Fri
Jul 31 2009 12:05pm
Review: You Might Sleep... by Nick Mamatas

Nick Mamatas returned to California in August of last year to become an editor at Viz Media, founding its Haikasoru imprint of Japanese novels in translation. When friends asked him why he was taking a day job after fifteen years of freelance writing, he told them that health insurance would help him pursue his true goal…becoming a cage fighter. Mamatas studies tai chi, but the better analogy for his writing, as showcased in his new short story collection, You Might Sleep..., is actually that cage fighting joke itself.

Mamatas’s stories employ an unpredictable array of viewpoints and perspectives, from the wry and bemused to the heartless and bleak. Maybe it is his belief in socialism or a communal love for human beings, maybe it is even because he ended up in speculative fiction even though much of his work is grounded in real world concerns—but the stories are often about people with crazy ideas, some of which turn out well and some of which turn out badly. Reading outside of the confines of the speculative genres allows You Might Sleep… to have a wonderful balance of day-to-day concerns (like having to get a day job because the economy is rough) and pulpier concerns (like a cult novelist shucking writing to fight for money).

Jay Lake (author of the recently-released Green) described the artistic dichotomy with this sentiment:

Nick Mamatas binds politics with an aesthetic of the fantastic, finding eldritch horror in everything from Lovecraft to Abu Ghraib. You Might Sleep... is the last roundup of the monsters from the id of the contemporary American psyche.  Read at your peril, read at your pleasure.

Reading the 22 stories in the collection is like hearing a double CD of greatest hits by a band that never had a consistent line-up. The stories are precise and move with a comfortable authority, but cover a vast range, as if other players dropped in to add notes. “Withdraw, Withdraw!” starts with sex, moves on to after-sex ritual sandwiches and then ends with Abu Ghraib. The ideas and images from the stories will carom through some readers’ skulls in their sleep—but the work, on the whole, remains unpredictable despite consistently finding that wiggle room between the known and the unknown. The title page says, “You might sleep…but you will never dream,” and it is a fair assessment of how Mamatas is able to blur lines.

Whether it is pirates coming back in present day and getting attacked by a flying piano (in “Build a Trebuchet” which subtly links to Mamatas’s most recently published novel, the bomb-in-a-garden-gnome story of Under My Roof) or Joan of Arc taking up blogging (“joanierules.bloggermax.com”), Mamatas writes weird and unsettling stories that still manage to feel familiar. At their best, his stories find a balance between depicting what is most unsettling in our present day world and depicting equally unsettling flames of fierier imagination.

There is no set Mamatas plot arc used in his stories, but plots are always hatching in them. “The Pitch” is a classic horror tale of the movie industry, a basic set up where an industry insider meets Marvin Pentecost, a writer who sells actual dark truths. Like Pentecost, part of Mamatas’s skill is that he does not pull punches. In “Real People Slash,” perhaps the collection's strongest contribution to traditional “old weird” fiction (with the possible exception of the short scary robot stunner “At the End of the Hall”), a Socialist writer named Nick realizes that the Mi-Go, the Fungi of Yuggoth from H. P. Lovecraft’s “The Whisperer in the Darkness,” have taken over the world. Like most of the stories in the collection, quotidian details and global menace combine to bring one or the other of those elements, the mundane or the apocalyptic, into starker relief.

As much as the stories are textured and varied, there are consistent ideas underpinning his perspectives. Momentum and curiosity, especially in terms of tearing down power structures, provide a thematic focus for the collection. Nick Mamatas does not pander or stop to make sure the reader follows along, which allows his work to leverage the maximum advantages from the consistent political and satirical core of his work. The fact that he is drawn to stark and dark themes also remains constant throughout.

Whether it is a bloodied, naked woman who is found in an apartment building or Joey Ramone saving the planet or even world leaders fighting like gladiators, his writing style displays his take on writing:

 Find a fan of horror, someone who really has a lot of horror novels and who can rattle off lists of his favorites and who fumes at several bad novels at length and whatever he is suspicious of or finds utterly unreadable, read that.

The work is technically precise and sometimes tries to be abrasive, a lot like a cult author who longs to become a cage fighter. Or, more accurately, a writer who brings together social criticism, yucks and dark wonder in a way that refuses to limit what can and cannot be done in short stories. You Might Sleep... takes elements from many traditions and makes a point of rapidly crossing the boundaries that sometimes exist at the margins of such taxonomies.


Geoffrey H. Goodwin is a former bookseller and academic who now writes full-time. His non-fiction appears in Weird Tales and Bookslut.com and his fiction has appeared in Lady Churchill's Rosebud Wristlet, Rabid Transit and the upcoming anthology Phantom, among other places.

1 comment
F. P.
1. F.P.
This book sounds different. But no comments from others here, yet a gazillion comments on Tolkien and other writers who've already received so much attention. This is the way of the world, unfortunately.

Does Tolkien need the attention? No! The guy's dead. I'm alive, other writers are alive. But some are largely ignored. (Though I am much more than Nick; I've been almost completely ignored. At least his works have been multipublished.)

I'm not addressing this toward you, Geoffrey, but toward reviews in general; this is something I've complained about in the past. Tell me more about a book's CONTENTS. Most reviewers focus on discussing plot--to me this is spoiling, but revealing contents isn't spoiling because contents don't have to be revealed inside the narrative structures. Contents could just be listed.

Whenever I pick up a movie at the video store, especially in the horror section, I look at the warning label where extent-of-violence is listed. I don't like viewing or reading too much violence, especially against women and other animals. Does You Might Sleep contain a lot of this?

Lovecraft's one of my favorite writers, but he's one of my favorites more for what he leaves unsaid than for what he says. And while all this unsaid stuff has been written, while so little has been described, I can still clearly see everything going on because Lovecraft's writing appeals to that dread-filled part of the human brain--and that dread-filled part inserts whatever the particular person finds so horrifying about the universe. For a supposed horror writer, his writing is incredibly quiet, but then I consider him a science-fiction/horror writer.

Whenever I hear complaints about not enough people reading sci-fi, readership is down, etc., I remember when I'd blog my speculative fiction, and people would say "I don't read sci-fi but I like this." I write warm speculative fiction, not cold speculative fiction; I think way too much speculative fiction is cold. The writers sound like they're trying to play scientist on the page and/or trying to convey an objective cold view of the universe. To me, with science fiction especially, the fiction part is more important than the science part.

I've done real science; I don't see what all the science fuss is about. And I think fiction should be FICTION. Novels-as-textbooks are irresponsible writing as only real science is real science.* Should people start practicing medicine based on Robin Cook's novels? If you want to learn real science, pick up a science textbook, take a college science course, become a real scientist. I can't stand "the science is sound" descriptions of science fiction. What science, I must ask? I don't see any. Attempting to use real scientific principles accurately should not be a science-fiction writing requirement. Even goddamn Einstein said "imagination is more important than knowledge" and, as far as I can tell, he wasn't even talking about FICTION. Fiction, imagination, fiction, imagination--get it, world?

At the same time, I (like Nick it sounds) also combine realism and fantasy--or at least my style is very realistic. In my opinion, speculative fiction needs more grounding in the real world. The real world is becoming so crazy and horrific that I think traditional speculative fiction seems silly in comparison. And it seems people no longer have time for silliness masquerading as seriousness. They want more ideas on how to survive in this crazy universe.

*And, in my opinion and experience, most people cannot easily understand real science textbooks, nor do they want to read these; they find science hard and boring. But they're expected to like and understand fictional books purporting to be real science? The more "real science" is included in fiction, the smaller the potential readership will probably be. I say, increase the fiction, decrease the science, and write, publish and review more of these books.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment