Mon
Mar 23 2009 4:28pm
Battle for the Cowl

Batman is dead.

Fortunately, comic book Heaven has a revolving door policy and we won’t have to suffer through third-rate bullshit like this for too much longer, and then we’ll get Batman back and be momentarily happy until we realize that we never bought this kind of hack work and really, cheapy weeklies like Battle For the Cowl were never relevant as far as Batman books go, and then we’ll go back to reading good comics and forget the whole thing ever happened until a few years later when DC decides it needs to pick up the slack in commemorative statuette sales, and fuck, it’s either Supes or Batman’s turn, but who remembers?  It’s not like DC has its eye to quality when it comes to shit like this.

So, Batman’s dead.  Nightwing’s upset about it.  Like, really upset.  Frankly, I’m more upset over having to dignify Nightwing as some kind of legitimate character, when really he was only brought in to butch up the idea of Robin.  Someone’s pretending to be Batman, and leaving notes saying things like “I AM BATMAN” written in crazy person scrawl, and we’re to believe that Batman didn’t write these because 1) he’s dead—trust us—and 2) Batman’s handwriting would be way sleeker, sexier… richer.

If you weren’t delighted by the prospect of DC yet again trotting out another enormously tired and overused conceit like (temporarily) killing a major character, then you’ll be super psyched that this also means every limping, uncoordinated, nearsighted, slobbering, slack-jawed reject of Gotham’s Junior Varsity team will be peeling out the cracks.  You remember Huntress, don’t you?  And… Squire?

Then some shit goes down and “the Black Mask” (he should really get a better mask; this one makes him look kind of busted) breaks all the baddies out of Arkham.  Or, rather, all the major baddies were conveniently on a bus because Arkham thought it reasonable to transport them together (or something) and apparently they learned nothing from Con Air, because you should never transport that many psychopaths at one time.  Things will go wrong.  Put the bunny down.

A few advertisements later (drink your milk, don’t do drugs, don’t be a snail) and all the baddies have to do what Black Mask says or… their faces will explode (swear to god).   Then Nightwing does some JV brooding in Batman’s lavish walk-in-closet, until he’s interrupted by Robin, but really we’re just distracted because despite (writer and “drawer”) Tony S. Daniels’ enthusiasm for the opulent curvature of heaving breasts, he’s still visibly uncomfortable with drawing the male buttocks.  Long story short, Nightwing should spend a little less time on his eleven ridiculous triceps and maybe do some lunges.  He’s top heavy.

More brooding.  Only, fight-brooding.  Also, Alfred looks like Vincent Price now.   More Black Mask talking, some flying, Batman’s here again (flashback?) (CONFUSED), s’up Catwoman, maybe some docks—holy fuck! Killer Croc just ate the shit out of some guy!

Before I can recover from Killer Croc eating someone, we’re back at Second String HQ, with Barb Gordon and Huntress and what is it?  Black Canary?  I don’t remember.  Then Poison Ivy does some seducing, Killer Croc almost eats someone again, important lessons are learned, Nightwing still sucks, promises are made to behave and carry on in a new era of personal responsibility, and then the guy who isn’t Batman shows up thinking this is Pulp Fiction because not only does he 1) have two pistols, but 2) is firing them sideways and 3) has his arms crossed for, you know, good measure.  Or stylistic reasons.  Or something.

Overall, this completely sucked.  We know it’s easy to bank on the Batman name and clog the shelves with forgettable garbage like this in between the Arkham Asylums and The Long Halloweens that come along and mow us over with their baby-melting awesomeness, but sometimes this lazy exploitation of a beloved franchise is too transparent for comfort… and we shouldn’t buy it.

16 comments
Matt London
1. Matt London
Tim Drake is awesome.
Jason Henninger
2. jasonhenninger
"...and we shouldn't buy it."

So, you mean you didn't like it?

(heh heh)

Incidentally, I think I'll add "suck my cowl" to my everyday speech.
Dave Thompson
3. DKT
I always thought Dick Grayson/Nightwing had great character potential.

And I think you do Pulp Fiction a discredit. What you decribed at the end sounds more like John Woo or Wanted :)

But yeah, this looks like a lot of suck.
Matt London
4. Neal S
Nice piece about a crap comic. But being that this is a science fiction and fantasy blog for an audience that I'd guess is at least 80% non comic readers, why bother to tell them about a book that would probably confirm their most worst ideas about superhero comics? Why not suggest a comic that is doing some genuinely great things in the realm of science fiction and fantasy?

Why not tell them about the bang up job Matt Fraction has been doing on Iron Man, the first arc of which in particular is a great example of genuine comic book science fiction. Unless of course you don't like Matt Fraction or something. Or why not Jeff Parker's wonderful Agents of Atlas, which is the best 50's pulp tribute I can think of. Or how about Alan Moore's Tom Strong?

Anyway, what I'm saying is, if we want sci-fi fans to read comics, why should we be telling them about how much Battle For The Cowl sucks?

I don't mean to be a hypercritical or anything. I do think it's great that you folks here talk about and clearly like comics, and do recommend good stuff from time to time. Which is more than I do.
Madeline Ferwerda
5. MadelineF
As a SF/F reader who avoids comics because they're about 99% suck, I trust a lot more a reviewer who's willing to call out the really, really sucky ones.
Matt London
6. Neal S
To Madeline F:

When you have to talk about everything, of course you need to say what is crap and what is not, but when you have maybe one comics post a week, why spend your time on crap? Especially for this audience. Why do you need to tell a bunch of people who probably haven't even heard of battle for the cowl how much it sucks and why they should avoid it, when instead you can tell them about how great Green Lantern is right now?

And the percentage of things that suck in comics is about the percentage of things that suck in everything else. But I can say I spend about 28 dollars a week buying comics that are on average pretty good. That's about seven single issues a week. In a month, that's around thirty titles that are at least good enough to keep reading at around 2.99 an issue. That's a whole heap of good stuff. And a fair amount of totally wonderful stuff. And that's just the stuff that I am aware of and on board with.
Tex Anne
7. TexAnne
NealS: tor.com has been doing sneak previews of major superhero comics for at least two months. I'm not a comics reader, so I don't know exactly--but there's no shortage of famous characters presented on this website. Not to mention the way tor.com is wholeheartedly promoting comics artists who don't work for the Big Two. It's all right there on the front page. And did you know you can start your own topics? They won't be on the front page, but you can post all you want, and if you're saying interesting things, people will listen.

Speaking as a non-comics reader, I found this rant HUGELY entertaining. It's the funniest thing I've read in days. Scenery-chewing is fun to write and fun to read, and as long as it's an occasional pleasure, I say dish it on out. Thanks, Ashley!
Matt London
8. Neal S
To Tex Anne:

wow, I did not notice those previews on the front page. I subscribe to the blog, and those things somehow don't make to the feed. So, factor that into the things I was saying. I don't know how relevant what I said is, taking into account the fact that there is more comics content on the website than I was aware of.
Matt London
9. Scott Starr
Really, Batman (or anything by DC, for that matter) hasn't been very entertaining for some time. I'm rather of the opinion that since the comic-book-to-movie-adaptation cliche has come along and personally raped everything golden about my youth, comics in general aren't really in the spotlight of the comic book industry anymore.

Feh.
Pablo Defendini
10. pablodefendini
@ Neal S:

There is a small contingent of hard-core Batman fans on Tor.com (myself included), so we tend to focus on him by default (the good stuff and the bad stuff). Besides, if all we wrote were fluff/praise pieces, you probably wouldn't be as interested in this site as a real critical voice... I know that as a reader, I probably wouldn't be.

But you're right—there's plenty of good stuff coming out that we should probably focus on (those Marvel previews notwithstanding—although I don't post everything they give me. Not all of it is grreat.). I'll see what we can do about that.

Do explore the rest of the site, though. As TexAnne says, we do offer a lot of cool comics content, and there's more to come.
Matt London
11. Lenny Bailes
I haven't read "Battle for the Cowl" yet. I'm still catching up with January and February releases. But I wasn't very impressed with the reviewer's statement:

"So, Batman’s dead. Nightwing’s upset about it. Like, really upset. Frankly, I’m more upset over having to dignify Nightwing as some kind of legitimate character, when really he was only brought in to butch up the idea of Robin."

This is a basic signal that the reviewer may not be able to distinguish between well-written stories that focus on Nightwing and poorly-written ones. To a hardcore Batman fan, Tim Drake, Jason Todd, and Dick Grayson are significant characters. They all have a history and good stories associated with them that we remember. (I'll confess to an inbuilt dislike of Damian, but I'm aware of a few readable stories that involve him and Bruce Wayne's relationship to Talia.)

That said, I'm not looking forward to reading "Battle of the Cowl," with the given factor recognized by the reviewer: the death of Bruce Wayne is a temporary, market-driven phenomenon.

Back in January '09, where I'm currently reading, I thought the Nightwing vs. R'as Al Ghul issue of Detective Comics made a reasonable story statement. I didn't like the "Last Rites" Catwoman/Hush issue of Batman that appeared in the same month. (I'm fairly allergic to Hush from Jeph Loeb's various stories.) I'm still hoping to enjoy the Neil Gaiman's "Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader."
Matt London
12. Neal S
@pablodefendini

I don't think praise should be considered equivalent to fluff. I'm of the Ratatouille school of criticism, in that I believe the most important thing a critic does is to tell you "Hey, THIS THING is good, you should pay attention to THIS THING." And I evaluate my critics not on how much their opinions overlap with my own, but on how many good things they can point me to that I wouldn't have checked out if it weren't for them. If a critic can do that for me, then it won't bother me if they praise a few things I hate, fail to warn me about what things are terrible, or even get me to seek out the occasional bad thing.

Though, yes it is still great loads of fun to read a scathing and accurate negative review .
Jared Kardos
13. darkknightjared
"Batman’s here again (flashback?)"

Uh...that's Tim Drake/Robin putting on the costume. It was kinda very obvious.

Overall, this was kind-of a crappy review about something that looks like you were hoping to hate. It's no great issue by a long shot, but yeesh. From your description, I would think that Chuck Austin and Rob Liefeld took a big dump on a blank comic and DC forced you to pay three bucks for it.
Matt London
14. Bad Comic but Slight Mistake
Actually we learned at the end of final crisis that Bruce Wayne is in fact still alive though apparently trapped in the prehistoric past.

I agree it was pretty terrible but worth it, for me at least, to see Tim Drake don the bat-costume.
Dave Robinson
15. DaveRobinson
I guess I'm one of the few people on Tor.com who both read the comic and enjoyed it.

I didn't enjoy the review, and not because it was a bad review but because I felt the review itself was poor. For starters, I thought the dismissal of Nightwing as a character was in very poor taste, and in my opinion indicated that the reviewer really didn't understand how Dick Grayson became Nightwing, and that they really didn't want to understand because they dislike the character.

Then we get a snarky synopsis rather than a real review, and to make matters worse, the synopsis shows that the reviewer missed at least one key aspect of the plot: Namely that it was Tim Drake in the bat-suit with the yellow oval.

So that leaves us with a "review" from someone who was predisposed to dislike the comic because of the characters and whose read-through of the comic appeared sufficiently cursory that they missed a major plot point: Namely Robin (Tim Drake) getting fed up of waiting for Nightwing to step up and putting on a batsuit himself.

So while it's great fun to read a scathing and accurate review, it's less fun to read a scathing and inaccurate synopsis dressed up as a review.

From my perspective it felt like the kind of assessment I'd get from a fourteen-year-old who picked up the comic, glanced through it once and then put it down because it wasn't the real Batman.
Matt London
16. acardiff
@Lenny Bailes
and
@ DarkKnightJared
and
@DaveRobinson

The phrase was "Batman’s here again (flashback?) (CONFUSED)" and if that indicated to you that I was literally confused (or rather, my understanding of the plot was as sophisticated as a fourteen-year-old's), fair enough, but in light of the rest of the language used, I'm surprised you picked that out (for some reason) as the sole serious line. It wasn't.

Moreover, the joke about Grayson and the subsequent criticism that I don't understand him, is off. I'm a lifelong fan of most Gotham storylines. However, the reason I reviewed the comic in this tone, was because I feel projects like this marginalize the Batman legacy. And you're all quite civil, so maybe I should do well to be more civil myself, but I really believe that comics like this don't deserve anything more than to be encountered on their own terms. Dismal though they may be.

Otherwise, thank you all for reading.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment