Mon
Apr 6 2009 6:45pm
Kings: “Insurrection”

After several episodes of wheel-spinning, the show decided to push eight plots forward in forty minutes, along the thematic divide of compassion vs. ruthlessness.

As usual, David’s plot was the least interesting. He spends most of it frowning manfully in Port Prosperity, where his brother is among those barricaded inside to protest the King’s decision to hand their sliver of the country to Gath. As the King fishes, Jack scrabbles for a little media power, Michelle decides to get herself taken hostage (she’s not too bright), and the Queen’s brother makes alliances like they’re going out of style.

Finally, because we don’t have enough characters to worry about, Caprica Six shows up and pushes for a council seat. Back home, Baltar’s all, “Do you just need some space? We can slow down, it’s cool!”

It feels as though the show is comfortable enough to widen the scope; this week we got our first look at Port Prosperity, a news network, and…a factory basement. (Two out of three ain’t bad?) We also got to see how the King’s policies affect the everyman, with unsurprising results, and to see how David handles them, with unsurprising results. Once again, David’s family and/or his crush object are directly tied to whatever he has to tackle. David Sheperd: blondest pawn!

However, as if to counter David’s blandness, we have the first glimpses of personality in Thomasina and General Wes Studi, who vocalize the compassion vs. ruthlessness debate. Thomasina accuses the King of ignoring the plight of his people, and says that while her job is to protect the royal family, she doesn’t know how to serve a cruel king. (Memo to Thomasina: Um, really? Have you watched any of the rest of the show?)

Wes Studi cuts the compassion crap and climbs into bed with Cross the financier-in-law; the Silas who shows mercy to traitors is “no longer the man I swore to follow.” It’s a shocking twist…that Wes Studi gets a scene where he’s not standing out of focus behind the King.

Cross is over the moon. Earlier, he reminded the Reverend of their old loyalties, and after Jack’s aborted bid for news-network ownership, has Jack on board to bring down the King. Getting General Wes Studi is the last letter on this guy’s Monarchy Coup Bingo card. Take the rest of the week off, big guy!

By episode’s end, it looks like compassion has won the day: David’s life is saved by the King; Michelle’s life is saved by Ethan Shepherd; Ethan’s life is saved by King Silas; and King Silas offers his conniving son a shadow Cabinet position, throwing the power-hungry Jack into a silent conniption as he tries to decide who has the better offer, his father or his uncle.

However, almost every instance of compassion backfires. Michelle’s sympathy visit to the protestors gets her taken hostage, David’s attempt to quell the riot earns his family’s enmity, and the King’s release of Ethan drives his General right into the arms of another man.

Ruthlessness is the only thing that brings rewards. Cross escapes arrest by leaving his companions to die, Jack gets offered a Cabinet position after challenging his father with his personal TV network, and ex-centerfold and total badass Katrina Ghent’s dogged persistence pays off in a TV network and a Cabinet post.

(It’s interesting to see the collection of savvy women this show is gathering: Queen Rose, who coolly suggests her husband go visit his mistress to shake off a bad mood; Thomasina, who speaks out against the King’s opinion even as she protects the monarchy; and Ghent, whose underplaying of her own appetite for power looks to be the first of many sneaky moves.)

The sucker in this episode is David, who loses his family, his trust in his King, and the girl he loves (again). You know, the Biblical David is a clever guy. He speaks wisely, he maneuvers out from under the King’s will, and he regularly employs deception in his own self-interest. This David seems continually stunned that the King is manipulating him. Does he have a concussion?

King Silas, meanwhile, straddles the compassion/ruthlessness line and manages to deceive everyone while battling himself; when he sends David into Port Prosperity to plead with his brother to surrender, there’s no doubt in my mind he considers eliminating David in the melee. He’s seen the crown God sent; he’s not stupid. Then again, David is valuable as the most relatable face of the monarchy, and King Silas clearly doesn’t mind pinning the poor guy to the wall in the name of the kingdom.

The King’s hold on David is untenable: his General thinks the King is coddling him, his brother-in-law thinks he’s peacemongering because of him, and his daughter thinks he’s endangering him. The question is: who will be the first to strike against the King? (Please let it be David, please oh please oh please.)

And Saul cast the javelin; for he said, I will smite David even to the wall with it.
— 1 Samuel 18:11

10 comments
JS Bangs
1. jaspax
Wake me up when David brings Silas 1,000 Gathian foreskins for a housewarming present.
CD Covington
2. ccovington
@jaspax *snrk*

Yes, writers, PLEASE give David something more interesting to do than stand around and look cute-and-gobsmacked or cute-and-constipated.
- -
3. heresiarch
"You know, the Biblical David is a clever guy. He speaks wisely, he maneuvers out from under the King’s will, and he regularly employs deception in his own self-interest. This David seems continually stunned that the King is manipulating him. Does he have a concussion?"

This is by far the weakest part of the show--the pure dumb of David. I don't mind that he cares deeply about doing the right thing, in fact I tend to like characters like that, but ye God, why is everyone in the show brain-damaged in direct correlation with how nice they are? Can't David figure out that people aren't going to do the right thing just cuz he looks at them all sad-puppy-eyes? Where's the badass deceiver and foreskin-chopper of Biblical reknown? This guy is like a Hallmark Jesus.
C.D. Thomas
4. cdthomas
They de-homo'd him, too. He's supposed to at least be good friends with Jonathan/Jack. Instead they wedge in a simpering, useless, naive princess who must have been similarly deprived of oxygen whilst young.
Heather Johnson
5. HeatherJ
On the whole I'm enjoying the show, but David DOES need a bit of help. He really isn't supposed to be that clueless, at least not in my mind.

Just a few random thoughts/questions ...

About Queen Rose and "serenity" - do you really think she knows about the mistress and was actually sending him there, or do you think she just knows that he goes "to the country" to relax and always comes back refreshed? Maybe I'm being naive, but I had the impression that her brother thought Silas has given up his mistress, and I really didn't think Rose was complicit in his affair. Thoughts?

cdthomas@4 - I'm guessing that the love for Jonathan in the Bible has been replace by the love for Michelle. Not that I LIKE that replacement, but I'm guessing that is the direction the show is taking. Agree? Disagree?
Brian Kaul
6. bkaul
The love between David and Jonathan in the Bible is that of fast friends, not sexual lovers. And Saul's daughter was his first wife, even if he added to the harem later ... a love story between David and Michelle is a reasonable inclusion in the show, I think. But their portrayal of David is far too weak and stupid, and Jack as the conniving, whiny brat is pretty far from the Biblical characterization of Jonathan, too.
Heather Johnson
7. HeatherJ
bkaul@6 - Yes, I agree. What I meant to say is that David's attachment to Michelle is replacing the Biblical storyline of David and Jonathan's friendship. In the show, David's big tie to the king's family will (I assume) be through his connection to the king's daughter, not the king's son. At least, that's how I see it playing out.
Pablo Defendini
8. pablodefendini
I've been cautiously enjoying this show as well. While I wasn't aware of the (arguably, I'm sure) homoerotic aspects of the David/Jonathan relationship in the Bible, I have been struck by how the show has glossed over Jack's homosexuality (or bisexuality) since he had that stern talking-to by his father. I would be very disappointed if they back down—I found Silas' speech to Jack on the stairs very compelling, and it seems to me like that would be an interesting thing to explore: just how much of yourself do you need to sublimate in order to effectively lead?

@Heather #5
I'm kinda on the fence as to whether Rose knows about "serenity" or not (and I can't help but think that Silas gets his downtime by hangin' out with Captain Reynolds and crew every time I hear the king is "in serenity"). Queen Rose strikes me as a very savvy woman, and certainly nobody's fool. But I haven't gotten enough of a sense of her to be able to tell if she's not also one of those incredibly smart people who choose to ignore certain uncomfortable truths in order to keep things running smoothly.

And yes, while Michelle certainly is the poster child for 'milquetoast' so far, I'm interested in finding out what this dark oath that she took with her father as a witness is all about.

The real revelation to me has been, at least over the last two episodes, Thomasina. I'm really interested in seeing where that character goes. Marlyne Afflack is fantastic, and I regret to say that I haven't caught her in any of her previous roles.
Heather Johnson
9. HeatherJ
pablo@8 -

Rose is "of those incredibly smart people who choose to ignore certain uncomfortable truths in order to keep things running smoothly."

That is exactly what I'm thinking. She's definitely not stupid - far from it - but she seems to think that he is totally committed to the royal family. At least, that's my take on it.


UPDATE: I just saw on SciFi that NBC is moving KINGS to Saturday night ... this does not bode well.
CD Covington
10. ccovington
Urgh. Saturday night is death time slot. Thanks, NBC. Maybe if you give your writers a little talking-to, they'll make the main characters more compelling and less generically bland. Please?

Not that I'm usually doing anything Saturday nights anyway. And if I miss it, there's NBC.com.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment