, ever.

Below, five excellent examples of things to avoid in episodic television writing, all five of which you managed to fit into under forty minutes. Um, well done?

1. Don’t make your hero too stupid to live. When a hero has to be saved by his dad’s old war buddy, a vanful of extras, and a God-sent dream in a single episode, he is officially not in the running for the hero any more. We enjoy a hero struggling with elements out of his control, but only when he has the intellect and fortitude to try to fight his way through. So far, David has manfully-ed around in a daze, kept from the gaping, hungry maw of death only by the literal grace of God. The hero of this series is Silas; your antihero is Jack. David is a living MacGuffin who has yet to make a decision of his own. When your “hero” is passed out on the train tracks, make sure your audience isn’t rooting for the train to do him in, is all I’m saying.

2. Don’t kill a good antagonist. For four episodes, Katrina Ghent has been moving to the fore as a powerful character, a major antagonist for Queen Rose, and a possible ally in Jack’s plans to steal the monarchy. Great setup for an antagonist who can go in any direction to the benefit of some and the ruin of others, show! Nice job writing her out. To kill her (offstage, no less) is a serious misstep, and a badly characterized one. (Are you telling me that the woman who plowed her way into the Cabinet, repeatedly outmaneuvered Queen Rose, and engaged herself to the Prince wouldn’t have any safeguards against assassination attempts?) Of course, she might have died just to narrow the field for the final showdown, which reminds me:

3. Don’t lose your subplots. Jack confronted his uncle about a promise made five episodes ago; a promise we haven’t heard one word about since it was made. Not saying there has to be a long scene in every episode where Jack cries about having made the wrong decision (he has plenty of those), but would it kill you to have a throwaway reference to their bargain every couple of episodes so people don’t have to sit through a car scene that’s 90% exposition and 10% slapping? (This would also cut down on Jack’s changes of heart, which currently occur just before every commercial break.)

4. Don’t waste characters. The Reverend shows up in this episode! …and he has two lines. One of them is about how wind power won’t please God. Another day, another meager paycheck for the criminally underutilized Eamonn Walker. The show has yet to use the Reverend for anything more than Silas’s sometimes-confessor, which, given the way he was introduced in the pilot, is a total waste of a foil. Hint: if the character has no scenes except with your lead, consider dropping them. (I’m looking at you, King in a Basement.)

5. Don’t whip out a voiceover in episode 10. No one remembers Petey the Royal Aide from six episodes ago, okay? To have him narrate the course of the episode’s events (in past tense, no less) not only ruins your pacing and tension, it makes us think of The Wonder Years every five minutes, which is really not what you want, ever. And the big reveal that he’s written the Book of David and not the Book of Silas is not nearly as interesting as Little Petey seems to think.

Next week we deal with David being arrested for treason (I plan to throw a party) and the beginning of the end for this series that looked so good from afar, and up close was just 90% promise, 10% slapping.

And David said in his heart, I shall now perish one day by the hand of Saul: there is nothing better for me than that I should speedily escape into the land of the Philistines; and Saul shall despair of me, to seek me any more in any coast of Israel: so shall I escape out of his hand.

- 1 Samuel 27:1

7 comments
C.D. Thomas
1. cdthomas
I haven't even see it yet (CASINO ROYALE, nekkid Daniel Craig, so-sue-me), but I can at least say this:

In re Mrs. Ghent:

OH, NO THEY *DIN'T*... they did *not* kill their Alexis Morell Carrington Colby Dexter Rowan... the only female character who could represent a threat to the most powerful and devious (and considering her evil bro, unchecked and kingdom-level-destructive) Rose?

Oh, yeah, it's more realistic that this brutal regime would simply assassinate, but you're telling me that once Ghent got her Cabinet position she didn't have a tasty blackmail file known around court that would blow wide open should she become unreasonably unhealthy?

Mrs. Ghent was the only schemer that saw more than two paces ahead, and she didn't protect herself, even though she had access to everyone's dirty laundry as Minister of Information?

OH HELL, NO.

I could even forgive them making David as dumb as paint, if they did a big Cordy-ANGEL-season-four reveal that he was masterminding his rise, all along, but this? I will not forgive. Never.

Yep -- it's dead, Jim.
Genevieve Valentine
2. GLValentine
@ cdthomas - PRECISELY. There is absolutely no way Katrina Ghent would not have had a contingency plan or fifty in place to secure her long and healthy life. It's against the character they've been creating this whole time (a character we know can bribe people even in the palace employ, since we saw it LAST WEEK).

This show totally blew it.
C.D. Thomas
3. cdthomas
The more I think about it the angrier I get.

Katrina Ghent was a broad who if Death made the O-Face at her, she'd throw her next husband, two kids to be named later and her family dog into the pot, just to get to the next coronation ceremony.... then she'd go all thermonuclear, and make Death her bitch.

This is a soap opera that dreamt it was BSG, and woke up in a soiled party dress, its granpa's Bible on the floor with pages ripped out and a Roofie hangover. It coulda been more, but it went to the cheap and easy tropes, because they were pretty.
Mitchell Downs
4. Beamish
As I watched this episode I became more and more amazed at just how much it highlighted the awful plotting of this show.

Our Rosencrantz and Guildenstern palace guards disappeared several episode ago and return with the great purpose of telling us just how shocking it is that the Ark of the Convenant...I mean "The Charter"...has been stolen. By enemies no less. This story is going to be awful...

Then there is a moment of reprieve from the silliness of the "A" story while Katrina Ghent lays repeated verbal smacks on the Queen and we all rejoiced because we knew there would a wonderfully delicious resolution to this titanic cat fight...wait...she died in a car wreck off screen? A wreck the Queen planned and executed so flawlessly that even the King is forced to show his grudging admiration? WTF?

Writing 101: SHOW don't TELL. But then again they made repeated use of a narrator for the first time so why should I even be surprised they got that one wrong?

No Creepy Mac - BIG mistake. The narrator could have told us all how he is soooo creepy while he just sits there and reads a paper from three years ago.

But they did at least show us the Ark in a box...under "The Charter" just in case you were missing the point.

Who else wishes Silas had said to David "I send you with only some cash, a phone to get weather updates (it can be chilly and rainy down south...until you find the desert parts at least) and a gun...in case you mercifully want to shoot yourself in the head and save us all from your terrible character."

Ima go have a good cry now.
Brian Kaul
5. bkaul
This episode makes me wonder if they were trying too hard to have an extended character arc with David ... at the end of the mission, he comes back maybe about as awake as he should've been to start the series. It strikes me as a caricature of the manner in which Aragorn's character was screwed up in the LOTR films. Make him dumber, weaker, less noble, and less heroic than he should be, and overly reluctant to be who he is, then have him go through some sort of self-realization, etc. It's a bunch of nonsense. It's the heroic character I want to watch, not some wimp!
C.D. Thomas
6. cdthomas
Just watched the minus-Katrina reception scene... and Dear Lord it's worse than I imagined.

Like introducing a new girl from the chorus at the same time they erase Katrina? And Silas positing the sacrifice Jack made, to create a blood dynasty? Like I FRAKKING CARE ABOUT JACK. And what sacrifice did he make? His lover conveniently took a way out not seen since before THE BOYS IN THE BAND, and he's on track for ruining more men's lives, and making his women suffer through the lies he and the Queen will insist be propagated.

This show has taught me how *not* to care for a closeted, mama-bound phony war hero who'll probably give his wife the latest STD, because he just doesn't care about what matters. At this point if Gath waterboarded him, I'd hand them the hose.

There's also the implication that Rose's dog of a brother greased the skids for Katrina... and the overwhelming tone of the following scenes -- and, Oh, Lord, Daddy's lil' girl's praising Silas whilst in a scanty purple robe -- IS THIS SHOW REALLY THAT STUPID ABOUT THE SUBTEXTS AN AUDIENCE FOLLOWS?

And why can't Jack and Cross have sex? That would mean so much more than a phony slap. These rat bastids keep feeding Cross what he likes, and they get all surprised when he bites their hands. "If you only had half as much mind as charm," indeed.

And he's frakking the guard, Stu? Well at least he's not wearing white. Nah, Katrina was too good for these evil clowns.

And now, HIPPIES??? DRAFT-DODGING HIPPIES? THREE-WAY-LOVING PILL-POPPING DRAFT-DODGING HIPPIES? TRIPPING THREE-WAY-LOVING PILL-POPPING DRAFT-DODGING HIPPIES? IF I HEAR THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE AND WILL HAPPEN AGAIN I WILL BLOW A FRAKKING GASKET. OH, THAT'S "FOLLOW THE TIME" AND MAN IS SEBASTIAN STAN PUNY IN THAT SUIT AND OH SWEET BABY JESUS YOU WEREN'T KIDDING ABOUT THE TRAINTRACK --

I'm gonna go home and lie down. I can no longer listen to this show while doing other work. It's not the compelling thing but the crazy thing...

And they didn't perform a background check and a period check BEFORE choosing the fiancee? Temps require a background -- AGITA. AGITA.

The only truthful and deep portion of this episode came and went with David's mom. *That's* how you do it -- hard, fast, simple.

Miss Valentine, you went way too easy on this episode. Way. Too. Easy. My disappointment is as big as its failure to capitalize on its strengths, week after week. Is it a bad thing to have to agree with a network that burial was best?
dcole78
7. dcole78
Agree completley except for the fact that you don't want people to ever think about the Wonder Years (unless you meant in that it would show how much better that was than this drivel) The wonder years was a really good show....I wonder if they were just to afraid to make David look like a strong leader in this show afraid they would tick to many people off..or maybe there was another subtext here we are missing. Maybe the show is anit-jewish and anti-christianity to the point that it WANTED to make David look like a scrub...and they knew exactly what they were doing.

It truly is a pity to see such a great idea with some good big name actors go so terribly terribly wrong..

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment