I have always found writing about Orientalism in illustration hard. It’s hard, because every picture becomes its own Arabian Nights; threatening to whisk you off into a different realm. Self-contained themes lead you away into another idea—and another, and another. Before you know it, you have leapt so far into a single image, clambering after ethereal motifs, that you cannot see your original starting point and—like a magic carpet that flies only so long as you believe in it—you start to sink.
In writing on fairy tales, there’s often a functionalist bent to the analysis. This means that tend we view fairy tales as fulfilling societal need: they contribute to the stability of a group or culture. In this way, characters and predicaments become allegories: practice for situations we may face ourselves in real life, or a form of ‘safe’ role play. Red Riding Hood is not about hiking in the forest; it’s a warning about wolves, about prostitution, a tale of sexual awakening, and so on, and so on.
I like this kind of analysis. It’s important because it dives under the smooth-looking surface of fairy tales, and stirs up a surprising turbidity. It makes us question unspoken assumptions (why is the youngest child always the special one?), and highlights the significance of story-telling in learning. However, I don’t think it’s always perfect. By our very framing of fairy tales in this waysomewhat didactic way, orientated around adherence and cohesionI think we sometimes lend them a static quality that they don’t always deserve.
Hi, everyone! Irene kindly asked me if I would like writing about some of the older fantasy-based art out there, an offer I’ve gratefully accepted. So I’ll be focusing on some of the great illustration that has inspired and shaped modern artists we admire.
Irene’s recent trip to the Waterhouse exhibition in Montreal sparked some interesting thoughts for me. Waterhouse’s work is undeniably beautifuland evocativebut, despite the obvious love of women in his paintings, you can’t help wondering if they’re the subjects of his pictures, or perhaps in fact the objects. The femininity we see in his images is draped with Victorian concerns, and those concerns can be quite sexist.
Waterhouse (and his spiritual brethren in the pre-Raphaelite movement) has been tremendously influential in illustrating the fantastic, but what I’m going to do is look at some of the other artists working around this time. We’ll see how the same stylistic tics and influences emerge, but there’s a sense of interplayof experimentation and even perhaps levitythat I think makes for more ambiguous, interesting images. Images that have, in my opinion, ultimately shaped just as much contemporary illustration.
- Keith DeCandido Holy Rewatch, Batman! “Marsha, Queen of Diamonds” / “Marsha’s Scheme of Diamonds” 2 days ago
- Natalie Zutter Consequences and Coping Mechanisms: Orphan Black, “The Antisocialism of Sex” 2 days ago
- Frederic S. Durbin A Green and Ancient Light 3 days ago
- Sweepstakes Leviathan’s Blood Sweepstakes! 3 days ago
- Grady Hendrix Abracadabra: The Only Good Magician is a Dead Magician 3 days ago
- Stubby the Rocket Netflix is Bringing us The Little Prince on August 5th! 3 days ago
- Justin Landon Rocket Talk Episode 77: Does Hamilton Count as Genre? 3 days ago
- Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Rewatch: “Melora” 1 min ago on
- Cloud Atlas One Year Later: Why 2012’s Biggest Flop is Also its Biggest Triumph 21 mins ago on
- A Return to the Glory Days: Disney’s Beauty and the Beast 31 mins ago on
- Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Rewatch: “Heart of Stone” 1 hour ago on
- For $10 A Night, You Can Stay in the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles’ Lair 1 hour ago on
- The Temeraire Reread: Tongues of Serpents 3 hours ago on
- Dream-Casting The Wheel of Time TV Series 7 hours ago on