Thu
Oct 16 2008 12:23pm

Keep your hands off my BRAINNNZZZ!!

During the presidential debate last night, John McCain came out, to the surprise of absolutely no one (but to the chagrin of many), in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court desicion which gave women the right to abort a fetus, up until the point when the fetus becomes “viable” (insert your own value for “viable”, and, er, have fun with that one around the water cooler). In the course of defending his position, he uttered the phrase “I support the rights of the unborn.”

Fair enough, Senator, but this begs the question: what about the rights of the undead?

This is a complex issue, my friends, and one that no amount of eye-winking, eye-blinking, eye-rolling, or even eye-gouging will sweep under the rug. One would think that John McCain, particularly, would be attuned to this hot-button issue in the geek community.

As always, we must start at the beginning, and consider some fundamental, if perhaps ultimately unanswerable, questions: When, percisely, does un-death begin? Is it at the point of infection? That is, as soon as an individual is bitten? Does the undead come into its own only after the infection has started to take its course, and the skin turns an ashen gray? Or does one have to wait until the zombie in question is actually attacking a living being in order to spring into action, chainsaw (or axe, or lawnmower, or blender, or—my favorite—machete) in hand?

Cases have been recorded, for example, of people taking matters into their own hands as soon as they are infected, and instead of waiting to become that which they hate and fear, have decided to end their own life (often quite violently, sometimes with great fanfare and always with unbelievable gore) before becoming a danger to their loved ones. This clearly denotes some capacity for rational thought post-bite, if only for a limited time. Alternately, there have been instances of so-called “domesticated zombies”: undead beings that have been either drugged, chained, electronically controlled, or otherwise subjugated into being lab rats, servants, or even life companions (which makes for another sticky values issue in and of itself, albeit one outside the scope of this post).

Even after initial infection, and well after the onset of undeath, the moral quandaries persist. Are the undead considered persons under the U.S. Constitution, or should the law of the land simply consider the strictest definition of the term “re-animated corpse”? If they are to be considered persons, what—if any—rights are the undead entitled to? Life? Certainly they’ve no use for that, by virtue of their very condition. But liberty and the pursuit of happiness are still on the table. Liberty to roam the countryside in search of sustenance? To the undead, happiness is a warm brain (to ham-fistedly paraphrase a much more gifted wordsmith than I), so: At what point does the incessant hunger for brains infringe upon living beings’ right to not have their own brains munched on?

There are no easy answers to the moral and legislative dilemmas posed by a zombie outbreak. But the lack of attention that this subject has received throughout the presidential campaign is alarming, indeed. These questions should not be left to the last minute, once the hordes are upon us, and we’re all in dire need of a quick and easy bailout. It’s late in the election cycle, and the moment of truth approaches. Even so, I call upon the presidential candidates to address this issue at a venue of their choosing (perhaps a town hall-style meeting, where the candidates can field questions from experts?). If we’re prepared beforehand, armed with a comprehensive plan for how to contain and handle a zombie outbreak, there is no reason that being overrun by hordes of the undead should become yet another national crisis. The living dead can be perfectly manageable, if you’ve got a plan.

For a little while, at least. Let’s not kid ourselves here: nothing can stop the inexorable march of the living dead, really. While we wait for the nation’s politicians to come up with some answers, we, the alpha geeks of Tor.com can help with our expert advice! What are your thoughts on the zombie controversy? Comment away. In the meantime, I’m going to the hardware store to stock up on machetes.

[Zombie illustration is actually a four foot by eight foot woodblock print, carved and printed by the author of this post. There’s your undead cred, right there.]

10 comments
Drew Shiel
1. Drew Shiel
Well, I reckon McCain is pro-undead, myself.

For my reasoning, see this picture from the Irish Times from the end of last night's debate:

http://www.irishtimes.com/homepage/images/1224108298595.jpg

... in which he's clearly going after Obama's brainz.
Drew Shiel
2. MarkDGuppy
Not to come off as a smarta** or troll, but I think radaronline scooped you:
http://radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2008/10/john_mccain_radar_exclusive_interview_jon_stewart_01.php
Pablo Defendini
3. pablodefendini
@ MarkDGuppy #2

Not at all. It's good to see that McCain has some awareness of the zombie situation. It's a step in the right direction!
Drew Shiel
4. UndeadIn08
This post raises some key points about the civil rights of the undead, but I am disappointed in your failure to address the question of voting rights for the undead. We've been hearing a lot about so-called "dead voters" lately. Many continue to receive voting materials from their local electoral jurisdictions even without any apparent statutes on the matter, but I'm concerned about the way in which newly-registered Undead Americans, and the community organizations doing the hard work of outreach to them, are being accused of vote fraud. I would love to see either campaign address this question, though I suspect that the large effort Republicans are currently making to "expose" this "fraud" is indicative of how zombies are likely to vote (surprising as that may seem to some). With so little time left before the election, I hope we begin to see some progress on this urgent issue. Otherwise, I fear some grave election-day consequences.
Pablo Defendini
5. pablodefendini
@UndeadIn08 #4
This is a great point to bring up. Unfortunately, more often than not, reaching out to undead voters results in loss of limb, which makes this type of voter outreach effort all the trickier.
Tara Chang
6. tlchang
Thank you Pablo. In a political season that I am abhorring (srsly!), I got some good belly laughs from both your insightful and incisive article and the thoughtful comments thereafter.
Tomasz Galazka
7. tetrix
@ 4 & 5 -
The issue of enfranchisement regarding the shambling masses of undead was covered, pretty extensively IMO, in Dale Bailey's seminal "Death and Suffrage" (here's a not very helpful link - sorry). Still, I think it's an issue that's bound to crop up as election campaigns come to the finish, until the legislature gets it act together and lays down some regulations in the matter...
Drew Shiel
8. UndeadIn08
@5 -- indeed. all the more reason for recognition of the brave work those folks are doing.

@7 -- hey, thanks, i wasn't familiar with that story. since "Death and Suffrage" appears to be online in it's entirety, i'll be brushing up on my zombie uprising election scenarios now.
Ben HM3
10. BenHM3
Choosing to miss the humor completely (*whoosh*) I'm confused: every contributor to, and reader of this thread is arguably undead.

Excuse me now, I have this strange urge to eat my cube-neighbor's brains.

Subscribe to this thread

Receive notification by email when a new comment is added. You must be a registered user to subscribe to threads.
Post a comment