I love print fiction but, sometimes when I’m reading a good graphic novel or manga, I find myself envying those who work in an illustrated format. There really is some truth to the proverb, “One picture is worth more than a thousand words.”
Here. Let’s grab a manga off a nearby shelf. Fruits Basket, volume one. Black and white, so we don’t have the complication of color.
Open at random. Page 11. Pick a panel. Top right. What do we find?
Tohru’s mother curled up on a floor mat next to the toddler Tohru, telling her a bedtime story. Mom wears a mini-dress, long-sleeved, covered in flowers. Her legs are covered in either tinted tights or stockings. Her hair is loose and falls to between her shoulder blades. Her head is resting on her bent arm, hand extended behind; her knees are comfortably crooked.
Tohru is tucked into bed. Her eyes are angled toward her mother. She wears a little smile of anticipation. Her blanket is flowered, but in a different pattern than her mother’s dress. The mat and cover are obviously thick and cushiony.
The atmosphere is of love and comfort. Those are joyful flowers. This is a relaxed and happy place. These are people completely comfortable with themselves and with each other.
And all this in (grab ruler, take rough measure) two inches by three and a half inches of space.
Not all manga (or comics in general) are so evocative. However, as a prose writer, I sometimes find myself looking at a fight scene—whether a duel or a mighty battle—and sighing as I think how very many words I would need to tell what can be told so very vividly in a handful of splashy panels.
And yet...
As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, there’s nothing like words for taking you right into a character’s head, even to make you that character for the time you’re immersed in the story.
There’s no question of what the character is like. The writer gives you some details, but you provide the rest. Those characters are yours, and yours alone.
Perhaps for this very reason, if I like a book, I’ll hardly ever see the movie. By then, it is a rare performer who can top what my imagination has come up with.
I did see the three Lord of the Rings movies, which I wouldn’t have, except that Jim (my husband) really wanted to do so. Although the characters didn’t look precisely as I had imagined they would, I didn’t find myself having a negative reaction. Afterwards, I realized why.
I’m young enough that visual adaptations of those stories have been part of the landscape as long as I can remember. I’d been exposed to other people’s ideas of what Frodo or Gandalf or whoever looked like. In a sense, I was conditioned in advance to accept yet another interpretation.
I don’t have the same reaction to manga made into anime as I do to novels made into movies. In fact, several manga/anime that I have enjoyed in both forms—Saiyuki and Revolutionary Girl Utena to name two off the top of my head—have plot lines that diverge so radically from each other that they eventually become almost different stories. But this doesn’t bother me in the least.
Perhaps this is because I always had someone else’s version of the characters in front of me. Certainly, it’s hard to imagine live actors playing those characters. They need the flexibility offered by being drawn. In fact, one of the great advantages of manga is the encoded, non-verbal symbol system that joins with pictures and text to add depth to the story.
Now that I think of these three variants—movies (all picture), manga/comics (picture, text, symbol), novels (all words)—I realize that I prefer at least some written text to no text at all. Yet, if a picture truly was worth a thousand words, I should prefer movies over everything else.
Maybe words aren’t as limiting as I sometimes wistfully find myself thinking, especially when forced to tell in a linear format events going on in simultaneous chaos. Words build a bridge between the imaginations of writer and reader, creating something unique between them.
Does a picture equal 1,000 words, as has been said, or do those words bring something extra, something intangible, to the tale told?
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 10, 2008 12:36pm EST
Seriously, though I think the subjective nature of words is such that it evokes a different set of pictures for everybody. The same but reverse can be said of pictures, though. So I guess there's a bi-directional exponential relation between pictures and words.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 10, 2008 02:38pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 10, 2008 05:05pm EST
*Frex, Alan Moore & Gave Gibbon's WATCHMEN.
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 11, 2008 02:58pm EST · amended on Tuesday November 11, 2008 02:59pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Tuesday November 11, 2008 03:31pm EST
Being able to separate all the visual information out of the main narrative would be nice in some cases. However, there are some things that you just can't achieve in comics -- like when you're reading a truly exciting bit in a story and your eyes are tumbling down the pages in a waterfall of words, trying to absorb it all, even holding your breath as you read faster and faster. I can think of plenty of examples where I've had that feeling (particularly during A Song of Ice & Fire!), and I think the longer-lasting tension can be more memorable than any visual image.
That's my take on it, anyway!
Regards,
Ryan
VIEW ALL BY · Wednesday November 12, 2008 09:44am EST
Even when reading graphic novels/comics, I want the prose.
I don't think it's a coincidence that my favorite illustrated stories are also "text heavy."
Thanks for the interesting thoughts...
VIEW ALL BY · Thursday November 20, 2008 05:25pm EST
VIEW ALL BY · Friday November 21, 2008 11:29am EST
"What is being said" and "how the 'Author'" chose to do so cannot be separated.
Otherwise every kiss, and every sword fight, and every other "standard" event would always be told in the exact same words.
Skill in the use of words is as important for a writer as the ability to draw is to a visual artist.
VIEW ALL BY · Monday November 24, 2008 03:30pm EST